Is the Preferred-Habitat Model of the Term Structure Inconsistent with Financial Market Efficiency?

1980 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 406-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederic S. Mishkin
Econometrica ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitri Vayanos ◽  
Jean-Luc Vila

We model the term structure of interest rates that results from the interaction between investors with preferences for specific maturities and risk‐averse arbitrageurs. Shocks to the short rate are transmitted to long rates through arbitrageurs' carry trades. Arbitrageurs earn rents from transmitting the shocks through bond risk premia that relate positively to the slope of the term structure. When the short rate is the only risk factor, changes in investor demand have the same relative effect on interest rates across maturities regardless of the maturities where they originate. When investor demand is also stochastic, demand effects become more localized. A calibration indicates that long rates underreact to forward‐guidance announcements about short rates. Large‐scale asset purchases can be more effective in moving long rates, especially if they are concentrated at long maturities.


2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 369-387
Author(s):  
Miljan Leković

Abstract The concept of an efficient financial market, in literature known as efficient market hypothesis (EMH), has had a long and difficult development path from the idea itself to its final conception, as one of the central paradigms in modern finance. It has been tested and critically reviewed for decades, and the two basic types of problems it has encountered are theoretical paradoxes and market anomalies. The aim of the paper is to examine the validity of EMH through various financial market efficiency tests and the results of previous research. The intention is to answer the question of whether, despite theoretical paradoxes and market anomalies, the notion of validity can be attributed to the concept of an efficient financial market. In this regard, the paper presents plenty of evidence for and against the validity of weak, semi-strong, and strong form of EMH, to conclude that, even after more than half a century of research, financial literature has not reached a consensus on the presence or absence of the validity of this hypothesis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document