Breeding biology and haul-out pattern of the New Zealand fur seal, Arctopehalus forsteri, at Cape Gantheaume, South Australia

1994 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 365 ◽  
Author(s):  
SD Goldsworthy ◽  
PD Shaughnessy
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Sex Ratio ◽  
Breeding Season ◽  
Age Distribution ◽  
South Australia ◽  
Operational Sex Ratio ◽  
Fur Seal ◽  
Median Date ◽  
Breeding Seasons ◽  
Bay Islands

New Zealand fur seals, Arctocephalus forsteri, breed at Cape Gantheaume (36�04'S,137�28'E), Kangaroo Island, South Australia, on broken rock platforms. In 1988-89, pups were born between late November and mid-January, 90% of them over 34 days between 3 December and 6 January. The median date of birth was 21 December. A re-analysis of data for this species from three breeding seasons at the Open Bay Islands (South Island, New Zealand, 43�52'S,l68�53'E) indicates that: (i) the breeding season at Cape Gantheaume occurs 5-12 days later than at the Open Bay Islands, (ii) the period containing 90% of births was the same duration for both populations, and (iii) the median date of birth spanned seven days in three seasons at the Open Bay Islands. In addition, the timing and duration of the pupping season varied within the Cape Gantheaume colony, it being later in recently colonised areas. We suggest that this pattern is a consequence of changes in the age distribution of females through the colony. The sex ratio of pups born in the colony over four breeding seasons did not differ significantly from 1:l. Females were mated on average 7.4 days after birth and left for sea 2.3 days later. The mean date of observed matings was 29 December; copulations lasted about 13 min. The operational sex ratio (OSR) in the colony was 8.6 females per territorial male (the maximum ratio of territorial males to pups was 1:16), which was within the range reported for other southern fur seal species. In two consecutive breeding seasons, the estimated fecundity rate of adult females averaged 67%. Non-breeding animals (sub-adult males, juveniles and yearlings) occurred in areas not occupied by breeding animals. The number of juveniles ashore increased after the breeding season, but no pattern was found for sub-adults and yearlings. Yearlings were uncommon in the colony at all times; it is suggested that they are mostly pelagic and do not moult in their second year.

Changes in the abundance of New Zealand fur seals, Arctocephalus forsteri, on Kangaroo Island, South Australia

1995 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 201 ◽  
Author(s):  
PD Shaughnessy ◽  
SD Goldsworthy ◽  
JA Libke
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
South Australia ◽  
Early Years ◽  
Mark Recapture ◽  
Fur Seals ◽  
Fur Seal ◽  
Rate Of Increase ◽  
New Zealand Fur Seal ◽  
Breeding Seasons ◽  
Made In

Kangaroo Island was an important seal-harvesting site during the early years of European colonisation of Australia. A recent survey of the New Zealand fur seal, Arctocephalus forsteri, in South and Western Australia indicates that Kangaroo I. is still an important centre for the species. In order to determine changes in the abundance of the population, numbers of pups were determined at four colonies on Kangaroo Island by mark-recapture in up to five breeding seasons from 1988-89 to 1992-93. Clipping was the preferred technique for mark-recapture estimation of pups because it was quick, easy and effective. Recaptures were conducted visually; they were repeated several times in each season to improve precision of the estimates. No pups were marked between recaptures in order to minimise disturbance. Assumptions made in estimating population size by the mark-recapture technique pertinent to this study are reviewed. Pup numbers increased at three colonies: at Cape Gantheaume, from 458 to 867 over five years (with exponential rate of increase r = 0.16, n = 5); at Nautilus North, from 182 to 376 over five years (at r = 0.19, n = 4); and at North Casuarina Islet, from 442 to 503 over four years (at r = 0.043, n = 2). Rates of increase in the first two colonies are similar to those at the most rapidly increasing fur seal populations in the Southern Hemisphere. The Kangaroo I. population is estimated to be 10000 animals in 1992-93. It is likely to be at the recolonisation phase of growth, with high rates of increase at individual colonies (or parts of colonies) resulting from local immigration. As space does not appear to be limiting expansion in these colonies, fur seal numbers may continue to increase there.

Increasing abundance of pups of the long-nosed fur seal (Arctocephalus forsteri) on Kangaroo Island, South Australia, over 26 breeding seasons to 2013–14

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (8) ◽  
pp. 619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter D. Shaughnessy ◽  
Simon D. Goldsworthy
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
South Australia ◽  
Breeding Habitat ◽  
Early Nineteenth Century ◽  
Fur Seals ◽  
Fur Seal ◽  
Rate Of Increase ◽  
Subantarctic Islands ◽  
Direct Counting ◽  
Breeding Seasons

Context Long-nosed (or New Zealand) fur seals breed on the southern coast of Australia, in New Zealand and on its subantarctic islands. They are recovering from over-harvesting that occurred in the early nineteenth century. Aims We estimated the rate of increase of the population at two colonies on Kangaroo Island, South Australia: Cape Gantheaume and Cape du Couedic. Methods From 1988–89 to 2013–14, pup abundance was estimated using a mark–resight procedure with multiple resights in large aggregations of pups and by direct counting in small aggregations. Key results At Cape Gantheaume, pup numbers increased by a factor of 10.7 from 457 to 5333 over 26 breeding seasons and the exponential rate of increase averaged 10.0% per annum (p.a.). Between 1988–89 and 1997–98, the population increased at 17.3% p.a., after which the increase was 7.2% p.a. At Cape du Couedic, pup numbers increased by a factor of 12.8 from 295 to 4070 over 21 breeding seasons at 11.4% p.a. Between 1988–89 and 1997–98, the increase averaged 14.2% p.a., after which it was 9.6% p.a. These increases have been accompanied by expansion in sub-colonies that existed in January 1989 and establishment of several new sub-colonies. Increases are likely to continue on Kangaroo Island. Conclusions There are few examples of increasing population levels for Australian native mammals and this is one of the best documented. It demonstrates that fur seal populations can recover from uncontrolled harvesting provided breeding habitat ashore is protected. Implications Fur seals interfere with fishers, disturb farmed tuna in aquaculture pens, and prey on little penguins.

Morphology, age and survival of adult male New Zealand fur seals, Arctocephalus forsteri, in South Australia

1999 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 21 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. K. Troy ◽  
R. Mattlin ◽  
P. D. Shaughnessy ◽  
P. S. Davie
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Adult Male ◽  
South Australia ◽  
Canine Tooth ◽  
Linear Measurements ◽  
Predictive Equations ◽  
Fur Seals ◽  
Fur Seal ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Breeding Seasons

Nineteen adult male New Zealand fur seals, Arctocephalus forsteri, were marked and measured at the start of the breeding seasons in November 1992 and 1993 at Cape Gantheaume, Kangaroo Island in South Australia. The age of each seal was estimated from the number of cementum layers in a post-canine tooth. The males that were attempting to hold territories were 7–15 years old and the heaviest was 160 kg. The mass of males could be predicted accurately from linear measurements and several predictive equations enable estimation of mass in the field. The mean annual survival rate for adult male New Zealand fur seals was 76%, which is higher than that in other fur seal species, perhaps reflecting the expanding nature of the A. forsteri population in Australia.

Changes in the abundance of New Zealand fur seals, Arctocephalus forsteri, on the Neptune Islands, South Australia

1996 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 697 ◽  
Author(s):  
PD Shaughnessy ◽  
I Stirling ◽  
TE Dennis
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
South Australia ◽  
Breeding Population ◽  
The South ◽  
Mark Recapture ◽  
The North ◽  
Fur Seals ◽  
Fur Seal ◽  
New Zealand Fur Seal ◽  
Breeding Seasons

The South Neptune Island group is a well-known site for the New Zealand fur seal, Arctocephalus forsteri. A survey of seals in South Australia and Western Australia in the 1989-90 summer indicated that colonies on the South Neptunes and the adjacent North Neptunes group contained half of the breeding population in Australia. The abundance of pups at the South Neptune group was determined in four breeding seasons: 1969-70, 1988-89, 1989-90 and 1992-93. The population on Main Island increased at an exponential rate of r = 0.053 (equivalent to 5.4% per annum) between the first two surveys: counts of pups increased from 487 to 1333, and the breeding area expanded to include several new colonies. Mark-recapture estimates of pup numbers in the two largest colonies in 1989-90 and 1992-93 did not differ statistically. Rates of increase in individual colonies over the 19 or 20 years from 1970 ranged from r = 0.031 (3.1%) to r = 0.256 (29.2%). On the South Neptune Islands, the estimate of pup abundance in the most recent survey (1992-93) was 1916, on the basis of mark-recapture in most colonies and of counting in a few small ones. On the North Neptune Islands, the estimate of pup abundance in 1992-93 was 2756, on the basis of mark-recapture in most colonies. By applying a multiplier of 4.9 to convert pup numbers to an estimate of abundance of the whole population, estimates of 9400 and 13500 fur seals were obtained for the South Neptune and North Neptune Islands in 1992-93, respectively. These estimates provide a firm foundation for comparisons in future years.

Records of vagrant fur seals (family Otariidae) in South Australia

2014 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter D. Shaughnessy ◽  
Catherine M. Kemper ◽  
David Stemmer ◽  
Jane McKenzie
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
South Australia ◽  
The South ◽  
South Indian Ocean ◽  
Fur Seals ◽  
South Indian ◽  
Fur Seal ◽  
New Zealand Fur Seal ◽  
The Antarctic ◽  
Subantarctic Fur Seals

Two fur seal species breed on the southern coast of Australia: the Australian fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus) and the New Zealand fur seal (A. forsteri). Two other species are vagrants: the subantarctic fur seal (A. tropicalis) and the Antarctic fur seal (A. gazella). We document records of vagrant fur seals in South Australia from 1982 to 2012 based primarily on records from the South Australian Museum. There were 86 subantarctic fur seals: 49 specimens and 37 sightings. Most (77%) were recorded from July to October and 83% of all records were juveniles. All but two specimens were collected between July and November. Sightings were prevalent during the same period, but there were also nine sightings during summer (December–February), several of healthy-looking adults. Notable concentrations were near Victor Harbor, on Kangaroo Island and Eyre Peninsula. Likely sources of subantarctic fur seals seen in South Australia are Macquarie and Amsterdam Islands in the South Indian Ocean, ~2700 km south-east and 5200 km west of SA, respectively. There were two sightings of Antarctic fur seals, both of adults, on Kangaroo Island at New Zealand fur seal breeding colonies. Records of this species for continental Australia and nearby islands are infrequent.

Seasonal dive behaviour of lactating New Zealand fur seals (Arctocephalus forsteri)

1998 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 350-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
R H Mattlin ◽  
N J Gales ◽  
D P Costa
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Dive Depth ◽  
Dive Duration ◽  
Early Summer ◽  
Late Winter ◽  
Individual Values ◽  
Dive Behaviour ◽  
Fur Seals ◽  
Fur Seal ◽  
Bay Islands

The dive behaviour of 18 female New Zealand fur seals (Arctocephalus forsteri) from Taumaka, Open Bay Islands, New Zealand (43°52'S, 168°53'E), was recorded during early (summer; December-February), mid (autumn; March-May), and late (winter; June-August) lactation. Mean dive depth, dive duration, and bottom time for dives >=6 m in depth increased from summer through winter. Variation in individual seal dive behaviour within a season accounted for approximately 11, 9, and 11% of the observed difference between seasons in dive depth, dive duration, and bottom time, respectively. Seasonal dive data (mean ± 1 SD) were as follows: summer: dive depth 30 ± 37 m, dive duration 1.4 ± 1.1 min, and bottom time 0.5 ± 0.6 min; autumn: dive depth 54 ± 47 m, dive duration 2.4 ± 1.3 min, and bottom time 1.0 ± 0.8 min; winter: dive depth 74 ± 64 m, dive duration 2.9 ± 1.5 min, and bottom time 1.2 ± 1.1 min. Maximum recorded dive depth was 274 m for a 5.67-min dive in autumn. Maximum duration was 11.17 min for a dive to 237+ m in winter. New Zealand fur seals are the deepest diving fur seal species reported thus far. The estimated theoretical aerobic dive limit was exceeded on 18.4% of dives (range of individual values 0.2-57.8%). Females (n = 12) were ashore about 1.8 days at a time during February through November, and this increased to about 4.3 days during December and January. Average time spent away from the rookery ranged from 3 to 15 days.

Colony growth and pup condition of the New Zealand fur seal (Arctocephalus forsteri) on the Kaikoura coastline compared with other east coast colonies

2006 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 497 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. J. Boren ◽  
C. G. Muller ◽  
N. J. Gemmell
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Body Condition ◽  
East Coast ◽  
Colony Growth ◽  
The Body ◽  
Fur Seal ◽  
Seal Population ◽  
Condition Indices ◽  
New Zealand Fur Seal ◽  
Breeding Seasons

Abstract.Since its near extermination by sealing, the New Zealand fur seal (Arctocephalus forsteri) has been recolonising areas of its former range throughout New Zealand and Australia. This study examined fur seal population growth over four breeding seasons spanning 2002–05 at the Ohau Point and Lynch’s Reef colonies in Kaikoura and the Horseshoe Bay and Te Oka Bay colonies on Banks Peninsula, on the east coast of New Zealand. Estimates of pup numbers were made using mark–recapture techniques and condition indices were used to assess the body condition of pups in each colony. We found that the Ohau Point and Te Oka Bay colonies are growing exponentially (32% and 47% per annum respectively), reaching nearly 600 pups at Ohau Point and 300 pups at Te Oka Bay, whereas Horseshoe Bay appears stable. Pups born at Ohau Point are consistently heavier and in better condition than their Banks Peninsula counterparts despite the faster rate of growth observed at Te Oka Bay. An El Niño event in 2003 coincided with a drop in mass and condition at the Banks Peninsula colonies, but not at the Kaikoura colony. This discrepancy between colonies in response to environmental conditions suggests that colony-specific variables at Kaikoura may provide more favourable conditions for rearing pups than on Banks Peninsula.

Studies on the behaviour on the South Ausralian fur seal, Arctocephalus forsteri (Lesson) II. Adult females and pups

1971 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 267 ◽  
Author(s):  
I Stirling
Keyword(s):  
Sex Ratio ◽  
Breeding Season ◽  
Male And Female ◽  
Specific Location ◽  
Adult Females ◽  
Specific Behaviour ◽  
Fur Seal ◽  
O 47 ◽  
High Degree ◽  
Regular Patterns

A. forsteri pups were all weaned by 1 year old and were then totally absent from the island during the breeding season. The recorded intervals, for three tagged females, between apparent weaning of one pup and birth of the next were 29, 40, and 60 days. Some females became infested with barnacles during the period of feeding at sea prior to parturition. Adult females showed a high degree of fidelity to specific breeding colonies. Little specific behaviour, other than restlessness, preceded birth. Five observed births took from 5 sec to 4 min. Pups could swim when born. Male and female newborn pups weighed 4.41 =0.60 and 4.11 +O.47 kg respectively; the sex ratio was not significantly different from unity. Pups stayed with their mothers at a specific location for the first few days, after which the females began to feed at sea and the pups began to associate with each other. Females had not established regular patterns of presence and absence in the pupping colony by early February, but did so by late April. Females did not defend even newborn pups from approaching humans.

Long-term survival, length of breeding season, and operational sex ratio in a boreal population of common frogs, Rana temporaria L.

1990 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johan Elmberg
Keyword(s):  
Sex Ratio ◽  
Breeding Season ◽  
Rana Temporaria ◽  
Return Rate ◽  
Operational Sex Ratio ◽  
Adult Males ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Size Dependent ◽  
Survival Selection

A population of individually marked adult Rana temporaria was studied during the breeding season in 1979–1988 in east-central Sweden. Annual return rate averaged 31% (range 16–51%) in males and 16% (range 5–33%) in females. Return rate was not size dependent but increased with every successful previous hibernation, indicating an increased survival rate with age. Return rate was not correlated with winter harshness. Once adult, males had on average 1.5 (maximum 6) seasons with the possibility of reproducing. Corresponding values for females were 1.4 and 4. Mean length of the breeding season was 20 (SD = 2) days. Calling generally started at water temperatures below 3 °C. The lowest spawning temperature was 1 °C. Average temperatures at spawning onset and peak spawning were 5 and 6 °C, respectively. Large males tended to arrive earlier at the pond than small males. Males arrived earlier and stayed longer than did females. The overall population sex ratio was close to unity. The operational sex ratio (OSR) varied during the breeding season, averaging 0.54 (one female to two males). No male was observed to mate more than once per season. I argue that survival selection is more important to male lifetime mating success than is competition in the breeding pond (sexual selection as affected by OSR and length of the breeding season).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document