scholarly journals Scale Dependence and the Species-Area Relationship

1994 ◽  
Vol 144 (5) ◽  
pp. 717-740 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael W. Palmer ◽  
Peter S. White
Keyword(s):  
Scale Dependence ◽  
Species Area ◽  
Species Area Relationship

scholarly journals The strength of the biodiversity–ecosystem function relationship depends on spatial scale

2018 ◽  
Vol 285 (1880) ◽  
pp. 20180038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick L. Thompson ◽  
Forest Isbell ◽  
Michel Loreau ◽  
Mary I. O'Connor ◽  
Andrew Gonzalez
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Variation ◽  
Spatial Scale ◽  
Spatial Scales ◽  
Scale Dependence ◽  
Α Diversity ◽  
Species Area ◽  
Species Area Relationship ◽  
Function Relationship ◽  
New Research ◽  
The Relationship

Our understanding of the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning (BEF) applies mainly to fine spatial scales. New research is required if we are to extend this knowledge to broader spatial scales that are relevant for conservation decisions. Here, we use simulations to examine conditions that generate scale dependence of the BEF relationship. We study scale by assessing how the BEF relationship (slope and R 2 ) changes when habitat patches are spatially aggregated. We find three ways for the BEF relationship to be scale-dependent: (i) variation among local patches in local (α) diversity, (ii) spatial variation in the local BEF relationship and (iii) incomplete compositional turnover in species composition among patches. The first two cause the slope of the BEF relationship to increase moderately with spatial scale, reflecting nonlinear averaging of spatial variation in diversity or the BEF relationship. The third mechanism results in much stronger scale dependence, with the BEF relationship increasing in the rising portion of the species area relationship, but then decreasing as it saturates. An analysis of data from the Cedar Creek grassland BEF experiment revealed a positive but saturating slope of the relationship with scale. Overall, our findings suggest that the BEF relationship is likely to be scale dependent.

Scale dependence of species‐area relationships is widespread but generally weak in Palaearctic grasslands

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinghui Zhang ◽  
François Gillet ◽  
Sándor Bartha ◽  
Juha Mikael Alatalo ◽  
Idoia Biurrun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scale Dependence ◽  
Species Area

scholarly journals The species–area relationship and evolution

2006 ◽  
Vol 241 (3) ◽  
pp. 590-600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Lawson ◽  
Henrik Jeldtoft Jensen
Keyword(s):  
Species Area ◽  
Species Area Relationship

Fragmentation, grazing and the species-area relationship

Ecography ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 224-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiffany L. Bogich ◽  
Gary M. Barker ◽  
Karin Mahlfeld ◽  
Frank Climo ◽  
Rhys Green ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Species Area ◽  
Species Area Relationship

Self‐Similarity, the Power Law Form of the Species‐Area Relationship, and a Probability Rule: A Reply to Maddux

2004 ◽  
Vol 163 (4) ◽  
pp. 627-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette Ostling ◽  
John Harte ◽  
Jessica L. Green ◽  
Ann P. Kinzig
Keyword(s):  
Power Law ◽  
Self Similarity ◽  
Species Area ◽  
Species Area Relationship

scholarly journals A Phylogenetic Perspective on the Individual Species-Area Relationship in Temperate and Tropical Tree Communities

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. e63192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Yang ◽  
Nathan G. Swenson ◽  
Min Cao ◽  
George B. Chuyong ◽  
Corneille E. N. Ewango ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tropical Tree ◽  
Individual Species ◽  
Tree Communities ◽  
Species Area ◽  
Phylogenetic Perspective ◽  
Species Area Relationship ◽  
The Individual
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document