scholarly journals Mapping Meaning: Critical Cartographies for Participatory Water Management in Taita Hills, Kenya

2016 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 383-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Hohenthal ◽  
Paola Minoia ◽  
Petri Pellikka
Keyword(s):  
Water Management ◽  
Taita Hills ◽  
Participatory Water Management

Participatory water management at the main canal: A case from South Ferghana canal in Uzbekistan

2009 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 317-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iskandar Abdullaev ◽  
Jusipbek Kazbekov ◽  
Hearth Manthritilake ◽  
Kahramon Jumaboev
Keyword(s):  
Water Management ◽  
Participatory Water Management ◽  
Main Canal

scholarly journals Co-engineering Participatory Water Management Processes: Theory and Insights from Australian and Bulgarian Interventions

2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine A. Daniell ◽  
Ian White ◽  
Nils Ferrand ◽  
Irina S. Ribarova ◽  
Peter Coad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Management ◽  
Management Processes ◽  
Participatory Water Management

Defining goals in participatory water management: merging local visions and expert judgements

2011 ◽  
Vol 54 (7) ◽  
pp. 909-935 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna C. Jonsson ◽  
Lotta Andersson ◽  
Johanna Alkan Olsson ◽  
Madelaine Johansson
Keyword(s):  
Water Management ◽  
Participatory Water Management

scholarly journals Assessing the societal adoptability of participatory water management: an application of the Motivation and Ability (MOTA) framework

Water Policy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Md Shibly Sadik ◽  
Leon M. Hermans ◽  
Jaap Evers ◽  
Hong Quan Nguyen ◽  
Malik Fida A. Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Management ◽  
Mekong Delta ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Flood Management ◽  
Essential Elements ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Plan Implementation ◽  
Structural Measures ◽  
Participatory Water Management ◽  
Development Trajectories

Abstract Exploring whether society is sufficiently equipped and motivated to adopt planned interventions is vital for modern plan development trajectories. The Motivation and Ability (MOTA) framework offers a tool to assess the societal adoptability of plans by exploring stakeholders' motivations and abilities. It was originally developed to assess plan implementation feasibility for structural measures of flood management in the Mekong Delta. Further development is necessary before applying the tool in other contexts and for other types of planning interventions. Institutional measures like participatory water management (PWM) have long been recognized as essential elements for water management, but have so far also remained out of the reach of conventional planning assessment tools such as cost–benefit or cost-effectiveness analyses. This research, therefore, aims at extending the MOTA tool in the context of PWM reforms in Bangladesh. It does this by, first, further detailing the MOTA components and identifying indicators for quantification and, second, an expert validation and application of this framework for coastal communities in Bangladesh. Our results suggest that the MOTA framework is capable of informing policymakers and implementing agencies about how to enhance the stakeholders' motivation and ability to ensure an enduring implementation of PWM reforms. HIGHLIGHTS The Motivation and Ability (MOTA) framework appeared recently to capture the societal and institutional dimensions in assessing the implementation feasibility of structural measures. This research further extends the MOTA framework and tests whether this can be applicable in case of assessing the implementation feasibility of soft measures like participatory water management.

Getting things done: bureaucratic and entrepreneurial approaches to the practice of participatory water management reforms in Brazil and India

Water Policy ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (S1) ◽  
pp. 84-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunil Tankha ◽  
Boyd Fuller
Keyword(s):  
Water Management ◽  
Capacity Building ◽  
Stakeholder Participation ◽  
Supply And Demand ◽  
Water Sector ◽  
Administrative Reforms ◽  
Field Investigations ◽  
Participatory Water Management

Based on field investigations of initiatives to increase stakeholder participation in water management in Brazil and India, this paper provides insights into the practice of water sector reforms. Looking at the pace of reforms across both countries, we find that the process of creating institutions to facilitate stakeholder participation is proceeding rapidly but greater attention is required on administrative reforms and capacity building. We find that the supply and demand of participation opportunities is often mismatched, and that participation reforms in the water sector may follow two very different paths: the bureaucratic and the entrepreneurial.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document