scholarly journals Myosin-driven peroxisome partitioning in S. cerevisiae

2009 ◽  
Vol 186 (4) ◽  
pp. 541-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrei Fagarasanu ◽  
Fred D. Mast ◽  
Barbara Knoblach ◽  
Yui Jin ◽  
Matthew J. Brunner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Molecular Motors ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Class V ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Mother And Daughter ◽  
Specific Receptors ◽  
Cycle Dependent ◽  
Mother Cells

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the class V myosin motor Myo2p propels the movement of most organelles. We recently identified Inp2p as the peroxisome-specific receptor for Myo2p. In this study, we delineate the region of Myo2p devoted to binding peroxisomes. Using mutants of Myo2p specifically impaired in peroxisome binding, we dissect cell cycle–dependent and peroxisome partitioning–dependent mechanisms of Inp2p regulation. We find that although total Inp2p levels oscillate with the cell cycle, Inp2p levels on individual peroxisomes are controlled by peroxisome inheritance, as Inp2p aberrantly accumulates and decorates all peroxisomes in mother cells when peroxisome partitioning is abolished. We also find that Inp2p is a phosphoprotein whose level of phosphorylation is coupled to the cell cycle irrespective of peroxisome positioning in the cell. Our findings demonstrate that both organelle positioning and cell cycle progression control the levels of organelle-specific receptors for molecular motors to ultimately achieve an equidistribution of compartments between mother and daughter cells.

scholarly journals An organelle inheritance pathway during polarized cell growth

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn W Li ◽  
Ross TA Pedersen ◽  
Michelle S Lu ◽  
David G Drubin
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Organelle Inheritance ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Bud Emergence ◽  
Mother Cells ◽  
Cell Cycle Signaling

AbstractSome organelles cannot be synthesized anew, so they are segregated into daughter cells during cell division. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, daughter cells bud from mother cells and are populated by organelles inherited from the mothers. To determine whether this organelle inheritance occurs in a stereotyped manner, we tracked organelles using fluorescence microscopy. We describe a program for organelle inheritance in budding yeast. The cortical endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and peroxisomes are inherited concomitant with bud emergence. Next, vacuoles are inherited in small buds, followed closely by mitochondria. Finally, the nucleus and perinuclear ER are inherited when buds have nearly reached their maximal size. Because organelle inheritance timing correlates with bud morphology, which is coupled to the cell cycle, we tested whether organelle inheritance order is controlled by the cell cycle. By arresting cell cycle progression but allowing continued bud growth, we determined that organelle inheritance still occurs without cell cycle progression past S-phase, and that the general inheritance order is maintained. Thus, organelle inheritance follows a preferred order during polarized cell division, but it is not controlled exclusively by cell cycle signaling.Summary statementOrganelles are interconnected by contact sites, but they must be inherited from mother cells into buds during budding yeast mitosis. We report that this process occurs in a preferred sequence.

Exogenous ATP induces a limited cell cycle progression of arterial smooth muscle cells

1993 ◽  
Vol 264 (4) ◽  
pp. C783-C788 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Malam-Souley ◽  
M. Campan ◽  
A. P. Gadeau ◽  
C. Desgranges
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Smooth Muscle ◽  
Smooth Muscle Cells ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Mrna Level ◽  
Muscle Cells ◽  
Arterial Smooth Muscle ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Arterial Smooth Muscle Cells ◽  
Cycle Dependent

Because exogenous ATP is suspected to influence the proliferative process, its effects on the cell cycle progression of arterial smooth muscle cells were studied by investigating changes in the mRNA steady-state level of cell cycle-dependent genes. Stimulation of cultured quiescent smooth muscle cells by exogenous ATP induced chronological activation not only of immediate-early but also of delayed-early cell cycle-dependent genes, which were usually expressed after a mitogenic stimulation. In contrast, ATP did not increase late G1 gene mRNA level, demonstrating that this nucleotide induces a limited cell cycle progression of arterial smooth muscle cells through the G1 phase but is not able by itself to induce crossing over the G1-S boundary and consequently DNA synthesis. An increase in c-fos mRNA level was also induced by ADP but not by AMP or adenosine. Moreover, 2-methylthioadenosine 5'-triphosphate but not alpha, beta-methyleneadenosine 5'-triphosphate mediated this kind of response. Taken together, these results demonstrate that extracellular ATP induces the limited progression of arterial smooth muscle cells through the G1 phase via its fixation on P2 gamma receptors.

scholarly journals Cell cycle phases in the unequal mother/daughter cell cycles of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

1984 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. 2529-2531 ◽  
Author(s):  
B J Brewer ◽  
E Chlebowicz-Sledziewska ◽  
W L Fangman
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cycle Phase ◽  
Cell Cycle Time ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycles ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Mother And Daughter ◽  
Cell Cycle Phases ◽  
Mother Cells

During cell division in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae mother cells produce buds (daughter cells) which are smaller and have longer cell cycles. We performed experiments to compare the lengths of cell cycle phases in mothers and daughters. As anticipated from earlier indirect observations, the longer cell cycle time of daughter cells is accounted for by a longer G1 interval. The S-phase and the G2-phase are of the same duration in mother and daughter cells. An analysis of five isogenic strains shows that cell cycle phase lengths are independent of cell ploidy and mating type.

scholarly journals Structural mechanism of Myb–MuvB assembly

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (40) ◽  
pp. 10016-10021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keelan Z. Guiley ◽  
Audra N. Iness ◽  
Siddharth Saini ◽  
Sarvind Tripathi ◽  
Joseph S. Lipsick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Biochemical Analysis ◽  
Adaptor Protein ◽  
Cancer Cell Proliferation ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Structural Mechanism ◽  
Transcriptional Regulatory ◽  
Regulatory Complex ◽  
Cycle Dependent

The MuvB transcriptional regulatory complex, which controls cell-cycle-dependent gene expression, cooperates with B-Myb to activate genes required for the G2 and M phases of the cell cycle. We have identified the domain in B-Myb that is essential for the assembly of the Myb–MuvB (MMB) complex. We determined a crystal structure that reveals how this B-Myb domain binds MuvB through the adaptor protein LIN52 and the scaffold protein LIN9. The structure and biochemical analysis provide an understanding of how oncogenic B-Myb is recruited to regulate genes required for cell-cycle progression, and the MMB interface presents a potential therapeutic target to inhibit cancer cell proliferation.

scholarly journals Centrosomes Enhance the Fidelity of Cytokinesis in Vertebrates and Are Required for Cell Cycle Progression

2001 ◽  
Vol 153 (1) ◽  
pp. 237-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexey Khodjakov ◽  
Conly L. Rieder
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Somatic Cells ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Primary Role ◽  
Mitotic Spindles ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Cell Changes

When centrosomes are destroyed during prophase by laser microsurgery, vertebrate somatic cells form bipolar acentrosomal mitotic spindles (Khodjakov, A., R.W. Cole, B.R. Oakley, and C.L. Rieder. 2000. Curr. Biol. 10:59–67), but the fate of these cells is unknown. Here, we show that, although these cells lack the radial arrays of astral microtubules normally associated with each spindle pole, they undergo a normal anaphase and usually produce two acentrosomal daughter cells. Relative to controls, however, these cells exhibit a significantly higher (30–50%) failure rate in cytokinesis. This failure correlates with the inability of the spindle to properly reposition itself as the cell changes shape. Also, we destroyed just one centrosome during metaphase and followed the fate of the resultant acentrosomal and centrosomal daughter cells. Within 72 h, 100% of the centrosome-containing cells had either entered DNA synthesis or divided. By contrast, during this period, none of the acentrosomal cells had entered S phase. These data reveal that the primary role of the centrosome in somatic cells is not to form the spindle but instead to ensure cytokinesis and subsequent cell cycle progression.

Epigenetic dynamics across the cell cycle

2010 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 107-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tony Bou Kheir ◽  
Anders H. Lund
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Chromatin Condensation ◽  
Chromatin Modifications ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Mammalian Cell Cycle ◽  
Regulate Cell Cycle Progression

Progression of the mammalian cell cycle depends on correct timing and co-ordination of a series of events, which are managed by the cellular transcriptional machinery and epigenetic mechanisms governing genome accessibility. Epigenetic chromatin modifications are dynamic across the cell cycle, and are shown to influence and be influenced by cell-cycle progression. Chromatin modifiers regulate cell-cycle progression locally by controlling the expression of individual genes and globally by controlling chromatin condensation and chromosome segregation. The cell cycle, on the other hand, ensures a correct inheritance of epigenetic chromatin modifications to daughter cells. In this chapter, we summarize the current knowledge on the dynamics of epigenetic chromatin modifications during progression of the cell cycle.

scholarly journals Cell cycle progression and transmitotic apoptosis resistance promote escape from extrinsic apoptosis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadine Pollak ◽  
Aline Lindner ◽  
Dirke Imig ◽  
Karsten Kuritz ◽  
Jacques S. Fritze ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Apoptosis Resistance ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Extrinsic Apoptosis ◽  
Primed State ◽  
Pass Through ◽  
Cycle Dependent

Extrinsic apoptosis relies on TNF-family receptor activation by immune cells or receptor-activating biologics. Here, we monitored cell cycle progression at minutes resolution to relate apoptosis kinetics and cell-to-cell heterogeneities in death decisions to cell cycle phases. Interestingly, we found that cells in S phase delay TRAIL receptor-induced death in favour for mitosis, thereby passing on an apoptosis-primed state to their offspring. This translates into two distinct fates, apoptosis execution post mitosis or cell survival from inefficient apoptosis. Transmitotic resistance is linked to Mcl-1 upregulation and increased accumulation at mitochondria from mid S phase onwards, which allows cells to pass through mitosis with activated caspase-8, and with cells escaping apoptosis after mitosis sustaining sublethal DNA damage. Antagonizing Mcl-1 suppresses cell cycle-dependent delays in apoptosis, prevents apoptosis-resistant progression through mitosis and averts unwanted survival from apoptosis induction. Cell cycle progression therefore modulates signal transduction during extrinsic apoptosis, with Mcl-1 governing decision making between death, proliferation and survival. Cell cycle progression thus is a crucial process from which cell-to-cell heterogeneities in fates and treatment outcomes emerge in isogenic cell populations during extrinsic apoptosis.

scholarly journals A preferred sequence for organelle inheritance during polarized cell growth

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn W. Li ◽  
Michelle S. Lu ◽  
Yuichiro Iwamoto ◽  
David G. Drubin ◽  
Ross T. A. Pedersen
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Organelle Inheritance ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Bud Emergence ◽  
Polarized Cell Growth ◽  
Bud Growth ◽  
Mother Cells ◽  
Cortical Endoplasmic Reticulum

Some organelles cannot be synthesized anew, so they are segregated into daughter cells during cell division. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, daughter cells bud from mother cells and are populated by organelles inherited from the mothers. To determine whether this organelle inheritance occurs in a stereotyped manner, we tracked organelles using fluorescence microscopy. We describe a program for organelle inheritance in budding yeast. The cortical endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and peroxisomes are inherited concomitant with bud emergence. Next, vacuoles are inherited in small buds, followed closely by mitochondria. Finally, the nucleus and perinuclear ER are inherited when buds have nearly reached their maximal size. Because organelle inheritance timing correlates with bud morphology, which is coupled to the cell cycle, we tested whether disrupting the cell cycle alters organelle inheritance order. By arresting cell cycle progression but allowing continued bud growth, we determined that organelle inheritance still occurs when DNA replication is blocked, and that the general inheritance order is maintained. Thus, organelle inheritance follows a preferred order during polarized cell division and does not require completion of S-phase.

scholarly journals Analysis of Cell Cycle Progression in the Budding Yeast S. cerevisiae

2021 ◽  
pp. 265-276
Author(s):  
Deniz Pirincci Ercan ◽  
Frank Uhlmann
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Model Organisms ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Substrate Phosphorylation

AbstractThe cell cycle is an ordered series of events by which cells grow and divide to give rise to two daughter cells. In eukaryotes, cyclin–cyclin-dependent kinase (cyclin–Cdk) complexes act as master regulators of the cell division cycle by phosphorylating numerous substrates. Their activity and expression profiles are regulated in time. The budding yeast S. cerevisiae was one of the pioneering model organisms to study the cell cycle. Its genetic amenability continues to make it a favorite model to decipher the principles of how changes in cyclin-Cdk activity translate into the intricate sequence of substrate phosphorylation events that govern the cell cycle. In this chapter, we introduce robust and straightforward methods to analyze cell cycle progression in S. cerevisiae. These techniques can be utilized to describe cell cycle events and to address the effects of perturbations on accurate and timely cell cycle progression.

Cells and polyamines do it cyclically

2009 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 63-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kersti Alm ◽  
Stina Oredsson
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Negative Regulator ◽  
Biosynthetic Activity ◽  
Polyamine Biosynthesis ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
G0 Phase ◽  
Proliferating Cell

Cell-cycle progression is a one-way journey where the cell grows in size to be able to divide into two equally sized daughter cells. The cell cycle is divided into distinct consecutive phases defined as G1 (first gap), S (synthesis), G2 (second gap) and M (mitosis). A non-proliferating cell, which has retained the ability to enter the cell cycle when it receives appropriate signals, is in G0 phase, and cycling cells that do not receive proper signals leave the cell cycle from G1 into G0. One of the major events of the cell cycle is the duplication of DNA during S-phase. A group of molecules that are important for proper cell-cycle progression is the polyamines. Polyamine biosynthesis occurs cyclically during the cell cycle with peaks in activity in conjunction with the G1/S transition and at the end of S-phase and during G2-phase. The negative regulator of polyamine biosynthesis, antizyme, shows an inverse activity compared with the polyamine biosynthetic activity. The levels of the polyamines, putrescine, spermidine and spermine, double during the cell cycle and show a certain degree of cyclic variation in accordance with the biosynthetic activity. When cells in G0/G1-phase are seeded in the presence of compounds that prevent the cell-cycle-related increases in the polyamine pools, the S-phase of the first cell cycle is prolonged, whereas the other phases are initially unaffected. The results point to an important role for polyamines with regard to the ability of the cell to attain optimal rates of DNA replication.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document