scholarly journals Mode shift of the voltage sensors in Shaker K+ channels is caused by energetic coupling to the pore domain

2011 ◽  
Vol 137 (5) ◽  
pp. 455-472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georges A. Haddad ◽  
Rikard Blunck
Keyword(s):  
Conformational Change ◽  
Mechanical Load ◽  
Voltage Sensor ◽  
Charge Movement ◽  
Gating Currents ◽  
Mode Shift ◽  
Voltage Sensors ◽  
Pore Opening ◽  
Voltage Gated Ion Channels ◽  
Pore Domain

The voltage sensors of voltage-gated ion channels undergo a conformational change upon depolarization of the membrane that leads to pore opening. This conformational change can be measured as gating currents and is thought to be transferred to the pore domain via an annealing of the covalent link between voltage sensor and pore (S4-S5 linker) and the C terminus of the pore domain (S6). Upon prolonged depolarizations, the voltage dependence of the charge movement shifts to more hyperpolarized potentials. This mode shift had been linked to C-type inactivation but has recently been suggested to be caused by a relaxation of the voltage sensor itself. In this study, we identified two ShakerIR mutations in the S4-S5 linker (I384N) and S6 (F484G) that, when mutated, completely uncouple voltage sensor movement from pore opening. Using these mutants, we show that the pore transfers energy onto the voltage sensor and that uncoupling the pore from the voltage sensor leads the voltage sensors to be activated at more negative potentials. This uncoupling also eliminates the mode shift occurring during prolonged depolarizations, indicating that the pore influences entry into the mode shift. Using voltage-clamp fluorometry, we identified that the slow conformational change of the S4 previously correlated with the mode shift disappears when uncoupling the pore. The effects can be explained by a mechanical load that is imposed upon the voltage sensors by the pore domain and allosterically modulates its conformation. Mode shift is caused by the stabilization of the open state but leads to a conformational change in the voltage sensor.

scholarly journals Components of gating charge movement and S4 voltage-sensor exposure during activation of hERG channels

2013 ◽  
Vol 141 (4) ◽  
pp. 431-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhuren Wang ◽  
Ying Dou ◽  
Samuel J. Goodchild ◽  
Zeineb Es-Salah-Lamoureux ◽  
David Fedida
Keyword(s):  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Voltage Sensor ◽  
Delayed Rectifier ◽  
Charge Movement ◽  
Α Subunit ◽  
Time Constants ◽  
Gating Charge ◽  
Activation Gating ◽  
Pore Opening ◽  
Herg Channels

The human ether-á-go-go–related gene (hERG) K+ channel encodes the pore-forming α subunit of the rapid delayed rectifier current, IKr, and has unique activation gating kinetics, in that the α subunit of the channel activates and deactivates very slowly, which focuses the role of IKr current to a critical period during action potential repolarization in the heart. Despite its physiological importance, fundamental mechanistic properties of hERG channel activation gating remain unclear, including how voltage-sensor movement rate limits pore opening. Here, we study this directly by recording voltage-sensor domain currents in mammalian cells for the first time and measuring the rates of voltage-sensor modification by [2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl] methanethiosulfonate chloride (MTSET). Gating currents recorded from hERG channels expressed in mammalian tsA201 cells using low resistance pipettes show two charge systems, defined as Q1 and Q2, with V1/2’s of −55.7 (equivalent charge, z = 1.60) and −54.2 mV (z = 1.30), respectively, with the Q2 charge system carrying approximately two thirds of the overall gating charge. The time constants for charge movement at 0 mV were 2.5 and 36.2 ms for Q1 and Q2, decreasing to 4.3 ms for Q2 at +60 mV, an order of magnitude faster than the time constants of ionic current appearance at these potentials. The voltage and time dependence of Q2 movement closely correlated with the rate of MTSET modification of I521C in the outermost region of the S4 segment, which had a V1/2 of −64 mV and time constants of 36 ± 8.5 ms and 11.6 ± 6.3 ms at 0 and +60 mV, respectively. Modeling of Q1 and Q2 charge systems showed that a minimal scheme of three transitions is sufficient to account for the experimental findings. These data point to activation steps further downstream of voltage-sensor movement that provide the major delays to pore opening in hERG channels.

scholarly journals Bipolar switching by HCN voltage sensor underlies hyperpolarization activation

2018 ◽  
Vol 116 (2) ◽  
pp. 670-678 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Cowgill ◽  
Vadim A. Klenchin ◽  
Claudia Alvarez-Baron ◽  
Debanjan Tewari ◽  
Alexander Blair ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Voltage Sensor ◽  
Hcn Channels ◽  
Structural Element ◽  
Bipolar Switching ◽  
Primary Determinant ◽  
Full Complement ◽  
Common Principle ◽  
Pore Opening ◽  
Voltage Gated Ion Channels ◽  
Common Architecture

Despite sharing a common architecture with archetypal voltage-gated ion channels (VGICs), hyperpolarization- and cAMP-activated ion (HCN) channels open upon hyperpolarization rather than depolarization. The basic motions of the voltage sensor and pore gates are conserved, implying that these domains are inversely coupled in HCN channels. Using structure-guided protein engineering, we systematically assembled an array of mosaic channels that display the full complement of voltage-activation phenotypes observed in the VGIC superfamily. Our studies reveal that the voltage sensor of the HCN channel has an intrinsic ability to drive pore opening in either direction and that the extra length of the HCN S4 is not the primary determinant for hyperpolarization activation. Tight interactions at the HCN voltage sensor–pore interface drive the channel into an hERG-like inactivated state, thereby obscuring its opening upon depolarization. This structural element in synergy with the HCN cyclic nucleotide-binding domain and specific interactions near the pore gate biases the channel toward hyperpolarization-dependent opening. Our findings reveal an unexpected common principle underpinning voltage gating in the VGIC superfamily and identify the essential determinants of gating polarity.

scholarly journals Effective gating charges per channel in voltage-dependent K+ and Ca2+ channels.

1996 ◽  
Vol 108 (3) ◽  
pp. 143-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Noceti ◽  
P Baldelli ◽  
X Wei ◽  
N Qin ◽  
L Toro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ionic Current ◽  
Variance Analysis ◽  
Beta Subunit ◽  
Charge Movement ◽  
Gating Currents ◽  
Open Probability ◽  
K Channels ◽  
Voltage Dependent ◽  
Pore Opening ◽  
Ca2 Channels

In voltage-dependent ion channels, the gating of the channels is determined by the movement of the voltage sensor. This movement reflects the rearrangement of the protein in response to a voltage stimulus, and it can be thought of as a net displacement of elementary charges (e0) through the membrane (z: effective number of elementary charges). In this paper, we measured z in Shaker IR (inactivation removed) K+ channels, neuronal alpha 1E and alpha 1A, and cardiac alpha 1C Ca2+ channels using two methods: (a) limiting slope analysis of the conductance-voltage relationship and (b) variance analysis, to evaluate the number of active channels in a patch, combined with the measurement of charge movement in the same patch. We found that in Shaker IR K+ channels the two methods agreed with a z congruent to 13. This suggests that all the channels that gate can open and that all the measured charge is coupled to pore opening in a strictly sequential kinetic model. For all Ca2+ channels the limiting slope method gave consistent results regardless of the presence or type of beta subunit tested (z = 8.6). However, as seen with alpha 1E, the variance analysis gave different results depending on the beta subunit used. alpha 1E and alpha 1E beta 1a gave higher z values (z = 14.77 and z = 15.13 respectively) than alpha 1E beta 2a (z = 9.50, which is similar to the limiting slope results). Both the beta 1a and beta 2a subunits, coexpressed with alpha 1E Ca2+ channels facilitated channel opening by shifting the activation curve to more negative potentials, but only the beta 2a subunit increased the maximum open probability. The higher z using variance analysis in alpha 1E and alpha 1E beta 1a can be explained by a set of charges not coupled to pore opening. This set of charges moves in transitions leading to nulls thus not contributing to the ionic current fluctuations but eliciting gating currents. Coexpression of the beta 2a subunit would minimize the fraction of nulls leading to the correct estimation of the number of channels and z.

scholarly journals A new mechanism of voltage-dependent gating exposed by KV10.1 channels interrupted between voltage sensor and pore

2017 ◽  
Vol 149 (5) ◽  
pp. 577-593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam P. Tomczak ◽  
Jorge Fernández-Trillo ◽  
Shashank Bharill ◽  
Ferenc Papp ◽  
Gyorgy Panyi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Conformational Changes ◽  
Voltage Sensor ◽  
Ion Flow ◽  
Gating Model ◽  
Cryo Electron Microscopy ◽  
Channel Gate ◽  
Voltage Dependent ◽  
Voltage Gated Ion Channels ◽  
Voltage Sensing Domain ◽  
Pore Domain

Voltage-gated ion channels couple transmembrane potential changes to ion flow. Conformational changes in the voltage-sensing domain (VSD) of the channel are thought to be transmitted to the pore domain (PD) through an α-helical linker between them (S4–S5 linker). However, our recent work on channels disrupted in the S4–S5 linker has challenged this interpretation for the KCNH family. Furthermore, a recent single-particle cryo-electron microscopy structure of KV10.1 revealed that the S4–S5 linker is a short loop in this KCNH family member, confirming the need for an alternative gating model. Here we use “split” channels made by expression of VSD and PD as separate fragments to investigate the mechanism of gating in KV10.1. We find that disruption of the covalent connection within the S4 helix compromises the ability of channels to close at negative voltage, whereas disconnecting the S4–S5 linker from S5 slows down activation and deactivation kinetics. Surprisingly, voltage-clamp fluorometry and MTS accessibility assays show that the motion of the S4 voltage sensor is virtually unaffected when VSD and PD are not covalently bound. Finally, experiments using constitutively open PD mutants suggest that the presence of the VSD is structurally important for the conducting conformation of the pore. Collectively, our observations offer partial support to the gating model that assumes that an inward motion of the C-terminal S4 helix, rather than the S4–S5 linker, closes the channel gate, while also suggesting that control of the pore by the voltage sensor involves more than one mechanism.

scholarly journals Coupling of Ca2+and voltage activation in BK channels through the αB helix/voltage sensor interface

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (25) ◽  
pp. 14512-14521
Author(s):  
Yanyan Geng ◽  
Zengqin Deng ◽  
Guohui Zhang ◽  
Gonzalo Budelli ◽  
Alice Butler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Structural Changes ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Bk Channels ◽  
Voltage Sensor ◽  
Membrane Excitability ◽  
Gating Currents ◽  
Sensor Interface ◽  
Pore Opening ◽  
Helical Turn ◽  
Voltage Activation

Large-conductance Ca2+and voltage-activated K+(BK) channels control membrane excitability in many cell types. BK channels are tetrameric. Each subunit is composed of a voltage sensor domain (VSD), a central pore-gate domain, and a large cytoplasmic domain (CTD) that contains the Ca2+sensors. While it is known that BK channels are activated by voltage and Ca2+, and that voltage and Ca2+activations interact, less is known about the mechanisms involved. We explore here these mechanisms by examining the gating contribution of an interface formed between the VSDs and the αB helices located at the top of the CTDs. Proline mutations in the αB helix greatly decreased voltage activation while having negligible effects on gating currents. Analysis with the Horrigan, Cui, and Aldrich model indicated a decreased coupling between voltage sensors and pore gate. Proline mutations decreased Ca2+activation for both Ca2+bowl and RCK1 Ca2+sites, suggesting that both high-affinity Ca2+sites transduce their effect, at least in part, through the αB helix. Mg2+activation also decreased. The crystal structure of the CTD with proline mutation L390P showed a flattening of the first helical turn in the αB helix compared to wild type, without other notable differences in the CTD, indicating that structural changes from the mutation were confined to the αB helix. These findings indicate that an intact αB helix/VSD interface is required for effective coupling of Ca2+binding and voltage depolarization to pore opening and that shared Ca2+and voltage transduction pathways involving the αB helix may be involved.

scholarly journals Can Shaker Potassium Channels be Locked in the Deactivated State?

2004 ◽  
Vol 124 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youshan Yang ◽  
Yangyang Yan ◽  
Fred J. Sigworth
Keyword(s):  
Xenopus Oocytes ◽  
Voltage Dependence ◽  
Voltage Sensor ◽  
Structural Studies ◽  
Gating Currents ◽  
Shaker Potassium Channel ◽  
Voltage Sensors ◽  
Voltage Gated ◽  
Gated Channel ◽  
Shaker Potassium Channels

For structural studies it would be useful to constrain the voltage sensor of a voltage-gated channel in its deactivated state. Here we consider one Shaker potassium channel mutant and speculate about others that might allow the channel to remain deactivated at zero membrane potential. Ionic and gating currents of F370C Shaker, expressed in Xenopus oocytes, were recorded in patches with internal application of the methanethiosulfonate reagent MTSET. It appears that the voltage dependence of voltage sensor movement is strongly shifted by reaction with internal MTSET, such that the voltage sensors appear to remain deactivated even at positive potentials. A disadvantage of this construct is that the rate of modification of voltage sensors by MTSET is quite low, ∼0.17 mM−1·s−1 at −80 mV, and is expected to be much lower at depolarized potentials.

scholarly journals Specificity of Charge-carrying Residues in the Voltage Sensor of Potassium Channels

2004 ◽  
Vol 123 (3) ◽  
pp. 205-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher A. Ahern ◽  
Richard Horn
Keyword(s):  
Potassium Channels ◽  
Electric Field ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Membrane Lipid ◽  
Voltage Sensor ◽  
Charge Movement ◽  
Gating Currents ◽  
Gating Charge ◽  
Channel Opening ◽  
Positively Charged

Positively charged voltage sensors of sodium and potassium channels are driven outward through the membrane's electric field upon depolarization. This movement is coupled to channel opening. A recent model based on studies of the KvAP channel proposes that the positively charged voltage sensor, christened the “voltage-sensor paddle”, is a peripheral domain that shuttles its charged cargo through membrane lipid like a hydrophobic cation. We tested this idea by attaching charged adducts to cysteines introduced into the putative voltage-sensor paddle of Shaker potassium channels and measuring fractional changes in the total gating charge from gating currents. The only residues capable of translocating attached charges through the membrane-electric field are those that serve this function in the native channel. This remarkable specificity indicates that charge movement involves highly specialized interactions between the voltage sensor and other regions of the protein, a mechanism inconsistent with the paddle model.

scholarly journals An allosteric model of the molecular interactions of excitation-contraction coupling in skeletal muscle.

1993 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 449-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Ríos ◽  
M Karhanek ◽  
J Ma ◽  
A González
Keyword(s):  
Skeletal Muscle ◽  
Calcium Release ◽  
Kinetic Equations ◽  
Voltage Sensor ◽  
Charge Movement ◽  
Calcium Release Channel ◽  
Open Probability ◽  
Release Channel ◽  
Voltage Sensors ◽  
Function Relationship

A contact interaction is proposed to exist between the voltage sensor of the transverse tubular membrane of skeletal muscle and the calcium release channel of the sarcoplasmic reticulum. This interaction is given a quantitative formulation inspired in the Monod, Wyman, and Changeux model of allosteric transitions in hemoglobin (Monod, J., J. Wyman, and J.-P. Changeux. 1965. Journal of Molecular Biology. 12:88-118), and analogous to one proposed by Marks and Jones for voltage-dependent Ca channels (Marks, T. N., and S. W. Jones. 1992. Journal of General Physiology. 99:367-390). The allosteric protein is the calcium release channel, a homotetramer, with two accessible states, closed and open. The kinetics and equilibrium of this transition are modulated by voltage sensors (dihydropyridine receptors) pictured as four units per release channel, each undergoing independent voltage-driven transitions between two states (resting and activating). For each voltage sensor that moves to the activating state, the tendency of the channel to open increases by an equal (large) factor. The equilibrium and kinetic equations of the model are solved and shown to reproduce well a number of experimentally measured relationships including: charge movement (Q) vs. voltage, open probability of the release channel (Po) vs. voltage, the transfer function relationship Po vs. Q, and the kinetics of charge movement, release activation, and deactivation. The main consequence of the assumption of allosteric coupling is that primary effects on the release channel are transmitted backward to the voltage sensor and give secondary effects. Thus, the model reproduces well the effects of perchlorate, described in the two previous articles, under the assumption that the primary effect is to increase the intrinsic tendency of the release channel to open, with no direct effects on the voltage sensor. This modification of the open-closed equilibrium of the release channel causes a shift in the equilibrium dependency of charge movement with voltage. The paradoxical slowing of charge movement by perchlorate also results from reciprocal effects of the channel on the allosterically coupled voltage sensors. The observations of the previous articles plus the simulations in this article constitute functional evidence of allosteric transmission.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document