Nazi Germany and the United States: A Review Essay

1969 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernest R. May
2005 ◽  
Vol 84 (6) ◽  
pp. 141
Author(s):  
Lawrence D. Freedman ◽  
Arieh J. Kochavi

1980 ◽  
Vol 22 (86) ◽  
pp. 162-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph L. Rosenberg

Éire was economically and militarily impotent, strategically significant, and the only European neutral behind allied lines in World War II. Although the Taoiseach, Eamon de Valera, refused to co-operate openly with his protectors in Britain and his friends in America or even to distinguish publicly between them and Nazi Germany, he wanted Anglo-American aid, and he wanted it without conditions. He wanted what the American minister at Dublin, David Gray, called a ‘free ride’On St Patrick’s Day, 1941, de Valera announced that he would send a special agent to purchase American food and weapons and expressed the hope that Ireland’s friends would help the mission. Acknowledging that the war was causing shortages, he repeated earlier claims that the belligerents, blockading each other, were blockading Éire, a land determined to avoid involvement in any ‘imperial adventure’


2016 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 577-586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Welker

“Mining is no ethnographic playground,” Chris Ballard and Glenn Banks warned in their 2003 review of the anthropology of mining. The deep conflicts that characterize the industry find echoes in “a parallel war of sorts …waged within the discipline about the nature and scope of appropriate forms of engagement” (p. 289). This review essay examines how authors of recent ethnographic studies of large-scale, capital-intensive mining projects in Papua New Guinea, South Africa, and the United States have politically positioned themselves as researchers, and the insights into mining companies that derive from these situated perspectives.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document