scholarly journals 14OVARIAN FOLLICULAR DYNAMICS IN COWS TREATED WITH A CIDR, ESTRADIOL AND PROGESTERONE LATE IN THE ESTROUS CYCLE

2004 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 129 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.P. Kastelic ◽  
M.G. Colazo ◽  
J.A. Small ◽  
D.R. Ward ◽  
R.J. Mapletoft

The objective was to characterize ovarian follicular dynamics in beef cows treated with a CIDR (Bioniche Animal Health; Belleville, Ontario, Canada) and an injection of estradiol-17β (E2), with or without progesterone (P4), late in the estrous cycle. Previously synchronized, non-lactating, crossbred beef cows (n=36) received a CIDR (Day 0) 16 to 18 days after ovulation and were randomly allocated to one of three treatment groups: no further treatment (Control, n=12), an injection of 5mg E2 (E2, n=12), or 5mg E2 plus 100mg P4 (E2P4, n=12; both from Sigma Chemical Co., St.Louis, MO, USA) i.m. in 2mL canola oil. On Day 7, CIDR were removed and cows received 500μg i.m. of cloprostenol (Estrumate, Schering Plough Animal Health, Pointe-Claire, Quebec, Canada). Ovaries were examined once daily by transrectal ultrasonography to detect ovarian follicle growth profiles, and determine the time of ovulation. Blood samples were taken daily for progesterone determination. Data were analyzed by ANOVA (LSD and Bartlett’s tests), Student’s t-test and chi-square procedures. Diameter of the CL and the dominant follicle, and progesterone concentration on Day 0 did not differ among groups (P=0.6; overall mean (±SD), 16.8±2.7mm, 14.1±2.0mm, and 1.5±1.9ngmL, respectively). Thirteen cows ovulated within 3 days of treatment (50% of E2- and E2P4-treated cows and 8.3% of Control cows; P=0.05); cows that ovulated had smaller CL diameters (15.2±1.7 v. 17.7±2.7mm; P<0.004) and lower progesterone concentrations (0.4±0.2 v.2.1±2.2ngmL; P<0.001) at the time of treatment. Follicular wave emergence occurred within 7 days in 4/12 Control cows, 10/12 E2-treated cows, and 10/12 E2P4-treated cows (P<0.01). Although the interval from treatment to wave emergence did not differ among treatments (P=0.8; overall, 3.4±1.5 days), follicular wave emergence was more synchronous (P<0.004) in the E2 group than in the Control or E2P4 groups. At CIDR removal, dominant follicle diameter was larger (P<0.02) in the Control group (15.9±5.5mm) than in the E2 (11.9±1.8mm) or E2P4 (11.5±3.4mm)groups, but dominant follicle diameter was less variable (P<0.003) in the E2 group than in the other two groups. Three cows did not ovulate after CIDR removal; two in the Control group and one in the E2P4 group. Interval to ovulation was shorter (P<0.05) in the Control group (70.8±10.5h)than in the E2 (87.0±9.0h) or E2P4 (86.2±7.2h) groups, and the intervals to ovulation in cows that ovulated following treatment (91.0±8.0h) was longer (P<0.001) than in those that did not (76.6±9.6h). In summary, treatment of cows with an estradiol-progesterone protocol late in the estrous cycle resulted in ovulation (50.0%), atresia (33.3%) or persistence (16.6%) of the dominant follicle present at that time. As length of follicular dominance and timing of ovulation were affected, fertility may be impaired following AI.

2004 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 130 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.J. Mapletoft ◽  
M.G. Colazo ◽  
J.A. Small ◽  
D.R. Ward ◽  
J.P. Kastelic

The objective was to investigate the effect of dose of estradiol valerate (EV) on ovarian follicular growth profiles, intervals to follicular wave emergence and, following CIDR removal, estrus and ovulation in beef cows. On Day 0, 43 non-lactating, crossbred beef cows, 3 to 9 yr of age and at random stages of the estrous cycle, received a CIDR (Bioniche Animal Health; Belleville, Ontario, Canada) and were randomly allocated to one of four groups to receive no further treatment (Control; n=10), or an injection of 1mg (n=11), 2mg (n=10), or 5mg (n=12) i.m. of EV (Sigma Chemical Co, St. Louis, MO, USA) in 2mL canola oil. On Day 7, CIDR were removed and cows received 500μg i.m. of cloprostenol (Estrumate, Schering Plough Animal Health, Pointe-Claire, Quebec, Canada). Ovaries were examined by transrectal ultrasonography once daily until 48h after CIDR removal to detect ovarian follicle growth profiles, and twice daily thereafter to detect ovulation. Data were analyzed by ANOVA (LSD and Bartlett’s tests) and chi-square procedures. One cow (5mg EV group) lost the CIDR and was removed from all analyses. There was an effect of day (P<0.0001) on CL diameter, but the effects of treatment (P=0.3), and the treatment-by-day interaction (P=0.1), were not significant. Follicular wave emergence occurred within 7d in 7/10 (70%) Control cows and 31/32 (97%; P<0.04) EV-treated cows (one cow in late diestrus at the time of treatment did not respond to 1mg EV). Mean (±SD) interval from treatment to wave emergence was longer (P<0.03) in cows treated with 5mg EV (4.8±1.2d) than in those treated with 1mg (3.2±0.9 days) or 2mg EV (3.4±0.8 days), while Control cows were intermediate (3.8±2.0 days). Although follicular wave emergence tended (P<0.09) to be more synchronous in cows receiving EV, intervals from CIDR removal to estrus (P=0.7) and ovulation (P=0.8) did not differ among groups. Diameter of the dominant follicle was smaller (P<0.04) at CIDR removal and tended to be smaller (P<0.08) just prior to ovulation in the 5mg EV group (8.5±2.2 and 13.2±0.6mm, respectively) than in the Control (11.8±4.6 and 15.5±2.9mm, respectively) or 1mg EV (11.7±2.5 and 15.1±2.2mm, respectively) groups, with the 2mg EV group (10.7±1.5 and 14.3±1.7mm, respectively) intermediate. Diameter of the dominant follicle at CIDR removal was less variable (P<0.01) in the 2 and 5mg EV groups than in the Control group and intermediate in the 1mg EV group. In summary, dose of EV affected follicular dynamics, interval to and synchrony of follicular wave emergence, and dominant follicle diameter at CIDR removal and just prior to ovulation in CIDR-treated cows. However, interval from CIDR removal to estrus and ovulation was not affected by treatment. Results suggest that a dose of 2mg EV may be most efficacious in synchronizing follicular wave emergence in CIDR-treated cows.


2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 90 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. F. Pfeifer ◽  
R. Mapletoft ◽  
G. Adams ◽  
J. Kastelic ◽  
J. Small ◽  
...  

The objective was to determine the effect of the level of progesterone (P4) during the ovulatory wave on fertility. Low v. high progesterone concentrations which were expected to result in high v. low LH pulse-frequency were compared. Lactating, postpartum beef cows (n = 69) at random stages of the estrous cycle were given cloprostenol (PGF; Schering-Plough Animal Health, Pointe-Claire, QC, Canada) twice at an 11-day interval to synchronize ovulation (Day 0 = day of 2nd PGF). Cows were given 1.5 mg estradiol benzoate on Day 10 (7 days after expected ovulation). On Day 10, the Low-P4 group was given PGF and an intravaginal CueMate (Bioniche Animal Health, Belleville, ON, Canada) containing one P4 pod (expected to achieve a P4 plasma level of 1 ng mL–1). The High-P4 group also received a CueMate with one pod on Day 10, but no PGF was administered (i.e., cows were allowed to retain their CL for 4 days after expected emergence of the estradiol-induced wave). On Day 18, CueMates were removed and PGF was administered to both groups. Fifty-four to 56 h later, all animals received 12.5 mg of Lutropin-V (Bioniche) IM and were timed AI (TAI). Dominant follicle diameter was measured on Day 18 and at the time of AI. Pregnancy diagnosis was done by ultrasonography 27 days after AI to compare fertility between groups. Follicle diameter data were analyzed by Student's t-test and pregnancy rate data were compared by the chi-square test. The dominant follicle in the Low-P4 group was larger (P < 0.05) than in the high-P4 group on the day of the CueMate removal (Day 18) and on the day of the TAI (11.8 � 0.4 and 13.7 � 0.5 v. 13.3 � 0.6 and 15.3 � 0.6 in the High-P4 and Low-P4 groups, respectively). Pregnancy rate was similar (P = 0.16) between the groups (High-P4: 55.6% (20/36) and Low-P4: 44.4% (16/33)); however, a larger study is in progress to confirm these results. To conclude, Low-P4 resulted in a larger dominant follicle without any apparent effect on pregnancy rate. The project was funded by Saskatchewan ADF and NSERC. L. Pfeifer is funded through a CAPES scholarship. We acknowledge Schering-Plough and Bioniche for donation of pharmaceuticals.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. I. Derar ◽  
H. A. Hussein

The objective of the current study was to describe follicular dynamics in Egyptian Jennies throughout the estrous cycle. In this experiment, 8 estrus cycles in 8 cyclic Jennies were studied from February to June using ultrasonography. The result revealed that one follicular wave per cycle was recorded throughout the studied period. Dominant follicle (DF) was firstly detected at day in Jennies. The growth rate of DF was  mm/day. Left ovulations were nonsignificantly () more than right ovulations (55.6% versus 44.6%). The CL was firstly detected at D , developed in a rate of  mm/day, reached a maximum diameter of  mm at D , and started to regress on D with a mean regression rate of  mm d-1. Results of the present study indicated that Jennies had one follicular wave per cycle. The Day of the cycle has a significant effect on the number of different classes of the ovarian follicles, but not large ones. Ultrasonographic characteristics of the preovulatory follicles could be useful to predict ovulation. CL developed and regressed in a slow rate.


2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 227
Author(s):  
A. Garcia Guerra ◽  
G. A. Bó ◽  
J. Villarreal ◽  
G. M. Brogliatti

Ovarian asynchrony and variability in response to superstimulation remain the most limiting factors in any embryo transfer program (Armstrong D 1993 Theriogenology 39, 7–24). Ovarian response can be increased and less variable if superstimulatory treatment is started at the time of follicular wave emergence (Bö GA et al. 1995 Theriogenology 43, 31–40). A combination of progesterone (P4) and estradiol have been used to synchronize follicular wave for superstimulation. A retrospective analysis was done to compare the ovarian response, superovulatory response and embryo production of cows in Argentina that received progesterone and estradol prior to superstimulation at different stages of the estrous cycle. This research was carried out using different breed of donors (n = 584, 88% Angus) during the last 4 years in Buenos Aires province, Argentina. Heat detection was performed twice a day. At random stages of the estrous cycle, donors received an intravaginal progesterone device (DIB; Syntex, Buenos Aires, Argentina), 2 mg of estradiol benzoate and 50 mg of progesterone (Syntex, Buenos Aires, Argentina) IM on the same day. On day 4 after DIB insertion, superestimulatory treatment was initiated on a decreasing dose regimen of FSH (Pluset; Callier, Spain, or Folltropin, Bioniche Animal Health Inc., Belleville, Ontario, Canada) as IM injections every 12 h over 4 d. On day 6, DIBs were removed, and cows received two doses of 2 mL of cloprostenol 12 h apart. At heat detection, all donors received a dose of 2 mL of GnRH (Dalmarelin; Fatro Von Franken, Buenos Aires, Argentina) by IM injection and were inseminated 12 and 24 h later. Seven days later, embryo collection was performed and ovarian response was evaluated as number of CL + unovulated follicles by transrectal ultrasound using a 7.5-MHz transducer (Pie Medical, Maastricht, the Netherlands). Ova/embryos were evaluated and classified according to the IETS manual. Donors were assigned to receive DIB and estradiol during the following stages of the cycle: group 1: between days 4 and 7 post-estrus (dominant follicle period), group 2: between days 8 and 12 post-estrus (emergence of the second follicular wave), and group 3: between days 13 and 21 post-estrus (dominant follicle of the second wave). Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare variables among groups, and results are shown in Table 1. Ovarian response as CL + unovulated follicles and number of ovulations were significantly different among groups (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the number of fertilized ova or transferable embryos. Nevertheless, numeric differences that show that group 2 (started between days 8 and 12 post-estrus) was always superior for all variables. In conclusion, data suggest that estradiol may be more effective in synchronizing follicle wave emergence for superstimulation during the mid-part of the estrous cycle. Table 1. Superovulatory response in cows in which follicle wave emergence was synchronized with estradiol at different stages of the estrous cycle (mean ± SD) Research supported by Centro Genetico Bovino Eolia S.A.


2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 228
Author(s):  
M. E. F. Oliveira ◽  
C. C. D'Amato ◽  
L. G. Oliveira ◽  
S. D. Bicudo ◽  
J. F. Fonseca ◽  
...  

This study was designed to investigate if the superovulatory response and embryo yield in Santa Ines ewes are influenced by the time that FSH treatments are inititiated: near the emergence of the first or last follicular wave of a progesterone-based (P4) protocol. Days of emergence of the follicular waves was defined in a previous study that evaluated follicular dynamics in oestrus synchronization treatments (Oliveira et al. 2011 Acta Sci. Vet. 40). Twenty Santa Ines cyclic ewes were submitted to 2 superovulatory protocols according to the time that FSH treatments were initiated (G-first wave, n = 10 and G-last wave, n = 10). Thus, the FSH treatment started on Day 4 and 10 of protocol for G-first and G-last, respectively (Day 0 = onset of protocol). Ewes were treated with a P4 device (CIDR®; Pfizer-New Zealand) for 6 and 12 days for G-first and G-last, respectively. Additionally, in G-last, the CIDR was replaced by a new one on Day 7. All ewes received 2 injections of 37.5 μg of D-cloprostenol (Prolise®, Arsa-Argentina) on Day 0 and at CIDR removal. The superovulatory regimen consisted of 8 IM injections of pFSH (Folltropin®; Bioniche Animal Health, Belleville, Ontario, Canada) administrated twice daily (40, 40, 30, 30, 20, 20, 10 and 10 mg of porcine FSH). A single IM dose of 200 IU of eCG (Novormon®, Syntex, Buenos Aires, Argentina) was given concurrently with CIDR removal. Ewes were mated by a fertile ram. Embryo collections were accomplished 7 days after CIDR removal. The superovulatory response was classified in scores: (0) 4 or fewer corpora lutea (CL); (1) between 5 and 10 CL and (2) 11 or more CL. Means (± SD) were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test and percentages using Chi-square (P < 0.05). Most donors (70%, 7/10) from G-last had a superovulatory response classified as score 2 and the remainder (30%, 3/10) as score 1, whereas half of ewes from G-first were classified as score 2 and half as score 1 (P > 0.05).There was no effect between treatments (P > 0.05) for ovulation rate (G-first: 90.7 ± 10.2% vs G-last: 93.0 ± 7.2%), number of ovulations (G-first: 13.1 ± 7.3 vs G-last: 14.0 ± 5.8), or number of luteinized unovulated follicles (G-first: 1.4 ± 1.3 vs G-last: 0.9 ± 1.0). Furthermore, there was no effect between G-first and G-last (P > 0.05) in the rate of ova/embryos recovered (55.1 ± 27.1% vs 67.0 ± 19.4%), mean number of ova/embryos recovered (7.0 ± 5.5 vs 9.1 ± 3.8), number of viable embryos (3.9 ± 6.1 vs 5.7 ± 4.4), or viability rate (49.1 ± 43.7 vs 58.5 ± 34.6). In conclusion, superovulatory response and embryo yield did not differ between FSH treatments initiated during the first or last follicular wave of a progesterone-based treatment in Santa Ines ewes. Financial support of FAPESP is acknowledged.


2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 176
Author(s):  
L. Proctor ◽  
D. Tutt ◽  
D. Olliver ◽  
S. Galloway ◽  
J. L. Juengel ◽  
...  

A study was designed to compare the effect of a prostaglandin-based synchronization protocol on ovarian follicular dynamics in sheep with the FecB (Booroola) mutation. Forty dry Romney sheep (57.6 ± 7.3 kg; 6.1 ± 1.1 years) were randomly selected from both Invermay Booroola (BB; n = 20) and commercial (non-FecB carriers, ++; n = 20) flocks. All ewes had their estrous cycles synchronized with 2 i.m. injections of PGF (150 μg of cloprostenol, Estrumate, Schering-Plough Coopers Animal Health Ltd., New Zealand) administered 7 days apart. Ewes were monitored by transrectal ultrasonography (Aloka 900-SSD and a 7.5-MHz linear-array transducer, Aloka, Tokyo, Japan) daily from Day -2 to the day of ovulation. Data were analyzed by Student’s t-test or Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. Variances were compared with Barlett’s test. Paired t-test compared the number of preovulatory follicles in each genotype after PGF treatments and intervals from PGF to ovulation after PGF. Data are presented as mean (± SEM). The number of corpora lutea (CL) and total CL area at the time of the first and second PGF treatment were 4.4 ± 0.6; 5.7 ± 1.4 and 672.1 ± 133.5 mm2; 999.0 ± 145.9 mm2 in the BB and 2.1 ± 0.2; 2.1 ± 0.5 and 342.3 ± 60.7 mm2; 401.3 ± 68.6 mm2 in ++ ewes, respectively. These 2 variables were higher (P < 0.01) at both PGF injections in the BB than in the ++ ewes, except the CL area at the time of first PGF treatment (P = 0.15). The largest follicle diameter at the time of the first and second PGF treatments was smaller (P < 0.003) in BB (4.1 ± 0.3 mm; 3.5 ± 0.2 mm) than in ++ (5.3 ± 0.3 mm; 5.8 ± 0.1 mm) ewes. The median and mean number of follicles that ovulated after the first and second PGF treatment were higher (P < 0.0001) in BB (6 & 7; 5.7 ± 0.3; 6.9 ± 0.3; difference = 1.2 ± 0.4; P < 0.003) than in the ++ (2 & 2; 2.1 ± 0.1; 2.1 ± 0.1) sheep. The luteal area at the time of first and second PGF in both BB and ++ did not differ (P = 0.3). The intervals from the first and second PGF to the respective ovulations did not differ (P > 0.61) between BB (3.4 ± 0.2; 3.0 ± 0.3d) and ++ (3.5 ± 0.2d; 3.0 ± 0.1d) ewes. However, interval from the second PGF to ovulation was more variable (P = 0.002) in the BB than in the ++ ewes. Data of both groups were combined and a mean significant difference of 0.6 ± 0.2d (P < 0.003) was found between the first and second PGF-to-ovulation intervals. The interval from the first PGF to emergence of the next follicular wave was shorter (P < 0.02) and more variable (P < 0.03) in the BB (2.7 ± 0.4d) than in the ++ (3.5 ± 0.2 d) group. Preovulatory follicles were smaller in Booroola, but higher in number, than in ++ ewes, whereas the luteal area was similar. Within the BB ewes, the higher number of follicles that ovulated after the second PGF than after the first injection may be due to a higher follicular response to an elevated rebound in circulating FSH after the first PGF. A high number of growing follicles of the first follicular wave may also have contributed to this event. These findings warrant further research aimed at the study of the interaction between FSH and follicle dynamics in estrus synchronized sheep carrying the FecB mutation.


2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 358 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Carballo Guerrero ◽  
A. Tríbulo ◽  
R. Tríbulo ◽  
H. Tríbulo ◽  
G. A. Bó

Although we have previously shown that ovarian superstimulation during the first follicular wave resulted in a successful response (Carballo Guerrero D et al. 2009 Reprod. Fertil. 21, 242), the current protocol needs to be optimized in order to be used in the field. Therefore, an experiment was designed to simplify this treatment and to compare it with the traditional superstimulation protocol using progesterone and estradiol. Simmental cows (n = 14) were subjected to 3 superstimulation treatments (2 first wave groups and 1 control group) in a crossover design (i.e. all cows received the 3 treatments and all treatments were represented on each collection day). Cows in Group 1 received a progesterone-releasing device (Cue-Mate®, Bioniche Animal Health, Belleville, Ontario, Canada) along with 0.150 mg of D + cloprostenol (PGF; Bioprost-D®, Biotay, Buenos Aires, Argentina) at random stages of the estrous cycle. A second PGF was injected 5 days after Cue-Mate® insertion, followed by GnRH (0.050 mg of lecirelin; Biosin-OV®, Biotay) 36 h later (i.e. 7 days after Cue-Mate® insertion). Based on previous studies, ovulation was expected to occur 30 to 36 h later. Therefore, superstimulation treatments were initiated 36 h after GnRH (Day 0), with a total dose of 400 mg NIH-FSH-P1 of Folltropin®-V (Bioniche Animal Health) in twice-daily decreasing doses over 4 days. Prostaglandin was administered with the last 2 Folltropin®-V injections and Cue-Mate® devices were removed with the last Folltropin®-V injection. Cows received 12.5 mg of porcine LH (Lutropin®-V, Bioniche Animal Health) 24 h after Cue-Mate® removal and were AI 12 and 24 h later. Ova/embryos were collected 7 days after porcine LH and evaluated following IETS recommendations. Cows in Group 2 were treated similarly to those in the Group 1, except they did not receive the second PGF injection 5 days after Cue-Mate® insertion (thus eliminating the need to handle animals on that day). Finally, cows in Group 3 [estradiol benzoate (EB)+P4 control group] received a Cue-Mate® plus 2.5 mg of EB (Bioestradiol®, Biotay) and 50 mg of progesterone (P4; Lab., Rio de Janeiro, Argentina) at random stages of their estrous cycle. Superstimulation treatments were initiated 4 days later (Day 0) following the same protocol used in Group 1. Data were transformed to square root and analyzed by ANOVA. Mean (± SEM) numbers of ova/embryos collected, fertilized ova, and transferable embryos did not differ among groups (12.9 ± 2.0, 9.8 ± 1.7, and 6.6 ± 1.2; 11.5 ± 1.7, 9.3 ± 1.5, and 7.7 ± 1.6; and 14.5 ± 2.8, 9.4 ± 2.3, and 6.8 ± 1.7 for Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively). In conclusion, data demonstrated that superstimulation during the first follicular wave can be successfully used in groups of randomly cycling donors without the need for estrus detection or estradiol to synchronize follicular wave emergence. The protocol is easy to follow and embryo production is comparable to that of the estradiol and progesterone protocol.


2004 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 128 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.G. Colazo ◽  
J.A. Small ◽  
D.R. Ward ◽  
N.E. Erickson ◽  
J.P. Kastelic ◽  
...  

The objective was to investigate the effect of presynchronization with PGF prior to a Cosynch protocol on estrus synchrony, CL and preovulatory follicle diameters and pregnancy rate following timed-AI (TAI) in beef heifers. Cycling beef heifers (n=148) were treated with 100μg GnRH i.m. (Cystorelin, Merial Canada Inc., Victoriaville, Quebec, Canada) on Day 0, 500μg cloprostenol i.m. (PGF; Estrumate, Schering Plough Animal Health, Pointe-Claire, Quebec, Canada) on Day 7, and GnRH concurrent with TAI on Day 9 (54h after PGF). Half of the heifers (Control) received the first GnRH treatment at random stages of the estrous cycle, while the other half (Presynch) received two injections of PGF 11 days apart, with the first injection of GnRH 11 days after the second injection of PGF. Estrus detection was done between the first GnRH and 12h after PGF, and heifers detected in estrus were inseminated (and considered nonpregnant to TAI), while all other heifers were TAI. Heifers were examined by transrectal ultrasonography for CL and follicle development, and confirmation of pregnancy. Data were compared between groups using Student’s t-test and chi-square procedures. The numbers of heifers in estrus early (after first GnRH and before TAI) was higher in the Control group than in the Presynch group (18/74 v. 2/74, respectively; P&lt;0.0001). Mean (±SD) diameters of the dominant follicle (12.1±3.1 v. 14.2±2.5mm) and CL (17.3±5.5v. 20.5±4.3mm) at first GnRH injection were smaller (P&lt;0.0001) and more variable (P&lt;0.03) in Control than Presynch heifers, but diameters of the preovulatory follicle (P=0.3) and CL (P=0.1) at TAI did not differ. Although the diameter of the preovulatory follicle was more variable (P&lt;0.004) in Control (5 to 19mm) than Presynch (8 to 17mm) heifers, pregnancy rate to TAI did not differ (P=0.4; 29.7 v. 36.5%, respectively). Overall pregnancy rates were 45.9 and 37.8% for Control and Presynch groups, respectively (P=0.3). Pregnancy rate tended (P&lt;0.08) to be affected by diameter of the preovulatory follicle at the time of TAI (0, 23.1, 45.7, 41.4, and 60.0% pregnant for diameters of &lt;9, 9–11, 12–14, 15–17, and &gt;17mm, respectively). Regardless of treatment, diameter of the preovulatory dominant follicle (P&lt;0.02) and CL (P&lt;0.03) 7 days after TAI was smaller, and CL diameter was more variable (P&lt;0.004), in open than in pregnant heifers (12.7±2.6v. 13.8±2.1mm, and 16.5±4.4v. 18.0±3.0mm, respectively). In summary, presynchronization with PGF prior to a Cosynch protocol reduced the proportion of heifers in estrus before TAI, suggesting that this approach may be useful in the successful application of Ovsynch or Cosynch programs in heifers. However, pregnancy rate to TAI did not differ between groups in this study. Diameter of the preovulatory follicle tended to positively affect pregnancy rate, regardless of treatment.


2004 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 213 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Small ◽  
M. Colazo ◽  
D. Ambrose ◽  
R. Mapletoft ◽  
J. Reeb ◽  
...  

The objective was to evaluate the effect of pLH treatment on pregnancy rates in recipients receiving in vivo- or in vitro-produced bovine embryos. Heifers (n=37) and lactating (n=28) and non-lactating (n=150) beef cows were treated at random stages of the cycle with 100μg GnRH i.m. (Cystorelin, Merial Canada Inc., Victoriaville, Quebec, Canada) on Day −9, 500μg cloprostenol i.m. (PGF; Estrumate, Schering Plough Animal Health, Pointe-Claire, Quebec, Canada) on Day —2 and GnRH on Day 0 (66h post-PGF; without estrus detection). Cattle were placed at random, by class, into three groups: no further treatment (Control; n=71), or 12.5mg pLH (Lutropin-V, Bioniche Animal Health, Belleville, Ontario, Canada) on Day 5 (n=72) or on Day 7 (n=72) after the second GnRH. On Day 7, cattle with a CL &gt;10mm in diameter (determined ultrasonically) received in vivo-produced, fresh (Simmental) or frozen (Holstein), or in vitro-produced frozen (Holstein) embryos (embryo type balanced among groups). Embryos were cryopreserved in 10% ethylene glycol; in vivo-produced frozen embryos were thawed 5 to 10s in air, 15s in a water-bath at 30°C and then “direct-transferred” nonsurgically. In vitro-produced frozen embryos (donated by IND Lifetech Inc., Delta, British Columbia, Canada) were thawed in a water-bath at 27°C for 10s and placed in ViGro Holding Plus medium (AB Technology, Pullman, WA, USA) at room temperature, evaluated and then transferred nonsurgically. Pregnancy was determined by ultrasonography on Day 35. Data were analyzed with CATMOD, chi-square and GLM procedures (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.). Twenty cattle (9.3%) did not receive embryos; five heifers had cervical problems, and five heifers and 10 cows did not have a CL &gt;10mm. Overall, 7.1% of the recipients had two CL on the day of embryo transfer. There was no effect (P&gt;0.05) of treatment, embryo type (or interaction) or class of recipient on pregnancy rate (overall, 44.1%, 86/195; Table 1). Similarly, mean (±SD) CL diameter and luteal area did not differ (P&gt;0.05) among groups or between pregnant and open recipients (overall, 22.0±3.4mm and 352.0±108.7mm, respectively). However, recipients with a CL diameter ≥18mm tended (P&lt;0.1) to have a higher pregnancy rate (45.8 vs 25.0%). In a subset of 40 recipients examined ultrasonically on Day 12, 50% of those treated on Day 5 and 70% of those treated with pLH on Day 7 had two CL. In summary, overall pregnancy rate in GnRH-synchronized recipients receiving in vitro- or in vivo-produced embryos by nonsurgical transfer was 44.1%. Embryo survival to Day 35 was not affected by type of embryo or treatment with pLH 5 or 7 days after ovulation. Table 1 Pregnancy rate in recipients on Day 35 based on pLH treatment and embryo-type


Author(s):  
Vinny Dodiyar ◽  
Parkash Singh Brar ◽  
Narinder Singh ◽  
Mrigank Honparkhe

Background: Understanding of ovarian follicular dynamics and endocrine regulation is essential to design and use interventions to optimize reproductive efficiency. Bos indicus and Bos taurus cows have some differences in their follicular dynamics and ovarian steroidal hormones. The present study was planned to understand follicular dynamics vis-a-vis ovarian steroids profiles in Sahiwal cattle. Methods: The study was conducted in normal cyclic, pluriparous, non-lactating Sahiwal cows (n=7). Trans-rectal ultrasonography was performed to record the location, size, number of follicles and size of corpus luteum (CL) from the beginning, till the end of experiment. The dataset was used to characterize the follicular wave emergence, growth, regression, time of selection and ovulation of the dominant follicle in each cow. Result: Three Sahiwal cows showed two wave and four cows showed three wave estrous cycles with mean interovulatory length of 20.33±0.33 and 22.50±0.28 days, respectively. No significant difference was recorded in the maximum diameter of corpus luteum, P4 and E2 plasma levels between 2-wave and 3-wave estrous cycles. The peak progesterone values of 6.00±0.91 and 6.2±1.2 ng/ml and peak estradiol values of 15.83±0.60 and 14.31±0.44 ng/ml were recorded in 2-wave and 3-wave estrous cycle, respectively. The results showed that Sahiwal cows had 2-wave and 3-wave estrous cycle and the 3-wave estrous cycle had comparatively longer inter-ovulatory period and smaller maximum diameter of second wave dominant follicle than 2-wave estrous cycle.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document