The Corporate Income Tax in the Long Run: A Comment

1958 ◽  
Vol 66 (5) ◽  
pp. 444-446
Author(s):  
Arnold Zellner
1958 ◽  
Vol 66 (5) ◽  
pp. 448-448
Author(s):  
Arnold Zellner

10.26458/1931 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 57-74
Author(s):  
Tajudeen A. ADEGBITE

ABSTRACTThis study examined the effect of taxation on investment in Nigeria from 1970 to 2018. Relevant secondary data were obtained from Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Statistical Bulletins and Federal Inland Revenue Services Bulletin from 1970 to 2018. Regression analysis technique, Units root test, Johansen co-integration, Vector Error-Correction Model, and Granger causality tests were employed to determine the long run relationship and causality links among the variables. Results showed that PPT and Value added tax had positive significant impact on INV both in the short run and in the long run while Company income tax, and Custom and Excise duties impacted INV negatively. It is concluded that all components of taxes had positive significant impact on investment in Nigeria except corporate income tax. Corporate income tax had negative significant impact on investment both in the short run and in the long run.


2017 ◽  
Vol 107 (7) ◽  
pp. 1858-1903 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrico Moretti ◽  
Daniel J. Wilson

We quantify how sensitive is migration by star scientists to changes in personal and business tax differentials across states. We uncover large, stable, and precisely estimated effects of personal and corporate taxes on star scientists' migration patterns. The long-run elasticity of mobility relative to taxes is 1.8 for personal income taxes, 1.9 for state corporate income tax, and −1.7 for the investment tax credit. While there are many other factors that drive when innovative individuals and innovative companies decide to locate, there are enough firms and workers on the margin that state taxes matter. (JEL H24, H25, H71, H73, J44, J61, R32)


1957 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-157
Author(s):  
M. A. Adelman

1958 ◽  
Vol 66 (5) ◽  
pp. 446-447
Author(s):  
M. A. Adelman

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 800-823
Author(s):  
A.A. Razuvaeva ◽  
N.V. Pokrovskaya

Subject. This article assesses the role of tax incentives for the Russian business' investment behavior. Objectives. The article aims to identify the relationship between the corporate income tax burden as an indicator responding to tax benefits application and the investment activities of Russian companies. Methods. For the study, we used the methods of analysis and synthesis, and the systems approach. The analysis covers the period from 2012 to 2018. The data of the Russian Federal State Statistics Service, Federal Tax Service of Russia, and the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation are the source of information for analysis. Results. The article summarizes the characteristics of the investment activity of the Russian business. However, the article does not reveal any obvious relationship between the income tax burden and the investment activity of the Russian business in the 2010s. There is also no link found between fixed investment and return on assets. Conclusions. The increase in income tax burden in the late 2010s, accompanied by a decrease in profitability, poses a threat to the active investment development of Russian organizations.


Author(s):  
Tetiana Vasilyeva ◽  
◽  
Alina Vysochyna ◽  
Alina Taranchenko ◽  
◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document