Beyond the Nuclear Family Model: Cross-Cultural Perspectives.Luis Lenero-Otero

1980 ◽  
Vol 85 (4) ◽  
pp. 1003-1005
Author(s):  
George Kurian
Social Forces ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 1018
Author(s):  
Bert N. Adams ◽  
Luis Lenero-Otero

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Katherine E. Starkweather

This dissertation addresses three general research questions. First, what are the socioecological conditions that lead Shodagor families to employ particular strategies in order to balance subsistence work and childcare? Second, why do Shodagor men and women pursue particular occupational strategies that are cross-culturally unusual while others divide labor in ways that are more in line with other societies? And third, how do Shodagor subsistence and childcare strategies, all of which are concentrated within the nuclear family and influenced by the constraints of the Shodagor socioecology, influence nutritional outcomes for children and parents? I find that the concentration of resource sharing and childcare duties within the nuclear family is associated with husbands and wives cooperating in order to fulfill a family's subsistence and childcare needs. I also find that specific aspects of the ecology -- how far an individual lives from a major market, and how far he or she lives from the Meghna River -- as well as a family's childcare needs play key roles in determining the specific strategies families will employ in order to meet those needs. Finally, I show that while some factors concentrated within the nuclear family influence Shodagor health outcomes within the family in accordance with theoretical and cross-cultural predictions, others do not. These findings have implications for human behavioral ecological theory, which are discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 116-147
Author(s):  
Moshe Lavee

Abstract Societies are constituted of thick networks of intersecting constructs: genealogical anxiety is bound up with stronger patriarchal family structures. Goody and Guichard portrayed two clusters of social features – the “Occidental” (bi-lineal family model, strengthened nuclear family, solid husband-wife relationship, monogamy, loose gender separation, and a higher status of women); and the “Oriental” (patrilineal model, broader family structure, weak husband-wife relationship, tribal importance attributed to genealogy, codes of honor and shame, legitimacy of polygamy, rigid gender separation, a lower status of women, active men, and female passivity). Following these taxonomies, the article explores the relationship between genealogical anxiety and intersecting social commitments in classical and early medieval rabbinic culture: Talmudic and Midrashic stories, as well as an exegetical narrative from an unknown Midrash preserved in the Genizah. It also claims that the earlier sources are proven helpful in reaffirming the claim for a different mode of genealogical anxiety in Babylonian sources.


2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 92-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Fortunato

My aim in this article is to elucidate the relevance of the evolutionary paradigm to the study of kinship and marriage systems. I begin with a discussion of conceptual and methodological issues that arise in approaching human social systems from an evolutionary perspective. I then narrow the focus on key tools used in contemporary cross-cultural research within evolutionary anthropology. Next, as a case study, I provide an overview of work aimed at reconstructing the (pre)history of the nuclear family in Indo-European-speaking societies, focusing on the interplay between monogamous marriage and neolocal residence. I conclude with musings on the prospect of a biologically based social anthropology.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 393-404
Author(s):  
Ilknur Koca ◽  
Pelin Yaprakdal

AbstractA work on a mathematical modeling is very popular in applied sciences. Nowadays many mathematical models have been considered and new methods have been used for approaching of these models. In this paper we are considering mathematical modeling of nuclear family model with fractional order Caputo derivative. Also the existence and uniqueness results and numerical scheme are given with Adams-Bashforth scheme via fractional order Caputo derivative.


2013 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Fiona Kelly

A growing number of lesbians and gay men are choosing to become parents. In response, provincial parentage laws have become increasingly inclusive of same-sex parents, though the presumption underlying most of the reforms is that queer parenting will adhere to a nuclear family model. The effect of this preferencefor the nuclear family is that queer parents who engage in non-normative arrangements continue to find themselves outside the law. Perhaps most vulnerable are gay men, particularly in situations where they co-parent with a lesbian couple. This article uses the recent decisions of the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench and Court of Appeal in D.W.H. v. D.J.R. to illustrate the challenges facing nonnormative queer families and gay male parents in particular. It argues that even in provinces with recentparentage law reforms, deviation from the nuclear family norm poses serious risks for queer parents.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document