Morphological and molecular characterisation of Twitcher mouse spermatogenesis: an update

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 1258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica Puggioni ◽  
Laura Governini ◽  
Martina Gori ◽  
Giuseppe Belmonte ◽  
Paola Piomboni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Hormone Receptors ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Neurological Impairment ◽  
Krabbe Disease ◽  
Sphingolipid Metabolism ◽  
Twitcher Mouse ◽  
Molecular Control ◽  
Gonadotrophin Releasing Hormone ◽  
Different Cell Types

Spermatogenesis is a complex developmental program in which interactions between different cell types are finely regulated. Mouse models in which any of the sperm maturation steps are perturbed provide major insights into the molecular control of spermatogenesis. The Twitcher mouse is a model of Krabbe disease, characterised by the deficiency of galactosylceramidase, the enzyme that hydrolyses galactosylceramide and galactosylsphingosine. Galactosyl-alkyl-acyl-glycerol, a precursor of seminolipid, the most abundant glycolipid in spermatozoa, is also a substrate for galactosylceramidase. Altered sphingolipid metabolism has been suggested to be the cause of the morphological abnormalities reported previously in the spermatogenesis of Twitcher. However, given the frequency of infertility associated with neurological impairment, we hypothesised that an unbalanced hormonal profile could contribute to male infertility in this mutant. In order to clarify this issue, we investigated potential variations in the expression of hormones and hormone receptors involved in the regulation of spermatogenesis. Our data show that, in the brain of Twitcher mouse, gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH), LH and FSH gene expression is decreased, whereas expression of androgen receptor (AR) and inhibin βA (INHβA) is increased. The changes in gene expression for the LH and FSH receptors and AR in the testes support the hypothesis that altered sphingolipid metabolism is not the only cause of Twitcher infertility.

Dpp signaling thresholds in the dorsal ectoderm of the Drosophila embryo

Development ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 127 (15) ◽  
pp. 3305-3312 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.L. Ashe ◽  
M. Mannervik ◽  
M. Levine
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Histone Acetyltransferase ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Present Evidence ◽  
Drosophila Homolog ◽  
Dorsal Ectoderm ◽  
Transgenic Embryos ◽  
Different Cell Types

The dorsal ectoderm of the Drosophila embryo is subdivided into different cell types by an activity gradient of two TGF(β) signaling molecules, Decapentaplegic (Dpp) and Screw (Scw). Patterning responses to this gradient depend on a secreted inhibitor, Short gastrulation (Sog) and a newly identified transcriptional repressor, Brinker (Brk), which are expressed in neurogenic regions that abut the dorsal ectoderm. Here we examine the expression of a number of Dpp target genes in transgenic embryos that contain ectopic stripes of Dpp, Sog and Brk expression. These studies suggest that the Dpp/Scw activity gradient directly specifies at least three distinct thresholds of gene expression in the dorsal ectoderm of gastrulating embryos. Brk was found to repress two target genes, tailup and pannier, that exhibit different limits of expression within the dorsal ectoderm. These results suggest that the Sog inhibitor and Brk repressor work in concert to establish sharp dorsolateral limits of gene expression. We also present evidence that the activation of Dpp/Scw target genes depends on the Drosophila homolog of the CBP histone acetyltransferase.

Abstract 191: Transcriptional Regulation of Renin by Nuclear Receptors Co-regulated With Renin

Hypertension ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 62 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ko-Ting Lu ◽  
Eric T Weatherford ◽  
Pimonrat Ketsawatsomkron ◽  
Justin L Grobe ◽  
Curt D Sigmund
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Nuclear Receptors ◽  
Estrogen Receptor Alpha ◽  
Hormone Receptors ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Negative Control ◽  
Sirna Duplex ◽  
Expression Of Genes ◽  
Renin Gene ◽  
Genes Encoding

Expression of the renin gene is required to maintain normal morphological and physiological identity of renal juxtaglomerular (JG) cells, yet the mechanisms regulating renin gene transcription remain elusive. We re-examined data from Brunskill et. al (JASN 22:2213, 2011), investigating genome-wide gene expression in JG and other renal cell types. Based on our previous data implicating nuclear receptors (RAR, RXR, VDR, PPARG, Nr2f2 and Nr2f6) in the regulation of mouse and human renin gene expression, we focused our analysis on the expression of genes encoding the 48 nuclear hormone receptors and their co-regulation with renin. Several nuclear receptors have an expression pattern emulating that of renin, that is, they were similarly enriched in JG cells but not in other cell types. These include Esr1, Nr1h4, Ppara, VDR, Nr1i2, Ppard, Hnf4g, Nr1h3, Thrb, Hnf4a, Esrrg, Nr4a3, Nr3c2, and Ar. We tested the hypothesis that a nuclear receptor that is co-regulated with renin may participate in renin gene regulation. To accomplish this, endogenous renin expression was evaluated in renin-expressing As4.1 cells after siRNA-mediated knock down of selected nuclear receptors. Each experiment included a negative control siRNA duplex (NC) that does not target any known genes. By way of example, siRNA-mediated inhibition of estrogen receptor alpha (Esr1) by 70-80% resulted in a 2-fold decrease in renin mRNA (fold change ± SEM: siEsr1: 0.4±0.2, p<0.001 vs NC). Similar results were obtained with a different siRNA targeting Esr1. Interestingly, loss of Esr1 also caused up-regulation of vitamin D receptor (VDR, 2.8±0.7 fold, p<0.001 vs NC) and Nr2f6 (2.0±0.2 fold, p<0.05 vs NC), both of which are known to be negative regulators of renin. Similarly, both renin (0.1±0.02, p<0.001 vs untreated) and Esr1 (0.3±0.1, p<0.05 vs untreated) mRNA were reduced in the kidney from mice treated with deoxycorticosterone acetate (50mg) and receiving 0.15 M NaCl in drinking water for 21 days (DOCA-salt). These data suggest Esr1 may regulate renin expression. Studies are in progress to assess if Esr1 stimulates renin expression on its own or acts by affecting the level of other nuclear receptors; and to determine if other co-regulated nuclear receptors also regulate expression of the renin gene.

scholarly journals Hypercapnia Regulates Gene Expression and Tissue Function

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiko Shigemura ◽  
Lynn C. Welch ◽  
Jacob I. Sznajder
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Lung Diseases ◽  
Transcriptional Response ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Chronic Lung Diseases ◽  
Tissue Responses ◽  
Mammalian Tissues ◽  
Specific Tissue ◽  
Different Cell Types ◽  
Alveolar Gas Exchange

Carbon dioxide (CO2) is produced in eukaryotic cells primarily during aerobic respiration, resulting in higher CO2 levels in mammalian tissues than those in the atmosphere. CO2 like other gaseous molecules such as oxygen and nitric oxide, is sensed by cells and contributes to cellular and organismal physiology. In humans, elevation of CO2 levels in tissues and the bloodstream (hypercapnia) occurs during impaired alveolar gas exchange in patients with severe acute and chronic lung diseases. Advances in understanding of the biology of high CO2 effects reveal that the changes in CO2 levels are sensed in cells resulting in specific tissue responses. There is accumulating evidence on the transcriptional response to elevated CO2 levels that alters gene expression and activates signaling pathways with consequences for cellular and tissue functions. The nature of hypercapnia-responsive transcriptional regulation is an emerging area of research, as the responses to hypercapnia in different cell types, tissues, and species are not fully understood. Here, we review the current understanding of hypercapnia effects on gene transcription and consequent cellular and tissue functions.

scholarly journals Differential Regulation of Human Interferon A Gene Expression by Interferon Regulatory Factors 3 and 7

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (12) ◽  
pp. 3435-3450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Génin ◽  
Rongtuan Lin ◽  
John Hiscott ◽  
Ahmet Civas
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Differential Expression ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Inhibitory Effect ◽  
Human Interferon ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Nucleotide Substitutions ◽  
D Modules ◽  
Different Cell Types

ABSTRACT Differential expression of the human interferon A (IFN-A) gene cluster is modulated following paramyxovirus infection by the relative amounts of active interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF-3) and IRF-7. IRF-3 expression activates predominantly IFN-A1 and IFN-B, while IRF-7 expression induces multiple IFN-A genes. IFN-A1 gene expression is dependent on three promoter proximal IRF elements (B, C, and D modules, located at positions −98 to −45 relative to the mRNA start site). IRF-3 binds the C module of IFN-A1, while other IFN-A gene promoters are responsive to the binding of IRF-7 to the B and D modules. Maximal expression of IFN-A1 is observed with complete occupancy of the three modules in the presence of IRF-7. Nucleotide substitutions in the C modules of other IFN-A genes disrupt IRF-3-mediated transcription, whereas a G/A substitution in the D modules enhances IRF7-mediated expression. IRF-3 exerts dual effects on IFN-A gene expression, as follows: a synergistic effect with IRF-7 on IFN-A1 expression and an inhibitory effect on other IFN-A gene promoters. Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments reveal that transient binding of both IRF-3 and IRF-7, accompanied by CBP/p300 recruitment to the endogenous IFN-A gene promoters, is associated with transcriptional activation, whereas a biphasic recruitment of IRF-3 and CBP/p300 represses IFN-A gene expression. This regulatory mechanism contributes to differential expression of IFN-A genes and may be critical for alpha interferon production in different cell types by RIG-I-dependent signals, leading to innate antiviral immune responses.

scholarly journals Global Analysis of Cell Type-Specific Gene Expression

2003 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 208-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
David W. Galbraith
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Global Analysis ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Global Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Reasonable Assumption ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Different Cell Types

The tissues and organs of multicellular eukaryotes are frequently observed to comprise complex three-dimensional interspersions of different cell types. It is a reasonable assumption that different global patterns of gene expression are found within these different cell types. This review outlines general experimental strategies designed to characterize these global gene expression patterns, based on a combination of methods of transgenic fluorescent protein (FP) expression and targeting, of flow cytometry and sorting and of high-throughput gene expression analysis.

Gene Expression in Different Cell Types of Aging Rat Brain

1991 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 812-817 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Venugopal ◽  
Kalluri Subba Rao
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Rat Brain ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Aging Rat ◽  
Different Cell Types

scholarly journals The Ability of Thyroid Hormone Receptors to Sense T4 as an Agonist Depends on Receptor Isoform and on Cellular Cofactors

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 745-757 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Schroeder ◽  
Robyn Jimenez ◽  
Briana Young ◽  
Martin L. Privalsky
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Hormone ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Hormone Receptors ◽  
Thyroid Hormone Receptor ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Receptor Associated Protein ◽  
Steroid Receptor Coactivator ◽  
Different Cell Types

Abstract T4 (3,5,3′,5′-tetraiodo-l-thyronine) is classically viewed as a prohormone that must be converted to the T3 (3,5,3′-triiodo-l-thyronine) form for biological activity. We first determined that the ability of reporter genes to respond to T4 and to T3 differed for the different thyroid hormone receptor (TR) isoforms, with TRα1 generally more responsive to T4 than was TRβ1. The response to T4 vs T3 also differed dramatically in different cell types in a manner that could not be attributed to differences in deiodinase activity or in hormone affinity, leading us to examine the role of TR coregulators in this phenomenon. Unexpectedly, several coactivators, such as steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC1) and thyroid hormone receptor-associated protein 220 (TRAP220), were recruited to TRα1 nearly equally by T4 as by T3 in vitro, indicating that TRα1 possesses an innate potential to respond efficiently to T4 as an agonist. In contrast, release of corepressors, such as the nuclear receptor coreceptor NCoRω, from TRα1 by T4 was relatively inefficient, requiring considerably higher concentrations of this ligand than did coactivator recruitment. Our results suggest that cells, by altering the repertoire and abundance of corepressors and coactivators expressed, may regulate their ability to respond to T4, raising the possibility that T4 may function directly as a hormone in specific cellular or physiological contexts.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document