PKS 0528-250 - A neutral stellar object at Z = 2.812, with no emission lines and a rich absorption-line spectrum

1978 ◽  
Vol 221 ◽  
pp. L109 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. L. Jauncey ◽  
A. E. Wright ◽  
B. A. Peterson ◽  
J. J. Condon
Nature ◽  
1967 ◽  
Vol 215 (5105) ◽  
pp. 1045-1046 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. F. FALLA

2020 ◽  
Vol 634 ◽  
pp. A111 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. P. U. Fynbo ◽  
P. Møller ◽  
K. E. Heintz ◽  
J. N. Burchett ◽  
L. Christensen ◽  
...  

We report on the discovery of a peculiar broad absorption line (BAL) quasar identified in our Gaia-assisted survey of red quasars. The systemic redshift of this quasar was difficult to establish because of the absence of conspicuous emission lines. Based on deep and broad BAL troughs of at least Si IV, C IV, and Al III, a redshift of z = 2.41 was established under the assumption that the systemic redshift can be inferred from the red edge of the BAL troughs. However, we observe a weak and spatially extended emission line at 4450 Å that is most likely due to Lyman-α emission, which implies a systemic redshift of z = 2.66 if correctly identified. There is also evidence for the onset of Lyman-α forest absorption bluewards of 4450 Å and evidence for Hα emission in the K band consistent with a systemic redshift of z = 2.66. If this redshift is correct, the quasar is an extreme example of a detached low-ionisation BAL quasar. The BALs must originate from material moving with very large velocities ranging from 22 000 km s−1 to 40 000 km s−1. To our knowledge, this is the first case of a systemic-redshift measurement based on extended Lyman-α emission for a BAL quasar. This method could also be useful in cases of sufficiently distant BL Lac quasars without systemic-redshift information.


1973 ◽  
Vol 49 ◽  
pp. 93-107
Author(s):  
Peter S. Conti

My intention here is to discuss the ‘high temperature’ portion of this symposium and call attention to those stars that are called Of. There are some similarities in spectral appearance to WR stars, e.g. emission lines. I should first like to define what I think are the essential differences among four groups of hot stars;O stars: Stars that have only absorption lines in the visible spectrum. Type O is distinguished from type B by the presence of He ii 4541 at MK dispersion. It may be that some (supergiants) O stars will have emission lines in the rocket UV region but this description will be primarily concerned with ground based observations.Of stars: These are O type stars that also have λλ 4634,40 N iii in emission above the continuum. In addition to normal O star absorption lines and N iii emission, they may also have other lines in emission. I will discuss this further below.Oe stars: These are O type stars that have emission in the hydrogen lines (or at least at Hα), but with no emission in N iii or in other lines. I personally think that this small class of objects is related to the Be stars in their evolutionary status and in their emission mechanism.WR stars: These stars are primarily characterized by emission lines. The only absorption lines seen are violet shifted (P Cyg type). Although in some cases emission lines appear which are similar to those found in some Of stars, the latter types always have some unshifted absorption lines present. Several Of stars have P Cyg profiles in some lines.


1972 ◽  
Vol 174 ◽  
pp. 237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald C. Morton ◽  
Winifred A. Morton

1973 ◽  
Vol 183 ◽  
pp. 767 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. A. Strittmatter ◽  
R. F. Carswell ◽  
E. M. Burbidge ◽  
C. Hazard ◽  
J. A. Baldwin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document