Work-Accidents and the Law. Crystal Eastman

1911 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. S. Deibler
Keyword(s):  
1910 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 83
Author(s):  
C. R. W. ◽  
Crystal Eastman
Keyword(s):  

1911 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 250
Author(s):  
P. K. ◽  
Crystal Eastman
Keyword(s):  

1911 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 315
Author(s):  
John Martin ◽  
Crystal Eastman
Keyword(s):  

1911 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 388
Author(s):  
F. M. B. ◽  
Crystal Eastman
Keyword(s):  

1910 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 81 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. E. P. ◽  
Crystal Eastman ◽  
Paul Underwood Kellogg
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 222-227
Author(s):  
Ida Bagus Alit Segara Gita ◽  
Nella Hasibuan Oleary ◽  
I Putu Gede Seputra

Waitress is usually tasked with pouring the drink that visitors ordered into a glass and accompanying visitors to sing while in the cafe. In labor law legal protection is provided in the form of legal protection in the field of job security where both in a relatively short or long time will be safe and there is a guarantee of safety for workers. In the case of liability to workers in the event of a work accident while carrying out their obligations at work the employer will bear the burden Arising materially by providingreimbursement for costs incurred due to work accidents based on the description the author gets the title Legal Protection Against Waitress at Katulebo Cafe Based on the Law Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Employment. The aims of this study is to  find out the legal protection provided by Katulebo cafe to waitresses according to Law No. 13 of 2003 concerning Employment and to find out the responsibility of Katulebo cafe for waitresses in work accidents. In practice the implementation of legal protection provided by the cafe to the waitress is only through a written agreement containing the regulations and what rights are obtained by the waitress. The form of responsibility given by the cafe to the waitress only provides a first-aid kit and compensation when work accidents occur. The writing method used is empirical legal research.


2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 72-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Leslie ◽  
Mary Casper

“My patient refuses thickened liquids, should I discharge them from my caseload?” A version of this question appears at least weekly on the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association's Community pages. People talk of respecting the patient's right to be non-compliant with speech-language pathology recommendations. We challenge use of the word “respect” and calling a patient “non-compliant” in the same sentence: does use of the latter term preclude the former? In this article we will share our reflections on why we are interested in these so called “ethical challenges” from a personal case level to what our professional duty requires of us. Our proposal is that the problems that we encounter are less to do with ethical or moral puzzles and usually due to inadequate communication. We will outline resources that clinicians may use to support their work from what seems to be a straightforward case to those that are mired in complexity. And we will tackle fears and facts regarding litigation and the law.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document