7 PLASMA PROGESTERONE CONCENTRATIONS IN OVARIECTOMIZED COWS WITH INTRAVAGINAL DEVICES CONTAINING DIFFERENT LEVELS OF PROGESTERONE

2006 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 112
Author(s):  
M. Aviles ◽  
L. Cutaia ◽  
I. Videla Dorna ◽  
M. Aba ◽  
G. A. Bo
Keyword(s):  
Los Angeles ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Solid Phase ◽  
Body Condition Score ◽  
Animal Health ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Beef Cows ◽  
Sudden Increase ◽  
Plasma Progesterone ◽  
Blood Samples

An experiment was designed to determine plasma progesterone (P4) concentrations in ovariectomized cows treated with either CIDR-B devices (Pfizer Animal Health, Hamilton, New Zealand) impregnated with 1.9 g of P4 or DIB devices (Syntex, Argentina) impregnated with 0.5 or 1.0 g of P4. Fifteen ovariectomized beef cows, weighing 350 to 450 kg and with a body condition score (BCS) 2.5 to 3.0 out of 5 were used. All cows were ovariectomized 30 days before the beginning of the trial and had plasma P4 concentrations <1 ng/mL (measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA)) 10 days before the trial. On Day 0, cows were stratified by weight and randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups to receive intravaginal devices containing 0.5 g of P4 (DIB 0.5), 1 g of P4 (DIB 1.0), or 1.9 g of P4 (CIDR-B). Blood samples were taken 12 and 24 h after intravaginal device insertion and then every 24 h until device removal on Day 7. Jugular blood samples were drawn into heparinized tubes and centrifuged within 20 min of collection; the plasma was harvested, frozen, and stored at −10°C. Progesterone was measured in plasma samples using a commercial solid-phase RIA (Coat-a-count; Diagnostic Products Corp., Los Angeles, CA, USA). All of the samples were analyzed at one time and the intra-assay coefficient of variation was 13%. Plasma P4 concentrations were compared among treatments by calculating the area under the curve over time and testing for differences by ANOVA. Plasma P4 profiles were also analyzed by ANOVA for repeated measures. Analysis of plasma P4 profiles revealed a day effect (P < 0.001) but not a treatment effect (P > 0.13) or a day by treatment interaction (P > 0.16; Table 1). The area under the curve did not differ (P = 0.95) among groups (DIB 0.5: 2236.4 ng, DIB 1.0: 2164.6 ng, and CIDR-B: 2266.8 ng). In all treatments, plasma P4 profiles were characterized by a sudden increase in P4 concentrations within 12 h of device insertion and a gradual decrease during the following several days. It was concluded that the use of CIDR-B devices impregnated with 1.9 g of P4 or DIB devices impregnated with 1.0 or 0.5 g of P4 did not result in different plasma P4 concentrations in ovariectomized cows. Further studies are needed to confirm these results in lactating and dry intact (not ovariectomized) cattle. Table 1. Mean plasma P4 concentrations (ng/mL ± SEM) in ovariectomized cows treated with intravaginal devices containing 0.5 g (DIB 0.5), 1.0 g (DIB 1.0), or 1.9 g (CIDR-B) of P4*

10 TIMED ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION PROTOCOLS TO SYNCHRONIZATION OF OVULATION IN BOS TAURUS TAURUS SUCKLING BEEF COWS

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 97
Author(s):  
G. A. Pessoa ◽  
A. P. Martini ◽  
J. M. Trentin ◽  
D. R. Dotto ◽  
H. L. D. Neri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bos Taurus ◽  
Body Condition Score ◽  
Animal Health ◽  
Beef Cows ◽  
Treated Group ◽  
Conception Rate ◽  
Plasma Progesterone ◽  
Follicle Diameter ◽  
Condition Score ◽  
South Of Brazil

The aim of this study was to compare 3 methods for synchronization of ovulation in anestrous beef cows. The hypothesis of this study was to determine whether low doses of hCG has superior efficacy to cypionate to induce ovulation in anestrous cows and provide higher pregnancy rate in oestrus-synchronization programs. Synchronization of ovulation and conception rate to timed AI (TAI) were evaluated in anestrus Bos taurus taurus suckling beef cows 45 ± 15 days postpartum and with body condition score of 2.9 (1 to 5) maintained in a native pastured system in the south of Brazil. Females were evaluated with ultrasound on the Day 0 (D0) of the protocol (Day 0), day 8 (D8), immediately before TAI (D10), and 7 days after TAI (Day 17). All cows were synchronized with an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device (IPRD; 0.75 g of progesterone, Prociclar®, Hertape Calier Animal Health, Juatuba, Brazil) and 2 mg IM of oestradiol benzoate (EB; Benzoato HC®) on D0. On Day 8, the IPRD was removed and 150 μg of D (+) cloprostenol (Veteglan Luteolytic®), and 25 IU IM FSH/LH (Pluset®) were administered. Females of the EC (n = 84) group received 1 mg IM of oestradiol cypionate (EC; Cipionato HC®). Females on D8 of the hCG (n = 81) group received 500 IU IM of hCG (Vetecor®, Hertape Calier) at the time of TAI. The females of the EC + hCG group (n = 83) received both treatments. All cows were submitted to TAI 54 h after withdrawal of IPRD. A part of the cows (n = 102) had the ovulation evaluated every 12 h from the withdrawal of IPRD [EC (n = 34), hCG (n = 34), and hCG + EC (n = 33)]. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS PROC GLIMMIX. The dominant follicle diameter (FD) on Day 8 (8.7 ± 0.2, 8.8 ± 0.2, 8.6 ± 0.2) did not differ between treatments EC, EC + hCG, or hCG (P = 0.79). However, the FD on D10 was higher (P = 0.001) for cows treated with hCG (12.9 ± 0.3) compared with cows from the EC (11.3 ± 0.2) or EC + hCG group (11.8 ± 0.2). The interval (h) between the withdrawal of IPRD and ovulation was lower (P = 0.01) for the hCG group, (71.2 ± 1.7) compared with the groups treated with EC or EC + hCG (76.6 ± 2.18 and 74.2 ± 1.65), respectively. The ovulation rate did not differ (P = 0.61) among the EC (85.2%, 29/34), hCG (91.1%, 31/34), or EC + hCG groups (90.9%, 30/33). Corpus luteum diameter (mm) was higher (P = 0.04) on D17 for the hCG-treated group (21.4 ± 0.3) compared with others treatments (EC = 19.1 ± 0.8 or EC + hCG = 20.4 ± 0.8). However, the plasma progesterone levels on D17 were EC = 2.0 ± 0.1, hCG = 2.4 ± 0.1, and EC + hCG = 2.3 ± 0.1 ng mL–1 (P = 0.19), and the conception rate on the 28th day after TAI (EC = 43.0%; hCG = 47.0%, and EC + hCG = 48.8%; P = 0.76) was also similar. The hCG determined smallest ovulation interval, but similar rates of pregnancy were observed with both treatments.

16 PROGESTERONE RELEASE PATTERNS FROM CUE-MATE IN COMPARISON TO OTHER INTRAVAGINAL PROGESTERONE-RELEASING DEVICES IN LACTATING DAIRY COWS

2007 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 126 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Rogan ◽  
M. F. Martinez ◽  
G. A. Bo ◽  
P. Chesta ◽  
F. Feresin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Los Angeles ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Buenos Aires ◽  
Animal Health ◽  
Plasma Progesterone ◽  
Pfizer Animal Health ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Main Effects ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Mean Concentration

Various intravaginal progesterone-releasing devices are commercially available and each is impregnated with different amounts of progesterone. An experiment was designed to characterize plasma progesterone release profiles from Cue-Mate in comparison with other commercially available progesterone-releasing devices. Cycling, lactating Holstein cows (n = 60; BCS between 2.0 and 3.0 out of 5) from commercial dairy farms in Argentina were used in 2 replicates. All cows received 2 injections of D+ cloprostenol (PGF, Bioprost-D�; Biotay, Buenos Aires, Argentina) 14 days apart and were randomly assigned to one of four groups to receive intravaginal devices as follows: Cue-Mate (1.56 g progesterone; Bioniche Animal Health, A/Asia Pty, Armidale, Australia; n = 10), DIB (1 g progesterone; Syntex SA, Argentina; n = 10), CIDR with 1.9 g progesterone (Pfizer Salud Animal S.A., Buenos Aires, Argentina; n = 10), or CIDR with 1.38 g progesterone (Pfizer Animal Health, Groton, CT, USA; n = 10). All devices were inserted 24 hours after the second PGF and were left in place for 31 days. Blood samples were taken for progesterone analysis at 6-hour intervals for the first 24 hours, then daily for a week, and every 2 days for an additional 25 days. Plasma progesterone concentrations were measured with a modified human double-antibody RIA kit (DPC Coat-A-Count�; Diagnostic Products Corporation, Los Angeles, CA, USA). Cows were observed twice daily to confirm that vaginal inserts were still in place. Time-series hormone data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure for repeated measures (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Main effects of device and time, the highest mean concentration of progesterone, and the mean day on which this occurred were compared by a protected LSD test. There was no evidence of cow discomfort with any of the vaginal devices, and loss rates did not differ. There was an effect of group (P &lt; 0.001) and day (P &lt; 0.001) for progesterone concentrations, but there was no interaction (P = 0.89). Peak concentrations of progesterone (ng mL-1) did not differ among groups (Cue-Mate: 5.0 � 1.1; DIB: 3.9 � 0.6; 1.9-g CIDR: 4.6 � 0.6; 1.38-g CIDR: 3.7 � 0.4; P = 0.51). Mean (� SEM) concentrations of progesterone over the 31-day insertion period differed between 1.9-g CIDR (1.8 � 0.2 ng mL-1) and DIB (1.5 � 0.1 ng mL-1, P &lt; 0.006), with Cue-Mate (1.5 � 0.2 ng mL-1) and 1.38-g CIDR (1.6 � 0.1 ng mL-1) intermediate and not different from either. When data were evaluated from insertion until Day 7, mean plasma progesterone concentrations did not differ among groups (Cue-Mate: 2.2 � 0.2 ng mL-1; DIB: 2.2 � 0.1 ng mL-1; 1.9-g CIDR: 2.6 � 0.2 ng mL-1; 1.38-g CIDR: 2.1 � 0.1 ng mL-1). However, progesterone concentrations from insertion until Day 21 were higher (P &lt; 0.03) in cows with a 1.9-g CIDR (2.1 � 0.1 ng mL-1) than in those with a DIB (1.6 � 0.1 ng mL-1) or a 1.38-g CIDR (1.6 � 0.1 ng mL-1), with Cue-Mate (1.7 � 0.1 ng mL-1) intermediate and not different. Based on progesterone release patterns, it was concluded that Cue-Mate intravaginal devices can be used in protocols for synchronization of estrus and ovulation as with other progesterone-releasing devices.

13 EFFECTS OF PLASMA PROGESTERONE CONCENTRATIONS ON LH RELEASE AND OVULATION IN BEEF CATTLE GIVEN GnRH

2006 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 115
Author(s):  
H. Davis ◽  
M. Colazo ◽  
M. Rutledge ◽  
J. Small ◽  
J. Kastelic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Animal Health ◽  
Beef Cows ◽  
Dominant Follicle ◽  
Plasma Progesterone ◽  
Lactating Cows ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Prostaglandin F ◽  
Pfizer Animal Health ◽  
Lh Release ◽  
To Receive

Two experiments were conducted to determine the effects of plasma progesterone (P4) concentrations on LH release and ovulation in beef heifers and lactating beef cows given gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). Previously autoclaved, once-used CIDR inserts (Colazo et al. 2004 Anim. Reprod. Sci. 81, 25-34) were used for experimental purposes to induce differential plasma progesterone concentrations. In Experiment 1, postpubertal heifers received 25 mg of dinoprost i.m. (prostaglandin F (PGF); Lutalyse; Pfizer Animal Health, Montreal, Quebec, Canada). On Day 4 (estrus = Day 0), heifers were randomly assigned (10/group) to receive no treatment (control) or 1 or 2 autoclaved once-used CIDR (Pfizer Animal Health) inserts (1CIDR and 2CIDR, respectively). On Day 5, heifers in the 1CIDR group were given PGF twice 12 h apart. On Day 6, all heifers received 100 �g of GnRH i.m. (Cystorelin; Merial Canada, Inc., Victoriaville, Quebec, Canada). Once daily on Days 4 to 9, a blood sample was collected and ultrasonography was performed. On Day 6, heifers in the control (3.0 � 0.4 ng/mL; mean � SD) and 1CIDR groups (3.0 � 0.3 ng/mL) had lower (P < 0.01) plasma progesterone concentrations than those in the 2CIDR group (5.7 � 0.4 ng/mL). However, the diameter of the dominant follicle was larger (P < 0.001) in heifers in the control and 1CIDR groups than in the 2CIDR group (12.1 � 1.0, 11.5 � 0.7, and 10.1 � 0.7 mm, respectively). More (P < 0.01) heifers ovulated in response to GnRH in the control and 1CIDR groups than in the 2CIDR group (10/10, 9/10, and 3/10, respectively). In Experiment 2, ultrasound-guided follicular ablation (FA) was performed (to synchronize ovarian follicular wave emergence) 4 to 6 days after estrus in 20 postpubertal heifers and 20 mature lactating cows. Cattle were randomly and equally assigned to receive an autoclaved, once-used CIDR, either with no further treatment (High-P4) or with two PGF treatments 12 h apart (Low-P4) given after FA. All cattle received 100 �g of GnRH either 6 days after FA or the day after the dominant follicle reached 9 mm in diameter. Ultrasonography was performed daily (from 4 days after FA to ovulation or to 3 days after GnRH treatment). In three cows and three heifers per group, blood samples were collected every 30 min for 12 h after GnRH. The dominant follicle at GnRH treatment was larger in cows than heifers (11.0 � 1.1 vs. 10.3 � 0.9 mm, respectively; P = 0.05) and tended to be smaller in the High-P4 group vs. the Low-P4 group (10.3 � 1.0 vs. 11.0 � 1.0 mm; P = 0.06). Ovulatory response was not different (P = 0.9) between heifers (77.7%) and cows (78.9%), but combined for heifers and cows, was lower in High-P4 vs. Low-P4 cattle (61.1 vs. 94.7; P < 0.01). The GnRH-induced LH surge did not differ (P = 0.23) between cows and heifers, but it was lower and of shorter duration (P < 0.001) in the High-P4 group than in the Low-P4 group. In summary, higher plasma P4 concentrations resulted in decreased LH release and the proportion of cattle ovulating in response to GnRH treatment. There was no significant difference between heifers and cows in LH release or ovulatory response.

445 RELATIONSHIPS OF LUTEAL PHASE VARIABLES (PRIOR TO AI) WITH FOLLICULAR WAVES IN WATER BUFFALOES

2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 379
Author(s):  
H. Kohram ◽  
G. Mohammadi ◽  
E. Dirandeh
Keyword(s):  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Ultrasound Examination ◽  
Limit Of Detection ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Prostaglandin F2α ◽  
Control Treatment ◽  
Estrous Cycles ◽  
Plasma Progesterone ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Follicular Waves

This study was done to consider relationships of luteal phase variables (prior to AI) with follicular waves. The estrous cycles of 15 buffaloes were synchronized with 2 i.m. injections of prostaglandin F2α given 11 days apart. The buffaloes were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatments. Buffaloes in the control treatment received no treatment, whereas G6 buffalos received a GnRH injection between Day 5 and 7 and G16 buffalos received a GnRH injection between Day 15 and 17 of the estrous cycle (estrus = Day 0). Daily, from estrus Day 0 to the next estrus Day 23, buffaloes had their ovaries scanned by ultrasound. Blood samples were collected by tail following each ultrasound examination from estrus until next estrus (estrus = 0). Concentrations of plasma progesterone were determined by radioimmunoassay kit. The limit of detection of the assay was 0.1 45 ng mL-1 and the intra- and interassay coeffients of variation were 7.4% and 9.2%, respectively. Data were analyzed by using PROC GLM of SAS (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). For comparisons between groups, the 2-sample t-test was used for continuous traits, such as size of CL or hormone concentrations. Prospective comparisons of indices of progesterone indicated that the length of luteal lifespan was longer in 3-wave than in 2-wave buffaloes (P < 0.01). Plasma progesterone concentrations were similar at peak and measured as area under the curve on Day 5 through 17 preceding insemination in 2-wave (5.30 ± 0.40 ng mL-1) and 3-wave buffaloes (5.10 ± 0.20 ng mL-1). Length of the luteal phase (defined as from the day of estrus until the last day on which plasma progesterone remained >2 ng mL-1) was <2 days shorter in 2-wave buffaloes than in 3-wave buffaloes (15.20 ± 0.40 v. 17.10 ± 0.50 d; P < 0.05). In addition, the day of peak progesterone occurred earlier in 2-wave buffaloes (13.50 ± 0.30 v. 15.30 ± 0.70 d; P < 0.05).

20 ADMINISTRATION OF FOLLICLE-STIMULATING HORMONE AT CIDR REMOVAL DOES NOT AFFECT THE PREGNANCY RATE IN A CIDR-BASED, COSYNCH PROTOCOL IN LACTATING BEEF COWS

2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 90 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Small ◽  
F. Dias ◽  
L. Pfeifer ◽  
K. Lightfoot ◽  
M. Colazo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Bos Taurus ◽  
Body Condition Score ◽  
Animal Health ◽  
Beef Cows ◽  
Pregnancy Rates ◽  
Condition Score ◽  
Secondary Objective ◽  
Pfizer Animal Health

In previous studies, giving eCG at CIDR removal significantly increased the pregnancy rate after timed-AI in beef cows. However, eCG is not universally available. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that giving pFSH at CIDR removal might improve the pregnancy rate in a CIDR-based, Cosynch protocol in postpartum, suckled Bos taurus beef cows; a secondary objective was to compare pregnancy rates when GnRH v. pLH was used to synchronize wave emergence and ovulation. This work was conducted as two experiments (separate locations). All cows were given a CIDR (containing 1.9 g progesterone; Pfizer Animal Health, Montreal, QC, Canada) on Day 0 (without regard to stage of estrous cycle or cyclicity). On Day 7, CIDRs were removed, all cows were concurrently given 25 mg PGF (Lutalyse; Pfizer Animal Health, Groton, CT, USA), half were given 20 mg pFSH (Folltropin-V; Bioniche Animal Health, Belleville, ON, Canada), and all cows were timed-AI 54 h later (Day 9). In Experiment 1, 240 cows [94 � 10.8 days postpartum; body condition score (BCS: 1 = emaciated, 9 = obese; mean � SD): 5.8 � 0.4] were used; at CIDR insertion and AI, cows were allocated to receive either 100 µg GnRH (n = 160; Cystorelin, Merial Canada Inc., Victoriaville, QC, Canada) or 12.5 mg pLH (n = 80; Lutropin-V, Bioniche Animal Health). In Experiment 2, 109 cows (59.2 � 19.5 days postpartum; BCS: 5.6 � 1.1) were used; all received 100 µg GnRH (Cystorelin) at CIDR insertion and AI. In Experiment 1, three cows that lost their CIDR were excluded; pregnancy rates after timed-AI (logistic regression, backward selection: parity, pFSH, synchronizing treatment, and their interactions) were not different between cows given pFSH v. control cows (64.7 v. 65.2%; P > 0.80), nor between cows given GnRH v. pLH (62.7 v. 69.6%; P = 0.91). However, there was an interaction (P < 0.04) between parity and the synchronizing treatment; in primiparous cows, pregnancy rates were significantly lower in those given GnRH v. pLH (59.3 v. 83.3%). In Experiment 2, pregnancy rates after timed-AI (logistic regression, backward selection: parity, pFSH, and their interaction) were not different between cows given pFSH v. control cows (38.2 v. 42.6%; P > 0.6). In conclusion, our hypothesis was not supported; giving pFSH at CIDR removal did not significantly improve the pregnancy rate in a CIDR-based, Cosynch protocol in postpartum, suckled Bos taurus beef cows.

Effects of body condition, food intake and temporary calf separation on the duration of the post-partum anoestrous period and associated LH, FSH and prolactin concentrations in beef cows

1987 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 395-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. A. Wright ◽  
S. M. Rhind ◽  
A. J. F. Russel ◽  
T. K. Whyte ◽  
Alison J. McBean ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Condition ◽  
Body Condition Score ◽  
Post Partum ◽  
Beef Cows ◽  
Pulse Frequency ◽  
Metabolizable Energy ◽  
Barley Straw ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Feeding Level ◽  
Condition Score

ABSTRACTAn experiment was conducted to examine factors affecting the length of the post-partum anoestrous period and associated effects on LH, FSH and prolactin. Forty-six cows (24 Hereford × Friesian and 22 Blue-Grey) ranging in body condition score at calving from 1·50 to 2·75 were used. They were individually fed chopped barley straw and concentrate at either 50 (low) or 91 (high) MJ metabolizable energy per day from calving. At 34 days post partum half the cows were separated from their calves for 48 h. The duration of the post-partum anoestrous period was estimated from progesterone concentrations in thrice weekly blood samples. Blood samples were collected every 20 min for 10 h periods immediately prior to calf separation, during the last 10 h of calf separation and 1 week later. All samples were analysed for LH, and every third sample was analysed for FSH and prolactin.There were no significant effects of genotype, feeding level or calf separation on the length of the post-partum anoestrous period. There was a negative association between body condition score at calving and the length of the anoestrous period, with each unit increase in body condition score reducing the anoestrous period by 43 (s.e. 20) days. There was some evidence that feeding level affected the number of thin cows (body condition score ≤2·25 at calving) which were still acyclic at the end of the experiment, but not the number of fat cows (body condition score ≥2·5 at calving).FSH levels were not affected by any of the factors examined. Prolactin concentrations were higher in fatter cows, in cows on the higher level of feeding and in Blue-Grey cows. Prolactin concentrations decreased during the period of calf separation. Genotype and feeding level had no effect on LH concentration or LH pulse frequency. LH pulse frequency was increased (P < 0·05) during the period of calf separation, but there was no effect 1 week later. There was a significant positive relationship between LH puise frequency and body condition score at calving in two of the three sampling periods.It is suggested that the effect of body condition on the duration of the post-partum anoestrous period i s mediated through effects on LH pulse frequency.

scholarly journals Influence of an immune-modulatory feed supplement on performance and immune function of beef cows and calves preweaning

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyler S Crook ◽  
Paul A Beck ◽  
Shane Gadberry ◽  
Michael B Sims ◽  
C Brandon Stewart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Condition ◽  
Body Condition Score ◽  
Animal Health ◽  
Late Summer ◽  
Beef Cows ◽  
Beef Industry ◽  
Data Loggers ◽  
Daily Rate ◽  
Condition Score ◽  
Nutritional Compounds

Abstract The ability to positively alter immune and stress response with nutritional compounds is of great interest and importance to the beef industry. There is a proprietary product (OmniGen-AF [OG]; Phibro Animal Health, Quincy, IL) reported to have performance-enhancing benefits by altering animal response to stress and immune challenges. The objective of this 2-yr research project was to study the effect of supplementing OG to beef cows and their calves on breeding and growth performance. One hundred and twelve multiparous beef cows and 48 primiparous cows were randomly assigned to treatment in year 1; control (CON, no OG; n = 56 multiparous and 24 primiparous) or treatment (OG fed at 8.8 g/100 kg body weight [BW]; n = 56 multiparous and 24 primiparous). Multiparous cows (mean ± SD = 6.4 ± 0.4 yr; BW = 589 ± 9.2 kg; body condition score [BCS] 6.2 ± 0.07) were used in both years of the experiment and primiparous cows (mean ± SD = 2.1 ± 0.04 yr of age, weighed 400 ± 7.5 kg, and BSC of 5.6 ± 0.06) were only used in the first year of the experiment. CON and OG supplements were offered over two production cycles beginning in December approximately 60 d prior to projected calving through pre-breeding in May of each year. Calves from treatment cows were offered treatments in a creep supplement limited to a daily rate of 1% as-fed of BW prorated for 3-d/wk feeding from mid-July through weaning with OG offered at 8.8 g/100 kg BW. Primiparous cow’s BW, BCS, and calf performance were not affected by treatment (P ≥ 0.15) in year 1. BW of multiparous OG cows tended (P = 0.10) to be heavier at weaning in year 1 and was greater (P = 0.05) at the onset of the experiment in year 2. Body condition of OG cows was greater (P ≤ 0.02) at weaning in both years 1 and 2, as well as at the onset of the experiment in year 2. Calves fed OG from the mature cows gained more (P = 0.05) BW during the creep feeding period than CON. Core body temperatures of OG heifers measured during the late summer with intravaginal temperature data loggers tended (P ≤ 0.10) to be less at 1400 and 1700 hours and were less (P = 0.05) at 1800 hours than CON heifers. Feeding OG did not result in changes (P = 0.25) in serum titer response to the BVD virus of calves during year 2. The results of the current experiment indicate feeding OG to beef cows and calves can result in improvement in BCS of cows, enhance weight gain of calves preweaning, and reduce heat loads in heifer calves during the late summer.

362 EFFECT OF TIME OF REMOVAL OF A PROGESTERONE RELEASING DEVICE AND GnRH TREATMENT ON THE INTERVAL TO AND DISTRIBUTION OF OVULATIONS IN SUPERSTIMULATED BEEF COWS

2006 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 288 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Chesta ◽  
D. Maraña ◽  
L. Peres ◽  
G. A. Bo
Keyword(s):  
Body Condition Score ◽  
Animal Health ◽  
Fixed Time ◽  
Beef Cows ◽  
Unequal Variances ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Condition Score ◽  
Red Angus ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Mean Time

An experiment was designed to evaluate the effect of the time of removal of an intravaginal progesterone (P4) releasing device and GnRH treatment on the interval to and the distribution of ovulations in beef cows superstimulated with Folltropin-V (Bioniche Animal Health, Belleville, Ontario, Canada). Red Angus donors (22 cows and 12 heifers) with a body condition score between 2.5 to 3.5 out of 5 were blocked by parity and randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups in a 2 × 2 factorial design. On Day 0, all donors received an i.m. DIB vaginal device (Syntex, Argentina) plus 2.5 mg estradiol-17β and 50 mg P4 (Laboritorio Rio de Janeiro, Argentina). Superstimulatory treatments were initiated on Day 4, with a total dose of 320 mg (cows) or 200 mg (heifers) NIH-FSH-P1 (Folltropin-V; Bioniche Animal Health, Inc., Belleville, Ontario, Canada) in twice daily i.m. injections over 4 days. All cows received PGF treatment (150 μD(+)cloprostenol: Ciclase; Syntex) in the morning and afternoon of Day 6 and were randomly divided to have DIB devices removed at the time of the second PGF treatment (Day 6.5) or 12 h later (Day 7). On Day 8, donors were further subdivided to receive GnRH (0.050 mg Lecirelina, Gonasyn; Syntex) or no further treatment, and all cows were fixed-time AI either 60 and 72 h after the first PGF injection (0 h). All cows and heifers were examined by ultrasonography every 8 h for a period of 120 h commencing at the time of DIB removal, to determine the time and distribution of ovulations. For each cow, mean time of ovulation was used for the statistical analysis. The distributions of ovulations were compared among groups by Levene's test, and then by ANOVA (equal variances) or Friedman two-way non-parametric ANOVA (unequal variances). No significant differences were detected between cows and heifers (P > 0.13) for the parameters evaluated, and data were combined. There was no effect (P > 0.22) of treatment on the number of ovulations (GnRH: 12.6 ± 1.6 vs. no GnRH: 15.1 ± 1.1 and Day 6.5: 13.7 ± 1.3 vs. Day 7: 14.3 ± 1.5), or numbers of transferable embryos (GnRH: 5.1 ± 1.1 vs. no GnRH: 3.1 ± 0.8 and Day 6.5: 3.5 ± 0.8 vs. Day 7: 4.81 ± 0.1). However, there was a significant effect of GnRH treatment and a GnRH-by-time-of-DIB-removal interaction on the distribution of ovulations (P < 0.05; Table 1). The administration of GnRH in a superstimulatory protocol using P4 releasing devices results in earlier and more synchronous ovulations than when GnRH is not used. Table 1. Distribution of ovulations (hours after the first PGF) in superstimulated Red Angus donors treated with progesterone-releasing devices (DIB) for 6.5 or 7 days with and without GnRH treatment on Day 8

scholarly journals PSIII-5 Metabolic hormones, live weight, grazing behaviour and offspring distance of primiparous beef cows grazing grasslands at two herbage allowances

2019 ◽  
Vol 97 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. 189-189
Author(s):  
Martin Claramunt ◽  
Ana Meikle ◽  
Pablo Soca
Keyword(s):  
Milk Yield ◽  
Mixed Models ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Body Condition Score ◽  
Live Weight ◽  
Beef Cows ◽  
Metabolic Hormones ◽  
Condition Score ◽  
Cow Calf ◽  
Induced Changes

Abstract The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of herbage allowance (HA; herbage mass in kg DM/ha: stocking rate in kg LW/ha ratio) during gestation and lactation on cow and calf LW, body condition score (BCS), insulin, IGF-1, and leptin concentrations, daily grazing, ruminating and idling proportion cow-calf distance in primiparous beef cows from -10 to 70 days from temporary suckling restriction (nose plates on calves during 12 days=TW; day 0=initiation of TW at 86 ± 10 postpartum) and flushing (2 kg FB/cow/day whole-rice bran for 22 days). Thirty-three cows were allocated to HA treatments during gestation and lactation (-150 to 195 days relative to calving), that annually averaged 2.5 (low HA) and 4 kg DM/kg LW (high HA). Data were analyzed using mixed models with repeated measures and general linear mixed models. Cows LW and BCS did not differ during the -10 to 50 day period but were greater in high HA at the end of the study. Concentrations of IGF-I were greater in high HA (80 vs 70 ± 3 ng/mL), but insulin and leptin did not differ. Daily grazing proportion was lower in high HA (0.64 vs 0.68 ± 0.06; P &lt; 0.05), and the opposite occur with rumination and idling (P &lt; 0.05). Cow-calf distance was greater in low HA cows (0.57 vs 0.75 ± 0.006; P &lt; 0.05) and increased greatly in this group after flushing. Milk yield was greater (3.7 vs 3 ± 0.3; P &gt; 0.05) and calf weight did not differ between treatments from -10 to 35 day and was greater after 45 days in high HA compared to low HA. Thus, increasing HA resulted in greater IGF-1 concentrations and milk yield, and induced changes in grazing and maternal behavior that were associated with increased cow and calf LW and BCS.

Reproductive and productive response to suckling restriction and dietary flushing in primiparous grazing beef cows

2013 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 283 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Soca ◽  
M. Carriquiry ◽  
D. H. Keisler ◽  
M. Claramunt ◽  
M. Do Carmo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breeding Season ◽  
Body Condition ◽  
Early Pregnancy ◽  
Body Condition Score ◽  
Average Daily Gain ◽  
Weather Conditions ◽  
Beef Cows ◽  
Plasma Progesterone ◽  
Condition Score ◽  
B 41

The objectives of the present experiment were to analyse the reproductive and productive responses to suckling-restriction treatments and flushing in primiparous grazing beef cows. During 3 years, 153 primiparous anoestrus cows were assigned randomly to one of four treatments in a 2 by 2 factorial arrangement of suckling-management treatments and flushing. Suckling-restriction treatments started at 61 ± 10 days postpartum and consisted of applying nose plates to calves for 12 days (i.e. TS treatment) or 5 days of isolation of the calf from the cow followed by applying nose plates to calves for 7 days as calves were reunited with their mothers (i.e. IS treatment). Nutritional treatments (flushing v. control) started at the beginning of the breeding season, immediately after the suckling-restriction treatments were finished (73 ± 10 days postpartum), with cows receiving or not receiving 2 kg/day of whole-rice middling for 22 days. Cow body condition score (BCS) was recorded every 20 days from calving until 120 days postpartum. Duration of postpartum anoestrus (PPA) and probability of cyclicity were estimated by plasma progesterone concentrations analysed in weekly samples. Pregnant cows were determined by ultrasound 42 days after bull introduction (early pregnancy; EP) and 30 days after the end of the breeding season (total pregnancy; TP). BCS at calving and changes in BCS from calving to the day of BCS nadir (ΔBCS) varied among years depending on forage availability and weather conditions. Increased cow BCS at calving decreased PPA (b = –41 days, P < 0.0001) and, in interaction with ΔBCS, increased EP (P < 0.008) and TP (P < 0.003). Calf weights at weaning and average daily gain were not affected by suckling-restriction or flushing treatments. Isolated temporary suckling control reduced PPA by 11 days when compared with temporary suckling control (P < 0.004). Flushing increased EP by 40%, which was also affected by BCS at calving and was greater in cows that gained, than in those that maintained or lost BCS. We conclude that flushing was useful in improving early pregnancy rates of primiparous beef cows with ‘suboptimal’ body condition (lower than 4.5) at calving and grazing native pasture.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document