American Philosophy Today and Tomorrow.Horace M. Kallen , Sidney Hook

1937 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 188-188
Author(s):  
Herbert Blumer
Keyword(s):  
Philosophy Today ◽  
American Philosophy

American Philosophy Today and Tomorrow.

1936 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 109
Author(s):  
H. A. L. ◽  
Horace M. Kallen ◽  
Sidney Hook
Keyword(s):  
Philosophy Today ◽  
American Philosophy

American Philosophy Today and Tomorrow

1936 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 292-294
Author(s):  
Henry A. Lucks ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Philosophy Today ◽  
American Philosophy

American Philosophy Today and Tomorrow.

1937 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 664
Author(s):  
Donald A. Piatt ◽  
H. M. Kallen ◽  
Sidney Hook
Keyword(s):  
Philosophy Today ◽  
American Philosophy

American Philosophy Today and Tomorrow

1936 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 269-270
Author(s):  
Robert Marshak ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Philosophy Today ◽  
American Philosophy

On the possibility/possibilities of the history of philosophy today

2006 ◽  
Vol 49 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 81-95
Author(s):  
Predrag Milidrag
Keyword(s):  
History Of Philosophy ◽  
Philosophy Today ◽  
Philosophical Interpretation ◽  
History Of

The article discusses the philosophical presuppositions of the history of philosophy as a philosophical discipline on the example of the problem of interpreting mutually incoherent claims of a philosopher. The conclusion is that the constitution of these presuppositions is onto-theo-logical. The importance of the criteria of coherence and comprehensiveness for historic philosophical interpretation is analyzed. Finally, the idea of the possibility of a postmetaphysical history of philosophy as a philosophical discipline is exposed, viewed as the accumulation of understandings of various paths - followed and not followed alike -found in past philosophers.

Oneness and Spontaneity

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip J. Ivanhoe
Keyword(s):  
Moral Agency ◽  
Chinese Philosophy ◽  
Human Life ◽  
Philosophy Today ◽  
Early Chinese Philosophy ◽  
Important Objective

This chapter elaborates on the connections between oneness, moral agency, and spontaneity by distinguishing between two general kinds of spontaneity: untutored spontaneity, which is characteristic of traditions such as Daoism, and cultivated spontaneity, representative of traditions such as Confucianism. This discussion intersects with oneness on the matter of “metaphysical comfort,” the sense of oneness, harmony, and happiness that one experiences when acting or reacting spontaneously, on either the untutored or cultivated model. Daoists argued quite plausibly that this experience goes hand in hand with certain kinds of untutored spontaneity, but an important objective of the chapter is to show that even cultivated spontaneity can provide the same comfort. The chapter makes the case that both forms of spontaneity are familiar, though largely unrecognized, in all forms of human life and that the descriptions provided, inspired by early Chinese philosophy, offer important theoretical resources for philosophy today.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document