Methodology, Epistemology, and Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Wolfgang Stegmüller on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday. Carl G. Hempel , Hilary Putnam , Wilhelm K. Essler

1989 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 361-362
Author(s):  
Brent Mundy
1965 ◽  
Vol 87 (9) ◽  
pp. 171-172
Author(s):  
Yu.B. Khariton ◽  
V.N. Kondrat'ev ◽  
A.S. Borovik-Romanov ◽  
N.V. Zavaritskii ◽  
M.P. Malkov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

1964 ◽  
Vol 84 (12) ◽  
pp. 723-726
Author(s):  
N.A. Dobrotin
Keyword(s):  

1996 ◽  
Vol 166 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-218
Author(s):  
V.E. Balakin ◽  
L.M. Barkov ◽  
Spartak T. Belyaev ◽  
N.S. Dikanskii ◽  
Gennadii I. Dimov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

1982 ◽  
Vol 138 (12) ◽  
pp. 683
Author(s):  
B.M. Vul ◽  
L.V. Keldysh ◽  
V.A. Kotel'nikov ◽  
Anatolii A. Logunov ◽  
M.A. Markov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 183 (6) ◽  
pp. 669-670
Author(s):  
Aleksandr F. Andreev ◽  
I.R. Gabitov ◽  
Vladimir E. Zakharov ◽  
S.V. Iordanskii ◽  
E.I. Kats ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (12) ◽  
pp. 1385
Author(s):  
Aleksandr F. Andreev ◽  
Vasilii S. Beskin ◽  
V.B. Braginsky ◽  
Vitalii L. Ginzburg ◽  
Yurii V. Gulyaev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Juhani Yli-Vakkuri ◽  
John Hawthorne

Narrow mental content, if there is such a thing, is content that is entirely determined by the goings-on inside the head of the thinker. A central topic in the philosophy of mind since the mid-1970s has been whether there is a kind of mental content that is narrow in this sense. It is widely conceded, thanks to famous thought experiments by Hilary Putnam and Tyler Burge, that there is a kind of mental content that is not narrow. But it is often maintained that there is also a kind of mental content that is narrow, and that such content can play various key explanatory roles relating, inter alia, to epistemology and the explanation of action. This book argues that this is a forlorn hope. It carefully distinguishes a variety of conceptions of narrow content and a variety of explanatory roles that might be assigned to narrow content. It then argues that, once we pay sufficient attention to the details, there is no promising theory of narrow content in the offing.


Author(s):  
Juhani Yli-Vakkuri ◽  
John Hawthorne

The Introduction outlines the history of the narrow content debate. It introduces the famous thought experiments by Hilary Putnam and Tyler Burge, discusses why the debate only came to prominence in the 1970s, and outlines what is to come.


Author(s):  
Simon Kirchin

This chapter introduces the distinction between thin and thick concepts and then performs a number of functions. First, two major accounts of thick concepts—separationism and nonseparationism—are introduced and, in doing so, a novel account of evaluation is indicated. Second, each chapter is outlined as is the general methodology, followed, third, by a brief history of the discussion of thick concepts, referencing Philippa Foot, Hilary Putnam, Gilbert Ryle, and Bernard Williams among others. Fourth, a number of relevant contrasts are introduced, such as the fact–value distinction and the difference between concepts, properties, and terms. Lastly, some interesting and relevant questions are raised that, unfortunately, have to be left aside.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document