Time-dependent models of radiatively driven stellar winds. I - Nonlinear evolution of instabilities for a pure absorption model

1988 ◽  
Vol 335 ◽  
pp. 914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanley P. Owocki ◽  
John I. Castor ◽  
George B. Rybicki
1993 ◽  
Vol 137 ◽  
pp. 572-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.A. Dorfi ◽  
M.U. Feuchtinger ◽  
S. Höfner

The cool extended atmospheres of late type giants are sites where dust formation takes place. Radiation pressure on the dust grains is an important force for driving the slow but massive winds observed in such objects. Existing calculations of dust driven stellar winds (e.g. Bowen 1988, Fleischer et al. 1991) suffer from the fact that they include approximations at various levels for different parts of the problem like the hydrodynamics or the dust formation. Furthermore they do not include time-dependent radiative transfer.In order to overcome these insufficiencies we plan to calculate self-consistent models of dust driven winds with a full description of both the radiation hydrodynamics and the time-dependent dust formation. As a first step, however, we concentrate our investigations on the self-consistent description of the radiation hydrodynamics adopting only a simple description of the dust opacities.


1989 ◽  
Vol 113 ◽  
pp. 291-292
Author(s):  
S.P. Owocki ◽  
J.I. Castor ◽  
G.B. Rybicki

One type of variability that is ubiquitous among luminous blue stars is that associated with their massive stellar winds. Ultraviolet spectral lines show variable narrow absorption components that may arise from dense shells or clumps in the wind; the observed soft X-ray and non-thermal radio emission from these stars may be produced in embedded wind shocks associated with these shells. The line-driving of such winds is known to be strongly unstable, and recent numerical simulations of the dynamical, nonlinear evolution of such instabilities indicate that such shocks and dense shells do indeed form (Owocki, Castor, and Rybicki 1988; hereafter OCR). However, the structure computed in these dynamical simulations is quite different, and in some sense opposite, what was anticipated in earlier heuristic shock models (e.g. Lucy 1984, Krolik and Raymond 1985, Abbott 1988); the highest speed material is veryrarefied, not dense, and the strongest shocks that form are of thereverse, not forward, type. In subsequent simulations we have found that the detailed character of this structure can depend on many variables, but this tendency always to form high speed rarefied waves and reverse shocks is quite robust. It is thus important that we have a clear understanding of the reasons for this tendency, and it is on this point that we focus our comments here.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document