Instrumental and moral assistance

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 440-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonia L. Krummheuer
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Interaction Analysis ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Acquired Brain Injury ◽  
Embodied Interaction ◽  
Analytical Perspective ◽  
Decision Making Processes ◽  
Five Phases

Abstract The present paper takes an ethnomethodological and conversation analytical perspective on assisted shopping as it is done by a person with acquired brain injury in collaboration with her caregiver. My interest is directed towards the interactional and embodied organization of the situated selecting and decision-making processes, while I am aiming to understand the interactional organization of assistance and agency. The embodied interaction analysis is based on two video-recorded examples in which a caregiver treats the institutional resident’s shopping choice as either unproblematic or undesirable. I will differentiate five phases in which the participants systematically organize the selection process. In these phases, the participants take different roles either as shopper or as assistant caregiver; as to the later, I will distinguish between moral and instrumental assistance. The analysis demonstrates an inherent tension in the assistance during shopping activities, as it is oriented to both the incompetence that justifies the need for assistance and to the interactional construction of a competent and independent shopper.

scholarly journals Attributes-Based Decision Making for Selection of Requirement Elicitation Techniques Using the Analytic Network Process

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Jinyu Li ◽  
Asif Ullah ◽  
Jun Li ◽  
Shah Nazir ◽  
Habib Ullah Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Multicriteria Decision Making ◽  
Requirement Engineering ◽  
Analytic Network Process ◽  
Software Project ◽  
Requirement Elicitation ◽  
Network Process ◽  
Decision Making Processes ◽  
Selection Of

Requirement engineering is the first phase of software engineering. In requirement engineering, the first phase is requirement elicitation (RE), which is the most critical and error-prone activity. In this phase, the requirements are extracted from various sources; after extraction, they are analyzed and documented for a specific purpose of software development. In RE, process requirements from stakeholders are gathered, upon which the entire software product failure and success are dependent. In order to accomplish the goal of requirement elicitation, various techniques are used. However, the selection of these techniques is a very challenging task, as one technique may suit a situation but may not be suited for other situations. Besides this, project attributes such as documentation culture of organization, degree of relationship among stakeholders, and familiarity to domain also have a great impact on the process of technique selection. The reason is that there is no empirical value of the techniques that provide help in techniques selection to analyze the basis software project attributes. This study proposed the analytic network process, which is one of the multicriteria decision making processes for the elicitation technique selection process with respect to criterion attributes of project. The motivation toward the use of the ANP approach for the selection of requirement selection technique is that there are dependencies existing among attributes of the project elements. So, the ANP approach is capable of dealing with such situations where dependencies and complexity occur. Results of the proposed study demonstrate that the technique helps in complex situations where decision making is difficult based on the alternatives.

Decision-Making Practices During the Instrument Selection Process: The Choices We Make

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 281-291
Author(s):  
Jessica A. Rueter ◽  
Rochell McWhorter ◽  
Julie Delello
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Learning Disabilities ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
School Personnel ◽  
Learning Disabled ◽  
Basic Knowledge ◽  
Students With Learning Disabilities ◽  
Instrument Selection ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Decision Making Processes

The purpose of this article is to understand the decision-making processes by assessment personnel when choosing instruments to evaluate students with learning disabilities. Eight school personnel responsible for the evaluation of students in Texas participated in face-to-face, semistructured interviews. The instruments chosen were based on a variety of factors including the personnel’s basic knowledge and training on the use of the instruments, the culture and climate of the district, and the overall characteristics of the child being tested. The findings of this study suggested that assessment personnel encounter many decisions when evaluating children with learning disabilities. Implications from this study include the need for frequent support in encouraging reflective thinking and assessment training for those responsible for the important decisions regarding the identification and placement of students who are learning disabled.

scholarly journals Leiten oder leiten lassen? Gesprächsanalytische Beobachtungen zur interaktiven Aushandlung der Leitungsfunktion im Klassenrat

2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-104
Author(s):  
Nadine Nell-Tuor ◽  
Nina Haldimann
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Interaction Analysis ◽  
The Other ◽  
School Life ◽  
Leadership Responsibility ◽  
Teaching Format ◽  
Specific Focus ◽  
Decision Making Processes ◽  
The One ◽  
Do So

Abstract The class council is a teaching format which takes place regularly, aiming at the teacher stepping back from his/her conventional role as the organizing authority in order to allow the students to participate directly in decision-making processes concerning their everyday school life. This format results in a unique interactional constellation among the participants. In this article, we explore this interactional constellation from the perspective of conversation and interaction analysis. On the basis of videographies of class council sessions in which students and teachers occupy different participation roles, we ask how those roles are negotiated interactively. With a specific focus on the teacher and the moderator (student), we ask to what extent the teacher is able to delegate leadership responsibility among the group. It is shown that teachers are only partly able to do so. Often, teachers influence the interaction on a multimodal level. The challenge of organizing the class council lies in the need for the participants to accomplish different (and in part incompatible) interactional orders: on the one hand, teachers as well as students have to consider their specific participation roles; on the other hand, their participation roles are framed institutionally and cannot easily be changed.

Narratives of acquired brain injury patients: Their experience of healthcare relationships and medical decision-making

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 190-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Michelle Wright ◽  
Maria Medved ◽  
Roberta L. Woodgate ◽  
Kerstin Roger ◽  
David Sullivan
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Medical Decision Making ◽  
Acquired Brain Injury ◽  
Medical Decision

Commercial and Open Source Business Intelligence Platforms for Big Data Warehousing

2019 ◽  
pp. 158-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Bernardino ◽  
Joaquim Lapa ◽  
Ana Almeida
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Big Data ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Open Source ◽  
Data Warehouse ◽  
Business Intelligence ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Decision Making Processes ◽  
Big Data Warehouse

A big data warehouse enables the analysis of large amounts of information that typically comes from the organization's transactional systems (OLTP). However, today's data warehouse systems do not have the capacity to handle the massive amount of data that is currently produced. Business intelligence (BI) is a collection of decision support technologies that enable executives, managers, and analysts to make better and faster decisions. Organizations must make good use of business intelligence platforms to quickly acquire desirable information from the huge volume of data to reduce the time and increase the efficiency of decision-making processes. In this chapter, the authors present a comparative analysis of commercial and open source BI tools capabilities, in order to aid organizations in the selection process of the most suitable BI platform. They also evaluated and compared six major open source BI platforms: Actuate, Jaspersoft, Jedox/Palo, Pentaho, SpagoBI, and Vanilla; and six major commercial BI platforms: IBM Cognos, Microsoft BI, MicroStrategy, Oracle BI, SAP BI, and SAS BI & Analytics.

scholarly journals Nepal’s Health Facility Operation and Management Committees: exploring community participation and influence in the Dang district’s primary care clinics

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 492-502
Author(s):  
Gagan Gurung ◽  
Sarah Derrett ◽  
Philip C. Hill ◽  
Robin Gauld
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Community Participation ◽  
Health Facility ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Group Representations ◽  
Decision Making Processes ◽  
Community Representation ◽  
Operation And Management

AimTo describe community representation in Nepal’s Health Facility Operation and Management Committees (HFMCs) and the degree of influence of community representatives in the HFMC decision-making processes.BackgroundCommunity participation has been recognised as one of the key components for the successful implementation of primary health care (PHC) strategies, following the 1978 Declaration of Alma-Ata. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), HFMCs are now widely considered as a mechanism to increase community participation in health through community representation. There is some research examining the implementation process, impact and factors affecting the effectiveness of HFMCs. Despite the documented evidence of the importance of factors such as adequate representation, links with wider community, and decision-making power, there is limited evidence about the nature of community representation and degree of decision making within HFMCs in the PHC setting, particularly in LMICs.MethodsQualitative interviews with 39 key informants were held to explore different aspects of community representation in HFMCs, and the influence of the HFMC on health facility decision-making processes. In addition, a facility audit at 22 facilities and review of HFMC meeting minutes at six health facilities were conducted.FindingsThere were Dalit (a marginalised caste) and Janajati (an ethnic group) representations in 77% and 100% of the committees, respectively. Likewise, there were at least two female members in each committee. However, the HFMC member selection process and decision making within the committees were influenced by powerful elites. The degree of participation through HFMCs appeared to be at the ‘Manipulation’ and ‘Informing’ stage of Arnstein’s ladder of participation. In conclusion, despite representation of the community on HFMCs, the depth of participation seems low. There is a need to ensure a democratic selection process of committee members; and to expand the depth of participation.

scholarly journals Deliberative process in sharing information with different audiences: Eye-tracking correlates

2021 ◽  
pp. 174702182110474
Author(s):  
Beatriz Martín-Luengo ◽  
Andriy Myachykov ◽  
Yury Shtyrov
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Eye Movements ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Social Contexts ◽  
Formal Context ◽  
Growth Curve Analysis ◽  
Deliberative Process ◽  
Job Interview ◽  
Decision Making Processes ◽  
The Given

Research on conversational pragmatics demonstrates how interlocutors tailor the information they share depending on the audience. Previous research showed that, in informal contexts, speakers often provide several alternative answers, whereas in formal contexts, they tend to give only a single answer; however, the psychological underpinnings of these effects remain obscure. To investigate this answer selection process, we measured participants’ eye movements in different experimentally modelled social contexts. Participants answered general knowledge questions by providing responses with either single (one) or plural (three) alternatives. Then, a formal (job interview) or informal (conversation with friends) context was presented and participants decided either to report or withdraw their responses after considering the given social context. Growth curve analysis on the eye movements indicates that the selected response option attracted more eye movements. There was a discrepancy between the answer selection likelihood and the proportion of fixations to the corresponding option—but only in the formal context. These findings support a more elaborate decision-making processes in formal contexts. They also suggest that eye movements do not necessarily accompany the options considered in the decision-making processes.

scholarly journals Balloon analogue risk task to assess decision-making in acquired brain injury

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Areny Balagueró ◽  
Mercè Jodar Vicente
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Iowa Gambling Task ◽  
Acquired Brain Injury ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Clinical Group ◽  
Gambling Task ◽  
Balloon Analogue Risk Task ◽  
Verbal Comprehension ◽  
Healthy Participants

Introduction: Although impairment in decision-making is a frequent consequence of frontal lobe injury, few instruments evaluate decision-making in patients with acquired brain injury (ABI). Most are difficult to use and require a well-preserved ability of complex verbal comprehension and executive functions. We propose the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) as an alternative instrument to evaluate decision-making in ABI. Material and Methods: Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) and Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) were administered to a clinical group of 30 patients with ABI and to a control group of 30 healthy participants; comparative study to assess possible differences in the results obtained; analysis to determine a possible correlation between the two tests between groups. Results: The results showed that BART is a sensitive instrument to detect differences in performance between a control group and a group of patients with ABI, p < .001, 95 % CI =537.21-1575.46,  but do not correlate with  IGT, p = .524, rab.c = ‒.134. Conclusions: Although IGT and BART were both designed to assess decision-making, the results obtained in our study show that the scores obtained by patients with ABI on both tests do not correlate. This clearly proves that IGT and BART measure different aspects of decision-making.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document