scholarly journals Bub1 kinase activity drives error correction and mitotic checkpoint control but not tumor suppression

2012 ◽  
Vol 199 (6) ◽  
pp. 931-949 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin M. Ricke ◽  
Karthik B. Jeganathan ◽  
Liviu Malureanu ◽  
Andrew M. Harrison ◽  
Jan M. van Deursen
Keyword(s):  
Error Correction ◽  
Tumor Suppression ◽  
Kinase Activity ◽  
Chromosome Instability ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Histone H2a ◽  
Checkpoint Control ◽  
Proliferating Cells ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint Protein

The mitotic checkpoint protein Bub1 is essential for embryogenesis and survival of proliferating cells, and bidirectional deviations from its normal level of expression cause chromosome missegregation, aneuploidy, and cancer predisposition in mice. To provide insight into the physiological significance of this critical mitotic regulator at a modular level, we generated Bub1 mutant mice that lack kinase activity using a knockin gene-targeting approach that preserves normal protein abundance. In this paper, we uncover that Bub1 kinase activity integrates attachment error correction and mitotic checkpoint signaling by controlling the localization and activity of Aurora B kinase through phosphorylation of histone H2A at threonine 121. Strikingly, despite substantial chromosome segregation errors and aneuploidization, mice deficient for Bub1 kinase activity do not exhibit increased susceptibility to spontaneous or carcinogen-induced tumorigenesis. These findings provide a unique example of a modular mitotic activity orchestrating two distinct networks that safeguard against whole chromosome instability and reveal the differential importance of distinct aneuploidy-causing Bub1 defects in tumor suppression.

scholarly journals ZW10 links mitotic checkpoint signaling to the structural kinetochore

2005 ◽  
Vol 169 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geert J.P.L. Kops ◽  
Yumi Kim ◽  
Beth A.A. Weaver ◽  
Yinghui Mao ◽  
Ian McLeod ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Instability ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Human Cells ◽  
Structural Elements ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Primary Mechanism ◽  
Egg Extracts ◽  
Xenopus Egg ◽  
Xenopus Egg Extracts

The mitotic checkpoint ensures that chromosomes are divided equally between daughter cells and is a primary mechanism preventing the chromosome instability often seen in aneuploid human tumors. ZW10 and Rod play an essential role in this checkpoint. We show that in mitotic human cells ZW10 resides in a complex with Rod and Zwilch, whereas another ZW10 partner, Zwint-1, is part of a separate complex of structural kinetochore components including Mis12 and Ndc80–Hec1. Zwint-1 is critical for recruiting ZW10 to unattached kinetochores. Depletion from human cells or Xenopus egg extracts is used to demonstrate that the ZW10 complex is essential for stable binding of a Mad1–Mad2 complex to unattached kinetochores. Thus, ZW10 functions as a linker between the core structural elements of the outer kinetochore and components that catalyze generation of the mitotic checkpoint-derived “stop anaphase” inhibitor.

scholarly journals Altered Expression of the Early Mitotic Checkpoint Protein, CHFR, in Breast Cancers: Implications for Tumor Suppression

2007 ◽  
Vol 67 (13) ◽  
pp. 6064-6074 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa M. Privette ◽  
Maria E. González ◽  
Lei Ding ◽  
Celina G. Kleer ◽  
Elizabeth M. Petty
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Suppression ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Altered Expression ◽  
Checkpoint Protein ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint Protein

scholarly journals Release of Mps1 from kinetochores is crucial for timely anaphase onset

2010 ◽  
Vol 191 (2) ◽  
pp. 281-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nannette Jelluma ◽  
Tobias B. Dansen ◽  
Tale Sliedrecht ◽  
Nicholas P. Kwiatkowski ◽  
Geert J.P.L. Kops
Keyword(s):  
Error Correction ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Kinase Activity ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Normal Chromosome ◽  
Half Time ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Chromosome Attachment

Mps1 kinase activity is required for proper chromosome segregation during mitosis through its involvements in microtubule–chromosome attachment error correction and the mitotic checkpoint. Mps1 dynamically exchanges on unattached kinetochores but is largely removed from kinetochores in metaphase. Here we show that Mps1 promotes its own turnover at kinetochores and that removal of Mps1 upon chromosome biorientation is a prerequisite for mitotic checkpoint silencing. Inhibition of Mps1 activity increases its half-time of recovery at unattached kinetochores and causes accumulation of Mps1 protein at these sites. Strikingly, preventing dissociation of active Mps1 from kinetochores delays anaphase onset despite normal chromosome attachment and alignment, and high interkinetochore tension. This delay is marked by continued recruitment of Mad1 and Mad2 to bioriented chromosomes and is attenuated by Mad2 depletion, indicating chronic engagement of the mitotic checkpoint in metaphase. We propose that release of Mps1 from kinetochores is essential for mitotic checkpoint silencing and a fast metaphase-to-anaphase transition.

The ‘anaphase problem’: how to disable the mitotic checkpoint when sisters split

2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 1660-1666 ◽  
Author(s):  
María Dolores Vázquez-Novelle ◽  
Lesia Mirchenko ◽  
Frank Uhlmann ◽  
Mark Petronczki
Keyword(s):  
Error Correction ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Eukaryotic Cells ◽  
Checkpoint Control ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Error Correction Mechanism ◽  
Chromosomal Passenger ◽  
Chromosome Attachment ◽  
Spindle Midzone

Two closely connected mechanisms safeguard the fidelity of chromosome segregation in eukaryotic cells. The mitotic checkpoint monitors the attachment of kinetochores to microtubules and delays anaphase onset until all sister kinetochores have become attached to opposite poles. In addition, an error correction mechanism destabilizes erroneous attachments that do not lead to tension at sister kinetochores. Aurora B kinase, the catalytic subunit of the CPC (chromosomal passenger complex), acts as a sensor and effector in both pathways. In this review we focus on a poorly understood but important aspect of mitotic control: what prevents the mitotic checkpoint from springing into action when sister centromeres are split and tension is suddenly lost at anaphase onset? Recent work has shown that disjunction of sister chromatids, in principle, engages the mitotic checkpoint, and probably also the error correction mechanism, with potentially catastrophic consequences for cell division. Eukaryotic cells have solved this ‘anaphase problem’ by disabling the mitotic checkpoint at the metaphase-to-anaphase transition. Checkpoint inactivation is in part due to the reversal of Cdk1 (cyclin-dependent kinase 1) phosphorylation of the CPC component INCENP (inner centromere protein; Sli15 in budding yeast), which causes the relocation of the CPC from centromeres to the spindle midzone. These findings highlight principles of mitotic checkpoint control: when bipolar chromosome attachment is reached in mitosis, the checkpoint is satisfied, but still active and responsive to loss of tension. Mitotic checkpoint inactivation at anaphase onset is required to prevent checkpoint re-engagement when sister chromatids split.

scholarly journals Microtubule capture by CENP-E silences BubR1-dependent mitotic checkpoint signaling

2005 ◽  
Vol 170 (6) ◽  
pp. 873-880 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yinghui Mao ◽  
Arshad Desai ◽  
Don W. Cleveland
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Activity ◽  
Control Mechanism ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Direct Binding ◽  
Spindle Microtubules ◽  
Multicellular Organisms ◽  
Kinesin Family ◽  
Microtubule Capture

The mitotic checkpoint is the major cell cycle control mechanism for maintaining chromosome content in multicellular organisms. Prevention of premature onset of anaphase requires activation at unattached kinetochores of the BubR1 kinase, which acts with other components to generate a diffusible “stop anaphase” inhibitor. Not only does direct binding of BubR1 to the centromere-associated kinesin family member CENP-E activate its essential kinase, binding of a motorless fragment of CENP-E is shown here to constitutively activate BubR1 bound at kinetochores, producing checkpoint signaling that is not silenced either by spindle microtubule capture or the tension developed at those kinetochores by other components. Using purified BubR1, microtubules, and CENP-E, microtubule capture by the CENP-E motor domain is shown to silence BubR1 kinase activity in a ternary complex of BubR1–CENP-E–microtubule. Together, this reveals that CENP-E is the signal transducing linker responsible for silencing BubR1-dependent mitotic checkpoint signaling through its capture at kinetochores of spindle microtubules.

scholarly journals Aurora B phosphorylates Bub1 to promote spindle assembly checkpoint signaling

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Babhrubahan Roy ◽  
Simon J. Y. Han ◽  
Adrienne N. Fontan ◽  
Ajit P. Joglekar
Keyword(s):  
Error Correction ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Aurora B Kinase ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Binding Interface ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Error Correction Mechanism

SummaryAccurate chromosome segregation during cell division requires amphitelic attachment of each chromosome to the spindle apparatus. This is ensured by the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint (SAC) [1], which delays anaphase onset in response to unattached chromosomes, and an error correction mechanism, which eliminates syntelic chromosome attachments [2]. The SAC is activated by the Mps1 kinase. Mps1 sequentially phosphorylates the kinetochore protein Spc105/KNL1 to license the recruitment of several signaling proteins including Bub1. These proteins produce the Mitotic Checkpoint Complex (MCC), which delays anaphase onset [3-8]. The error correction mechanism is regulated by the Aurora B kinase, which phosphorylates the microtubule-binding interface of the kinetochore. Aurora B is also known to promote SAC signaling indirectly [9-12]. Here we present evidence that Aurora B kinase activity directly promotes MCC production in budding yeast and human cells. Using the ectopic SAC activation (eSAC) system, we find that the conditional dimerization of Aurora B (or an Aurora B recruitment domain) with either Bub1 or Mad1, but not the ‘MELT’ motifs in Spc105/KNL1, leads to a SAC-mediated mitotic arrest [13-16]. Importantly, ectopic MCC production driven by Aurora B requires the ability of Bub1 to bind both Mad1 and Cdc20. These and other data show that Aurora B cooperates with Bub1 to promote MCC production only after Mps1 licenses Bub1 recruitment to the kinetochore. This direct involvement of Aurora B in SAC signaling is likely important for syntelically attached sister kinetochores that must delay anaphase onset in spite of reduced Mps1 activity due to their end-on microtubule attachment.

scholarly journals Molecular Contribution to Embryonic Aneuploidy and Genotypic Complexity During Initial Cleavage Divisions of Mammalian Development

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelsey E. Brooks ◽  
Brittany L. Daughtry ◽  
Brett Davis ◽  
Melissa Y. Yan ◽  
Suzanne S. Fei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Fluorescent Imaging ◽  
Mitotic Progression ◽  
Mammalian Development ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Kinase Substrate ◽  
Mammalian Embryogenesis ◽  
Substrate Network ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint Protein ◽  
Genome Activation

ABSTRACTEmbryonic aneuploidy is highly complex, often leading to developmental arrest, implantation failure, or spontaneous miscarriage in both natural and assisted reproduction. Despite our knowledge of mitotic mis-segregation in somatic cells, the molecular pathways regulating chromosome fidelity during the error-prone cleavage-stage of mammalian embryogenesis remain largely undefined. Using bovine embryos and live-cell fluorescent imaging, we observed frequent micro-/multi-nucleation of anaphase lagging or mis-segregated chromosomes in initial mitotic divisions that underwent unilateral inheritance, re-fused with the primary nucleus, or formed a chromatin bridge with neighboring cells. A correlation between a lack of maternal and paternal pronuclei fusion (syngamy), multipolar cytokinesis, and uniparental genome segregation was also revealed and single-cell DNA-seq showed propagation of primarily non-reciprocal mitotic errors in embryonic blastomeres. Depletion of the mitotic checkpoint protein, BUB1B/BUBR1, resulted in micro-/multi-nuclei formation, atypical cytokinesis, chaotic aneuploidy, and disruption of the kinase-substrate network regulating mitotic progression and exit, culminating in embryo arrest prior to genome activation. This demonstrates that embryonic micronuclei sustain multiple fates, provides a mechanism for blastomeres with uniparental origins, and substantiates the contribution of defective checkpoint signaling and/or the inheritance of other maternally-derived factors to the high genotypic complexity afflicting preimplantation development in higher-order mammals.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae Checkpoint Genes MEC1, RAD17 and RAD24 Are Required for Normal Meiotic Recombination Partner Choice

Genetics ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 153 (2) ◽  
pp. 607-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy M Grushcow ◽  
Teresa M Holzen ◽  
Ken J Park ◽  
Ted Weinert ◽  
Michael Lichten ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Meiotic Recombination ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Partner Choice ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Spore Viability ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Ectopic Recombination ◽  
Meiotic Progression ◽  
Checkpoint Genes

Abstract Checkpoint gene function prevents meiotic progression when recombination is blocked by mutations in the recA homologue DMC1. Bypass of dmc1 arrest by mutation of the DNA damage checkpoint genes MEC1, RAD17, or RAD24 results in a dramatic loss of spore viability, suggesting that these genes play an important role in monitoring the progression of recombination. We show here that the role of mitotic checkpoint genes in meiosis is not limited to maintaining arrest in abnormal meioses; mec1-1, rad24, and rad17 single mutants have additional meiotic defects. All three mutants display Zip1 polycomplexes in two- to threefold more nuclei than observed in wild-type controls, suggesting that synapsis may be aberrant. Additionally, all three mutants exhibit elevated levels of ectopic recombination in a novel physical assay. rad17 mutants also alter the fraction of recombination events that are accompanied by an exchange of flanking markers. Crossovers are associated with up to 90% of recombination events for one pair of alleles in rad17, as compared with 65% in wild type. Meiotic progression is not required to allow ectopic recombination in rad17 mutants, as it still occurs at elevated levels in ndt80 mutants that arrest in prophase regardless of checkpoint signaling. These observations support the suggestion that MEC1, RAD17, and RAD24, in addition to their proposed monitoring function, act to promote normal meiotic recombination.

scholarly journals Bub1 mediates cell death in response to chromosome missegregation and acts to suppress spontaneous tumorigenesis

2007 ◽  
Vol 179 (2) ◽  
pp. 255-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karthik Jeganathan ◽  
Liviu Malureanu ◽  
Darren J. Baker ◽  
Susan C. Abraham ◽  
Jan M. van Deursen
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Physiological Role ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Critical Threshold ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Checkpoint Protein ◽  
Chromosome Missegregation ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint Protein

The physiological role of the mitotic checkpoint protein Bub1 is unknown. To study this role, we generated a series of mutant mice with a gradient of reduced Bub1 expression using wild-type, hypomorphic, and knockout alleles. Bub1 hypomorphic mice are viable, fertile, and overtly normal despite weakened mitotic checkpoint activity and high percentages of aneuploid cells. Bub1 haploinsufficient mice, which have a milder reduction in Bub1 protein than Bub1 hypomorphic mice, also exhibit reduced checkpoint activity and increased aneuploidy, but to a lesser extent. Although cells from Bub1 hypomorphic and haploinsufficient mice have similar rates of chromosome missegregation, cell death after an aberrant separation decreases dramatically with declining Bub1 levels. Importantly, Bub1 hypomorphic mice are highly susceptible to spontaneous tumors, whereas Bub1 haploinsufficient mice are not. These findings demonstrate that loss of Bub1 below a critical threshold drives spontaneous tumorigenesis and suggest that in addition to ensuring proper chromosome segregation, Bub1 is important for mediating cell death when chromosomes missegregate.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document