scholarly journals Large distances separate coregulated genes in living Drosophila embryos

2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (30) ◽  
pp. 15062-15067 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyler Heist ◽  
Takashi Fukaya ◽  
Michael Levine
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcriptional Activity ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Reporter Genes ◽  
Transcriptional Enhancers ◽  
Close Proximity ◽  
Resolution Imaging ◽  
In Cis ◽  
Target Promoters ◽  
Drosophila Embryos

Transcriptional enhancers are short segments of DNA that switch genes on and off in response to a variety of cellular signals. Many enhancers map quite far from their target genes, on the order of tens or even hundreds of kilobases. There is extensive evidence that remote enhancers are brought into proximity with their target promoters via long-range looping interactions. However, the exact physical distances of these enhancer–promoter interactions remain uncertain. Here, we employ high-resolution imaging of living Drosophila embryos to visualize the distances separating linked genes that are coregulated by a shared enhancer. Cotransvection assays (linked genes on separate homologs) suggest a surprisingly large distance during transcriptional activity: at least 100–200 nm. Similar distances were observed when a shared enhancer was placed into close proximity with linked reporter genes in cis. These observations are consistent with the occurrence of “transcription hubs,” whereby clusters (or condensates) of multiple RNA polymerase II complexes and associated cofactors are periodically recruited to active promoters. The dynamics of this process might be responsible for rapid fluctuations in the distances separating the transcription of coregulated reporter genes during transvection. We propose that enhancer-promoter communication depends on a combination of classical looping and linking models.

scholarly journals Postrecruitment Regulation of RNA Polymerase II Directs Rapid Signaling Responses at the Promoters of Estrogen Target Genes

2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 1123-1133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miltiadis Kininis ◽  
Gary D. Isaacs ◽  
Leighton J. Core ◽  
Nasun Hah ◽  
W. Lee Kraus
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Elongation Factor ◽  
Estrogen Signaling ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Activator Proteins ◽  
Classical Models ◽  
Target Promoters

ABSTRACT Under classical models for signal-dependent transcription in eukaryotes, DNA-binding activator proteins regulate the recruitment of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) to a set of target promoters. However, recent studies, as well as our results herein, show that Pol II is widely distributed (i.e., “preloaded”) at the promoters of many genes prior to specific signaling events. How Pol II recruitment and Pol II preloading fit within a unified model of gene regulation is unclear. In addition, the mechanisms through which cellular signals activate preloaded Pol II across mammalian genomes remain largely unknown. We show here that the predominant genomic outcome of estrogen signaling is the postrecruitment regulation of Pol II activity at target gene promoters, likely through specific changes in Pol II phosphorylation rather than through recruitment of Pol II to the promoters. Furthermore, we show that negative elongation factor binds to estrogen target promoters in conjunction with preloaded Pol II and represses gene expression until the appropriate signal is received. Finally, our studies reveal that the estrogen-dependent activation of preloaded Pol II facilitates rapid gene regulatory responses which play important physiological roles in regulating estrogen signaling itself. Our results reveal a broad use of postrecruitment Pol II regulation by the estrogen signaling pathway, a mode of regulation that is likely to apply to a wide variety of signal-regulated pathways.

scholarly journals MED14 Tethers Mediator to the N-Terminal Domain of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ and Is Required for Full Transcriptional Activity and Adipogenesis

2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 2155-2169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars Grøntved ◽  
Maria S. Madsen ◽  
Michael Boergesen ◽  
Robert G. Roeder ◽  
Susanne Mandrup
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcriptional Activity ◽  
Target Gene ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Gene Activation ◽  
Proximal Promoter ◽  
Peroxisome Proliferator ◽  
Independent Manner ◽  
Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor ◽  
Terminal Domain

ABSTRACT The Mediator subunit MED1/TRAP220/DRIP205/PBP interacts directly with many nuclear receptors and was long thought to be responsible for tethering Mediator to peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-responsive promoters. However, it was demonstrated recently that PPARγ can recruit Mediator by MED1-independent mechanisms. Here, we show that target gene activation by ectopically expressed PPARγ and PPARα is independent of MED1. Consistent with this finding, recruitment of PPARγ, MED6, MED8, TATA box-binding protein (TBP), and RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) to the enhancer and proximal promoter of the PPARγ target gene Fabp4 is also independent of MED1. Using a small interfering RNA (siRNA)-based approach, we identify MED14 as a novel critical Mediator component for PPARγ-dependent transactivation, and we demonstrate that MED14 interacts directly with the N terminus of PPARγ in a ligand-independent manner. Interestingly, MED14 knockdown does not affect the recruitment of PPARγ, MED6, and MED8 to the Fabp4 enhancer but does reduce their occupancy of the Fabp4 proximal promoter. In agreement with the necessity of MED14 for PPARγ transcriptional activity, we show that knockdown of MED14 impairs adipogenesis of 3T3-L1 cells. Thus, MED14 constitutes a novel anchoring point between Mediator and the N-terminal domain of PPARγ that is necessary for functional PPARγ-mediated recruitment of Mediator and transactivation of PPARγ subtype-specific target genes.

Leukemogenic MLL Fusion Proteins Promote MLL Association with HOX Loci Resulting in Persistent Expression.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 386-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Milne ◽  
Mary Ellen Martin ◽  
Robert K. Slany ◽  
Jay L. Hess
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Histone Modifications ◽  
Fusion Proteins ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Transcriptional Elongation ◽  
Major Mechanism ◽  
Coding Regions ◽  
High Level ◽  
Target Promoters

Abstract Rearrangements of the mixed lineage leukemia gene MLL are associated with aggressive lymphoid and myeloid leukemias. The resulting MLL fusion proteins enforce high-level expression of HOX genes including HOX A7 and HOX A9 and the HOX cofactor MEIS1, which is pivotal for leukemogenesis. The mechanism by which this occurs and the relationship to normal MLL function is unknown. To address this we performed a detailed study of where MLL and MLL fusion proteins bind at target genes in hematopoietic cells using quantitative chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP). In addition we characterized the histone modifications at the HOX A9 locus that occur with normal down modulation of HOX A9 expression during hematopoietic differentiation and how this is perturbed by induction of conditionally transforming MLL fusion proteins. These studies suggest that a major mechanism of regulating MLL, which is expressed throughout hematopoiesis, is through modulating it’s binding to target promoters. MLL binds directly to the promoters and coding regions of HOX A7, HOX A9, and MEIS1 only in myeloblasts and not in neutrophils, indicating MLL is physically associated with genes only when they are actively transcribed. Expression of A cluster HOX loci and MEIS1 is transiently increased by the addition of IL-3 but remains persistently elevated when MLL-ENL or dimerized MLL fusion proteins are expressed. Expression of either fusion protein is associated with increased binding of wild type MLL accompanied by increases in histone acetylation and histone H3 lysine 4 methylation, marks that are normally almost completely erased during myeloid differentiation. In addition MLL-ENL induces increased lysine 79 methylation. MLL extensively colocalizes with RNA polymerase II, which shows abnormal pausing in the coding regions of HOX genes in Mll null cells. These findings suggest MLL fusion proteins maintain expression of HOX genes critical for leukemogenesis through increased MLL binding resulting in both MLL dependent histone modifications and lysine 79 methylation and ultimately promotion of transcriptional elongation.

scholarly journals An Array of Coactivators Is Required for Optimal Recruitment of TATA Binding Protein and RNA Polymerase II by Promoter-Bound Gcn4p

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 4104-4117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongfang Qiu ◽  
Cuihua Hu ◽  
Sungpil Yoon ◽  
Krishnamurthy Natarajan ◽  
Mark J. Swanson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Elongation Phase ◽  
Target Promoters

ABSTRACT Wild-type transcriptional activation by Gcn4p is dependent on multiple coactivators, including SAGA, SWI/SNF, Srb mediator, CCR4-NOT, and RSC, which are all recruited by Gcn4p to its target promoters in vivo. It was not known whether these coactivators are required for assembly of the preinitiation complex (PIC) or for subsequent steps in the initiation or elongation phase of transcription. We find that mutations in subunits of these coactivators reduce the recruitment of TATA binding protein (TBP) and RNA polymerase II (Pol II) by Gcn4p at ARG1, ARG4, and SNZ1, implicating all five coactivators in PIC assembly at Gcn4p target genes. Recruitment of Pol II at SNZ1 and ARG1 was eliminated by mutations in TBP or by deletion of the TATA box, indicating that TBP binding is a prerequisite for Pol II recruitment by Gcn4p. However, several mutations in SAGA subunits and deletion of SRB10 had a greater impact on promoter occupancy of Pol II versus TBP, suggesting that SAGA and Srb mediator can promote Pol II binding independently of their stimulatory effects on TBP recruitment. Our results reveal an unexpected complexity in the cofactor requirements for the enhancement of PIC assembly by a single activator protein.

scholarly journals Mediator subunit MED25 links the jasmonate receptor to transcriptionally active chromatin

2017 ◽  
Vol 114 (42) ◽  
pp. E8930-E8939 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunpeng An ◽  
Lin Li ◽  
Qingzhe Zhai ◽  
Yanrong You ◽  
Lei Deng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Active Form ◽  
Receptor Protein ◽  
Helix Loop Helix ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligase Complex ◽  
H3k9 Acetylation ◽  
F Box Protein ◽  
And Function ◽  
Target Promoters

Jasmonoyl-isoleucine (JA-Ile), the active form of the plant hormone jasmonate (JA), is sensed by the F-box protein CORONATINE INSENSITIVE 1 (COI1), a component of a functional Skp–Cullin–F-box E3 ubiquitin ligase complex. Sensing of JA-Ile by COI1 rapidly triggers genome-wide transcriptional changes that are largely regulated by the basic helix–loop–helix transcription factor MYC2. However, it remains unclear how the JA-Ile receptor protein COI1 relays hormone-specific regulatory signals to the RNA polymerase II general transcriptional machinery. Here, we report that the plant transcriptional coactivator complex Mediator directly links COI1 to the promoters of MYC2 target genes. MED25, a subunit of the Mediator complex, brings COI1 to MYC2 target promoters and facilitates COI1-dependent degradation of jasmonate–ZIM domain (JAZ) transcriptional repressors. MED25 and COI1 influence each other’s enrichment on MYC2 target promoters. Furthermore, MED25 physically and functionally interacts with HISTONE ACETYLTRANSFERASE1 (HAC1), which plays an important role in JA signaling by selectively regulating histone (H) 3 lysine (K) 9 (H3K9) acetylation of MYC2 target promoters. Moreover, the enrichment and function of HAC1 on MYC2 target promoters depend on COI1 and MED25. Therefore, the MED25 interface of Mediator links COI1 with HAC1-dependent H3K9 acetylation to activate MYC2-regulated transcription of JA-responsive genes. This study exemplifies how a single Mediator subunit integrates the actions of both genetic and epigenetic regulators into a concerted transcriptional program.

scholarly journals The Non-Canonical Aspects of MicroRNAs: Many Roads to Gene Regulation

Cells ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 1465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christiaan J. Stavast ◽  
Stefan J. Erkeland
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Small Rnas ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Biological Functions ◽  
Rnase Iii ◽  
Mrna Targets ◽  
Argonaute Proteins ◽  
Epigenetic Modifiers ◽  
Encoding Genes

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are critical regulators of gene expression. As miRNAs are frequently deregulated in many human diseases, including cancer and immunological disorders, it is important to understand their biological functions. Typically, miRNA-encoding genes are transcribed by RNA Polymerase II and generate primary transcripts that are processed by RNase III-endonucleases DROSHA and DICER into small RNAs of approximately 21 nucleotides. All miRNAs are loaded into Argonaute proteins in the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) and act as post-transcriptional regulators by binding to the 3′- untranslated region (UTR) of mRNAs. This seed-dependent miRNA binding inhibits the translation and/or promotes the degradation of mRNA targets. Surprisingly, recent data presents evidence for a target-mediated decay mechanism that controls the level of specific miRNAs. In addition, several non-canonical miRNA-containing genes have been recently described and unexpected functions of miRNAs have been identified. For instance, several miRNAs are located in the nucleus, where they are involved in the transcriptional activation or silencing of target genes. These epigenetic modifiers are recruited by RISC and guided by miRNAs to specific loci in the genome. Here, we will review non-canonical aspects of miRNA biology, including novel regulators of miRNA expression and functions of miRNAs in the nucleus.

scholarly journals Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Ray-Jones ◽  
Mikhail Spivakov
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Functional Genomics ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Gene Control ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Joint Effects ◽  
Transcriptional Enhancers ◽  
Quantitative Understanding ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Way

AbstractTranscriptional enhancers play a key role in the initiation and maintenance of gene expression programmes, particularly in metazoa. How these elements control their target genes in the right place and time is one of the most pertinent questions in functional genomics, with wide implications for most areas of biology. Here, we synthesise classic and recent evidence on the regulatory logic of enhancers, including the principles of enhancer organisation, factors that facilitate and delimit enhancer–promoter communication, and the joint effects of multiple enhancers. We show how modern approaches building on classic insights have begun to unravel the complexity of enhancer–promoter relationships, paving the way towards a quantitative understanding of gene control.

scholarly journals Lysine acetyltransferase Tip60 acetylates the APP adaptor Fe65 to increase its transcriptional activity

2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine Probst ◽  
Florian Riese ◽  
Larissa Kägi ◽  
Maik Krüger ◽  
Natalie Russi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Activity ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Adaptor Protein ◽  
Proteolytic Processing ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Lysine Deacetylase ◽  
Lysine Residues ◽  
Lysine Acetyltransferase ◽  
Complex Forms ◽  
Spot Formation

AbstractProteolytic processing of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) releases the APP intracellular domain (AICD) from the membrane. Bound to the APP adaptor protein Fe65 and the lysine acetyltransferase (KAT) Tip60, AICD translocates to the nucleus. Here, the complex forms spherical condensates at sites of endogenous target genes, termed AFT spots (AICD-Fe65-Tip60). We show that loss of Tip60 KAT activity prevents autoacetylation, reduces binding of Fe65 and abolishes Fe65-mediated stabilization of Tip60. Autoacetylation is a prerequisite for AFT spot formation, with KAT-deficient Tip60 retained together with Fe65 in speckles. We identify lysine residues 204 and 701 of Fe65 as acetylation targets of Tip60. We do not detect acetylation of AICD. Mutation of Fe65 K204 and K701 to glutamine, mimicking acetylation-induced charge neutralization, increases the transcriptional activity of Fe65 whereas Tip60 inhibition reduces it. The lysine deacetylase (KDAC) class III Sirt1 deacetylates Fe65 and pharmacological modulation of Sirt1 activity regulates Fe65 transcriptional activity. A second acetylation/deacetylation cycle, conducted by CBP and class I/II KDACs at different lysine residues, regulates stability of Fe65. This is the first report describing a role for acetylation in the regulation of Fe65 transcriptional activity, with Tip60 being the only KAT tested that supports AFT spot formation.

scholarly journals Commuting to Work: Nucleolar Long Non-Coding RNA Control Ribosome Biogenesis from Near and Far

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 42
Author(s):  
Victoria Mamontova ◽  
Barbara Trifault ◽  
Lea Boten ◽  
Kaspar Burger
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Intergenic Spacer ◽  
Cellular Growth ◽  
Rrna Synthesis ◽  
Protein Coding ◽  
Non Coding Rna ◽  
And Function ◽  
In Cis

Gene expression is an essential process for cellular growth, proliferation, and differentiation. The transcription of protein-coding genes and non-coding loci depends on RNA polymerases. Interestingly, numerous loci encode long non-coding (lnc)RNA transcripts that are transcribed by RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) and fine-tune the RNA metabolism. The nucleolus is a prime example of how different lncRNA species concomitantly regulate gene expression by facilitating the production and processing of ribosomal (r)RNA for ribosome biogenesis. Here, we summarise the current findings on how RNAPII influences nucleolar structure and function. We describe how RNAPII-dependent lncRNA can both promote nucleolar integrity and inhibit ribosomal (r)RNA synthesis by modulating the availability of rRNA synthesis factors in trans. Surprisingly, some lncRNA transcripts can directly originate from nucleolar loci and function in cis. The nucleolar intergenic spacer (IGS), for example, encodes nucleolar transcripts that counteract spurious rRNA synthesis in unperturbed cells. In response to DNA damage, RNAPII-dependent lncRNA originates directly at broken ribosomal (r)DNA loci and is processed into small ncRNA, possibly to modulate DNA repair. Thus, lncRNA-mediated regulation of nucleolar biology occurs by several modes of action and is more direct than anticipated, pointing to an intimate crosstalk of RNA metabolic events.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document