Land application of farm dairy effluent to a mole and pipe drained soil: implications for nutrient enrichment of winter-spring drainage

Soil Research ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 45 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Houlbrooke ◽  
D. J. Horne ◽  
M. J. Hedley ◽  
V. O. Snow ◽  
J. A. Hanly

Spray irrigation of farm dairy effluent (FDE) to artificially drained land in accordance with deferred irrigation criteria causes minimal direct drainage of partially treated FDE at the time of irrigation. The influence of deferred irrigation of FDE on the subsequent nutrient enrichment of winter–spring drainage from mole and pipe systems is unknown. Research was conducted in the Manawatu region, New Zealand, to investigate the influence of deferred irrigation of FDE on the quality of water in artificial drainage. The experimental site was established on a Pallic soil (Tokomaru silt loam) at the No. 4 dairy farm at Massey University, Palmerston North. There were 6 plots (each 40 m by 40 m), each with an isolated mole and pipe drainage network. Four of the plots received fertiliser according to the farm’s fertiliser program (non-effluent plots), while the other 2 plots received applications of FDE according to the deferred irrigation scheduling criteria (effluent plots). All of the plots were subject to the farm’s standard grazing management.The average concentrations of N and P in the 2003 winter drainage (average 236 mm) from both the non-effluent and FDE irrigated plots were well above the threshold concentrations that stimulate aquatic weed growth in fresh water bodies. Annual nutrient losses of 31.4 kg N ha/year and 0.65 kg P ha/year in drainage were recorded for non-effluent plots. Deferred irrigation of FDE in the summer period did not increase the loss of N in winter–spring drainage (N loss from effluent plots was 31.1 kg N ha/year) but did cause a significant increase (P < 0.001) in total P in drainage (an additional 1.03 kg P/ha, c. 160% of losses from non-effluent plots, a loss of 3.3% of applied P). Furthermore, an irrigation of FDE to near-saturated soil in mid September resulted in the direct drainage of partially treated effluent, and hence, N and P concentrations in drainage were 6–10-fold greater than those that would normally be expected from drainage events induced by winter–spring rainfall. This illustrates the importance of scheduling FDE irrigation in accordance with deferred irrigation principles.

2003 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 73-83
Author(s):  
V.O. Snow ◽  
L.E. Fung ◽  
S.E. Hurst ◽  
I.R. Mcivor ◽  
G.B. Douglas ◽  
...  

Alternatives to the traditional treatment of effluent, irrigation back onto pasture, may prove valuable for farmers. Here we present the results from the first two years of a trial set up to test the potential of cut-and-carry coppiced hardwoods (poplars and willows) in taking up nitrogen from fresh effluent and providing fodder on a dairy farm. Three blocks each of Argyle poplars and Tangoio willows were planted as 1.2 m stakes on a dairy farm in southern Wairarapa in September 2001. One block of each species was irrigated with fresh farm dairy effluent at a high rate, about 5 mm per week, the second was irrigated at a low rate of about half that amount, and the third control block of each species was left unirrigated. The first coppicing, conducted in March 2002, yielded 6, 13, and 24 t DM/ha from the Willow-Control, -Low, and -High treatments. The corresponding yields from the poplar blocks were 6, 14, and 11 t DM/ha. The depressed yield of the Poplar- High was due to a rust infection. Growth was much slower in 2002/03 due to a cold October and dry summer. The yields were about a third of those measured in the previous year. The amount of nitrogen in the harvested biomass of the Willow- High treatment was 440 and 100 kg N/ha in the two years. Coppice blocks are likely to be most useful where the amount of land suitable for irrigation is limited, where there may be heightened concerns about the effects of nitrate leaching, or where wet weather storage of effluent is limited. The coppice blocks accumulate a large amount of animal fodder in late summer when many farms experience feed gaps and the fodder from coppice blocks may also have animal health benefits. Keywords: willow, poplar, forage crops


2016 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 337 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Li ◽  
J. Luo ◽  
Y. Shi ◽  
Y. Li ◽  
Y. Ma ◽  
...  

Urine patches in grazed pastures have been identified as important sources of nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions. An increase in N2O emissions is possible where urine patches coincide with dung patches and farm dairy effluent (FDE) applications. The aim of the present study was to quantify the effects of dung additions and fresh FDE applications on N2O emissions from urine patches. A field experiment was conducted on a pasture site at the AgResearch’s Ruakura dairy farm in Hamilton, New Zealand. A closed soil chamber technique was used to measure the N2O emissions from a free-draining volcanic soil that received urine (492 kg N/ha, simulated urine patches), with or without dung (1146 kg N/ha) and fresh FDE (100 kg N/ha) and to compare these with controls receiving no urine. The addition of dung delayed the peak N2O fluxes from the urine patches by ~30 days. This could be due to temporary nitrogen (N) immobilisation during decomposition of carbon from the dung. However, over the whole measurement period (271 days), dung addition increased the N2O emission factor (EF, % of applied N emitted as N2O) for the urine from 1.02% to 2.09%. The application of fresh FDE increased the EF to 1.40%. The effluent- or dung-induced increases in N2O emissions from the urine patches were possibly caused both by the direct input of N from effluent or dung and through the indirect priming effect of addition of dung or effluent on the availability of N from urine patches for N2O production. We conclude that when EFs are used in calculations of N2O emissions from urine, consideration should be given to the likelihood of coincidence with dung or FDE applications.


Author(s):  
C.G. Roach ◽  
R.D. Longhurst ◽  
S.F. Ledgard

Land application of farm dairy effluent (FDE) is preferred over pond treatment because of the potential reduction in environmental impacts, and recycling of valuable nutrients. Recent findings from the past 5 years of research by AgResearch and Dexcel are presented to provide an overview of the effects of applying FDE to pastures. Results indicate that significant pasture responses to applying FDE at increasing rates of N were found in both the mowing and grazing trials. There was no difference in pasture responses between FDE and urea when applied at the same rate of N. The ryegrass content of pastures increased with increasing N rates whether from effluent or urea. N and nitrate-N concentrations in the herbage showed some increases but were not excessive at rates up to 400 kgN/ha/yr. Pasture concentrations of other nutrients (except K) were unaffected by the rate or form of nitrogen applied. Both pasture K and soil K levels were significantly higher under the effluent treatments. Nitrate and calcium leaching increased significantly under the highest rate of N application (400 kgN/ha/yr). Spreading FDE over a sufficiently large area (15-20% of the farm) can reduce inputs of K to near maintenance requirements and restrict N inputs to about 80- 120 kg N/ha/yr, thereby avoiding potential animal health and environmental problems. A behavioural study showed that cows disliked grazing pastures recently treated with FDE. This study also showed that there was a significant and rapid decline in faecal coliform counts on pasture following effluent application. Keywords: faecal coliforms, farm dairy effluent, FDE, groundwater, nitrate leaching, pasture, soil


2015 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Laubach ◽  
S Heubeck ◽  
C Pratt ◽  
KB Woodward ◽  
B Guieysse ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 222 ◽  
pp. 133-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.J. van der Weerden ◽  
N. Cox ◽  
J. Luo ◽  
H.J. Di ◽  
A. Podolyan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document