scholarly journals Hook3 is a scaffold for the opposite-polarity microtubule-based motors cytoplasmic dynein-1 and KIF1C

2019 ◽  
Vol 218 (9) ◽  
pp. 2982-3001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnieszka A. Kendrick ◽  
Andrea M. Dickey ◽  
William B. Redwine ◽  
Phuoc Tien Tran ◽  
Laura Pontano Vaites ◽  
...  

The unidirectional and opposite-polarity microtubule-based motors, dynein and kinesin, drive long-distance intracellular cargo transport. Cellular observations suggest that opposite-polarity motors may be coupled. We recently identified an interaction between the cytoplasmic dynein-1 activating adaptor Hook3 and the kinesin-3 KIF1C. Here, using in vitro reconstitutions with purified components, we show that KIF1C and dynein/dynactin can exist in a complex scaffolded by Hook3. Full-length Hook3 binds to and activates dynein/dynactin motility. Hook3 also binds to a short region in the “tail” of KIF1C, but unlike dynein/dynactin, this interaction does not activate KIF1C. Hook3 scaffolding allows dynein to transport KIF1C toward the microtubule minus end, and KIF1C to transport dynein toward the microtubule plus end. In cells, KIF1C can recruit Hook3 to the cell periphery, although the cellular role of the complex containing both motors remains unknown. We propose that Hook3’s ability to scaffold dynein/dynactin and KIF1C may regulate bidirectional motility, promote motor recycling, or sequester the pool of available dynein/dynactin activating adaptors.

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnieszka A. Kendrick ◽  
William B. Redwine ◽  
Phuoc Tien Tran ◽  
Laura Pontano Vaites ◽  
Monika Dzieciatkowska ◽  
...  

AbstractThe unidirectional and opposite-polarity microtubule-based motors, dynein and kinesin, drive long-distance intracellular cargo transport. Cellular observations support the existence of mechanisms to couple opposite polarity motors: in cells some cargos rapidly switch directions and kinesin motors can be used to localize dynein. We recently identified an interaction between the cytoplasmic dynein-1 activating adaptor HOOK3 and the kinesin-3 KIF1C. Here we show that KIF1C and dynein/dynactin can exist in a single complex scaffolded by HOOK3. Full-length HOOK3 binds to and activates dynein/dynactin motility. HOOK3 also binds to a short region in the “tail” of KIF1C, but unlike dynein/dynactin, this interaction does not affect the processive motility of KIF1C. HOOK3 scaffolding allows dynein to transport KIF1C towards the microtubule minus end, and KIF1C to transport dynein towards the microtubule plus end. We propose that linking dynein and kinesin motors by dynein activating adaptors may be a general mechanism to regulate bidirectional motility.


2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 2742-2749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viacheslav Malikov ◽  
Anna Kashina ◽  
Vladimir Rodionov

Numerous evidence demonstrates that dynein is crucial for organization of microtubules (MTs) into radial arrays, but its exact function in this process is unclear. Here, we studied the role of cytoplasmic dynein in MT radial array formation in the absence of the centrosome. We found that dynein is a potent MT nucleator in vitro and that stimulation of dynein activity in cytoplasmic fragments of melanophores induces nucleation-dependent formation of MT radial array in the absence of the centrosome. This new property of dynein, in combination with its known role as an MT motor that is essential for MT array organization in the absence and presence of the centrosome, makes it a unique molecule whose activity is necessary and sufficient for the formation and maintenance of MT radial arrays in cells.


2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 967-982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony J. Roberts

Two classes of dynein power long-distance cargo transport in different cellular contexts. Cytoplasmic dynein-1 is responsible for the majority of transport toward microtubule minus ends in the cell interior. Dynein-2, also known as intraflagellar transport dynein, moves cargoes along the axoneme of eukaryotic cilia and flagella. Both dyneins operate as large ATP-driven motor complexes, whose dysfunction is associated with a group of human disorders. But how similar are their mechanisms of action and regulation? To examine this question, this review focuses on recent advances in dynein-1 and -2 research, and probes to what extent the emerging principles of dynein-1 transport could apply to or differ from those of the less well-understood dynein-2 mechanoenzyme.


2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 422-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lahoucine Izem ◽  
Yan Liu ◽  
Richard E. Morton

Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) exists as full-length (FL) and exon 9 (E9)-deleted isoforms. The function of E9-deleted CETP is poorly understood. Here, we investigated the role of E9-deleted CETP in regulating the secretion of FL-CETP by cells and explored its possible role in intracellular lipid metabolism. CETP overexpression in cells that naturally express CETP confirmed that E9-deleted CETP is not secreted, and showed that cellular FL- and E9-deleted CETP form an isolatable complex. Coexpression of CETP isoforms lowered cellular levels of both proteins and impaired FL-CETP secretion. These effects were due to reduced synthesis of both isoforms; however, the predominate consequence of FL- and E9-deleted CETP coexpression is impaired FL-CETP synthesis. We reported previously that reducing both CETP isoforms or overexpressing FL-CETP impairs cellular triglyceride (TG) storage. To investigate this further, E9-deleted CETP was expressed in SW872 cells that naturally synthesize CETP and in mouse 3T3-L1 cells that do not. E9-deleted CETP overexpression stimulated SW872 triglyceride synthesis and increased stored TG 2-fold. Expression of E9-deleted CETP in mouse 3T3-L1 cells produced a similar lipid phenotype. In vitro, FL-CETP promotes the transfer of TG from ER-enriched membranes to lipid droplets. E9-deleted CETP also promoted this transfer, although less effectively, and it inhibited the transfer driven by FL-CETP. We conclude that FL- and E9-deleted CETP isoforms interact to mutually decrease their intracellular levels and impair FL-CETP secretion by reducing CETP biosynthesis. E9-deleted CETP, like FL-CETP, alters cellular TG metabolism and storage but in a contrary manner.


2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 223
Author(s):  
C. Dores ◽  
I. Dobrinski

In vertebrates, the primary cilium is a nearly ubiquitous organelle present in somatic cells, but little is known about its function in the male gonad. We investigated the role of primary cilia in testis cells using in vitro formation of seminiferous tubules and in vitro culture of testicular somatic cells by inhibiting the primary cilium with CiliobrevinD, a cell-permeable, reversible chemical modulator that inhibits the major component of the organelle: ATPase motor cytoplasmic dynein. We analysed in vitro cultures for the presence of primary cilia and the activation of hedgehog signalling through translocation of Gli2 to the nuclei; in vitro tubule formation was evaluated by length and width of tubules formed. Methods: testicular cells were harvested from neonatal pigs by 2-step enzymatic digestion. Cells (50 × 106 mL–1) were plated on 100 mm Petri dishes in 15 mL of DMEM + 5% FBS + 50 U of penicillin and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 in air overnight, cells remaining in suspension and those slightly attached were removed and the somatic cells attached were trypsinized to obtain a single cell suspension, and then submitted to two different protocols: in vitro culture (A) or in vitro tubule formation (B), n = 5 replicates each. For A, somatic cells were replated on coverslips in 24-well plates and cultured in serum free media for 48 h, then for the treated group, 10 mM of CiliobrevinD was added for 24 h, attached cells from control and treated groups were fixed in 4% PFA and characterised by immunocytochemistry for ARL13B, Vimentin, and Gli2. For B: 1 × 106 cells were added to 24-well plates coated with 1 : 1 diluted Matrigel, the control group was kept in serum free media and to the treated group was added 20 mM CiliobrevinD at Day 0. Results: A) primary cilia were present in 89.3 ± 2.3% of cells cultured in serum-free media for the control group and Gli2 was located in the nuclei of 90.2 ± 1.2% of cells; in the CiliobrevinD-treated group the percentage of primary cilia decreased (P < 0.05) to 3.1 ± 2.5% and nuclear Gli2 to 3.9 ± 0.7; B) tubules formed in the control group were significantly longer and wider than the ones formed when CiliobrevinD was added (9.91 ± 0.35 v. 5.540 ± 1.08 mm and 339.8 ± 55.78 v. 127.2 ± 11.9 µm, respectively, P < 0.05 by Student's t-test). In conclusion, the inhibition of ATPase motor cytoplasmic dynein perturbs formation of primary cilia in testicular somatic cells, blocks Hedgehog signalling, and impairs in vitro tubule formation. Therefore, primary cilia on testicular somatic cells appear to be essential for testicular morphogenesis.Research was supported by 5 R01 OD016575-13.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (16) ◽  
pp. 5908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alain A. M. André ◽  
Evan Spruijt

Biomolecular condensates play a key role in organizing cellular fluids such as the cytoplasm and nucleoplasm. Most of these non-membranous organelles show liquid-like properties both in cells and when studied in vitro through liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) of purified proteins. In general, LLPS of proteins is known to be sensitive to variations in pH, temperature and ionic strength, but the role of crowding remains underappreciated. Several decades of research have shown that macromolecular crowding can have profound effects on protein interactions, folding and aggregation, and it must, by extension, also impact LLPS. However, the precise role of crowding in LLPS is far from trivial, as most condensate components have a disordered nature and exhibit multiple weak attractive interactions. Here, we discuss which factors determine the scope of LLPS in crowded environments, and we review the evidence for the impact of macromolecular crowding on phase boundaries, partitioning behavior and condensate properties. Based on a comparison of both in vivo and in vitro LLPS studies, we propose that phase separation in cells does not solely rely on attractive interactions, but shows important similarities to segregative phase separation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (13) ◽  
pp. 6152-6161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin I. Schimert ◽  
Breane G. Budaitis ◽  
Dana N. Reinemann ◽  
Matthew J. Lang ◽  
Kristen J. Verhey

Kinesin motor proteins that drive intracellular transport share an overall architecture of two motor domain-containing subunits that dimerize through a coiled-coil stalk. Dimerization allows kinesins to be processive motors, taking many steps along the microtubule track before detaching. However, whether dimerization is required for intracellular transport remains unknown. Here, we address this issue using a combination of in vitro and cellular assays to directly compare dimeric motors across the kinesin-1, -2, and -3 families to their minimal monomeric forms. Surprisingly, we find that monomeric motors are able to work in teams to drive peroxisome dispersion in cells. However, peroxisome transport requires minimal force output, and we find that most monomeric motors are unable to disperse the Golgi complex, a high-load cargo. Strikingly, monomeric versions of the kinesin-2 family motors KIF3A and KIF3B are able to drive Golgi dispersion in cells, and teams of monomeric KIF3B motors can generate over 8 pN of force in an optical trap. We find that intracellular transport and force output by monomeric motors, but not dimeric motors, are significantly decreased by the addition of longer and more flexible motor-to-cargo linkers. Together, these results suggest that dimerization of kinesin motors is not required for intracellular transport; however, it enables motor-to-motor coordination and high force generation regardless of motor-to-cargo distance. Dimerization of kinesin motors is thus critical for cellular events that require an ability to generate or withstand high forces.


2018 ◽  
Vol 315 (5) ◽  
pp. E924-E948 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing Wen ◽  
Elizabeth I. Tang ◽  
Wing-yee Lui ◽  
Will M. Lee ◽  
Chris K. C. Wong ◽  
...  

In the mammalian testis, spermatogenesis is dependent on the microtubule (MT)-specific motor proteins, such as dynein 1, that serve as the engine to support germ cell and organelle transport across the seminiferous epithelium at different stages of the epithelial cycle. Yet the underlying molecular mechanism(s) that support this series of cellular events remain unknown. Herein, we used RNAi to knockdown cytoplasmic dynein 1 heavy chain (Dync1h1) and an inhibitor ciliobrevin D to inactivate dynein in Sertoli cells in vitro and the testis in vivo, thereby probing the role of dynein 1 in spermatogenesis. Both treatments were shown to extensively induce disruption of MT organization across Sertoli cells in vitro and the testis in vivo. These changes also perturbed the transport of spermatids and other organelles (such as phagosomes) across the epithelium. These changes thus led to disruption of spermatogenesis. Interestingly, the knockdown of dynein 1 or its inactivation by ciliobrevin D also perturbed gross disruption of F-actin across the Sertoli cells in vitro and the seminiferous epithelium in vivo, illustrating there are cross talks between the two cytoskeletons in the testis. In summary, these findings confirm the role of cytoplasmic dynein 1 to support the transport of spermatids and organelles across the seminiferous epithelium during the epithelial cycle of spermatogenesis.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 74-74
Author(s):  
Yoshiaki Yamamoto ◽  
Yohann Loriot ◽  
Eliana Beraldi ◽  
Tianyuan Zhou ◽  
Youngsoo Kim ◽  
...  

74 Background: While recent reports link androgen receptor (AR) variants (AR-Vs) to castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), the biological significance of AR-Vs in AR-regulated cell survival and proliferation, independent of AR full length (AR-FL), remains controversial. To define the functional role of AR-FL and AR-Vs in MDV3100-resistant (MDV-R), we designed antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) targeting exon 1 and exon 8 in AR to knockdown AR-FL alone or in combination with AR-Vs and examined these effects in MDV-R LNCaP-derived cells in vitro and in vivo. Methods: We generated by selection MDV-R LNCaP-derived sub-lines that uniformly expressed high levels of both AR-FL and AR-V7 compared to CRPC LNCaP xenografts. Cell growth rates, protein and gene expression were analyzed using crystal violet assay, western blotting and real-time PCR, respectively. Exon 1 and 8 AR-ASO were evaluated in MDV-R49F CRPC LNCaP xenografts. Results: AR-V7 was transiently transfected in MDV-R49F cells and differential knockdown of AR-V7 and/or AR-FL by exon 1 versus exon 8 AR-ASO was used to evaluate relative biologic contributions of AR-FL versus AR-V7 in MDV-R LNCaP AR-V7 overexpressing cells. Exon 1 and 8 AR-ASO treatment in these cells similarly decreased prostate-specific antigen (PSA) expression and induced apoptosis as measured by caspase-3 and PARP cleavage and cell growth inhibition. To further define the functional role of AR-Vs in MDV-R LNCaP cells, we used a CE3 siRNA that specifically silenced AR-V7, but not AR-FL in MDV-R LNCaP cells. AR-V7 knockdown did not decrease PSA levels, did not induce apoptosis, and did not inhibit cell growth. In MDV-R LNCaP cells, exon 1 and 8 ASO similarly suppressed cell growth and AR-regulated gene expression in vitro and in vivo. Conclusions: These results indicate that the AR remains an important driver of MDV3100 resistance and, the biologic consequences mainly driven by AR-FL in MDV-R LNCaP models.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document