Peronospora arborescens. [Descriptions of Fungi and Bacteria].
Abstract A description is provided for Peronospora arborescens. Information is included on the disease caused by the organism, its transmission, geographical distribution, and hosts. HOSTS: Papaver alpinum, P. dubium, P. caucasicum, P. nudicaule, P. rhoeas, P. somniferum, P. setigerum, Meconopsis spp. DISEASE: Downy mildew of the opium poppy, Papaver somniferum. Seedlings if attacked usually succumb. In older plants the infection may be systemic with all parts of the plant, including the growing point, affected. In Berkeley's original diagnosis of the pathogen on P. rhoeas he described infected plants as 'having a peculiar aspect by which they may be known at a distance'. The leaves appear greenish-yellow, thickened and deformed. Conidiophores develop as a greyish violet felt on the lower surface of the leaves and in severe attacks appear on the stems, buds and capsules. Local secondary infections also occur usually on the lower leaves and here the pathogen forms rather angular chlorotic blotches on the upper leaf surface. These are often associated with the larger veins. GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION: Africa (Algeria, Egypt); Asia (Afghanistan, Azerbaijan (USSR), India, Iran, Japan, Turkey, Pakistan); Australasia (Australia); Europe (widespread); S. America (Argentina). TRANSMISSION: Authors agree that diseased plant debris remaining in the fields can infect a subsequent crop and that the practice of using this debris to manure the ground is to be deprecated. Opinions differ on the part that the oospores, which are formed in profusion in all aerial parts, play in this primary infection. Neither Behr (1956) nor Kothari & Prasad (1970) were able to germinate resting spores. Behr considered that they had no part in disease transmission. Kothari & Prasad (1970), however, in a series of field experiments obtained indirect evidence that oospores present in the soil could become infective one year after their formation. The role of infected seed in transmitting the disease is also disputed. Yossifovitch (1929) and Kothari & Prasad (1970) suggested that infected seed is not important while Behr (1956) showed that perennating mycelium was present in the seed from diseased crops. Alavi (1975), in experiments made over several years on farms in Iran, reported a high probability that the disease was transmitted by seeds.