Cytokine regulation of mucosal responses: a rational basis for new vaccine delivery strategies

1994 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 381 ◽  
Author(s):  
AJ Husband ◽  
S Bao ◽  
W Muir ◽  
AJ Ramsay ◽  
IA Ramshaw
Keyword(s):  
Gene Therapy ◽  
Vaccine Delivery ◽  
Delivery Systems ◽  
Immune Network ◽  
Rational Basis ◽  
Cytokine Regulation ◽  
Host Environment ◽  
Delivery Strategies

In this review, cytokine regulation of mucosal responses is discussed in relation to the mucosal immune network and regulation of IgA responses. Based on this understanding, aspects of gene therapy for manipulation of the host environment and vaccine delivery systems are discussed. Although evidence obtained in vitro is briefly reviewed the general focus of this article is on evidence obtained from models in vivo.

scholarly journals Oncogene dependency and the potential of targeted RNAi-based anti-cancer therapy

2014 ◽  
Vol 461 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruiyang Yan ◽  
Andrew Hallam ◽  
Peter G. Stockley ◽  
Joan Boyes
Keyword(s):  
Delivery Systems ◽  
Cationic Polymers ◽  
Anti Cancer ◽  
Invaluable Tool ◽  
Effective Delivery ◽  
Rnai Therapeutics ◽  
Delivery Strategies ◽  
High Immunogenicity

Cancers arise through the progression of multiple genetic and epigenetic defects that lead to deregulation of numerous signalling networks. However, the last decade has seen the development of the concept of ‘oncogene addiction’, where tumours appear to depend on a single oncogene for survival. RNAi has provided an invaluable tool in the identification of these oncogenes and oncogene-dependent cancers, and also presents great potential as a novel therapeutic strategy against them. Although RNAi therapeutics have demonstrated effective killing of oncogene-dependent cancers in vitro, their efficacy in vivo is severely limited by effective delivery systems. Several virus-based RNAi delivery strategies have been explored, but problems arose associated with high immunogenicity, random genome integration and non-specific targeting. This has directed efforts towards non-viral formulations, including delivery systems based on virus-like particles, liposomes and cationic polymers, which can circumvent some of these problems by immunomasking and the use of specific tumour-targeting ligands. This review outlines the prevalence of oncogene-dependent cancers, evaluates the potential of RNAi-based therapeutics and assesses the relative strengths and weaknesses of different approaches to targeted RNAi delivery.

FM2-6 Cell delivery for intracerebral cell transplantation

2019 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. e25.1-e25
Author(s):  
MAH Abdulla ◽  
AP Jathoul ◽  
AE Rosser ◽  
WP Gray
Keyword(s):  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Delivery Systems ◽  
Large Animal Model ◽  
Large Animal ◽  
List Type ◽  
Agarose Gel ◽  
Contributing Factors ◽  
Delivery Strategies

ObjectivesClinical trials of intracerebral cell replacement therapy (CRT) yield inconsistent results owing to poor graft survival and ectopic graft placement. A paucity of available CE marked specialised delivery systems and a lack of reliable delivery protocols could be major contributing factors to both phenomena. Here, we aimed to investigate current needle delivery strategies in-vitro and in a large animal model in pigs.DesignIn-vitro laboratory and in-vivo pigs experiments.SubjectsIn-vitroAgarose gel In-vivo: 4 white Landracer pigs.MethodsIn-vitro: Human Embryonic Kidney cells expressing luciferase and 0.6% agarose gel were used to test 3 delivery strategies:Bracelet deposit,Large deposit in a pre–formed tract,Multiple deposits in a pre–formed tract.In-vivo: Pigs underwent MRI- guided Human Foetal Luciferase-transduced cell transplantation into the putamen and thalamus. Post-operative MRI, Bioluminescence imaging (BLI) and histology were used to identify graft location and viability.ResultsUsing a commercially available needle delivery system, significant reflux of deposits was noted in all 3 delivery strategies during in-vitro testing. Depositing into a preformed tract yielded the best delivery, and was therefore used for in-vivo testing. Studies in pigs using MRI and BLI confirmed significant reflux and ectopic deposition of grafts.ConclusionsSimple needle delivery systems appear to suffer from significant reflux and ectopic cell deposition. This may adversely affect the outcomes of CRT trials in humans.

SiRNA technology, the gene therapy of the future?

2008 ◽  
Vol 149 (4) ◽  
pp. 153-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zsuzsanna Rácz ◽  
Péter Hamar
Keyword(s):  
Gene Therapy ◽  
Short Interfering Rna ◽  
The Future ◽  
Interfering Rna

A genetikában új korszak kezdődött 17 éve, amikor a petúniában felfedezték a koszuppressziót. Később a koszuppressziót azonosították a növényekben és alacsonyabb rendű eukariótákban megfigyelt RNS-interferenciával (RNSi). Bár a növényekben ez ősi vírusellenes gazdaszervezeti védekezőmechanizmus, emlősökben az RNSi élettani szerepe még nincs teljesen tisztázva. Az RNSi-t rövid kettős szálú interferáló RNS-ek (short interfering RNA, siRNS) irányítják. A jelen cikkben összefoglaljuk az RNSi történetét és mechanizmusát, az siRNS-ek szerkezete és hatékonysága közötti összefüggéseket, a célsejtbe való bejuttatás virális és nem virális módjait. Az siRNS-ek klinikai alkalmazásának legfontosabb akadálya az in vivo alkalmazás. Bár a hidrodinamikus kezelés állatokban hatékony, embereknél nem alkalmazható. Lehetőséget jelent viszont a szervspecifikus katéterezés. A szintetizált siRNS-ek ismert mellékhatásait szintén tárgyaljuk. Bár a génterápia ezen új területén számos problémával kell szembenézni, a sikeres in vitro és in vivo kísérletek reményt jelentenek emberi betegségek siRNS-sel történő kezelésére.

Exosome as a Natural Gene Delivery Vector for Cancer Treatment

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 821-830
Author(s):  
Prasad Pofali ◽  
Adrita Mondal ◽  
Vaishali Londhe
Keyword(s):  
Gene Therapy ◽  
Gene Delivery ◽  
Nucleic Acids ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Intestinal Barrier ◽  
Gene Carrier ◽  
Gene Delivery Vector ◽  
Delivery Vector

Background: Current gene therapy vectors such as viral, non-viral, and bacterial vectors, which are used for cancer treatment, but there are certain safety concerns and stability issues of these conventional vectors. Exosomes are the vesicles of size 40-100 nm secreted from multivesicular bodies into the extracellular environment by most of the cell types in-vivo and in-vitro. As a natural nanocarrier, exosomes are immunologically inert, biocompatible, and can cross biological barriers like the blood-brain barrier, intestinal barrier, and placental barrier. Objective: This review focusses on the role of exosome as a carrier to efficiently deliver a gene for cancer treatment and diagnosis. The methods for loading of nucleic acids onto the exosomes, advantages of exosomes as a smart intercellular shuttle for gene delivery and therapeutic applications as a gene delivery vector for siRNA, miRNA and Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) and also the limitations of exosomes as a gene carrier are all reviewed in this article. Methods: Mostly, electroporation and chemical transfection are used to prepare gene loaded exosomes. Results: Exosome-mediated delivery is highly promising and advantageous in comparison to the current delivery methods for systemic gene therapy. Targeted exosomes, loaded with therapeutic nucleic acids, can efficiently promote the reduction of tumor proliferation without any adverse effects. Conclusion: In the near future, exosomes can become an efficient gene carrier for delivery and a biomarker for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.

Non-Viral Vectors for Gene Delivery

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aparna Bansal ◽  
Himanshu
Keyword(s):  
Gene Therapy ◽  
Viral Vectors ◽  
Transfection Efficiency ◽  
Gene Transfection ◽  
Expression System ◽  
Target Cells ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Naked Dna

Introduction: Gene therapy has emerged out as a promising therapeutic pave for the treatment of genetic and acquired diseases. Gene transfection into target cells using naked DNA is a simple and safe approach which has been further improved by combining vectors or gene carriers. Both viral and non-viral approaches have achieved a milestone to establish this technique, but non-viral approaches have attained a significant attention because of their favourable properties like less immunotoxicity and biosafety, easy to produce with versatile surface modifications, etc. Literature is rich in evidences which revealed that undoubtedly, non–viral vectors have acquired a unique place in gene therapy but still there are number of challenges which are to be overcome to increase their effectiveness and prove them ideal gene vectors. Conclusion: To date, tissue specific expression, long lasting gene expression system, enhanced gene transfection efficiency has been achieved with improvement in delivery methods using non-viral vectors. This review mainly summarizes the various physical and chemical methods for gene transfer in vitro and in vivo.

scholarly journals Growth Factor Therapy for Parkinson’s Disease: Alternative Delivery Systems

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Sarah Jarrin ◽  
Abrar Hakami ◽  
Ben Newland ◽  
Eilís Dowd
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Gene Therapy ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Growth Factors ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Brain Regions ◽  
Delivery Systems ◽  
Alternative Delivery

Despite decades of research and billions in global investment, there remains no preventative or curative treatment for any neurodegenerative condition, including Parkinson’s disease (PD). Arguably, the most promising approach for neuroprotection and neurorestoration in PD is using growth factors which can promote the growth and survival of degenerating neurons. However, although neurotrophin therapy may seem like the ideal approach for neurodegenerative disease, the use of growth factors as drugs presents major challenges because of their protein structure which creates serious hurdles related to accessing the brain and specific targeting of affected brain regions. To address these challenges, several different delivery systems have been developed, and two major approaches—direct infusion of the growth factor protein into the target brain region and in vivo gene therapy—have progressed to clinical trials in patients with PD. In addition to these clinically evaluated approaches, a range of other delivery methods are in various degrees of development, each with their own unique potential. This review will give a short overview of some of these alternative delivery systems, with a focus on ex vivo gene therapy and biomaterial-aided protein and gene delivery, and will provide some perspectives on their potential for clinical development and translation.

scholarly journals Mechanisms and Pharmaceutical Action of Lipid Nanoformulation of Natural Bioactive Compounds as Efficient Delivery Systems in the Therapy of Osteoarthritis

Pharmaceutics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1108
Author(s):  
Oana Craciunescu ◽  
Madalina Icriverzi ◽  
Paula Ecaterina Florian ◽  
Anca Roseanu ◽  
Mihaela Trif
Keyword(s):  
Drug Delivery ◽  
Bioactive Compounds ◽  
Targeted Delivery ◽  
Drug Delivery Systems ◽  
Delivery Systems ◽  
Joint Disease ◽  
Duration Of Action ◽  
Immune System Activation

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative joint disease. An objective of the nanomedicine and drug delivery systems field is to design suitable pharmaceutical nanocarriers with controllable properties for drug delivery and site-specific targeting, in order to achieve greater efficacy and minimal toxicity, compared to the conventional drugs. The aim of this review is to present recent data on natural bioactive compounds with anti-inflammatory properties and efficacy in the treatment of OA, their formulation in lipid nanostructured carriers, mainly liposomes, as controlled release systems and the possibility to be intra-articularly (IA) administered. The literature regarding glycosaminoglycans, proteins, polyphenols and their ability to modify the cell response and mechanisms of action in different models of inflammation are reviewed. The advantages and limits of using lipid nanoformulations as drug delivery systems in OA treatment and the suitable route of administration are also discussed. Liposomes containing glycosaminoglycans presented good biocompatibility, lack of immune system activation, targeted delivery of bioactive compounds to the site of action, protection and efficiency of the encapsulated material, and prolonged duration of action, being highly recommended as controlled delivery systems in OA therapy through IA administration. Lipid nanoformulations of polyphenols were tested both in vivo and in vitro models that mimic OA conditions after IA or other routes of administration, recommending their clinical application.

scholarly journals Preclinical Development of Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell-Based Gene Therapy for Immune Deficiencies: A Journey from Mouse Cage to Bed Side

Pharmaceutics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 549
Author(s):  
Laura Garcia-Perez ◽  
Anita Ordas ◽  
Kirsten Canté-Barrett ◽  
Pauline Meij ◽  
Karin Pike-Overzet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Therapy ◽  
Severe Combined Immunodeficiency ◽  
Good Manufacturing Practice ◽  
Proof Of Concept ◽  
Preclinical Development ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Immune Deficiencies ◽  
Suitable Vector

Recent clinical trials using patient’s own corrected hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), such as for primary immunodeficiencies (Adenosine deaminase (ADA) deficiency, X-linked Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID), X-linked chronic granulomatous disease (CGD), Wiskott–Aldrich Syndrome (WAS)), have yielded promising results in the clinic; endorsing gene therapy to become standard therapy for a number of diseases. However, the journey to achieve such a successful therapy is not easy, and several challenges have to be overcome. In this review, we will address several different challenges in the development of gene therapy for immune deficiencies using our own experience with Recombinase-activating gene 1 (RAG1) SCID as an example. We will discuss product development (targeting of the therapeutic cells and choice of a suitable vector and delivery method), the proof-of-concept (in vitro and in vivo efficacy, toxicology, and safety), and the final release steps to the clinic (scaling up, good manufacturing practice (GMP) procedures/protocols and regulatory hurdles).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document