Flare loop radiative hydrodynamics. V - Response to thick-target heating. VI - Chromospheric evaporation due to heating by nonthermal electrons. VII - Dynamics of the thick-target heated chromosphere

1985 ◽  
Vol 289 ◽  
pp. 414 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. H. Fisher ◽  
R. C. Canfield ◽  
A. N. McClymont
1994 ◽  
Vol 144 ◽  
pp. 275-277
Author(s):  
M. Karlický ◽  
J. C. Hénoux

AbstractUsing a new ID hybrid model of the electron bombardment in flare loops, we study not only the evolution of densities, plasma velocities and temperatures in the loop, but also the temporal and spatial evolution of hard X-ray emission. In the present paper a continuous bombardment by electrons isotropically accelerated at the top of flare loop with a power-law injection distribution function is considered. The computations include the effects of the return-current that reduces significantly the depth of the chromospheric layer which is evaporated. The present modelling is made with superthermal electron parameters corresponding to the classical resistivity regime for an input energy flux of superthermal electrons of 109erg cm−2s−1. It was found that due to the electron bombardment the two chromospheric evaporation waves are generated at both feet of the loop and they propagate up to the top, where they collide and cause temporary density and hard X-ray enhancements.


1985 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-68
Author(s):  
M. E. Machado

The ongoing research carried out by the solar community has been reported in the proceedings of several recent symposia, seminars and workshops, as well as in scientific journals (Kane et al. 1983, Švestka et al. 1982a, Shea et al. 1984, Kundu S Woodgate 1984, Simon 1984). We summarize here some of the novel results with reference to flare research as far as SMM data analysis is concerned. Understanding of impulsive phase phenomena was one of the primary goals of the SMM. The early reports from the analysis of the first ever obtained high-resolution images in the <30 keV energy range stressed the fact that some flares showed hard x-ray (HXR) bright sources at the feet of coronal loops (Hoyng et al. 1981a, b, Machado et al. 1982, Duijveman et al. 1982), the so-called HXR “footpoints,” favoring the thick-target beam mechanism for the production of HXRs, and indicating acceleration efficiencies >20% during the early impulsive phase. This phenomenon was shown to be accompanied by soft x-ray (SXR) line broadening, indicative of strong turbulence, and the immediate appearance of blue shifted spectral lines, which shows that plasma heated to >10-1 K rises from the footpoints of loops with velocities to 300 km s-1 (Antonucci et al. 1982, Antonucci et al. 1984a). This result provides a strong indication of the chromospheric evaporation phenomenon, which has been confirmed in analyses of combined SXR and Ha observations (Acton et al. 1982, Gunkler et al. 1984).


2021 ◽  
Vol 923 (2) ◽  
pp. L33
Author(s):  
Dmitrii Y. Kolotkov ◽  
Valery M. Nakariakov ◽  
Robin Holt ◽  
Alexey A. Kuznetsov

Abstract We present the first multiwavelength simultaneous detection of quasi-periodic pulsations (QPPs) in a superflare (more than a thousand times stronger than known solar flares) on a cool star, in soft X-rays (SXRs, with XMM-Newton) and white light (WL, with Kepler). It allowed for the first ever analysis of oscillatory processes in a stellar flare simultaneously in thermal and nonthermal emissions, conventionally considered to come from the corona and chromosphere of the star, respectively. The observed QPPs have periods 1.5 ± 0.15 hr (SXR) and 3 ± 0.6 hr (WL), and correlate well with each other. The unique relationship between the observed parameters of QPPs in SXR and WL allowed us to link them with oscillations of the electric current in the flare loop, which directly affect the dynamics of nonthermal electrons and indirectly (via ohmic heating) the thermal plasma. These findings could be considered in favor of the equivalent LCR contour model of a flare loop, at least in the extreme conditions of a stellar superflare.


1985 ◽  
Vol 107 ◽  
pp. 509-512
Author(s):  
Dean F. Smith

Up until about five years ago all models for hard X-ray bursts consisted of streaming nonthermal electrons interacting with an ambient plasma (Brown 1975). Even in its most efficient form of thick-target emission in which electrons are stopped in the ambient plasma, this type of model is very inefficient because the electrons lose about 105 times more energy in Coulomb collisions with the ambient plasma than in X-rays resulting from bremsstrahlung. As a result, according to the latest estimates, at least 20% of the dissipated flare energy must go into accelerated electrons at the peak of the impulsive phase (Duijveman et al. 1982). Stimulated by observations of hard X-rays with thermal spectra (Crannel et al. 1978; Elcan 1978), analysis of a thermal model in which all the electrons in a given volume are heated to a temperature Te = 108K was begun (Brown et al. 1979; Smith and Lilliequist 1979; Vlahos and Papadopoulos 1979). It was recognized from the beginning that some electrons in the tail of the distribution would escape through the conduction fronts formed and mimic nonthermal streaming electrons. This thermal model with loss of electrons or dissipation became known as the dissipative thermal model (Emslie and Vlahos 1980). If the escaping electrons are not replenished, they will cease to make a contribution after a fraction of a second and the source will become a pure thermal source. It will be shown below that collisional replenishment (Smith and Brown 1980) is too slow.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document