A research group model for graduate training in counselling

2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis V. Paradise ◽  
Roxane L. Dufrene
2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gili Marbach-Ad ◽  
Volker Briken ◽  
Kenneth Frauwirth ◽  
Lian-Yong Gao ◽  
Steven W. Hutcheson ◽  
...  

As research faculty with expertise in the area of host–pathogen interactions (HPI), we used a research group model to effect our professional development as scientific educators. We have established a working hypothesis: The implementation of a curriculum that forms bridges between our seven HPI courses allows our students to achieve deep and meaningful learning of HPI concepts. Working collaboratively, we identified common learning goals, and we chose two microorganisms to serve as anchors for student learning. We instituted variations of published active-learning methods to engage students in research-oriented learning. In parallel, we are developing an assessment tool. The value of this work is in the development of a teaching model that successfully allowed faculty who already work collaboratively in the research area of HPI to apply a “research group approach” to further scientific teaching initiatives at a research university. We achieved results that could not be accomplished by even the most dedicated instructor working in isolation.


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maura Borrego ◽  
David B. Knight ◽  
Nathan Hyungsok Choe

Purpose The purpose of this study is to better understand the nature of graduate training experiences in research groups and to identify factors that may lead to increased student retention and success. Design/methodology/approach Surveys administered at four US universities resulted in quantitative responses from 130 Master’s and 702 doctoral engineering students participating in graduate research groups. Missing data were imputed, and responses were weighted by gender, discipline, degree program and nationality. Exploratory factor analysis identified four factors describing research group experiences. Regression models were built for two outcomes: satisfaction with research group experience and intention to complete degree. Control variables included gender, discipline, degree program, nationality, year in program and institution. Findings Fifty-five per cent of the variance in satisfaction was described by a model including agency, support, international diversity and group climate. Sixty-five per cent of variance in intent to complete was described by a model comprising international diversity, agency and support. Several control variables were significant. Originality/value Agency and support in particular were the most influential predictors of both satisfaction and intention, suggesting that future efforts should emphasize stable funding, clear expectations, access to mentors and agency-building experiences to help students take an active role in their own success.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document