scholarly journals Potyvirus Genome-linked Protein, VPg, Directly Affects Wheat Germ in Vitro Translation

2007 ◽  
Vol 283 (3) ◽  
pp. 1340-1349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mateen A. Khan ◽  
Hiroshi Miyoshi ◽  
Daniel R. Gallie ◽  
Dixie J. Goss
Keyword(s):  
Translation Initiation ◽  
Wheat Germ ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Kinetic Studies ◽  
Dissociation Rate ◽  
In Vitro Translation ◽  
Translation Efficiency ◽  
Viral Mrna ◽  
Initiation Factors

Potyvirus genome linked protein, VPg, interacts with translation initiation factors eIF4E and eIFiso4E, but its role in protein synthesis has not been elucidated. We show that addition of VPg to wheat germ extract leads to enhancement of uncapped viral mRNA translation and inhibition of capped viral mRNA translation. This provides a significant competitive advantage to the uncapped viral mRNA. To understand the molecular basis of these effects, we have characterized the interaction of VPg with eIF4F, eIFiso4F, and a structured RNA derived from tobacco etch virus (TEV RNA). When VPg formed a complex with eIF4F, the affinity for TEV RNA increased more than 4-fold compared with eIF4F alone (19.4 and 79.0 nm, respectively). The binding affinity of eIF4F to TEV RNA correlates with translation efficiency. VPg enhanced eIFiso4F binding to TEV RNA 1.6-fold (178 nm compared with 108 nm). Kinetic studies of eIF4F and eIFiso4F with VPg show ∼2.6-fold faster association for eIFiso4F·VPg as compared with eIF4F·VPg. The dissociation rate was ∼2.9-fold slower for eIFiso4F than eIF4F with VPg. These data demonstrate that eIFiso4F can kinetically compete with eIF4F for VPg binding. The quantitative data presented here suggest a model where eIF4F·VPg interaction enhances cap-independent translation by increasing the affinity of eIF4F for TEV RNA. This is the first evidence of direct participation of VPg in translation initiation.

Reconstitution of yeast translation elongation and termination in vitro utilizing CrPV IRES-containing mRNA

2020 ◽  
Vol 167 (5) ◽  
pp. 441-450
Author(s):  
Taisho Abe ◽  
Riku Nagai ◽  
Hiroaki Imataka ◽  
Nono Takeuchi-Tomita
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Weight ◽  
Translation Initiation ◽  
In Vitro Translation ◽  
Translation System ◽  
Reporter Protein ◽  
Translation Elongation ◽  
Initiation Factors ◽  
Translation Factors ◽  
Internal Translation

Abstract We developed an in vitro translation system from yeast, reconstituted with purified translation elongation and termination factors and programmed by CrPV IGR IRES-containing mRNA, which functions in the absence of initiation factors. The system is capable of synthesizing the active reporter protein, nanoLuciferase, with a molecular weight of 19 kDa. The protein synthesis by the system is appropriately regulated by controlling its composition, including translation factors, amino acids and antibiotics. We found that a high eEF1A concentration relative to the ribosome concentration is critically required for efficient IRES-mediated translation initiation, to ensure its dominance over IRES-independent random internal translation initiation.

scholarly journals Translation initiation mediated by RNA looping

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (4) ◽  
pp. 1041-1046 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ki Young Paek ◽  
Ka Young Hong ◽  
Incheol Ryu ◽  
Sung Mi Park ◽  
Sun Ju Keum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reporter Gene ◽  
Translation Initiation ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Encephalomyocarditis Virus ◽  
Initiation Codon ◽  
Translation Efficiency ◽  
Upstream Gene ◽  
Translational Initiation ◽  
Initiation Factors ◽  
Translation Initiation Factors

Eukaryotic translation initiation commences at the initiation codon near the 5′ end of mRNA by a 40S ribosomal subunit, and the recruitment of a 40S ribosome to an mRNA is facilitated by translation initiation factors interacting with the m7G cap and/or poly(A) tail. The 40S ribosome recruited to an mRNA is then transferred to the AUG initiation codon with the help of translation initiation factors. To understand the mechanism by which the ribosome finds an initiation codon, we investigated the role of eIF4G in finding the translational initiation codon. An artificial polypeptide eIF4G fused with MS2 was localized downstream of the reporter gene through MS2-binding sites inserted in the 3′ UTR of the mRNA. Translation of the reporter was greatly enhanced by the eIF4G-MS2 fusion protein regardless of the presence of a cap structure. Moreover, eIF4G-MS2 tethered at the 3′ UTR enhanced translation of the second cistron of a dicistronic mRNA. The encephalomyocarditis virus internal ribosome entry site, a natural translational-enhancing element facilitating translation through an interaction with eIF4G, positioned downstream of a reporter gene, also enhanced translation of the upstream gene in a cap-independent manner. Finally, we mathematically modeled the effect of distance between the cap structure and initiation codon on the translation efficiency of mRNAs. The most plausible explanation for translational enhancement by the translational-enhancing sites is recognition of the initiation codon by the ribosome bound to the ribosome-recruiting sites through “RNA looping.” The RNA looping hypothesis provides a logical explanation for augmentation of translation by enhancing elements located upstream and/or downstream of a protein-coding region.

scholarly journals Selective 40S footprinting reveals that scanning ribosomes remain cap-tethered in human cells

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Bohlen ◽  
Kai Fenzl ◽  
Günter Kramer ◽  
Bernd Bukau ◽  
Aurelio A. Teleman
Keyword(s):  
Translation Initiation ◽  
Human Cells ◽  
Open Reading Frames ◽  
Translation Regulation ◽  
List Type ◽  
Translation Efficiency ◽  
Initiation Factors ◽  
Upstream Open Reading Frames

SUMMARYTranslation regulation occurs largely during initiation. Currently, translation initiation can be studied in vitro, but these systems lack features present in vivo and on endogenous mRNAs. Here we develop selective 40S footprinting for visualizing initiating 40S ribosomes on endogenous mRNAs in vivo. It pinpoints where on an mRNA initiation factors join the ribosome to act, and where they leave. We discover that in human cells most scanning ribosomes remain attached to the 5’ cap. Consequently, only one ribosome scans a 5’UTR at a time, and 5’UTR length affects translation efficiency. We discover that eIF3B, eIF4G1 and eIF4E remain on translating 80S ribosomes with a decay half-length of ∼12 codons. Hence ribosomes retain these initiation factors while translating short upstream Open Reading Frames (uORFs), providing an explanation for how ribosomes can re-initiate translation after uORFs in humans. This method will be of use for studying translation initiation mechanisms in vivo.HIGHLIGHTSSelective 40S FPing visualizes regulation of translation initiation on mRNAs in vivoScanning ribosomes are cap-tethered in human cellsOnly one ribosome scans a 5’UTR at a time in human cellsRibosomes retain eIFs during early translation, allowing reinitiation after uORFs

scholarly journals Competitive mRNA translation in an in vitro system from wheat germ.

1979 ◽  
Vol 254 (17) ◽  
pp. 8245-8249
Author(s):  
D. Herson ◽  
A. Schmidt ◽  
S. Seal ◽  
A. Marcus ◽  
L. van Vloten-Doting
Keyword(s):  
Wheat Germ ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
In Vitro System

scholarly journals A Complementary Mechanism of Bacterial mRNA Translation Inhibition by Tetracyclines

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Barrenechea ◽  
Maryhory Vargas-Reyes ◽  
Miguel Quiliano ◽  
Pohl Milón
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Translation Initiation ◽  
Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Resistance Mechanisms ◽  
Dissociation Rate ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Translation Elongation ◽  
Initiation Phase ◽  
Complementary Mechanism

Tetracycline has positively impacted human health as well as the farming and animal industries. Its extensive usage and versatility led to the spread of resistance mechanisms followed by the development of new variants of the antibiotic. Tetracyclines inhibit bacterial growth by impeding the binding of elongator tRNAs to the ribosome. However, a small number of reports indicated that Tetracyclines could also inhibit translation initiation, yet the molecular mechanism remained unknown. Here, we use biochemical and computational methods to study how Oxytetracycline (Otc), Demeclocycline (Dem), and Tigecycline (Tig) affect the translation initiation phase of protein synthesis. Our results show that all three Tetracyclines induce Initiation Factor IF3 to adopt a compact conformation on the 30S ribosomal subunit, similar to that induced by Initiation Factor IF1. This compaction was faster for Tig than Dem or Otc. Furthermore, all three tested tetracyclines affected IF1-bound 30S complexes. The dissociation rate constant of IF1 in early 30S complexes was 14-fold slower for Tig than Dem or Otc. Late 30S initiation complexes (30S pre-IC or IC) exhibited greater IF1 stabilization by Tig than for Dem and Otc. Tig and Otc delayed 50S joining to 30S initiation complexes (30S ICs). Remarkably, the presence of Tig considerably slowed the progression to translation elongation and retained IF1 in the resulting 70S initiation complex (70S IC). Molecular modeling of Tetracyclines bound to the 30S pre-IC and 30S IC indicated that the antibiotics binding site topography fluctuates along the initiation pathway. Mainly, 30S complexes show potential contacts between Dem or Tig with IF1, providing a structural rationale for the enhanced affinity of the antibiotics in the presence of the factor. Altogether, our data indicate that Tetracyclines inhibit translation initiation by allosterically perturbing the IF3 layout on the 30S, retaining IF1 during 70S IC formation, and slowing the transition toward translation elongation. Thus, this study describes a new complementary mechanism by which Tetracyclines may inhibit bacterial protein synthesis.

scholarly journals Binding of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) to eIF4G represses translation of uncapped mRNA.

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 6876-6886 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Z Tarun ◽  
A B Sachs
Keyword(s):  
Translation Initiation ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Translation Initiation Factor ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor ◽  
Eukaryotic Translation ◽  
Eukaryotic Translation Initiation ◽  
Stimulation Of

mRNA translation in crude extracts from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is stimulated by the cap structure and the poly(A) tail through the binding of the cap-binding protein eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) and the poly(A) tail-binding protein Pab1p. These proteins also bind to the translation initiation factor eIF4G and thereby link the mRNA to the general translational apparatus. In contrast, uncapped, poly(A)-deficient mRNA is translated poorly in yeast extracts, in part because of the absence of eIF4E and Pab1p binding sites on the mRNA. Here, we report that uncapped-mRNA translation is also repressed in yeast extracts due to the binding of eIF4E to eIF4G. Specifically, we find that mutations which weaken the eIF4E binding site on the yeast eIF4G proteins Tif4631p and Tif4632p lead to temperature-sensitive growth in vivo and the stimulation of uncapped-mRNA translation in vitro. A mutation in eIF4E which disturbs its ability to interact with eIF4G also leads to a stimulation of uncapped-mRNA translation in vitro. Finally, overexpression of eIF4E in vivo or the addition of excess eIF4E in vitro reverses these effects of the mutations. These data support the hypothesis that the eIF4G protein can efficiently stimulate translation of exogenous uncapped mRNA in extracts but is prevented from doing so as a result of its association with eIF4E. They also suggest that some mRNAs may be translationally regulated in vivo in response to the amount of free eIF4G in the cell.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document