scholarly journals Human securin proteolysis is controlled by the spindle checkpoint and reveals when the APC/C switches from activation by Cdc20 to Cdh1

2002 ◽  
Vol 157 (7) ◽  
pp. 1125-1137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anja Hagting ◽  
Nicole den Elzen ◽  
Hartmut C. Vodermaier ◽  
Irene C. Waizenegger ◽  
Jan-Michael Peters ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Live Cell Imaging ◽  
Cell Imaging ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Cyclin B1 ◽  
Mutant Form ◽  
Exact Time ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Sister Chromatid Separation

Progress through mitosis is controlled by the sequential destruction of key regulators including the mitotic cyclins and securin, an inhibitor of anaphase whose destruction is required for sister chromatid separation. Here we have used live cell imaging to determine the exact time when human securin is degraded in mitosis. We show that the timing of securin destruction is set by the spindle checkpoint; securin destruction begins at metaphase once the checkpoint is satisfied. Furthermore, reimposing the checkpoint rapidly inactivates securin destruction. Thus, securin and cyclin B1 destruction have very similar properties. Moreover, we find that both cyclin B1 and securin have to be degraded before sister chromatids can separate. A mutant form of securin that lacks its destruction box (D-box) is still degraded in mitosis, but now this is in anaphase. This destruction requires a KEN box in the NH2 terminus of securin and may indicate the time in mitosis when ubiquitination switches from APCCdc20 to APCCdh1. Lastly, a D-box mutant of securin that cannot be degraded in metaphase inhibits sister chromatid separation, generating a cut phenotype where one cell can inherit both copies of the genome. Thus, defects in securin destruction alter chromosome segregation and may be relevant to the development of aneuploidy in cancer.

scholarly journals Genes Involved in Sister Chromatid Separation and Segregation in the Budding Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Genetics ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 159 (2) ◽  
pp. 453-470
Author(s):  
Sue Biggins ◽  
Needhi Bhalla ◽  
Amy Chang ◽  
Dana L Smith ◽  
Andrew W Murray
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Chromosome Behavior ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Marked Chromosome ◽  
Sister Chromatid Separation

Abstract Accurate chromosome segregation requires the precise coordination of events during the cell cycle. Replicated sister chromatids are held together while they are properly attached to and aligned by the mitotic spindle at metaphase. At anaphase, the links between sisters must be promptly dissolved to allow the mitotic spindle to rapidly separate them to opposite poles. To isolate genes involved in chromosome behavior during mitosis, we microscopically screened a temperature-sensitive collection of budding yeast mutants that contain a GFP-marked chromosome. Nine LOC (loss of cohesion) complementation groups that do not segregate sister chromatids at anaphase were identified. We cloned the corresponding genes and performed secondary tests to determine their function in chromosome behavior. We determined that three LOC genes, PDS1, ESP1, and YCS4, are required for sister chromatid separation and three other LOC genes, CSE4, IPL1, and SMT3, are required for chromosome segregation. We isolated alleles of two genes involved in splicing, PRP16 and PRP19, which impair α-tubulin synthesis thus preventing spindle assembly, as well as an allele of CDC7 that is defective in DNA replication. We also report an initial characterization of phenotypes associated with the SMT3/SUMO gene and the isolation of WSS1, a high-copy smt3 suppressor.

scholarly journals Mad2 and BubR1 Function in a Single Checkpoint Pathway that Responds to a Loss of Tension

2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 3706-3719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie B. Shannon ◽  
Julie C. Canman ◽  
E. D. Salmon
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Live Cell Imaging ◽  
Cell Imaging ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Normal Numbers ◽  
Microtubule Attachment ◽  
Checkpoint Pathway ◽  
Chromosome Congression ◽  
Full Complement ◽  
Checkpoint Genes

The spindle checkpoint monitors microtubule attachment and tension at kinetochores to ensure proper chromosome segregation. Previously, PtK1 cells in hypothermic conditions (23°C) were shown to have a pronounced mitotic delay, despite having normal numbers of kinetochore microtubules. At 23°C, we found that PtK1 cells remained in metaphase for an average of 101 min, compared with 21 min for cells at 37°C. The metaphase delay at 23°C was abrogated by injection of Mad2 inhibitors, showing that Mad2 and the spindle checkpoint were responsible for the prolonged metaphase. Live cell imaging showed that kinetochore Mad2 became undetectable soon after chromosome congression. Measurements of the stretch between sister kinetochores at metaphase found a 24% decrease in tension at 23°C, and metaphase kinetochores at 23°C exhibited higher levels of 3F3/2, Bub1, and BubR1 compared with 37°C. Microinjection of anti-BubR1 antibody abolished the metaphase delay at 23°C, indicating that the higher kinetochore levels of BubR1 may contribute to the delay. Disrupting both Mad2 and BubR1 function induced anaphase with the same timing as single inhibitions, suggesting that these checkpoint genes function in the same pathway. We conclude that reduced tension at kinetochores with a full complement of kinetochore microtubules induces a checkpoint dependent metaphase delay associated with elevated amounts of kinetochore 3F3/2, Bub1, and BubR1 labeling.

scholarly journals Control of localization of a spindle checkpoint protein, Mad2, in fission yeast

2002 ◽  
Vol 115 (8) ◽  
pp. 1603-1610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy E. Ikui ◽  
Kanji Furuya ◽  
Mitsuhiro Yanagida ◽  
Tomohiro Matsumoto
Keyword(s):  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Nuclear Membrane ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Nuclear Periphery ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Chromatin Domain ◽  
Checkpoint Protein ◽  
Higher Eukaryotes ◽  
Sister Chromatid Separation

To ensure accurate chromosome segregation, the spindle checkpoint delays the onset of sister chromatid separation when the spindle is not attached to a kinetochore. Mad2, a component of the checkpoint, targets fission yeast Slp1/budding yeast Cdc20/human p55CDC and prevents it from promoting proteolysis, which is a prerequisite to sister chromatid separation. The protein is localized to unattached kinetochores in higher eukaryotes, and it is thought to be required for activation of the checkpoint as well. In this study, Mad2 and its target Slp1 were visualized in a tractable organism,fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. When cells were arrested at a prometaphase-like stage, the Mad2-Slp1 complex was stable and the two proteins were colocalized to unattached kinetochores. When the spindle attachment was completed, the complex was no longer detectable and only Mad2 was found associated to the spindle. These results would suggest that unattached kinetochores provide sites for assembly of the Mad2-Slp1 complex. During interphase, Mad2 was localized to the nuclear periphery as well as to the chromatin domain. This localization was abolished in a yeast strain lacking Mad1, a protein that physically interacts with Mad2. Mad1 may anchor Mad2 to the nuclear membrane and regulate its entry into the nucleus.

scholarly journals Yeast Kinetochores Do Not Stabilize Stu2p-dependent Spindle Microtubule Dynamics

2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 4181-4195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chad G. Pearson ◽  
Paul S. Maddox ◽  
Ted R. Zarzar ◽  
E.D. Salmon ◽  
Kerry Bloom
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Live Cell Imaging ◽  
Cell Imaging ◽  
Regulatory Mechanism ◽  
Metaphase Plate ◽  
Microtubule Dynamics ◽  
Spindle Microtubule ◽  
Microtubule Binding ◽  
Microtubule Stabilization ◽  
Kinetochore Function

The interaction of kinetochores with dynamic microtubules during mitosis is essential for proper centromere motility, congression to the metaphase plate, and subsequent anaphase chromosome segregation. Budding yeast has been critical in the discovery of proteins necessary for this interaction. However, the molecular mechanism for microtubule–kinetochore interactions remains poorly understood. Using live cell imaging and mutations affecting microtubule binding proteins and kinetochore function, we identify a regulatory mechanism for spindle microtubule dynamics involving Stu2p and the core kinetochore component, Ndc10p. Depleting cells of the microtubule binding protein Stu2p reduces kinetochore microtubule dynamics. Centromeres remain under tension but lack motility. Thus, normal microtubule dynamics are not required to maintain tension at the centromere. Loss of the kinetochore (ndc10-1, ndc10-2, and ctf13-30) does not drastically affect spindle microtubule turnover, indicating that Stu2p, not the kinetochore, is the foremost governor of microtubule dynamics. Disruption of kinetochore function with ndc10-1 does not affect the decrease in microtubule turnover in stu2 mutants, suggesting that the kinetochore is not required for microtubule stabilization. Remarkably, a partial kinetochore defect (ndc10-2) suppresses the decreased spindle microtubule turnover in the absence of Stu2p. These results indicate that Stu2p and Ndc10p differentially function in controlling kinetochore microtubule dynamics necessary for centromere movements.

scholarly journals The spindle checkpoint, APC/CCdc20, and APC/CCdh1 play distinct roles in connecting mitosis to S phase

2013 ◽  
Vol 201 (7) ◽  
pp. 1013-1026 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Clijsters ◽  
Janneke Ogink ◽  
Rob Wolthuis
Keyword(s):  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Cyclin B1 ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Animal Cells ◽  
Proliferating Cells ◽  
Cell Cycle Entry ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Mitotic Cyclin ◽  
Bona Fide ◽  
Subsequent Activation

DNA replication depends on a preceding licensing event by Cdt1 and Cdc6. In animal cells, relicensing after S phase but before mitosis is prevented by the Cdt1 inhibitor geminin and mitotic cyclin activity. Here, we show that geminin, like cyclin B1 and securin, is a bona fide target of the spindle checkpoint and APC/CCdc20. Cyclin B1 and geminin are degraded simultaneously during metaphase, which directs Cdt1 accumulation on segregating sister chromatids. Subsequent activation of APC/CCdh1 leads to degradation of Cdc6 well before Cdt1 becomes unstable in a replication-coupled manner. In mitosis, the spindle checkpoint supports Cdt1 accumulation, which promotes S phase onset. We conclude that the spindle checkpoint, APC/CCdc20, and APC/CCdh1 act successively to ensure that the disappearance of licensing inhibitors coincides exactly with a peak of Cdt1 and Cdc6. Whereas cell cycle entry from quiescence requires Cdc6 resynthesis, our results indicate that proliferating cells use a window of time in mitosis, before Cdc6 is degraded, as an earlier opportunity to direct S phase.

scholarly journals The spindle checkpoint protein Mad2 regulates APC/C activity during prometaphase and metaphase of meiosis I in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (16) ◽  
pp. 2848-2861 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dai Tsuchiya ◽  
Claire Gonzalez ◽  
Soni Lacefield
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Meiotic Division ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Meiotic Cell ◽  
Checkpoint Protein ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Meiosis I

In many eukaryotes, disruption of the spindle checkpoint protein Mad2 results in an increase in meiosis I nondisjunction, suggesting that Mad2 has a conserved role in ensuring faithful chromosome segregation in meiosis. To characterize the meiotic function of Mad2, we analyzed individual budding yeast cells undergoing meiosis. We find that Mad2 sets the duration of meiosis I by regulating the activity of APCCdc20. In the absence of Mad2, most cells undergo both meiotic divisions, but securin, a substrate of the APC/C, is degraded prematurely, and prometaphase I/metaphase I is accelerated. Some mad2Δ cells have a misregulation of meiotic cell cycle events and undergo a single aberrant division in which sister chromatids separate. In these cells, both APCCdc20 and APCAma1 are prematurely active, and meiosis I and meiosis II events occur in a single meiotic division. We show that Mad2 indirectly regulates APCAma1 activity by decreasing APCCdc20 activity. We propose that Mad2 is an important meiotic cell cycle regulator that ensures the timely degradation of APC/C substrates and the proper orchestration of the meiotic divisions.

scholarly journals Inefficient degradation of cyclin B1 re-activates the spindle checkpoint right after sister chromatid disjunction

Cell Cycle ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 2370-2378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Clijsters ◽  
Wouter van Zon ◽  
Bas ter Riet ◽  
Erik Voets ◽  
Michiel Boekhout ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Cyclin B1

scholarly journals Reduced Mad2 expression keeps relaxed kinetochores from arresting budding yeast in mitosis

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (14) ◽  
pp. 2448-2457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin L. Barnhart ◽  
Russell K. Dorer ◽  
Andrew W. Murray ◽  
Scott C. Schuyler
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Chromosome Loss ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Diploid Cells ◽  
Antimicrotubule Drugs

Chromosome segregation depends on the spindle checkpoint, which delays anaphase until all chromosomes have bound microtubules and have been placed under tension. The Mad1–Mad2 complex is an essential component of the checkpoint. We studied the consequences of removing one copy of MAD2 in diploid cells of the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Compared to MAD2/MAD2 cells, MAD2/mad2Δ heterozygotes show increased chromosome loss and have different responses to two insults that activate the spindle checkpoint: MAD2/mad2Δ cells respond normally to antimicrotubule drugs but cannot respond to chromosomes that lack tension between sister chromatids. In MAD2/mad2Δ cells with normal sister chromatid cohesion, removing one copy of MAD1 restores the checkpoint and returns chromosome loss to wild-type levels. We conclude that cells need the normal Mad2:Mad1 ratio to respond to chromosomes that are not under tension.

scholarly journals The Cyclin B2/CDK1 Complex Conservatively Inhibits Separase Activity in Oocyte Meiosis II

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Li ◽  
Hong-Yong Zhang ◽  
Feng Wang ◽  
Qing-Yuan Sun ◽  
Wei-Ping Qian
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Homologous Chromosome ◽  
Cyclin B1 ◽  
Mouse Oocyte ◽  
Parthenogenetic Activation ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Oocyte Meiosis ◽  
Meiosis I

Recently, we have reported that the cyclin B2/CDK1 complex regulates homologous chromosome segregation through inhibiting separase activity in oocyte meiosis I, which further elucidates the compensation of cyclin B2 on cyclin B1’s function in meiosis I. However, whether cyclin B2/CDK1 complex also negatively regulates separase activity during oocyte meiosis II remains unknown. In the present study, we investigated the function of cyclin B2 in meiosis II of oocyte. We found that stable cyclin B2 expression impeded segregation of sister chromatids after oocyte parthenogenetic activation. Consistently, stable cyclin B2 inhibited separase activation, while introduction of non-phosphorylatable separase mutant rescued chromatid separation in the stable cyclin B2-expressed oocytes. Therefore, the cyclin B2/CDK1 complex conservatively regulates separase activity via inhibitory phosphorylation of separase in both meiosis I and meiosis II of mouse oocyte.

scholarly journals Anaphase Bridges: Not All Natural Fibers Are Healthy

Genes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 902
Author(s):  
Alice Finardi ◽  
Lucia F. Massari ◽  
Rosella Visintin
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Potential Role ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Natural Fibers ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Anaphase Bridges ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Sister Chromatids

At each round of cell division, the DNA must be correctly duplicated and distributed between the two daughter cells to maintain genome identity. In order to achieve proper chromosome replication and segregation, sister chromatids must be recognized as such and kept together until their separation. This process of cohesion is mainly achieved through proteinaceous linkages of cohesin complexes, which are loaded on the sister chromatids as they are generated during S phase. Cohesion between sister chromatids must be fully removed at anaphase to allow chromosome segregation. Other (non-proteinaceous) sources of cohesion between sister chromatids consist of DNA linkages or sister chromatid intertwines. DNA linkages are a natural consequence of DNA replication, but must be timely resolved before chromosome segregation to avoid the arising of DNA lesions and genome instability, a hallmark of cancer development. As complete resolution of sister chromatid intertwines only occurs during chromosome segregation, it is not clear whether DNA linkages that persist in mitosis are simply an unwanted leftover or whether they have a functional role. In this review, we provide an overview of DNA linkages between sister chromatids, from their origin to their resolution, and we discuss the consequences of a failure in their detection and processing and speculate on their potential role.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document