Time of ovulation in merino ewes superovulated with PMSG and FSH-P

1992 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 91 ◽  
Author(s):  
JP Ryan ◽  
JR Hunton ◽  
WM Maxwell

An experiment examined the effects of treatment with gonadotrophin releasing hormone (100 micrograms GnRH injected 24 h after progestagen sponge removal), season of treatment (autumn v. spring), the effect of supplementary feeding with lupin grain (in autumn only, from 12 days before until 8 days after sponge removal) on the time of ovulation in 182 mature Merino ewes superovulated with a combination of 400 I.U. pregnant mare serum gonadotrophin (PMSG) and 12 mg follicle stimulating hormone (FSH-P). Time of ovulation was influenced by both season and the administration of GnRH. Two peaks of ovulation were observed in spring, the first between 24 and 30 h after sponge removal, and the second commencing 42 h after sponge removal. In autumn, there was one peak of ovulation between 42 and 54 h after sponge removal. Treatment with GnRH advanced the time of ovulation in autumn (P less than 0.05), but had no apparent effect in spring. In contrast to the effect of GnRH, time of ovulation for ewes treated in autumn was delayed (P less than 0.001) by supplementary feeding with lupins.

1991 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 699 ◽  
Author(s):  
HN Jabbour ◽  
JP Ryan ◽  
G Evans ◽  
WM Maxwell

Administration of gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) 24 h after sponge withdrawal did not affect the numbers of corpora lutea (CL) or persistent large follicles (LF) in ewes superovulated with 400 I.U. pregnant mare serum gonadotrophin and 12 mg follicle stimulating hormone in spring (11.6 +/- 0.9 v. 13.0 +/- 0.9 CL and 0.8 +/- 0.9 v. 0.9 +/- 0.3 LF, for +GnRH and -GnRH ewes, respectively). However, it did increase the ovulatory response of ewes superovulated in autumn (15.8 +/- 1.2 v. 11.8 +/- 1.1 CL). The incidence of ewes with prematurely regressed CL was also greater in autumn than in spring (21/89 v. 5/88). Supplementary feeding with lupin grain in autumn had no effect on numbers of CL but did increase the incidence of ewes with LF (18/48 v. 7/46) and caused a marked reduction in the incidence of ewes with regressed CL (1/44 v. 20/45). For ewes treated in autumn, there were no effects of lupin supplementation or GnRH administration on peak oestradiol-17 beta (E2) or peak luteinizing hormone (LH) levels. However, when peak E2 concentrations in the plasma were adjusted for numbers of preovulatory follicles, higher concentrations were observed for ewes in the +lupin/-GnRH group (12.4 +/- 2.9 pg mL-1) than in other treatment groups (range 4.3 +/- 0.4 to 5.7 +/- 0.3 pg mL-1). Moreover, the time of the LH peak was advanced by both lupin supplementation and GnRH treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document