scholarly journals The Second Transmembrane Domain of the Human Type 1 Angiotensin II Receptor Participates in the Formation of the Ligand Binding Pocket and Undergoes Integral Pivoting Movement during the Process of Receptor Activation

2009 ◽  
Vol 284 (18) ◽  
pp. 11922-11929 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivana Domazet ◽  
Brian J. Holleran ◽  
Stéphane S. Martin ◽  
Pierre Lavigne ◽  
Richard Leduc ◽  
...  
2003 ◽  
Vol 278 (38) ◽  
pp. 36628-36636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antony A. Boucard ◽  
Marise Roy ◽  
Marie-Ève Beaulieu ◽  
Pierre Lavigne ◽  
Emanuel Escher ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 279 (49) ◽  
pp. 51415-51423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphane S. Martin ◽  
Antony A. Boucard ◽  
Martin Clément ◽  
Emanuel Escher ◽  
Richard Leduc ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katy Rivard ◽  
Pierre Paradis ◽  
Mona Nemer ◽  
Céline Fiset

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fan Yang ◽  
Chunyou Mao ◽  
Lulu Guo ◽  
Jingyu Lin ◽  
Qianqian Ming ◽  
...  

AbstractG protein-coupled bile acid receptor (GPBAR) is a membrane receptor that senses bile acids to regulate diverse functions through Gs activation. Here, we report the cryo-EM structures of GPBAR–Gs complexes stabilized by either high-affinity P395 or the semisynthesized bile acid derivative INT-777 at 3-Å resolution. These structures revealed a large oval-shaped ligand pocket with several sporadic polar groups to accommodate the amphipathic cholic core of bile acids. A fingerprint of key residues recognizing diverse bile acids in the orthosteric site, a putative second bile acid binding site with allosteric properties and structural features contributing to bias property were identified through structural analysis and mutagenesis studies. Moreover, structural comparison of GPBAR with other GPCRs uncovered an atypical mode of receptor activation and G-protein– coupling, featuring a different set of key residues connecting the ligand binding pocket to the Gs coupling site, and a specific interaction motif localized in intracellular loop 3. Overall, our study not only provides unique structural features of GPBAR in bile acid recognition, allosteric effects and biased signaling, but also suggests that distinct allosteric connecting mechanisms between the ligand binding pocket and the G protein binding site exist in the GPCR superfamily.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 3571-3571
Author(s):  
Fadi T. Khasawneh ◽  
Jin-Sheng Huang ◽  
Joseph W. Turek ◽  
Guy C. Le Breton

Abstract Despite the well-documented involvement of thromboxane A2 receptor (TPR) signaling in the pathogenesis of thrombotic diseases, there are currently no rationally-designed antagonists available for clinical use. To a large extent this derives from a lack of knowledge regarding the topography of the TPR ligand binding pocket. On this basis, the purpose of the current study was to identify the specific amino acid residues in the TPR protein which regulate ligand coordination and binding. The sites selected for mutation reside within or in close proximity to a region we previously defined as a TPR ligand binding site, i.e., the C-terminus of the second extracellular loop and the leading edge of the fifth transmembrane domain. Mutation of these residues caused varying effects on the TPR-ligand coordination process. Specifically, the D193A mutant lacked both SQ29,548 (antagonist) binding and U46619 (agonist)-induced calcium mobilization. Three other mutants, F184Y, T186A and S191T, discriminated between SQ29,548 binding and the U46619-mediated functional response. Furthermore, these mutants also revealed a divergence in the binding of two structurally different antagonists, SQ29,548 and BM13.505. Conversely, two separate mutants which exhibited SQ29,548 binding activity yielded either a normal (F196Y) or reduced (S201T) U46619 response. Finally, mutation of other residues directly adjacent to those described above, e.g., E190A and F200A, produced no detectable effects on either SQ29,548 binding or the U46619-induced functional response. In summary, these results identify key amino acids involved in TPR ligand coordination and demonstrate that TPR-specific ligands do not necessarily interact with the same residues in the ligand-binding pocket.


2001 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 1659-1688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Santosh T. Menon ◽  
May Han ◽  
Thomas P. Sakmar

The crystal structure of rod cell visual pigment rhodopsin was recently solved at 2.8-Å resolution. A critical evaluation of a decade of structure-function studies is now possible. It is also possible to begin to explain the structural basis for several unique physiological properties of the vertebrate visual system, including extremely low dark noise levels as well as high gain and color detection. The ligand-binding pocket of rhodopsin is remarkably compact, and several apparent chromophore-protein interactions were not predicted from extensive mutagenesis or spectroscopic studies. The transmembrane helices are interrupted or kinked at multiple sites. An extensive network of interhelical interactions stabilizes the ground state of the receptor. The helix movement model of receptor activation, which might apply to all G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) of the rhodopsin family, is supported by several structural elements that suggest how light-induced conformational changes in the ligand-binding pocket are transmitted to the cytoplasmic surface. The cytoplasmic domain of the receptor is remarkable for a carboxy-terminal helical domain extending from the seventh transmembrane segment parallel to the bilayer surface. Thus the cytoplasmic surface appears to be approximately the right size to bind to the transducin heterotrimer in a one-to-one complex. Future high-resolution structural studies of rhodopsin and other GPCRs will form a basis to elucidate the detailed molecular mechanism of GPCR-mediated signal transduction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document