scholarly journals Differential functions of G protein and Baz–aPKC signaling pathways in Drosophila neuroblast asymmetric division

2004 ◽  
Vol 164 (5) ◽  
pp. 729-738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasushi Izumi ◽  
Nao Ohta ◽  
Asako Itoh-Furuya ◽  
Naoyuki Fuse ◽  
Fumio Matsuzaki
Keyword(s):  
Signaling Pathways ◽  
G Protein ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Dominant Role ◽  
Spindle Orientation ◽  
Mitotic Spindles ◽  
Asymmetric Divisions ◽  
Fate Determinants ◽  
Cell Fate Determinants

Drosophila melanogaster neuroblasts (NBs) undergo asymmetric divisions during which cell-fate determinants localize asymmetrically, mitotic spindles orient along the apical–basal axis, and unequal-sized daughter cells appear. We identified here the first Drosophila mutant in the Gγ1 subunit of heterotrimeric G protein, which produces Gγ1 lacking its membrane anchor site and exhibits phenotypes identical to those of Gβ13F, including abnormal spindle asymmetry and spindle orientation in NB divisions. This mutant fails to bind Gβ13F to the membrane, indicating an essential role of cortical Gγ1–Gβ13F signaling in asymmetric divisions. In Gγ1 and Gβ13F mutant NBs, Pins–Gαi, which normally localize in the apical cortex, no longer distribute asymmetrically. However, the other apical components, Bazooka–atypical PKC–Par6–Inscuteable, still remain polarized and responsible for asymmetric Miranda localization, suggesting their dominant role in localizing cell-fate determinants. Further analysis of Gβγ and other mutants indicates a predominant role of Partner of Inscuteable–Gαi in spindle orientation. We thus suggest that the two apical signaling pathways have overlapping but different roles in asymmetric NB division.

scholarly journals Distinct roles of Gαi and Gβ13F subunits of the heterotrimeric G protein complex in the mediation of Drosophila neuroblast asymmetric divisions

2003 ◽  
Vol 162 (4) ◽  
pp. 623-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fengwei Yu ◽  
Yu Cai ◽  
Rachna Kaushik ◽  
Xiaohang Yang ◽  
William Chia
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Protein Complex ◽  
Complex Function ◽  
Asymmetric Division ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Asymmetric Divisions ◽  
Fate Determinants ◽  
Cell Fate Determinants

The asymmetric division of Drosophila neuroblasts involves the basal localization of cell fate determinants and the generation of an asymmetric, apicobasally oriented mitotic spindle that leads to the formation of two daughter cells of unequal size. These features are thought to be controlled by an apically localized protein complex comprising of two signaling pathways: Bazooka/Drosophila atypical PKC/Inscuteable/DmPar6 and Partner of inscuteable (Pins)/Gαi; in addition, Gβ13F is also required. However, the role of Gαi and the hierarchical relationship between the G protein subunits and apical components are not well defined. Here we describe the isolation of Gαi mutants and show that Gαi and Gβ13F play distinct roles. Gαi is required for Pins to localize to the cortex, and the effects of loss of Gαi or pins are highly similar, supporting the idea that Pins/Gαi act together to mediate various aspects of neuroblast asymmetric division. In contrast, Gβ13F appears to regulate the asymmetric localization/stability of all apical components, and Gβ13F loss of function exhibits phenotypes resembling those seen when both apical pathways have been compromised, suggesting that it acts upstream of the apical pathways. Importantly, our results have also revealed a novel aspect of apical complex function, that is, the two apical pathways act redundantly to suppress the formation of basal astral microtubules in neuroblasts.

scholarly journals Epithelial polarity and spindle orientation: intersecting pathways

2013 ◽  
Vol 368 (1629) ◽  
pp. 20130291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan T. Bergstralh ◽  
Timm Haack ◽  
Daniel St Johnston
Keyword(s):  
Epithelial Cells ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Spindle Orientation ◽  
Mitotic Spindles ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Cell Divisions ◽  
Discs Large ◽  
Stem Cell Divisions ◽  
Fate Determinants ◽  
Cell Fate Determinants

During asymmetric stem cell divisions, the mitotic spindle must be correctly oriented and positioned with respect to the axis of cell polarity to ensure that cell fate determinants are appropriately segregated into only one daughter cell. By contrast, epithelial cells divide symmetrically and orient their mitotic spindles perpendicular to the main apical–basal polarity axis, so that both daughter cells remain within the epithelium. Work in the past 20 years has defined a core ternary complex consisting of Pins, Mud and Gαi that participates in spindle orientation in both asymmetric and symmetric divisions. As additional factors that interact with this complex continue to be identified, a theme has emerged: there is substantial overlap between the mechanisms that orient the spindle and those that establish and maintain apical–basal polarity in epithelial cells. In this review, we examine several factors implicated in both processes, namely Canoe, Bazooka, aPKC and Discs large, and consider the implications of this work on how the spindle is oriented during epithelial cell divisions.

The role of centrosomes and astral microtubules during asymmetric division of Drosophila neuroblasts

Development ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 128 (7) ◽  
pp. 1137-1145 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.G. Giansanti ◽  
M. Gatti ◽  
S. Bonaccorsi
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Cleavage Plane ◽  
Mitotic Division ◽  
Spindle Orientation ◽  
Central Spindle ◽  
Spindle Rotation ◽  
Spindle Midzone ◽  
Fate Determinants ◽  
Cell Fate Determinants

Drosophila neuroblasts are stem cells that divide asymmetrically to produce another large neuroblast and a smaller ganglion mother cell (GMC). During neuroblast division, several cell fate determinants, such as Miranda, Prospero and Numb, are preferentially segregated into the GMC, ensuring its correct developmental fate. The accurate segregation of these determinants relies on proper orientation of the mitotic spindle within the dividing neuroblast, and on the correct positioning of the cleavage plane. In this study we have analyzed the role of centrosomes and astral microtubules in neuroblast spindle orientation and cytokinesis. We examined neuroblast division in asterless (asl) mutants, which, although devoid of functional centrosomes and astral microtubules, form well-focused anastral spindles that undergo anaphase and telophase. We show that asl neuroblasts assemble a normal cytokinetic ring around the central spindle midzone and undergo unequal cytokinesis. Thus, astral microtubules are not required for either signaling or positioning cytokinesis in Drosophila neuroblasts. Our results indicate that the cleavage plane is dictated by the positioning of the central spindle midzone within the cell, and suggest a model on how the central spindle attains an asymmetric position during neuroblast mitosis. We have also analyzed the localization of Miranda during mitotic division of asl neuroblasts. This protein accumulates in morphologically regular cortical crescents but these crescents are mislocalized with respect to the spindle orientation. This suggests that astral microtubules mediate proper spindle rotation during neuroblast division.

The endocytic adaptor Numb regulates thymus size by modulating pre-TCR signaling during asymmetric division

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (10) ◽  
pp. 1705-1714 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rocio Aguado ◽  
Nadia Martin-Blanco ◽  
Michael Caraballo ◽  
Matilde Canelles
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Asymmetric Division ◽  
Cell Receptor ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Thymocyte Development ◽  
Tcr Signaling ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Fate Determinants ◽  
Cell Fate Determinants

Abstract Stem cells must proliferate and differentiate to generate the lineages that shape mature organs; understanding these 2 processes and their interaction is one of the central themes in current biomedicine. An intriguing aspect is asymmetric division, by which 2 daughter cells with different fates are generated. Several cell fate determinants participate in asymmetric division, with the endocytic adaptor Numb as the best-known example. Here, we have explored the role of asymmetric division in thymocyte development, visualizing the differential segregation of Numb and pre-TCR in thymic precursors. Analysis of mice where Numb had been inhibited by expressing a dominant negative revealed enhanced pre–T-cell receptor (TCR) signaling and a smaller thymus. Conversely, Numb overexpression resulted in loss of asymmetric division and a larger thymus. The conclusion is that Numb determines the levels of pre-TCR signaling in dividing thymocytes and, ultimately, the size of the pool from which mature T lymphocytes are selected.

scholarly journals Membrane Targeting and Asymmetric Localization of Drosophila Partner of Inscuteable Are Discrete Steps Controlled by Distinct Regions of the Protein

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 4230-4240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fengwei Yu ◽  
Chin Tong Ong ◽  
William Chia ◽  
Xiaohang Yang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Protein Localization ◽  
Asymmetric Division ◽  
Terminal Region ◽  
Spindle Orientation ◽  
Functional Domain ◽  
Fate Determinants ◽  
Cell Fate Determinants ◽  
Apical Localization

ABSTRACT Asymmetric division of neural progenitors is a key mechanism by which neuronal diversity in the Drosophila central nervous system is generated. The distinct fates of the daughter cells derived from these divisions are achieved through preferential segregation of the cell fate determinants Prospero and Numb to one of the two daughters. This is achieved by coordinating apical and basal mitotic spindle orientation with the basal cortical localization of the cell fate determinants during mitosis. A complex of apically localized proteins, including Inscuteable (Insc), Partner of Inscuteable (Pins), Bazooka (Baz), DmPar-6, DaPKC, and Gαi, is required to mediate and coordinate basal protein localization with mitotic spindle orientation. Pins, a molecule which directly interacts with Insc, is a key component required for the integrity of this complex; in the absence of Pins, other components become mislocalized or destabilized, and basal protein localization and mitotic spindle orientation are defective. Here we define the functional domains of Pins. We show that the C-terminal region containing the Gαi binding GoLoco motifs is necessary and sufficient for targeting to the neuroblast cortex, which appears to be a prerequisite for apical localization of Pins. The N-terminal tetratricopeptide repeat-containing region of Pins is required for two processes; TPR repeats 1 to 3 plus the C-terminal region are required for apical localization but are insufficient to recruit Insc to the apical cortex, whereas TPR repeats 1 to 7 plus C-terminal Pins can perform both functions. Hence, the abilities of Pins to cortically localize, to apically localize, and to restore Insc apical localization are all separable, and all three capabilities are necessary to mediate asymmetric division. Moreover, the need for N-terminal Pins can be obviated by fusing a minimal Insc functional domain with the C-terminal region of Pins; this chimeric molecule is apically localized and can fulfill the functions of both Insc and Pins.

scholarly journals The Eya1 phosphatase mediates Shh-driven symmetric cell division of cerebellar granule cell precursors

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Merk ◽  
Pengcheng Zhou ◽  
Samuel M. Cohen ◽  
Maria F. Pazyra-Murphy ◽  
Grace H. Hwang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Granule Cell ◽  
Cerebellar Granule Cell ◽  
Spindle Orientation ◽  
Cerebellar Granule ◽  
Shh Pathway ◽  
Pathway Activation ◽  
Fate Determinants ◽  
Cell Fate Determinants ◽  
Granule Cell Precursors

AbstractDuring neural development, stem and precursor cells can divide either symmetrically or asymmetrically. The transition between symmetric and asymmetric cell divisions is a major determinant of precursor cell expansion and neural differentiation, but the underlying mechanisms that regulate this transition are not well understood. Here, we identify the Sonic hedgehog (Shh) pathway as a critical determinant regulating the mode of division of cerebellar granule cell precursors (GCPs). Using partial gain and loss of function mutations within the Shh pathway, we show that pathway activation determines spindle orientation of GCPs, and that mitotic spindle orientation directly correlates with the mode of division. Mechanistically, we show that the phosphatase Eya1 is essential for implementing Shh-dependent GCP spindle orientation. We identify atypical protein kinase C (aPKC) as a direct target of Eya1 activity and show that Eya1 dephosphorylates Threonine (T410) in the activation loop of this polarity complex component. Thus, Eya1 inactivates the cell polarity complex, resulting in reduced phosphorylation of Numb and other components that regulate the mode of division. This Eya1-dependent cascade is critical in linking spindle orientation, cell cycle exit and terminal differentiation. Together these findings demonstrate that a Shh-Eya1 regulatory axis selectively promotes symmetric cell divisions during cerebellar development by coordinating spindle orientation and cell fate determinants.Summary statementBiological responses to Shh signaling are specified by the magnitude of pathway activation and the cellular context. This study shows that potent Shh signaling regulates mitotic orientation and symmetric division of cerebellar granule cell precursors in a process that requires the phosphatase Eya1 and unequal distribution of cell fate determinants to daughter cells.

scholarly journals SeesawPred: A Web Application for Predicting Cell-fate Determinants in Cell Differentiation

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
András Hartmann ◽  
Satoshi Okawa ◽  
Gaia Zaffaroni ◽  
Antonio del Sol
Keyword(s):  
Cell Differentiation ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Web Application ◽  
Fate Determinants ◽  
Cell Fate Determinants

scholarly journals Chromatin Dynamics in Intestinal Epithelial Homeostasis: A Paradigm of Cell Fate Determination versus Cell Plasticity

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 1062-1080
Author(s):  
Jérémie Rispal ◽  
Fabrice Escaffit ◽  
Didier Trouche
Keyword(s):  
Signaling Pathways ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Chromatin Modification ◽  
Intestinal Cell ◽  
Intestinal Epithelial ◽  
Cell Plasticity ◽  
Chromatin Dynamics ◽  
Irritable Bowel ◽  
The Many

AbstractThe rapid renewal of intestinal epithelium is mediated by a pool of stem cells, located at the bottom of crypts, giving rise to highly proliferative progenitor cells, which in turn differentiate during their migration along the villus. The equilibrium between renewal and differentiation is critical for establishment and maintenance of tissue homeostasis, and is regulated by signaling pathways (Wnt, Notch, Bmp…) and specific transcription factors (TCF4, CDX2…). Such regulation controls intestinal cell identities by modulating the cellular transcriptome. Recently, chromatin modification and dynamics have been identified as major actors linking signaling pathways and transcriptional regulation in the control of intestinal homeostasis. In this review, we synthesize the many facets of chromatin dynamics involved in controlling intestinal cell fate, such as stemness maintenance, progenitor identity, lineage choice and commitment, and terminal differentiation. In addition, we present recent data underlying the fundamental role of chromatin dynamics in intestinal cell plasticity. Indeed, this plasticity, which includes dedifferentiation processes or the response to environmental cues (like microbiota’s presence or food ingestion), is central for the organ’s physiology. Finally, we discuss the role of chromatin dynamics in the appearance and treatment of diseases caused by deficiencies in the aforementioned mechanisms, such as gastrointestinal cancer, inflammatory bowel disease or irritable bowel syndrome.

scholarly journals Cell shape and intercellular adhesion regulate mitotic spindle orientation

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (19) ◽  
pp. 2458-2468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingchen Li ◽  
Longcan Cheng ◽  
Hongyuan Jiang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Epithelial Cells ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Cell Shape ◽  
Intercellular Adhesion ◽  
Shape Anisotropy ◽  
Spindle Orientation ◽  
Mitotic Spindles ◽  
Strong Adhesion ◽  
Fate Decision

Cell division orientation plays an essential role in tissue morphogenesis and cell fate decision. Recent studies showed that either cell shape or adhesion geometry can regulate the orientation of mitotic spindles and thereby the cell division orientation. However, how they together regulate the spindle orientation remains largely unclear. In this work, we use a general computational model to investigate the competitive mechanism of determining the spindle orientation between cell shape and intercellular adhesion in epithelial cells. We find the spindle orientation is dominated by the intercellular adhesion when the cell shape anisotropy is small, but dominated by the cell shape when the shape anisotropy is large. A strong adhesion and moderate adhesive size can ensure the planar division of epithelial cells with large apico-basal elongation. We also find the spindle orientation could be perpendicular to the adhesive region when only one side of the cell is adhered to an E-cadherin–coated matrix. But after the cell is compressed, the spindle orientation is governed by the cell shape and the spindle will be parallel to the adhesive region when the cell shape anisotropy is large. Finally, we demonstrate the competition between cell shape and tricellular junctions can also effectively regulate the spindle orientation.

scholarly journals Unequal distribution of 16S mtrRNA at the 2-cell stage regulates cell lineage allocations in mouse embryos

Reproduction ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 151 (4) ◽  
pp. 351-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhuxia Zheng ◽  
Hongmei Li ◽  
Qinfen Zhang ◽  
Lele Yang ◽  
Huayu Qi
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Cell Lineage ◽  
Early Embryogenesis ◽  
Embryonic Cells ◽  
Cell Stage ◽  
Unequal Distribution ◽  
Fate Determinants ◽  
Cell Fate Determinants

Cell lineage determination during early embryogenesis has profound effects on adult animal development. Pre-patterning of embryos, such as that of Drosophila and Caenorhabditis elegans, is driven by asymmetrically localized maternal or zygotic factors, including mRNA species and RNA binding proteins. However, it is not clear how mammalian early embryogenesis is regulated and what the early cell fate determinants are. Here we show that, in mouse, mitochondrial ribosomal RNAs (mtrRNAs) are differentially distributed between 2-cell sister blastomeres. This distribution pattern is not related to the overall quantity or activity of mitochondria which appears equal between 2-cell sister blastomeres. Like in lower species, 16S mtrRNA is found to localize in the cytoplasm outside of mitochondria in mouse 2-cell embryos. Alterations of 16S mtrRNA levels in one of the 2-cell sister blastomere via microinjection of either sense or anti-sense RNAs drive its progeny into different cell lineages in blastocyst. These results indicate that mtrRNAs are differentially distributed among embryonic cells at the beginning of embryogenesis in mouse and they are functionally involved in the regulation of cell lineage allocations in blastocyst, suggesting an underlying molecular mechanism that regulates pre-implantation embryogenesis in mouse.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document