scholarly journals Fluorescence changes reveal kinetic steps of muscarinic receptor–mediated modulation of phosphoinositides and Kv7.2/7.3 K+ channels

2009 ◽  
Vol 133 (4) ◽  
pp. 347-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jill B. Jensen ◽  
John S. Lyssand ◽  
Chris Hague ◽  
Bertil Hille
Keyword(s):  
Muscarinic Receptor ◽  
Neuronal Excitability ◽  
Resonance Energy Transfer ◽  
Resonance Energy ◽  
Signaling Cascades ◽  
M Current ◽  
M1 Muscarinic ◽  
Rate Limiting ◽  
G Protein Coupled ◽  
Kinetics Of

G protein–coupled receptors initiate signaling cascades. M1 muscarinic receptor (M1R) activation couples through Gαq to stimulate phospholipase C (PLC), which cleaves phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2). Depletion of PIP2 closes PIP2-requiring Kv7.2/7.3 potassium channels (M current), thereby increasing neuronal excitability. This modulation of M current is relatively slow (6.4 s to reach within 1/e of the steady-state value). To identify the rate-limiting steps, we investigated the kinetics of each step using pairwise optical interactions likely to represent fluorescence resonance energy transfer for M1R activation, M1R/Gβ interaction, Gαq/Gβ separation, Gαq/PLC interaction, and PIP2 hydrolysis. Electrophysiology was used to monitor channel closure. Time constants for M1R activation (<100 ms) and M1R/Gβ interaction (200 ms) are both fast, suggesting that neither of them is rate limiting during muscarinic suppression of M current. Gαq/Gβ separation and Gαq/PLC interaction have intermediate 1/e times (2.9 and 1.7 s, respectively), and PIP2 hydrolysis (6.7 s) occurs on the timescale of M current suppression. Overexpression of PLC accelerates the rate of M current suppression threefold (to 2.0 s) to become nearly contemporaneous with Gαq/PLC interaction. Evidently, channel release of PIP2 and closure are rapid, and the availability of active PLC limits the rate of M current suppression.

Kinetics of G-protein-coupled receptor signalling and desensitization

2004 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 1029-1031 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Krasel ◽  
J.-P. Vilardaga ◽  
M. Bünemann ◽  
M.J. Lohse
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Second Messengers ◽  
Resonance Energy Transfer ◽  
Resonance Energy ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptor ◽  
Protein Subunit ◽  
Protein Activation ◽  
G Protein Coupled ◽  
Kinetics Of

The kinetics of G-protein-coupled receptor activation and deactivation has, so far, been measured only indirectly, most frequently by assessing the production of various second messengers. We have developed methods based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer to quantify the kinetics of receptor activation by agonist (measured as conformational change in the receptor), the kinetics of G-protein activation (measured as G-protein subunit rearrangement) and the kinetics of receptor inactivation by arrestins (measured as receptor–arrestin interaction). Using these methods, we show that receptor activation by agonists and signalling to G-proteins occur on the subsecond time scale, whereas receptor desensitization is limited by receptor phosphorylation and proceeds more slowly.

scholarly journals Cooperative Binding of Insulin-Like Peptide 3 to a Dimeric Relaxin Family Peptide Receptor 2

Endocrinology ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 149 (3) ◽  
pp. 1113-1120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Manegold Svendsen ◽  
Milka Vrecl ◽  
Tina M. Ellis ◽  
Anders Heding ◽  
Jesper Bøggild Kristensen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Resonance Energy Transfer ◽  
Resonance Energy ◽  
Insulin Binding ◽  
Hek293 Cells ◽  
Negative Cooperativity ◽  
Peptide Receptor ◽  
Relaxin Family ◽  
G Protein Coupled ◽  
Kinetics Of ◽  
Receptor Dimer

Insulin-like peptide 3 (INSL3) binds to a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) called relaxin family peptide receptor 2 (RXFP2). RXFP2 belongs to the leucine-rich repeat-containing subgroup (LGR) of class A GPCRs. Negative cooperativity has recently been demonstrated in other members of the LGR subgroup. In this work, the kinetics of INSL3 binding to HEK293 cells stably transfected with RXFP2 (HEK293-RXFP2) have been investigated in detail to study whether negative cooperativity occurs and whether this receptor functions as a dimer. Our results show that negative cooperativity is present and that INSL3-RXFP2 binding shows both similarities and differences with insulin binding to the insulin receptor. A dose-response curve for the negative cooperativity of INSL3 binding had a reverse bell shape reminiscent of that seen for the negative cooperativity of insulin binding to its receptor. This suggests that binding of INSL3 may happen in a trans rather than in a cis way in a receptor dimer. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET2) experiments confirmed that RXFP2 forms constitutive homodimers. Heterodimerization between RXFP2 and RXFP1 was also observed.

scholarly journals Heterodimerization Between the Lutropin and Follitropin Receptors is Associated With an Attenuation of Hormone-Dependent Signaling

Endocrinology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 154 (10) ◽  
pp. 3925-3930 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiuyan Feng ◽  
Meilin Zhang ◽  
Rongbin Guan ◽  
Deborah L. Segaloff
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Resonance Energy Transfer ◽  
Resonance Energy ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptors ◽  
Fsh Receptor ◽  
Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Lh Receptor ◽  
G Protein Coupled ◽  
Stimulation Of

The LH receptor (LHR) and FSH receptor (FSHR) are each G protein-coupled receptors that play critical roles in reproductive endocrinology. Each of these receptors has previously been shown to self-associate into homodimers and oligomers shortly after their biosynthesis. As shown herein using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer to detect protein-protein interactions, our data show that the LHR and FSHR, when coexpressed in the same cells, specifically heterodimerize with each other. Further experiments confirm that at least a portion of the cellular LHR/FSHR heterodimers are present on the cell surface and are functional. We then sought to ascertain what effects, if any, heterodimerization between the LHR and FSHR might have on signaling. It was observed that when the LHR was expressed under conditions promoting the heterodimerization with FSHR, LH or human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) stimulation of Gs was attenuated. Conversely, when the FSHR was expressed under conditions promoting heterodimerization with the LHR, FSH-stimulated Gs activation was attenuated. These results demonstrate that the coexpression of the LHR and FSHR enables heterodimerizaton between the 2 gonadotropin receptors and results in an attenuation of signaling through each receptor.

scholarly journals Circuit-dependent striatal PKA and ERK signaling underlies rapid behavioral shift in mating reaction of male mice

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (21) ◽  
pp. 6718-6723 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akihiro Goto ◽  
Ichiro Nakahara ◽  
Takashi Yamaguchi ◽  
Yuji Kamioka ◽  
Kenta Sumiyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
D2 Receptor ◽  
Resonance Energy Transfer ◽  
Resonance Energy ◽  
Signaling Cascades ◽  
Male Mice ◽  
Indirect Pathway ◽  
Dynamic Activity ◽  
Reward Seeking ◽  
Electric Shocks

The selection of reward-seeking and aversive behaviors is controlled by two distinct D1 and D2 receptor-expressing striatal medium spiny neurons, namely the direct pathway MSNs (dMSNs) and the indirect pathway MSNs (iMSNs), but the dynamic modulation of signaling cascades of dMSNs and iMSNs in behaving animals remains largely elusive. We developed an in vivo methodology to monitor Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) of the activities of PKA and ERK in either dMSNs or iMSNs by microendoscopy in freely moving mice. PKA and ERK were coordinately but oppositely regulated between dMSNs and iMSNs by rewarding cocaine administration and aversive electric shocks. Notably, the activities of PKA and ERK rapidly shifted when male mice became active or indifferent toward female mice during mating behavior. Importantly, manipulation of PKA cascades by the Designer Receptor recapitulated active and indifferent mating behaviors, indicating a causal linkage of a dynamic activity shift of PKA and ERK between dMSNs and iMSNs in action selection.

scholarly journals Minireview: GPCR and G Proteins: Drug Efficacy and Activation in Live Cells

2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 590-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Pierre Vilardaga ◽  
Moritz Bünemann ◽  
Timothy N. Feinstein ◽  
Nevin Lambert ◽  
Viacheslav O. Nikolaev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Energy Transfer ◽  
G Protein ◽  
G Proteins ◽  
Intracellular Signaling ◽  
Resonance Energy Transfer ◽  
Resonance Energy ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
Live Cells ◽  
Mechanical Stimuli ◽  
G Protein Coupled

Abstract Many biochemical pathways are driven by G protein-coupled receptors, cell surface proteins that convert the binding of extracellular chemical, sensory, and mechanical stimuli into cellular signals. Their interaction with various ligands triggers receptor activation that typically couples to and activates heterotrimeric G proteins, which in turn control the propagation of secondary messenger molecules (e.g. cAMP) involved in critically important physiological processes (e.g. heart beat). Successful transfer of information from ligand binding events to intracellular signaling cascades involves a dynamic interplay between ligands, receptors, and G proteins. The development of Förster resonance energy transfer and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer-based methods has now permitted the kinetic analysis of initial steps involved in G protein-coupled receptor-mediated signaling in live cells and in systems as diverse as neurotransmitter and hormone signaling. The direct measurement of ligand efficacy at the level of the receptor by Förster resonance energy transfer is also now possible and allows intrinsic efficacies of clinical drugs to be linked with the effect of receptor polymorphisms.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document