scholarly journals Drosophila aPKC regulates cell polarity and cell proliferation in neuroblasts and epithelia

2003 ◽  
Vol 163 (5) ◽  
pp. 1089-1098 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa M. Rolls ◽  
Roger Albertson ◽  
Hsin-Pei Shih ◽  
Cheng-Yu Lee ◽  
Chris Q. Doe
Keyword(s):  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Cell Polarity ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Proper Function ◽  
Larval Stages ◽  
Kinase C ◽  
Discs Large ◽  
Lethal Giant Larvae ◽  
Cell Diversity ◽  
Apical Localization

Cell polarity is essential for generating cell diversity and for the proper function of most differentiated cell types. In many organisms, cell polarity is regulated by the atypical protein kinase C (aPKC), Bazooka (Baz/Par3), and Par6 proteins. Here, we show that Drosophila aPKC zygotic null mutants survive to mid-larval stages, where they exhibit defects in neuroblast and epithelial cell polarity. Mutant neuroblasts lack apical localization of Par6 and Lgl, and fail to exclude Miranda from the apical cortex; yet, they show normal apical crescents of Baz/Par3, Pins, Inscuteable, and Discs large and normal spindle orientation. Mutant imaginal disc epithelia have defects in apical/basal cell polarity and tissue morphology. In addition, we show that aPKC mutants show reduced cell proliferation in both neuroblasts and epithelia, the opposite of the lethal giant larvae (lgl) tumor suppressor phenotype, and that reduced aPKC levels strongly suppress most lgl cell polarity and overproliferation phenotypes.

scholarly journals Structural insights into the aPKC regulatory switch mechanism of the human cell polarity protein lethal giant larvae 2

2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (22) ◽  
pp. 10804-10812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lior Almagor ◽  
Ivan S. Ufimtsev ◽  
Aruna Ayer ◽  
Jingzhi Li ◽  
William I. Weis
Keyword(s):  
Cell Polarity ◽  
Apical Membrane ◽  
Kinase C ◽  
Lethal Giant Larvae ◽  
Direct Binding ◽  
Switch Mechanism ◽  
Membrane Phosphorylation ◽  
Metazoan Cell ◽  
Structural Insights

Metazoan cell polarity is controlled by a set of highly conserved proteins. Lethal giant larvae (Lgl) functions in apical-basal polarity through phosphorylation-dependent interactions with several other proteins as well as the plasma membrane. Phosphorylation of Lgl by atypical protein kinase C (aPKC), a component of the partitioning-defective (Par) complex in epithelial cells, excludes Lgl from the apical membrane, a crucial step in the establishment of epithelial cell polarity. We present the crystal structures of human Lgl2 in both its unphosphorylated and aPKC-phosphorylated states. Lgl2 adopts a double β-propeller structure that is unchanged by aPKC phosphorylation of an unstructured loop in its second β-propeller, ruling out models of phosphorylation-dependent conformational change. We demonstrate that phosphorylation controls the direct binding of purified Lgl2 to negative phospholipids in vitro. We also show that a coil–helix transition of this region that is promoted by phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) is also phosphorylation-dependent, implying a highly effective phosphorylative switch for membrane association.

Cortical Cyclin A controls spindle orientation during asymmetric cell division

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pénélope Darnat ◽  
Angelique Burg ◽  
Jérémy Sallé ◽  
Jérôme Lacoste ◽  
Sophie Louvet-Vallée ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Cell Polarity ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Planar Cell Polarity ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Cyclin A ◽  
Spindle Orientation ◽  
Posterior Cortex ◽  
Cell Diversity

Abstract Cell proliferation and cell polarity need to be precisely coordinated to orient the asymmetric cell divisions crucial for generating cell diversity in epithelia. In many instances, the Frizzled/Dishevelled planar cell polarity pathway is involved in mitotic spindle orientation, but how this is spatially and temporally coordinated with cell cycle progression has remained elusive. Using Drosophila sensory organ precursor cells as a model system, we show that Cyclin A, the main Cyclin driving the transition to M-phase of the cell cycle, is recruited to the apical-posterior cortex in prophase by the Frizzled/Dishevelled complex. This cortically localized Cyclin A then regulates the orientation of the division by recruiting Mud, a homologue of NuMA, the well-known spindle-associated protein. The observed non-canonical subcellular localization of Cyclin A reveals this mitotic factor as a direct link between cell proliferation, cell polarity and spindle orientation.

scholarly journals A bidirectional antagonism between aPKC and Yurt regulates epithelial cell polarity

2014 ◽  
Vol 204 (4) ◽  
pp. 487-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clémence L. Gamblin ◽  
Émilie J.-L. Hardy ◽  
François J.-M. Chartier ◽  
Nicolas Bisson ◽  
Patrick Laprise
Keyword(s):  
Epithelial Cell ◽  
Cell Polarity ◽  
Cell Polarization ◽  
Membrane Domains ◽  
Epithelial Cell Polarity ◽  
Kinase C ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Regulatory Loop ◽  
Late Stages ◽  
Apical Localization

During epithelial cell polarization, Yurt (Yrt) is initially confined to the lateral membrane and supports the stability of this membrane domain by repressing the Crumbs-containing apical machinery. At late stages of embryogenesis, the apical recruitment of Yrt restricts the size of the apical membrane. However, the molecular basis sustaining the spatiotemporal dynamics of Yrt remains undefined. In this paper, we report that atypical protein kinase C (aPKC) phosphorylates Yrt to prevent its premature apical localization. A nonphosphorylatable version of Yrt dominantly dismantles the apical domain, showing that its aPKC-mediated exclusion is crucial for epithelial cell polarity. In return, Yrt counteracts aPKC functions to prevent apicalization of the plasma membrane. The ability of Yrt to bind and restrain aPKC signaling is central for its role in polarity, as removal of the aPKC binding site neutralizes Yrt activity. Thus, Yrt and aPKC are involved in a reciprocal antagonistic regulatory loop that contributes to segregation of distinct and mutually exclusive membrane domains in epithelial cells.

scholarly journals Distinct activities of Scrib module proteins organize epithelial polarity

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (21) ◽  
pp. 11531-11540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark J. Khoury ◽  
David Bilder
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Epithelial Polarity ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Kinase C ◽  
Mutual Antagonism ◽  
Discs Large ◽  
Lethal Giant Larvae ◽  
Epithelial Structure ◽  
And Function

A polarized architecture is central to both epithelial structure and function. In many cells, polarity involves mutual antagonism between the Par complex and the Scribble (Scrib) module. While molecular mechanisms underlying Par-mediated apical determination are well-understood, how Scrib module proteins specify the basolateral domain remains unknown. Here, we demonstrate dependent and independent activities of Scrib, Discs-large (Dlg), and Lethal giant larvae (Lgl) using theDrosophilafollicle epithelium. Our data support a linear hierarchy for localization, but rule out previously proposed protein–protein interactions as essential for polarization. Cortical recruitment of Scrib does not require palmitoylation or polar phospholipid binding but instead an independent cortically stabilizing activity of Dlg. Scrib and Dlg do not directly antagonize atypical protein kinase C (aPKC), but may instead restrict aPKC localization by enabling the aPKC-inhibiting activity of Lgl. Importantly, while Scrib, Dlg, and Lgl are each required, all three together are not sufficient to antagonize the Par complex. Our data demonstrate previously unappreciated diversity of function within the Scrib module and begin to define the elusive molecular functions of Scrib and Dlg.

The Scribble–Dlg–Lgl polarity module in development and cancer: from flies to man

2012 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 141-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Imogen Elsum ◽  
Laura Yates ◽  
Patrick O. Humbert ◽  
Helena E. Richardson
Keyword(s):  
Cell Polarity ◽  
Cancer Progression ◽  
Basal Cell ◽  
Cell Signalling ◽  
Fruit Fly ◽  
Strongly Correlated ◽  
Tissue Architecture ◽  
Discs Large ◽  
Lethal Giant Larvae

The Scribble, Par and Crumbs modules were originally identified in the vinegar (fruit) fly, Drosophila melanogaster, as being critical regulators of apico–basal cell polarity. In the present chapter we focus on the Scribble polarity module, composed of Scribble, discs large and lethal giant larvae. Since the discovery of the role of the Scribble polarity module in apico–basal cell polarity, these proteins have also been recognized as having important roles in other forms of polarity, as well as regulation of the actin cytoskeleton, cell signalling and vesicular trafficking. In addition to these physiological roles, an important role for polarity proteins in cancer progression has also been uncovered, with loss of polarity and tissue architecture being strongly correlated with metastatic disease.

scholarly journals p32 is a novel mammalian Lgl binding protein that enhances the activity of protein kinase Cζ and regulates cell polarity

2007 ◽  
Vol 178 (4) ◽  
pp. 575-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl U. Bialucha ◽  
Emma C. Ferber ◽  
Franck Pichaud ◽  
Sew Y. Peak-Chew ◽  
Yasuyuki Fujita
Keyword(s):  
Protein Kinase ◽  
Cell Polarity ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Phosphorylation Site ◽  
Madin Darby Canine Kidney ◽  
Hairpin Rna ◽  
Kinase C ◽  
Lethal Giant Larvae ◽  
3D Matrix ◽  
Darby Canine Kidney

Lgl (lethal giant larvae) plays an important role in cell polarity. Atypical protein kinase C (aPKC) binds to and phosphorylates Lgl, and the phosphorylation negatively regulates Lgl activity. In this study, we identify p32 as a novel Lgl binding protein that directly binds to a domain on mammalian Lgl2 (mLgl2), which contains the aPKC phosphorylation site. p32 also binds to PKCζ, and the three proteins form a transient ternary complex. When p32 is bound, PKCζ is stimulated to phosphorylate mLgl2 more efficiently. p32 overexpression in Madin–Darby canine kidney cells cultured in a 3D matrix induces an expansion of the actin-enriched apical membrane domain and disrupts cell polarity. Addition of PKCζ inhibitor blocks apical actin accumulation, which is rescued by p32 overexpression. p32 knockdown by short hairpin RNA also induces cell polarity defects. Collectively, our data indicate that p32 is a novel regulator of cell polarity that forms a complex with mLgl2 and aPKC and enhances aPKC activity.

scholarly journals Sro7 and Sro77, the yeast homologues of the Drosophila lethal giant larvae (Lgl), regulate cell proliferation via the Rho1–Tor1 pathway

Microbiology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 160 (10) ◽  
pp. 2208-2214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang-Chun Liou ◽  
Qun Ren ◽  
Qiuqiang Gao ◽  
Zhaojie Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Cell Polarity ◽  
Smooth Surface ◽  
Colony Growth ◽  
Tumour Suppressor ◽  
Colony Development ◽  
Double Mutation ◽  
Double Deletion ◽  
Transmission Electron ◽  
Lethal Giant Larvae

Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sro7 and Sro77 are homologues of the Drosophila tumour suppressor lethal giant larvae (Lgl), which regulates cell polarity in Drosophila epithelial cells. Here, we showed that double mutation of SRO7/SRO77 was defective in colony growth. The colony of the SRO7/SRO77 double deletion was much smaller than the WT and appeared to be round with a smooth surface, compared with the WT. Analysis using transmission electron microscopy revealed multiple defects of the colony cells, including multiple budding, multiple nuclei, cell lysis and dead cells, suggesting that the double deletion caused defects in cell polarity and cell wall integrity (CWI). Overexpression of RHO1, one of the central regulators of cell polarity and CWI, fully recovered the sro7Δ/sro77Δ phenotype. We further demonstrated that sro7Δ/sro77Δ caused a decrease of the GTP-bound, active Rho1, which in turn caused an upregulation of TOR1. Deletion of TOR1 in sro7Δ/sro77Δ (sro7Δ/sro77Δ/tor1Δ) recovered the cell growth and colony morphology, similar to WT. Our results suggested that the tumour suppressor homologue SRO7/SRO77 regulated cell proliferation and yeast colony development via the Rho1–Tor1 pathway.

scholarly journals Extracellular-Vesicle-Based Coatings Enhance Bioactivity of Titanium Implants—SurfEV

Nanomaterials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 1445
Author(s):  
Taisa Nogueira Pansani ◽  
Thanh Huyen Phan ◽  
Qingyu Lei ◽  
Alexey Kondyurin ◽  
Bill Kalionis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Titanium Surface ◽  
Wound Closure ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Extracellular Vesicle ◽  
Tissue Growth ◽  
Titanium Implants ◽  
The Body ◽  
High Concentrations ◽  
And Migration

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nanoparticles released by cells that contain a multitude of biomolecules, which act synergistically to signal multiple cell types. EVs are ideal candidates for promoting tissue growth and regeneration. The tissue regenerative potential of EVs raises the tantalizing possibility that immobilizing EVs on implant surfaces could potentially generate highly bioactive and cell-instructive surfaces that would enhance implant integration into the body. Such surfaces could address a critical limitation of current implants, which do not promote bone tissue formation or bond bone. Here, we developed bioactive titanium surface coatings (SurfEV) using two types of EVs: secreted by decidual mesenchymal stem cells (DEVs) and isolated from fermented papaya fluid (PEVs). For each EV type, we determined the size, morphology, and molecular composition. High concentrations of DEVs enhanced cell proliferation, wound closure, and migration distance of osteoblasts. In contrast, the cell proliferation and wound closure decreased with increasing concentration of PEVs. DEVs enhanced Ca/P deposition on the titanium surface, which suggests improvement in bone bonding ability of the implant (i.e., osteointegration). EVs also increased production of Ca and P by osteoblasts and promoted the deposition of mineral phase, which suggests EVs play key roles in cell mineralization. We also found that DEVs stimulated the secretion of secondary EVs observed by the presence of protruding structures on the cell membrane. We concluded that, by functionalizing implant surfaces with specialized EVs, we will be able to enhance implant osteointegration by improving hydroxyapatite formation directly at the surface and potentially circumvent aseptic loosening of implants.

Development of Testis Cords and the Formation of Efferent Ducts in Xenopus laevis: Differences and Similarities with Other Vertebrates

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Yuanyuan Li ◽  
Jinbo Li ◽  
Man Cai ◽  
Zhanfen Qin
Keyword(s):  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Xenopus Laevis ◽  
Germ Cells ◽  
Sertoli Cells ◽  
Testis Development ◽  
Larval Stages ◽  
Efferent Ducts ◽  
Steroidogenic Cells ◽  
Testis Cord ◽  
Anterior Posterior

The knowledge of testis development in amphibians relative to amniotes remains limited. Here, we used Xenopus laevis to investigate the process of testis cord development. Morphological observations revealed the presence of segmental gonomeres consisting of medullary knots in male gonads at stages 52–53, with no distinct gonomeres in female gonads. Further observations showed that cell proliferation occurs at specific sites along the anterior-posterior axis of the future testis at stage 50, which contributes to the formation of medullary knots. At stage 53, adjacent gonomeres become close to each other, resulting in fusion; then (pre-)Sertoli cells aggregate and form primitive testis cords, which ultimately become testis cords when germ cells are present inside. The process of testis cord formation in X. laevis appears to be more complex than in amniotes. Strikingly, steroidogenic cells appear earlier than (pre-)Sertoli cells in differentiating testes of X. laevis, which differs from earlier differentiation of (pre-)Sertoli cells in amniotes. Importantly, we found that the mesonephros is connected to the testis gonomere at a specific site at early larval stages and that these connections become efferent ducts after metamorphosis, which challenges the previous concept that the mesonephric side and the gonadal side initially develop in isolation and then connect to each other in amphibians and amniotes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document