scholarly journals A Presumptive Developmental Role for a Sea Urchin Cyclin B Splice Variant

1998 ◽  
Vol 140 (2) ◽  
pp. 283-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Claude Lozano ◽  
Philippe Schatt ◽  
François Marquès ◽  
Gérard Peaucellier ◽  
Philippe Fort ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Sea Urchin ◽  
Splice Variant ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Initial Step ◽  
Cyclin B ◽  
Abnormal Development ◽  
Oocyte Meiosis ◽  
Developmental Role ◽  
Variant Protein

We show that a splice variant–derived cyclin B is produced in sea urchin oocytes and embryos. This splice variant protein lacks highly conserved sequences in the COOH terminus of the protein. It is found strikingly abundant in growing oocytes and cells committed to differentiation during embryogenesis. Cyclin B splice variant (CBsv) protein associates weakly in the cell with Xenopus cdc2 and with budding yeast CDC28p. In contrast to classical cyclin B, CBsv very poorly complements a triple CLN deletion in budding yeast, and its microinjection prevents an initial step in MPF activation, leading to an important delay in oocyte meiosis reinitiation. CBsv microinjection in fertilized eggs induces cell cycle delay and abnormal development. We assume that CBsv is produced in growing oocytes to keep them in prophase, and during embryogenesis to slow down cell cycle in cells that will be committed to differentiation.

scholarly journals Cdc14 phosphatase directs centrosome re-duplication at the meiosis I to meiosis II transition in budding yeast

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colette Fox ◽  
Juan Zou ◽  
Juri Rappsilber ◽  
Adele L. Marston
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Spindle Pole Body ◽  
Initial Step ◽  
Mitotic Cell ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Fluorescence And Electron Microscopy ◽  
Meiosis I

Background Gametes are generated through a specialized cell division called meiosis, in which ploidy is reduced by half because two consecutive rounds of chromosome segregation, meiosis I and meiosis II, occur without intervening DNA replication. This contrasts with the mitotic cell cycle where DNA replication and chromosome segregation alternate to maintain the same ploidy. At the end of mitosis, CDKs are inactivated. This low CDK state in late mitosis/G1 allows for critical preparatory events for DNA replication and centrosome/spindle pole body (SPB) duplication. However, their execution is inhibited until S phase, where further preparatory events are also prevented. This “licensing” ensures that both the chromosomes and the centrosomes/SPBs replicate exactly once per cell cycle, thereby maintaining constant ploidy. Crucially, between meiosis I and meiosis II, centrosomes/SPBs must be re-licensed, but DNA re-replication must be avoided. In budding yeast, the Cdc14 protein phosphatase triggers CDK down regulation to promote exit from mitosis. Cdc14 also regulates the meiosis I to meiosis II transition, though its mode of action has remained unclear. Methods Fluorescence and electron microscopy was combined with proteomics to probe SPB duplication in cells with inactive or hyperactive Cdc14. Results We demonstrate that Cdc14 ensures two successive nuclear divisions by re-licensing SPBs at the meiosis I to meiosis II transition. We show that Cdc14 is asymmetrically enriched on a single SPB during anaphase I and provide evidence that this enrichment promotes SPB re-duplication. Cells with impaired Cdc14 activity fail to promote extension of the SPB half-bridge, the initial step in morphogenesis of a new SPB. Conversely, cells with hyper-active Cdc14 duplicate SPBs, but fail to induce their separation. Conclusion Our findings implicate reversal of key CDK-dependent phosphorylations in the differential licensing of cyclical events at the meiosis I to meiosis I transition.

scholarly journals The Coordination of Centrosome Reproduction with Nuclear Events of the Cell Cycle in the Sea Urchin Zygote

1998 ◽  
Vol 140 (6) ◽  
pp. 1417-1426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward H. Hinchcliffe ◽  
Grizzel O. Cassels ◽  
Conly L. Rieder ◽  
Greenfield Sluder
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Sea Urchin ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cyclin B ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Phase Arrest ◽  
Stage Specificity ◽  
S Phase Arrest ◽  
Nuclear Events ◽  
Block Protein Synthesis

Centrosomes repeatedly reproduce in sea urchin zygotes arrested in S phase, whether cyclin-dependent kinase 1–cyclin B (Cdk1-B) activity remains at prefertilization levels or rises to mitotic values. In contrast, when zygotes are arrested in mitosis using cyclin B Δ-90, anaphase occurs at the normal time, yet centrosomes do not reproduce. Together, these results reveal the cell cycle stage specificity for centrosome reproduction and demonstrate that neither the level nor the cycling of Cdk1-B activity coordinate centrosome reproduction with nuclear events. In addition, the proteolytic events of the metaphase–anaphase transition do not control when centrosomes duplicate. When we block protein synthesis at first prophase, the zygotes divide and arrest before second S phase. Both blastomeres contain just two complete centrosomes, which indicates that the cytoplasmic conditions between mitosis and S phase support centrosome reproduction. However, the fact that these daughter centrosomes do not reproduce again under such supportive conditions suggests that they are lacking a component required for reproduction. The repeated reproduction of centrosomes during S phase arrest points to the existence of a necessary “licensing” event that restores this component to daughter centrosomes during S phase, preparing them to reproduce in the next cell cycle.

scholarly journals Members of the NAP/SET family of proteins interact specifically with B-type cyclins.

1995 ◽  
Vol 130 (3) ◽  
pp. 661-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
D R Kellogg ◽  
A Kikuchi ◽  
T Fujii-Nakata ◽  
C W Turck ◽  
A W Murray
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Fusion Protein ◽  
Affinity Chromatography ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Cyclin A ◽  
Xenopus Embryo ◽  
Catalytic Subunit ◽  
Cyclin B ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Do So

Cyclin-dependent kinase complexes that contain the same catalytic subunit are able to induce different events at different times during the cell cycle, but the mechanisms by which they do so remain largely unknown. To address this problem, we have used affinity chromatography to identify proteins that bind specifically to mitotic cyclins, with the goal of finding proteins that interact with mitotic cyclins to carry out the events of mitosis. This approach has led to the identification of a 60-kD protein called NAP1 that interacts specifically with members of the cyclin B family. This interaction has been highly conserved during evolution: NAP1 in the Xenopus embryo interacts with cyclins B1 and B2, but not with cyclin A, and the S. cerevisiae homolog of NAP1 interacts with Clb2 but not with Clb3. Genetic experiments in budding yeast indicate that NAP1 plays an important role in the function of Clb2, while biochemical experiments demonstrate that purified NAP1 can be phosphorylated by cyclin B/p34cdc2 kinase complexes, but not by cyclin A/p34cdc2 kinase complexes. These results suggest that NAP1 is a protein involved in the specific functions of cyclin B/p34cdc2 kinase complexes. In addition to NAP1, we found a 43-kD protein in Xenopus that is homologous to NAP1 and also interacts specifically with B-type cyclins. This protein is the Xenopus homolog of the human SET protein, which was previously identified as part of a putative oncogenic fusion protein (Von Lindern et al., 1992).

scholarly journals Cdc14 phosphatase directs centrosome re-duplication at the meiosis I to meiosis II transition in budding yeast

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colette Fox ◽  
Juan Zou ◽  
Juri Rappsilber ◽  
Adele L. Marston
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Spindle Pole Body ◽  
Initial Step ◽  
Mitotic Cell ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Fluorescence And Electron Microscopy ◽  
Meiosis I

Background: Gametes are generated through a specialized cell division called meiosis, in which ploidy is reduced by half because two consecutive rounds of chromosome segregation, meiosis I and meiosis II, occur without intervening DNA replication. This contrasts with the mitotic cell cycle where DNA replication and chromosome segregation alternate to maintain the same ploidy. At the end of mitosis, cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) are inactivated. This low CDK state in late mitosis/G1 allows for critical preparatory events for DNA replication and centrosome/spindle pole body (SPB) duplication. However, their execution is inhibited until S phase, where further preparatory events are also prevented. This “licensing” ensures that both the chromosomes and the centrosomes/SPBs replicate exactly once per cell cycle, thereby maintaining constant ploidy. Crucially, between meiosis I and meiosis II, centrosomes/SPBs must be re-licensed, but DNA re-replication must be avoided. In budding yeast, the Cdc14 protein phosphatase triggers CDK down regulation to promote exit from mitosis. Cdc14 also regulates the meiosis I to meiosis II transition, though its mode of action has remained unclear. Methods: Fluorescence and electron microscopy was combined with proteomics to probe SPB duplication in cells with inactive or hyperactive Cdc14. Results: We demonstrate that Cdc14 ensures two successive nuclear divisions by re-licensing SPBs at the meiosis I to meiosis II transition. We show that Cdc14 is asymmetrically enriched on a single SPB during anaphase I and provide evidence that this enrichment promotes SPB re-duplication. Cells with impaired Cdc14 activity fail to promote extension of the SPB half-bridge, the initial step in morphogenesis of a new SPB. Conversely, cells with hyper-active Cdc14 duplicate SPBs, but fail to induce their separation. Conclusion: Our findings implicate reversal of key CDK-dependent phosphorylations in the differential licensing of cyclical events at the meiosis I to meiosis II transition.

scholarly journals Budding yeast relies on G1 cyclin specificity to couple cell cycle progression with morphogenetic development

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (23) ◽  
pp. eabg0007
Author(s):  
Deniz Pirincci Ercan ◽  
Florine Chrétien ◽  
Probir Chakravarty ◽  
Helen R. Flynn ◽  
Ambrosius P. Snijders ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Quantitative Model ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Model Cell ◽  
Mitotic Cyclin ◽  
Substrate Phosphorylation ◽  
The Cost

Two models have been put forward for cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk) control of the cell cycle. In the qualitative model, cell cycle events are ordered by distinct substrate specificities of successive cyclin waves. Alternatively, in the quantitative model, the gradual rise of Cdk activity from G1 phase to mitosis leads to ordered substrate phosphorylation at sequential thresholds. Here, we study the relative contributions of qualitative and quantitative Cdk control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. All S phase and mitotic cyclins can be replaced by a single mitotic cyclin, albeit at the cost of reduced fitness. A single cyclin can also replace all G1 cyclins to support ordered cell cycle progression, fulfilling key predictions of the quantitative model. However, single-cyclin cells fail to polarize or grow buds and thus cannot survive. Our results suggest that budding yeast has become dependent on G1 cyclin specificity to couple cell cycle progression to essential morphogenetic events.

scholarly journals Systems Level Modeling of the Cell Cycle Using Budding Yeast

2007 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 117693510700300 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.P. Ingalls ◽  
B.P. Duncker ◽  
D.R. Kim ◽  
B.J. McConkey
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Human Cancer ◽  
Quality Data ◽  
Cell Cycle Gene ◽  
Mathematical Framework ◽  
Gene Transcript ◽  
Proteomics Data ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Protein Levels

Proteins involved in the regulation of the cell cycle are highly conserved across all eukaryotes, and so a relatively simple eukaryote such as yeast can provide insight into a variety of cell cycle perturbations including those that occur in human cancer. To date, the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has provided the largest amount of experimental and modeling data on the progression of the cell cycle, making it a logical choice for in-depth studies of this process. Moreover, the advent of methods for collection of high-throughput genome, transcriptome, and proteome data has provided a means to collect and precisely quantify simultaneous cell cycle gene transcript and protein levels, permitting modeling of the cell cycle on the systems level. With the appropriate mathematical framework and sufficient and accurate data on cell cycle components, it should be possible to create a model of the cell cycle that not only effectively describes its operation, but can also predict responses to perturbations such as variation in protein levels and responses to external stimuli including targeted inhibition by drugs. In this review, we summarize existing data on the yeast cell cycle, proteomics technologies for quantifying cell cycle proteins, and the mathematical frameworks that can integrate this data into representative and effective models. Systems level modeling of the cell cycle will require the integration of high-quality data with the appropriate mathematical framework, which can currently be attained through the combination of dynamic modeling based on proteomics data and using yeast as a model organism.

scholarly journals Far3 and Five Interacting Proteins Prevent Premature Recovery from Pheromone Arrest in the Budding Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 1750-1763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilary A. Kemp ◽  
George F. Sprague,
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Open Reading Frames ◽  
Velocity Sedimentation ◽  
Interacting Proteins ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Mutant Cells ◽  
Two Hybrid ◽  
Reading Frames

ABSTRACT In budding yeast, diffusible mating pheromones initiate a signaling pathway that culminates in several responses, including cell cycle arrest. Only a handful of genes required for the interface between pheromone response and the cell cycle have been identified, among them FAR1 and FAR3; of these, only FAR1 has been extensively characterized. In an effort to learn about the mechanism by which Far3 acts, we used the two-hybrid method to identify interacting proteins. We identified five previously uncharacterized open reading frames, dubbed FAR7, FAR8, FAR9, FAR10, and FAR11, that cause a far3-like pheromone arrest defect when disrupted. Using two-hybrid and coimmunoprecipitation analysis, we found that all six Far proteins interact with each other. Moreover, velocity sedimentation experiments suggest that Far3 and Far7 to Far11 form a complex. The phenotype of a sextuple far3far7-far11 mutant is no more severe than any single mutant. Thus, FAR3 and FAR7 to FAR11 all participate in the same pathway leading to G1 arrest. These mutants initially arrest in response to pheromone but resume budding after 10 h. Under these conditions, wild-type cells fail to resume budding even after several days whereas far1 mutant cells resume budding within 1 h. We conclude that the FAR3-dependent arrest pathway is functionally distinct from that which employs FAR1.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document