The Measurement of Verbal Working Memory Capacity and Its Relation to Reading Comprehension

1996 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gloria S. Waters ◽  
David Caplan
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Sentence Processing ◽  
Digit Span ◽  
Verbal Working Memory ◽  
Span Task ◽  
Word Recall ◽  
Reading Span ◽  
Visual Spatial ◽  
Span Tasks

Ninety-four subjects were tested on the Daneman and Carpenter (1980) reading span task, four versions of a related sentence span task in which reaction times and accuracy on sentence processing were measured along with sentence-final word recall, two number generation tasks designed to test working memory, digit span, and two shape-generation tasks designed to measure visual-spatial working memory. Forty-four subjects were retested on a subset of these measures at a 3-month interval. All subjects were tested on standard vocabulary and reading tests. Correlational analyses showed better internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the sentence span tasks than of the Daneman-Carpenter reading span task. Factor analysis showed no factor that could be related to a central verbal working memory; rotated factors suggested groupings of tests into factors that correspond to digit related tasks, spatial tasks, sentence processing in sentence span tasks, and recall in sentence span tasks. Correlational analyses and regression analyses showed that the sentence processing component of the sentence span tasks was the best predictor of performance on the reading test, with a small independent contribution of the recall component. The results suggest that sentence span tasks are unreliable unless measurements are made of both their sentence processing and recall components, and that the predictive value of these tasks for reading comprehension abilities lies in the overlap of operations rather than in limitations in verbal working memory that apply to both.

A meta-analysis of the relationship between working memory and second language reading comprehension: Does task type matter?

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 873-900
Author(s):  
Jihye Shin
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Second Language ◽  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Quantitative Description ◽  
Span Task ◽  
Word Recall ◽  
Reading Span ◽  
L2 Reading ◽  
L2 Reading Comprehension

AbstractDespite the increasing attention paid to the role of working memory in reading, findings and measurement of working memory have been inconsistent. The current meta-analysis aims to provide a quantitative description of the overall relationship between second language (L2) reading comprehension and working memory measured through reading span task and identify methodological features that moderate this relationship. Following a comprehensive search, 25 primary studies (23 peer-reviewed studies and 2 dissertations) were included comprising 37 unique samples (N = 2,682), all of which were coded for substantive and methodological features. The results showed that (a) there is a moderate relationship between L2 reading comprehension and working memory (r = .30), (b) reading span task features such as the scoring procedure, task language, and final word recall order moderate this relationship, and (c) the degree to which working memory’s involvement in L2 reading comprehension may vary depending on the type of reading tasks at hand. Implications are discussed in terms of conceptualization and measurement of working memory. Future directions are also offered in relation to measurement practices to encourage consistency and to improve our understanding of the link between working memory and L2 reading comprehension.

scholarly journals Measuring verbal working memory capacity: A reading span task for laboratory and web-based use

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jana Klaus ◽  
Herbert Schriefers
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Recall Performance ◽  
Working Memory Capacity ◽  
Verbal Working Memory ◽  
Span Task ◽  
Reading Span ◽  
Complex Span ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Extreme Groups ◽  
Span Tasks

Typically, working memory (WM) capacity as a source of individual differences is assessed by complex span tasks which combine a processing and a storage task. However, there are no standardized open-source versions, and the tasks that are used are not easily comparable. We introduce a browser-based version of the reading span task, which yielded normally distributed recall performance scores. Next, we provide a within-participant comparison of this task to two other complex span tasks. Finally, we introduce a web-based version of the reading span task. WM scores were comparable to those obtained in the laboratory, but web participants were also faster and made more mistakes in the processing task. We conclude that the task introduced here is an adequate way to measure verbal WM capacity in the laboratory. In addition, it may prove to be a useful, time-efficient online tool, for instance to extract extreme groups from a larger sample.

Stimulus similarity decrements in children's working memory span

2005 ◽  
Vol 58 (8) ◽  
pp. 1434-1446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliet A. Conlin ◽  
Susan E. Gathercole ◽  
John W. Adams
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Memory Span ◽  
Response Competition ◽  
Span Task ◽  
Word Recall ◽  
Stimulus Category ◽  
Processing Task ◽  
Operation Span ◽  
Span Tasks ◽  
The Impact

Two experiments investigated the impact of the relationship between processing and storage stimuli on the working memory span task performance of children aged 7 and 9 years of age. In Experiment 1, two types of span task were administered (sentence span and operation span), and participants were required to recall either the products of the processing task (sentence-final word, arithmetic total) or a word or digit unrelated to the processing task. Experiment 2 contrasted sentence span and operation span combined with storage of either words or digits, in tasks in which the item to be remembered was not a direct product of the processing task in either condition. In both experiments, memory span was significantly greater when the items to be recalled belonged to a different stimulus category from the material that was processed, so that in sentence span tasks, number recall was superior to word recall, and in operation span tasks, word recall was superior to number recall. Explanations of these findings in terms of similarity-based interference and response competition in working memory are discussed.

Performance-Evaluation Threat Does Not Adversely Affect Verbal Working Memory in High Test-Anxious Persons

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 120-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
David W. Putwain ◽  
Jawad Shah ◽  
Rebecca Lewis
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Effortful Control ◽  
Digit Span ◽  
Working Memory Capacity ◽  
Verbal Working Memory ◽  
Memory Capacity ◽  
Span Task ◽  
High Threat ◽  
High Test

In two studies, we set out to examine whether the verbal working memory of high and low test-anxious students differed under performance-evaluative threat. In Study 1, 84 schoolchildren completed a backward digit span task under threat or no-threat conditions. In Study 2, 71 schoolchildren completed a backward digit span task in both threat and no-threat conditions. Results showed that the verbal working memory capacity of highly test-anxious students in Study 1 did not change under low or high threat conditions. In Study 2, the verbal working memory capacity of highly test-anxious students decreased under performance-evaluative threat when this condition was taken first but increased when this condition was taken second. To account for the effects of performance-evaluative threat, it is necessary to consider how increased effortful control may compensate for anxiety-induced reduced efficiency when tasks are not timed.

Aspects of working memory in L2 learning

2011 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Juffs ◽  
Michael Harrington
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Sentence Processing ◽  
Digit Span ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Instructional Interventions ◽  
L2 Acquisition ◽  
Lexical Development ◽  
L2 Learning ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Span Tasks

This article reviews research on working memory (WM) and its use in second language (L2) acquisition research. Recent developments in the model and issues surrounding the operationalization of the construct itself are presented, followed by a discussion of various methods of measuring WM. These methods include word and digit span tasks, reading, listening and speaking span tasks. We next outline the role proposed for WM in explaining individual differences in L2 learning processes and outcomes, including sentence processing, reading, speaking, lexical development and general proficiency. Key findings are that WM is not a unitary construct and that its role varies depending on the age of the L2 learners, the task and the linguistic domain. Some tests of WM may in fact be tests of differences in ability to attend to aspects of the L2. Future research will focus on matching tests of WM more closely with linguistic tasks and using more standardized, replicable measures of WM in new areas including writing in non-alphabetic scripts, instructional interventions and cognitive neuropsychology.

scholarly journals Comparation and validation of reading span tasks

Psihologija ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dejan Lalovic ◽  
Dusan Vejnovic
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Predictive Validity ◽  
Memory Span ◽  
Verbal Ability ◽  
Verbal Working Memory ◽  
Second Step ◽  
Reading Span ◽  
Memory Efficiency ◽  
Span Tasks

The aim of the present study was to compare two most widely employed versions of the reading span task in Serbian speaking population, with respect to the procedure and validity. First step was to compare psychometric properties of several measures of reading span, derived from each task version. Second step was to compare predictive validity of memory span and processing measures, for each task version. Two task versions proved to be parallel, with small discrepanciens, providing reliable and discriminative measures. The only exception was traditional reading span measure, which has not met any of psychometric standards. Therefore, we propose this measure to be abandoned. While processing measures showed better predictive validity with respect to criteria of verbal ability and reading comprehension, reading span measures independently contributed to prediction of the same criteria with only one exception. Results obtained suggest a small modifications of reading span tasks required in order to improve their psychometric properties. They also suggest combining processing and span measures might yield a better verbal working memory efficiency estimate.

The role of working memory capacityin interpreting performance

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Munjung Bae ◽  
Cheol Ja Jeong
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Span Task ◽  
Reading Span ◽  
Simultaneous Interpreting ◽  
Operation Span ◽  
English Reading ◽  
Korean And English ◽  
Span Tasks

Abstract This study aims to examine the relationship between working memory (WM) capacity and the performance of student interpreters defined as the quality of their interpreting output. To measure WM capacity, we administered Korean and English reading span tasks, and an operation span task. The WM scores were analysed for correlation with simultaneous interpreting (SI) and consecutive interpreting (CI) scores. The results were mixed: (1) the CI score showed no correlation with any of the WM span tasks and (2) the SI score correlated with only one WM span task, the operation span task. Given that the participants received shorter training in SI than in CI, we can tentatively conclude that interpreting performance is influenced more by WM capacity when the interpreter performs a less familiar type of interpreting. Further research is needed to find out why the reading span tasks and the operation span task showed different relationships with SI.

scholarly journals Assessment of Verbal and Visuospatial Performance Predicting Cognitive Impairment in a Monolingual, Spanish-Speaking Sample

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 1245-1245
Author(s):  
L Castillo ◽  
K Campos ◽  
J R Soble
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Cognitive Abilities ◽  
Digit Span ◽  
Memory Performance ◽  
Verbal Working Memory ◽  
Spatial Span ◽  
Spanish Speaking ◽  
Span Tasks ◽  
Neuropsychological Evaluations

Abstract Objective The Batería Neuropsicológica en Español (BNE) – Digit Span (DS) and Spatial Span (SS) subtests are popular instruments used to measure the capacity of verbal and visuospatial attention/working memory. Although deficits in working memory performance have been found in cases of mild cognitive impairment and dementia in analogous versions of these tasks among English speakers, very few studies have assessed the ability of verbal and visuospatial span tasks to identify impairment within a mono-lingual Spanish-speaking population. This study investigated the clinical utility of the BNE verbal and visuospatial span tasks for discriminating those with and without cognitive impairment in a Spanish-speaking Hispanic population. Participants and Method Participants were 46 monolingual, Spanish-speaking Hispanics, 28 women (60.9%) and 18 (39.1%) men (M age = 63.41 (SD = 14.54); M education = 8.41 (SD = 4.39), referred for neuropsychological evaluations, which included the BNE-DS/SS. Three patients with invalid performances were excluded. Of the remaining 46, 17 were cognitively intact following evaluation, whereas 29 met criteria for a neurocognitive disorder. Results Logistic regression analysis revealed that although DS backward model was significant, both DS forward age/education-corrected T- scores (p = .878) and DS backward (p = .67), were not significant predictors of cognitive impairment. In contrast, both SS forward (p = .002) and backward (p = .022) were significant predictors of impairment status with respective classification accuracies of 63% and 76.1%. Conclusions Findings suggest better performance on visuospatial working memory (SS) is associated with generally intact cognitive abilities and decreased odds of cognitive impairment in a sample of monolingual Spanish-Speaking Hispanics; whereas verbal working memory (DS) findings were less robust.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document