scholarly journals Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse

10.1075/aic.2 ◽  
2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frans H. van Eemeren
Keyword(s):  
Strategic Maneuvering ◽  
Argumentative Discourse

Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse in political deliberation

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frans H. van Eemeren
Keyword(s):  
Institutional Constraints ◽  
The Political ◽  
Strategic Maneuvering ◽  
Argumentative Discourse ◽  
Communicative Practices ◽  
Dialectical Theory ◽  
Activity Types ◽  
Political Deliberation ◽  
Communicative Activity

In this essay, first the pragma-dialectical theory of strategic maneuvering is explained. Then the focus is on the conventionalization of communicative practices in communicative activity types and the institutional constraints it imposes on strategic maneuvering. Thus, an adequate background is created for discussing, on the basis of several recent projects, pragma-dialectical research of argumentative discourse in the political domain.

Strategic maneuvering in the political rhetoric of Barack Obama

2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 357-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manfred Kienpointner
Keyword(s):  
Political Rhetoric ◽  
Barack Obama ◽  
Interesting Case ◽  
Strategic Maneuvering ◽  
Argumentative Discourse ◽  
Pragmatic Argument ◽  
Universal Values ◽  
Normative Standards ◽  
The One

U.S. President Barack Obama’s rhetoric lends itself well as a highly interesting case study for exploring the possibilities of contemporary political rhetoric of being both successful on the one hand and rational, according to normative standards of argumentative discourse, on the other. Taking up the concept of “strategic maneuvering” as developed within Pragma-Dialectics (cf. van Eemeren 2010), a corpus of Obama’s speeches and books is analyzed in order to assess both its rationality and efficiency. The analysis shows that Obama not only knows extremely well how to use the classical inventory of (political) rhetoric, but also tries to overcome the standard strategic maneuvering of political rhetoric which is often polarizing and destructive. Obama tries to change this traditional style of political rhetoric by his orientation towards consensus and universal values and by his willingness to practice self-criticism. The evaluation of Obama’s political rhetoric has also shown, however, that Obama is sometimes forced to abandon his high ethical and rhetorical standards in order not to lose a substantial section of the U.S. voters. In some of these cases, it might be argued that his strategic maneuvering “derails”. All in all, however, Obama has shown us that a leading contemporary politician can overcome traditional party rhetoric by following new types of strategic maneuvering which, at least sometimes, successfully reconcile normative standards of rational discussion with rhetorical principles of efficient persuasion. Keywords: Barack Obama; political rhetoric; democracy; Pragma-Dialectics; strategic maneuvering; fallacy; pragmatic argument; irony; self-criticism

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document