scholarly journals Regulators of cyclin-dependent kinases are crucial for maintaining genome integrity in S phase

2010 ◽  
Vol 188 (5) ◽  
pp. 629-638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Halfdan Beck ◽  
Viola Nähse ◽  
Marie Sofie Yoo Larsen ◽  
Petra Groth ◽  
Trevor Clancy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Human Cell Line ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Replication Proteins ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinases ◽  
Mitotic Kinase ◽  
Cellular Control ◽  
Interfering Rna

Maintenance of genome integrity is of critical importance to cells. To identify key regulators of genomic integrity, we screened a human cell line with a kinome small interfering RNA library. WEE1, a major regulator of mitotic entry, and CHK1 were among the genes identified. Both kinases are important negative regulators of CDK1 and -2. Strikingly, WEE1 depletion rapidly induced DNA damage in S phase in newly replicated DNA, which was accompanied by a marked increase in single-stranded DNA. This DNA damage is dependent on CDK1 and -2 as well as the replication proteins MCM2 and CDT1 but not CDC25A. Conversely, DNA damage after CHK1 inhibition is highly dependent on CDC25A. Furthermore, the inferior proliferation of CHK1-depleted cells is improved substantially by codepletion of CDC25A. We conclude that the mitotic kinase WEE1 and CHK1 jointly maintain balanced cellular control of Cdk activity during normal DNA replication, which is crucial to prevent the generation of harmful DNA lesions during replication.

Overlapping Roles of the Spindle Assembly and DNA Damage Checkpoints in the Cell-Cycle Response to Altered Chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Genetics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 161 (2) ◽  
pp. 521-534
Author(s):  
Peter M Garber ◽  
Jasper Rine
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Replication Proteins ◽  
Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoints ◽  
Dna Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Mcm Proteins ◽  
Stalled Replication Forks

Abstract The MAD2-dependent spindle checkpoint blocks anaphase until all chromosomes have achieved successful bipolar attachment to the mitotic spindle. The DNA damage and DNA replication checkpoints block anaphase in response to DNA lesions that may include single-stranded DNA and stalled replication forks. Many of the same conditions that activate the DNA damage and DNA replication checkpoints also activated the spindle checkpoint. The mad2Δ mutation partially relieved the arrest responses of cells to mutations affecting the replication proteins Mcm3p and Pol1p. Thus a previously unrecognized aspect of spindle checkpoint function may be to protect cells from defects in DNA replication. Furthermore, in cells lacking either the DNA damage or the DNA replication checkpoints, the spindle checkpoint contributed to the arrest responses of cells to the DNA-damaging agent methyl methanesulfonate, the replication inhibitor hydroxyurea, and mutations affecting Mcm2p and Orc2p. Thus the spindle checkpoint was sensitive to a wider range of chromosomal perturbations than previously recognized. Finally, the DNA replication checkpoint did not contribute to the arrests of cells in response to mutations affecting ORC, Mcm proteins, or DNA polymerase δ. Thus the specificity of this checkpoint may be more limited than previously recognized.

scholarly journals Combined Inactivation of Pocket Proteins and APC/CCdh1 by Cdk4/6 Controls Recovery from DNA Damage in G1 Phase

Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 550
Author(s):  
Indra A. Shaltiel ◽  
Alba Llopis ◽  
Melinda Aprelia ◽  
Rob Klompmaker ◽  
Apostolos Menegakis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Normal Cell ◽  
S Phase ◽  
G1 Phase ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Inhibitory Effects ◽  
Pocket Proteins ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinases ◽  
Independent Functions ◽  
Phase Entry

Most Cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks) are redundant for normal cell division. Here we tested whether these redundancies are maintained during cell cycle recovery after a DNA damage-induced arrest in G1. Using non-transformed RPE-1 cells, we find that while Cdk4 and Cdk6 act redundantly during normal S-phase entry, they both become essential for S-phase entry after DNA damage in G1. We show that this is due to a greater overall dependency for Cdk4/6 activity, rather than to independent functions of either kinase. In addition, we show that inactivation of pocket proteins is sufficient to overcome the inhibitory effects of complete Cdk4/6 inhibition in otherwise unperturbed cells, but that this cannot revert the effects of Cdk4/6 inhibition in DNA damaged cultures. Indeed, we could confirm that, in addition to inactivation of pocket proteins, Cdh1-dependent anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/CCdh1) activity needs to be inhibited to promote S-phase entry in damaged cultures. Collectively, our data indicate that DNA damage in G1 creates a unique situation where high levels of Cdk4/6 activity are required to inactivate pocket proteins and APC/CCdh1 to promote the transition from G1 to S phase.

scholarly journals Human Fbh1 helicase contributes to genome maintenance via pro- and anti-recombinase activities

2009 ◽  
Vol 186 (5) ◽  
pp. 655-663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kasper Fugger ◽  
Martin Mistrik ◽  
Jannie Rendtlew Danielsen ◽  
Christoffel Dinant ◽  
Jacob Falck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Small Interfering Rna ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Premature Aging ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Helicase Activity ◽  
Genome Maintenance ◽  
Dna Helicases ◽  
Replication Block ◽  
Interfering Rna

Homologous recombination (HR) is essential for faithful repair of DNA lesions yet must be kept in check, as unrestrained HR may compromise genome integrity and lead to premature aging or cancer. To limit unscheduled HR, cells possess DNA helicases capable of preventing excessive recombination. In this study, we show that the human Fbh1 (hFbh1) helicase accumulates at sites of DNA damage or replication stress in a manner dependent fully on its helicase activity and partially on its conserved F box. hFbh1 interacted with single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), the formation of which was required for hFbh1 recruitment to DNA lesions. Conversely, depletion of endogenous Fbh1 or ectopic expression of helicase-deficient hFbh1 attenuated ssDNA production after replication block. Although elevated levels of hFbh1 impaired Rad51 recruitment to ssDNA and suppressed HR, its small interfering RNA–mediated depletion increased the levels of chromatin-associated Rad51 and caused unscheduled sister chromatid exchange. Thus, by possessing both pro- and anti-recombinogenic potential, hFbh1 may cooperate with other DNA helicases in tightly controlling cellular HR activity.

scholarly journals S-Phase Checkpoint Pathways Stimulate the Mobility of the Retrovirus-Like Transposon Ty1

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (24) ◽  
pp. 8874-8885 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Joan Curcio ◽  
Alison E. Kenny ◽  
Sharon Moore ◽  
David J. Garfinkel ◽  
Matthew Weintraub ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Reverse Transcriptase ◽  
Reverse Transcriptase Activity ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Restriction Factors ◽  
Transcriptase Activity ◽  
Checkpoint Pathway ◽  
Ty1 Mobility ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

ABSTRACT The mobility of the Ty1 retrotransposon in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is restricted by a large collection of proteins that preserve the integrity of the genome during replication. Several of these repressors of Ty1 transposition (Rtt)/genome caretakers are orthologs of mammalian retroviral restriction factors. In rtt/genome caretaker mutants, levels of Ty1 cDNA and mobility are increased; however, the mechanisms underlying Ty1 hypermobility in most rtt mutants are poorly characterized. Here, we show that either or both of two S-phase checkpoint pathways, the replication stress pathway and the DNA damage pathway, partially or strongly stimulate Ty1 mobility in 19 rtt/genome caretaker mutants. In contrast, neither checkpoint pathway is required for Ty1 hypermobility in two rtt mutants that are competent for genome maintenance. In rtt101Δ mutants, hypermobility is stimulated through the DNA damage pathway components Rad9, Rad24, Mec1, Rad53, and Dun1 but not Chk1. We provide evidence that Ty1 cDNA is not the direct target of the DNA damage pathway in rtt101Δ mutants; instead, levels of Ty1 integrase and reverse transcriptase proteins, as well as reverse transcriptase activity, are significantly elevated. We propose that DNA lesions created in the absence of Rtt/genome caretakers trigger S-phase checkpoint pathways to stimulate Ty1 reverse transcriptase activity.

scholarly journals Distinct roles of XRCC1 in genome integrity in Xenopus egg extracts

2019 ◽  
Vol 476 (24) ◽  
pp. 3791-3804 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Cupello ◽  
Yunfeng Lin ◽  
Shan Yan
Keyword(s):  
Oxidative Stress ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Oxidative Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Polymerase Beta ◽  
Egg Extracts ◽  
Xenopus Egg ◽  
Xenopus Egg Extracts

Oxidative DNA damage represents one of the most abundant DNA lesions. It remains unclear how DNA repair and DNA damage response (DDR) pathways are co-ordinated and regulated following oxidative stress. While XRCC1 has been implicated in DNA repair, it remains unknown how exactly oxidative DNA damage is repaired and sensed by XRCC1. In this communication, we have demonstrated evidence that XRCC1 is dispensable for ATR-Chk1 DDR pathway following oxidative stress in Xenopus egg extracts. Whereas APE2 is essential for SSB repair, XRCC1 is not required for the repair of defined SSB and gapped plasmids with a 5′-OH or 5′-P terminus, suggesting that XRCC1 and APE2 may contribute to SSB repair via different mechanisms. Neither Polymerase beta nor Polymerase alpha is important for the repair of defined SSB structure. Nonetheless, XRCC1 is important for the repair of DNA damage following oxidative stress. Our observations suggest distinct roles of XRCC1 for genome integrity in oxidative stress in Xenopus egg extracts.

scholarly journals Checkpoint inhibition of origin firing prevents inappropriate replication outside of S-phase

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark C. Johnson ◽  
Geylani Can ◽  
Miguel Santos ◽  
Diana Alexander ◽  
Philip Zegerman
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Origin Firing ◽  
Initiation Factors ◽  
Dependent Inhibition ◽  
Rad53 Kinase ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

AbstractAcross eukaryotes, checkpoints maintain the order of cell cycle events in the face of DNA damage or incomplete replication. Although a wide array of DNA lesions activates the checkpoint kinases, whether and how this response differs in different phases of the cell cycle remains poorly understood. The S-phase checkpoint for example results in the slowing of replication, which in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is caused by Rad53 kinase-dependent inhibition of the initiation factors Sld3 and Dbf4. Despite this, we show here that Rad53 phosphorylates both of these substrates throughout the cell cycle at the same sites as in S-phase, suggesting roles for this pathway beyond S-phase. Indeed we show that Rad53-dependent inhibition of Sld3 and Dbf4 limits re-replication in G2/M phase, preventing inappropriate gene amplification events. In addition we show that inhibition of Sld3 and Dbf4 after DNA damage in G1 phase prevents premature replication initiation at all origins at the G1/S transition. This study redefines the scope and specificity of the ‘S-phase checkpoint’ with implications for understanding the roles of this checkpoint in the majority of cancers that lack proper cell cycle controls.

scholarly journals Working on Genomic Stability: From the S-Phase to Mitosis

Genes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Ovejero ◽  
Avelino Bueno ◽  
María P. Sacristán
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Genomic Stability ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Control Mechanisms ◽  
Replicative Stress ◽  
Cancer Pathogenesis ◽  
Life Challenges ◽  
Strict Regulation

Fidelity in chromosome duplication and segregation is indispensable for maintaining genomic stability and the perpetuation of life. Challenges to genome integrity jeopardize cell survival and are at the root of different types of pathologies, such as cancer. The following three main sources of genomic instability exist: DNA damage, replicative stress, and chromosome segregation defects. In response to these challenges, eukaryotic cells have evolved control mechanisms, also known as checkpoint systems, which sense under-replicated or damaged DNA and activate specialized DNA repair machineries. Cells make use of these checkpoints throughout interphase to shield genome integrity before mitosis. Later on, when the cells enter into mitosis, the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) is activated and remains active until the chromosomes are properly attached to the spindle apparatus to ensure an equal segregation among daughter cells. All of these processes are tightly interconnected and under strict regulation in the context of the cell division cycle. The chromosomal instability underlying cancer pathogenesis has recently emerged as a major source for understanding the mitotic processes that helps to safeguard genome integrity. Here, we review the special interconnection between the S-phase and mitosis in the presence of under-replicated DNA regions. Furthermore, we discuss what is known about the DNA damage response activated in mitosis that preserves chromosomal integrity.

scholarly journals Impact of G-Quadruplexes on the Regulation of Genome Integrity, DNA Damage and Repair

Biomolecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 1284
Author(s):  
Anzhela V. Pavlova ◽  
Elena A. Kubareva ◽  
Mayya V. Monakhova ◽  
Maria I. Zvereva ◽  
Nina G. Dolinnaya
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
Dna Damage And Repair ◽  
Repair Processes

DNA G-quadruplexes (G4s) are known to be an integral part of the complex regulatory systems in both normal and pathological cells. At the same time, the ability of G4s to impede DNA replication plays a critical role in genome integrity. This review summarizes the results of recent studies of G4-mediated genomic and epigenomic instability, together with associated DNA damage and repair processes. Although the underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated, it is known that, among the proteins that recognize G4 structures, many are linked to DNA repair. We analyzed the possible role of G4s in promoting double-strand DNA breaks, one of the most deleterious DNA lesions, and their repair via error-prone mechanisms. The patterns of G4 damage, with a focus on the introduction of oxidative guanine lesions, as well as their removal from G4 structures by canonical repair pathways, were also discussed together with the effects of G4s on the repair machinery. According to recent findings, there must be a delicate balance between G4-induced genome instability and G4-promoted repair processes. A broad overview of the factors that modulate the stability of G4 structures in vitro and in vivo is also provided here.

scholarly journals Maternal Smc3 protects the integrity of the zygotic genome through DNA replication and mitosis

Development ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Ting Yueh ◽  
Vijay Pratap Singh ◽  
Jennifer L. Gerton
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Meiotic Chromosome ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Mammalian Development ◽  
Cell Stage ◽  
Early Embryos ◽  
Zygotic Genome

Aneuploidy is frequently observed in oocytes and early embryos, begging the question of how genome integrity is monitored and preserved during this critical period. SMC3 is a subunit of the cohesin complex that supports genome integrity, but its role in maintaining the genome in this window of mammalian development is unknown. We discovered that although depletion of Smc3 following meiotic S phase in mouse oocytes allowed accurate meiotic chromosome segregation, adult females were infertile. We provide evidence that DNA lesions accumulated following S phase in SMC3-deficient zygotes, followed by mitosis with lagging chromosomes, elongated spindles, micronuclei, and arrest at the 2-cell stage. Remarkably, although centromeric cohesion was defective, the dosage of SMC3 was sufficient to enable embryogenesis in juvenile mutant females. Our findings suggest that despite previous reports of aneuploidy in early embryos, chromosome missegregation in zygotes halts embryogenesis at the 2-cell stage. Smc3 is a maternal gene with essential functions in repair of spontaneous damage associated with DNA replication and subsequent chromosome segregation in zygotes, making cohesin a key protector of the zygotic genome.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document