A planning tool for integrating crop choices with weed management in the Northern Great Plains

Randy L. Anderson

doi:10.1079/rafs200357

Planting Date and Preplant Weed Management Influence Yield, Water Use, and Weed Seed Production in Herbicide-Free Forage Barley

Weed Technology ◽

10.1614/wt-08-009.1 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 22 (3) ◽

pp. 486-492 ◽

Cited By ~ 14

Author(s):

Andrew W. Lenssen

Keyword(s):

Seed Production ◽

Water Use ◽

Great Plains ◽

Weed Management ◽

Planting Date ◽

Management Systems ◽

Northern Great Plains ◽

Zero Tillage ◽

Weed Seed ◽

Early Planting

In the semiarid northern Great Plains, the adoption of zero tillage improves soil water conservation, allowing for increased crop intensification and diversification. Zero-tillage crop production relies heavily on herbicides for weed management, particularly the herbicide glyphosate, increasing selection pressure for herbicide-resistant weeds. Barley is well adapted to the northern Great Plains, and may be a suitable herbicide-free forage crop in zero-tillage systems. A 2-yr field study was conducted to determine if planting date influenced crop and weed biomass, water use (WU), and water-use efficiency (WUE) of barley and weed seed production in three preplant weed management systems: (1) conventional preplant tillage with a field cultivator (TILL); (2) zero tillage with preemergence glyphosate application (ZTPRE); and (3) zero tillage without preemergence glyphosate (ZT). None of the systems included an in-crop herbicide. Planting dates were mid-April (early), late May (mid), and mid-June (delayed). Early planting of ZT barley resulted in excellent forage yields (7,228 kg/ha), similar to those from TILL and ZTPRE. Early planting resulted in a small accumulation of weed biomass, averaging 76 kg/ha, and no weed seed production regardless of preplant weed management system. Early planting resulted in higher WU than delayed planting, averaging 289 and 221 mm, respectively, across management systems and years. The WUE of crop and total biomass did not differ among preplant weed management systems at harvest from the early planting date. Delayed planting resulted in decreased forage yield with high amounts of weed biomass and seed production, especially in ZT. A pre-emergence glyphosate application was not necessary for early-planted ZT forage barley. Early planting of herbicide-free barley for forage can be an excellent addition to northern Great Plains cropping systems as part of a multitactic approach for improved weed and water management.

Download Full-text

Cultural weed management practices shorten the critical weed-free period for soybean grown in the Northern Great Plains

Weed Science ◽

10.1017/wsc.2019.60 ◽

2019 ◽

pp. 1-13

Author(s):

Jonathan D. Rosset ◽

Robert H. Gulden

Keyword(s):

Great Plains ◽

Weed Management ◽

Competitive Ability ◽

Management Practices ◽

Developmental Stages ◽

Cultural Practices ◽

Northern Great Plains ◽

Herbicide Resistant ◽

Soybean Cultivars ◽

Rotational Crop

Abstract Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] has recently become a popular rotational crop in the Canadian Northern Great Plains where herbicide-resistant (HR) soybean cultivars have been widely adopted. Intense reliance on herbicides has contributed to the development of HR weeds in soybean and other crops. Cultural weed management practices reduce the need for herbicides and lower the selection pressure for HR weed biotypes by improving the competitiveness of the crop. The effects of two row spacings, three target densities, and three cultivars on the critical weed-free period (CWFP) in soybean were evaluated as three separate experiments in southern Manitoba. In the row-spacing experiment, soybean grown in narrow rows shortened the CWFP by up to three soybean developmental stages at site-years with increased weed pressure. In the target density experiment, low-density soybean stands lengthened the CWFP by one soybean developmental stage compared with higher-density soybean stands. The effect of soybean cultivar varied among locations, yet tended to be consistent within location over the 2-yr study, suggesting that competitive ability in these soybean cultivars was linked to edaphic and/or environmental factors. Generally, the cultivar with the shortest days to maturity, which also had the shortest stature, consistently had a longer CWFP. Each of these cultural practices were effective at reducing the need for in-crop herbicide applications.

Download Full-text

Variable response of kochia [Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad.] to auxinic herbicides dicamba and fluroxypyr in Montana

Canadian Journal of Plant Science ◽

10.4141/cjps-2015-019 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 95 (5) ◽

pp. 965-972 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Prashant Jha ◽

Vipan Kumar ◽

Charlemagne A. Lim

Keyword(s):

Great Plains ◽

Dose Response ◽

Weed Management ◽

Dry Weight ◽

Northern Great Plains ◽

Variable Response ◽

Kochia Scoparia ◽

Management Tools ◽

Herbicide Resistant ◽

Shoot Dry Weight

Jha, P., Kumar, V. and Lim, C. A. 2015. Variable response of kochia [Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad.] to auxinic herbicides dicamba and fluroxypyr in Montana. Can. J. Plant Sci. 95: 965–972. Herbicide-resistant kochia is an increasing concern for growers in the Northern Great Plains of United States and Canada. The objective of the research was to characterize the response of the three putative auxinic herbicide-resistant kochia inbreds (derived from accessions collected from wheat/chemical fallow fields in northern Montana) to dicamba and fluroxypyr relative to a susceptible (SUS) inbred. A dicamba dose-response study indicated that the three putative resistant inbreds (Chot-01, Chot-02, and Chot-03) had R/S ratios of 1.3 to 6.1 based on the visible control response (I50 values), and R/S ratios of 1.5 to 6.8 based on the shoot dry weight response (GR50 values). Dose-response experiments with fluroxypyr determined I50 R/S ratios of 1.4 to 5.7 and GR50 R/S ratios of 1.6 to 4.0 for the three putative resistant inbreds. The selected inbreds showed variable symptomology (phenotype) in response to dicamba and fluroxypyr. Among the three inbreds, Chot-01 exhibited the least epinasty, stem curling/swelling, and chlorosis/necrosis symptoms, and was resistant to dicamba and fluroxypyr. Growers should diversify their weed management tools to manage further spread of auxinic or multiple herbicide-resistant kochia in the region.

Download Full-text

Contribution of Nitrogen Fertilizer Placement to Weed Management in Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Weed Technology ◽

10.1017/s0890037x00044225 ◽

1998 ◽

Vol 12 (3) ◽

pp. 507-514 ◽

Cited By ~ 42

Author(s):

Kenneth J. Kirkland ◽

Hugh J. Beckie

Keyword(s):

Great Plains ◽

Weed Management ◽

N Uptake ◽

Growing Season ◽

Conventional Tillage ◽

Northern Great Plains ◽

Fertilizer Placement ◽

No Till ◽

Tillage System ◽

Weed Emergence

The contribution of nitrogen (N) fertilizer placement to management of annual weeds in spring wheat grown under two tillage systems was examined at sites located in three ecoregions of the northern Great Plains from 1994 to 1996. The effect of three different fertilizer placements on narrowleaf and broadleaf weed emergence, growth, and N uptake were determined in a no-till and a conventional tillage system. Fertilizer was broadcast, subsurface-banded in the spring prior to seeding, or side-banded at the time of seeding. Tillage system generally did not influence weed and crop response to fertilizer placement. Broadcast-applied fertilizer was more effective than banded fertilizer in promoting wild oat and broadleaf weed emergence and growth over the growing season. Weed densities, biomass, and N uptake measured early in the growing season averaged 20 to 40% less, and grain yield of wheat at maturity averaged 12% higher where fertilizer was side-banded compared to broadcast. In contrast, the addition of fertilizer, regardless of placement, was detrimental to green foxtail because of enhanced crop competitiveness. Banding fertilizer at recommended rates can be an effective cultural practice for managing weeds in no-till and conventional tillage wheat-cropping systems in semiarid to subhumid regions of the northern Great Plains, but it is not reliable when used as the sole method of weed management.

Download Full-text