Somatic cell nuclear transfer in pigs: recent achievements and future possibilities

2007 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gábor Vajta ◽  
Yunhai Zhang ◽  
Zoltán Macháty
Keyword(s):  
Somatic Cell ◽  
Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer ◽  
Nuclear Transfer ◽  
Direct Evidence ◽  
Research Area ◽  
Genetically Engineered ◽  
Transgenic Pigs ◽  
Actual Performance ◽  
Donor Cells

During the past 6 years, considerable advancement has been achieved in experimental embryology of pigs. This process was mainly generated by the rapidly increasing need for transgenic pigs for biomedical research purposes, both for future xenotransplantation to replace damaged human organs or tissues, and for creating authentic animal models for human diseases to study aetiology, pathogenesis and possible therapy. Theoretically, among various possibilities, an established somatic cell nuclear transfer system with genetically engineered donor cells seems to be an efficient and reliable approach to achieve this goal. However, as the result of unfortunate coincidence of known and unknown factors, porcine embryology had been a handicapped branch of reproductive research in domestic animals and a very intensive and focused research was required to eliminate or minimise this handicap. This review summarises recent achievements both in the background technologies (maturation, activation, embryo culture) and the actual performance of the nuclear replacement. Recent simplified methods for in vivo development after embryo transfer are also discussed. Finally, several fields of potential application for human medical purposes are discussed. The authors conclude that although in this early phase of research no direct evidence can be provided about the practical use of transgenic pigs produced by somatic cell nuclear transfer as organ donors or disease models, the future chances even in medium term are good, and at least proportional with the efforts and sums that are invested into this research area worldwide.

59 HIGHER BLASTOCYST FORMATION OF SOMATIC CELL NUCLEAR TRANSFER EMBRYOS DOES NOT GUARANTEE BETTER PREGNANCY IN PIG

2007 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 147
Author(s):  
E. Lee ◽  
K. Song ◽  
Y. Jeong ◽  
S. Hyun
Keyword(s):  
Somatic Cell ◽  
Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer ◽  
Nuclear Transfer ◽  
Cell Number ◽  
Skin Fibroblasts ◽  
Miniature Pig ◽  
Donor Cells ◽  
Fetal Fibroblasts

Generally, blastocyst (BL) formation and embryo cell number are used as main parameters to evaluate the viability and quality of in vitro-produced somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) embryos. We investigated whether in vitro development of SCNT pig embryos correlates with in vivo viability after transfer to surrogates. For SCNT, cumulus–oocyte complexes (COCs) were matured in TCM-199 supplemented with follicular fluid, hormones, EGF, cysteine, and insulin for the first 22 h and in a hormone-free medium for 18 h. Three sources of pig skin cells were used as nuclear donor: (1) skin fibroblasts of a cloned piglet that were produced by SCNT of fetal fibroblasts from a Landrace × Yorkshire × Duroc F1 hybrid (LYD), (2) skin fibroblasts of a miniature pig having the human decay accelerating factor gene (hDAF-MP), and (3) skin fibroblasts of a miniature pig with a different strain (MP). MII oocytes were enucleated, subjected to nuclear transfer from a donor cell, electrically fused, and activated 1 h after fusion. SCNT embryos were cultured in a modified NCSU-23 (Park Y et al. 2005 Zygote 13, 269–275) for 6 days or surgically transferred (110–150 fused embryos) into the oviduct of a surrogate that showed standing estrus on the same day as SCNT. Embryos were examined for cleavage and BL formation on Days 2 and 6, respectively (Day 0 = the day of SCNT). BLs were examined for their cell number after staining with Hoechst 33342. Pregnancy was diagnosed by ultrasound 30 and 60 days after embryo transfer. Embryo cleavage was not affected by donor cells (82, 81, and 72% for LYD, hDAF-MP, and MP, respectively), but BL formation was higher (P < 0.05) in hDAF-MP (16%) than in LYD (9%) and MP (6%). MP showed higher (P < 0.05) BL cell number (46 cells/BL) than hDAF-MP (34 cells) but did not show a difference from LYD (37 cells). LYD and MP showed higher pregnancy rates (Table 1) on Days 30 and 60, even though they showed lower BL formation in vitro. Due to a relatively small number of embryo transfers through a limited period, we could not exclude any possible effects by seasonal or operational differences. These results indicated that pregnancy did not correlate with in vitro BL formation of SCNT pig embryos but rather were affected by the source of donor cells. Table 1.In vivo development of somatic cell nuclear transfer pig embryos derived from different sources of donor cells This work was supported by the Research Project on the Production of Bio-organs (No. 200506020601), Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Republic of Korea.

Establishment and characterization of embryonic stem-like cells from porcine somatic cell nuclear transfer blastocysts

Zygote ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Kim ◽  
J.H. Kim ◽  
E. Lee ◽  
Y.W. Jeong ◽  
M.S. Hossein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Somatic Cell ◽  
Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer ◽  
Nuclear Transfer ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Donor Cell ◽  
Mouse Embryonic Fibroblast ◽  
Embryoid Bodies ◽  
Transgenic Pigs ◽  
Donor Cells ◽  
Embryonic Antigen

SummaryThis study was aimed to establish embryonic stem (ES)-like cells from blastocysts derived from somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) in pig. Somatic cells isolated from both day-30 fetus and neonatal cloned piglet were used for donor cells. A total of 60 blastocysts (46 and 14 derived from fetal and neonatal fibroblast donor cells, respectively) were seeded onto a mitotically inactive mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) monolayer and two ES-like cell lines, one from each donor cell type, were established. They remained undifferentiated over more than 52 (fetal fibroblast-derived) and 48 (neonatal fibroblast-derived) passages, while retaining alkaline phosphatase activity and reactivity with ES specific markers Oct-4, stage-specific embryonic antigen-1 (SSEA-1), SSEA-4, TRA-1–60 and TRA-1–81. These ES-like cells maintained normal diploid karyotype throughout subculture and successfully differentiated into embryoid bodies that expressed three germ layer-specific genes (ectoderm: β-III tubulin; endoderm: amylase; and mesoderm: enolase) after culture in leukemia inhibitory factor-free medium. Microsatellite analysis confirmed that they were genetically identical to its donor cells. Combined with gene targeting, our results may contribute to developing an efficient method for producing transgenic pigs for various purposes.

Successful cloning of coyotes through interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer using domestic dog oocytes

2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 1142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Insung Hwang ◽  
Yeon Woo Jeong ◽  
Joung Joo Kim ◽  
Hyo Jeong Lee ◽  
Mina Kang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Somatic Cell ◽  
Canis Lupus ◽  
Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer ◽  
Nuclear Transfer ◽  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Domestic Dogs ◽  
Domestic Dog ◽  
Canis Lupus Familiaris ◽  
Cloning Efficiency ◽  
Donor Cells

Interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer (iSCNT) is an emerging assisted reproductive technology (ART) for preserving Nature’s diversity. The scarcity of oocytes from some species makes utilisation of readily available oocytes inevitable. In the present study, we describe the successful cloning of coyotes (Canis latrans) through iSCNT using oocytes from domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris or dingo). Transfer of 320 interspecies-reconstructed embryos into 22 domestic dog recipients resulted in six pregnancies, from which eight viable offspring were delivered. Fusion rate and cloning efficiency during iSCNT cloning of coyotes were not significantly different from those observed during intraspecies cloning of domestic dogs. Using neonatal fibroblasts as donor cells significantly improved the cloning efficiency compared with cloning using adult fibroblast donor cells (P < 0.05). The use of domestic dog oocytes in the cloning of coyotes in the present study holds promise for cloning other endangered species in the Canidae family using similar techniques. However, there are still limitations of the iSCNT technology, as demonstrated by births of morphologically abnormal coyotes and the clones’ inheritance of maternal domestic dog mitochondrial DNA.

Using a nano-flare probe to detect RNA in live donor cells prior to somatic cell nuclear transfer

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-15
Author(s):  
Bo Fu ◽  
Liang Ren ◽  
Di Liu ◽  
Jian-zhang Ma ◽  
Tie-zhu An ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Somatic Cell ◽  
Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer ◽  
Nuclear Transfer ◽  
Live Donor ◽  
Donor Cells

scholarly journals Differential In Vivo Binding Dynamics of Somatic and Oocyte-specific Linker Histones in Oocytes and During ES Cell Nuclear Transfer

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 3887-3895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Becker ◽  
Antje Becker ◽  
Faiçal Miyara ◽  
Zhiming Han ◽  
Maki Kihara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Somatic Cell ◽  
Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer ◽  
Nuclear Transfer ◽  
Somatic Cells ◽  
Linker Histone ◽  
Binding Properties ◽  
Paternal Genome ◽  
Linker Histones ◽  
In Vivo Binding

The embryonic genome is formed by fusion of a maternal and a paternal genome. To accommodate the resulting diploid genome in the fertilized oocyte dramatic global genome reorganizations must occur. The higher order structure of chromatin in vivo is critically dependent on architectural chromatin proteins, with the family of linker histone proteins among the most critical structural determinants. Although somatic cells contain numerous linker histone variants, only one, H1FOO, is present in mouse oocytes. Upon fertilization H1FOO rapidly populates the introduced paternal genome and replaces sperm-specific histone-like proteins. The same dynamic replacement occurs upon introduction of a nucleus during somatic cell nuclear transfer. To understand the molecular basis of this dynamic histone replacement process, we compared the localization and binding dynamics of somatic H1 and oocyte-specific H1FOO and identified the molecular determinants of binding to either oocyte or somatic chromatin in living cells. We find that although both histones associate readily with chromatin in nuclei of somatic cells, only H1FOO is capable of correct chromatin association in the germinal vesicle stage oocyte nuclei. This specificity is generated by the N-terminal and globular domains of H1FOO. Measurement of in vivo binding properties of the H1 variants suggest that H1FOO binds chromatin more tightly than somatic linker histones. We provide evidence that both the binding properties of linker histones as well as additional, active processes contribute to the replacement of somatic histones with H1FOO during nuclear transfer. These results provide the first mechanistic insights into the crucial step of linker histone replacement as it occurs during fertilization and somatic cell nuclear transfer.

44 IN VITRO AND IN VIVO SURVIVABILITY ON VITRIFIED EMBRYOS OBTAINED BY BOVINE SOMATIC CELL NUCLEAR TRANSFER

2006 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 131
Author(s):  
K. Kaneyama ◽  
S. Kobayashi ◽  
S. Matoba ◽  
Y. Hashiyada ◽  
K. Imai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Somatic Cell ◽  
Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer ◽  
Nuclear Transfer ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Calf Serum ◽  
Cumulus Cells ◽  
Nuclear Transplantation ◽  
Embryo Cryopreservation

Although many studies have been conducted on somatic cell nuclear transfer, there are only a few reports on cryopreservation of reconstructed embryos after nuclear transplantation. The objective of this study was to examine in vitro or in vivo development of vitrified blastocysts obtained by nuclear transfer. Nuclear transfer was carried out according to the procedure of Goto et al. (1999 Anim. Sci. J. 70, 243–245), and conducted using abattoir-derived oocytes and cumulus cells derived by ovum pickup from Holstein and Japanese Black cows. Embryos were vitrified as described by Saito et al. (1998 Cryobiol. Cryotech. 43, 34–39). The vitrification solution (GESX solution) was based on Dulbecco's PBS containing 20% glycerol (GL), 20% ethylene glycol (EG), 0.3 M sucrose (Suc), 0.3 M xylose (Xyl), and 3% polyethylene glycol (PEG). The blastocysts were equilibrated in three steps, with 10% GL, 0.1 M Suc, 0.1 M Xyl, and 1% PEG for 5 min (1); with 10% GL, 10% EG, 0.2 M Suc, 0.2 M Xyl, and 2% PEG for 5 min (2) and GESX solution (3). After transfer to GESX, equilibrated embryos were loaded to 0.25-mL straws and plunged into liquid nitrogen for 1 min. The vitrified blastocysts were warmed in water (20°C) and diluted in 0.5 M and 0.25 M sucrose for 5 min each. Equilibration and dilution procedures were conducted at room temperature (25–26°C). After dilution, the vitrified blastocysts were cultured in TCM-199 supplemented with 20% fetal calf serum and 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol at 38.5°C under gas phase of 5% CO2 in air. In Experiment 1, survival rates after vitrification were compared between the nuclear transfer and the IVF blastocysts. Survival rates of vitrified nuclear transfer blastocysts (n = 60, Day 8) at 24 and 48 h were 70.0% and 56.7%, respectively, and those of vitrified IVF blastocysts (n = 41) were 82.9% and 82.9%, respectively. There were no significant differences in survival rates at 24 and 48 h between the two groups. In Experiment 2, one (VIT-single) or two (VIT-double) vitrified and one (nonVIT-single) or two (nonVIT-double) nonvitrified reconstructed blastocysts per animal were transferred into Holstein dry cows. The result of Experiment 2 is shown in Table 1. This experiment demonstrated that the vitrification method in this study can be used for cloned embryo cryopreservation but the production rate should be improved. Table 1. Comparison of survival rates of vitrified or nonvitrified cloned embryos after transfer

24 BUFFALO (BUBALUS BUBALIS) SOMATIC CELL NUCLEAR TRANSFER EMBRYOS PRODUCED FROM FROZEN–THAWED SEMEN-DERIVED SOMATIC CELLS: EFFECT OF TRICHOSTATIN A ON THE IN VITRO AND IN VIVO DEVELOPMENTAL POTENTIAL, QUALITY, AND EPIGENETIC STATUS

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 104
Author(s):  
N. L. Selokar ◽  
M. Saini ◽  
H. Agrawal ◽  
P. Palta ◽  
M. S. Chauhan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Somatic Cell ◽  
Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer ◽  
Nuclear Transfer ◽  
Trichostatin A ◽  
Somatic Cells ◽  
Developmental Potential ◽  
Reconstructed Embryos ◽  
Frozen Semen ◽  
Significant Difference

Cryopreservation of semen allows preservation of somatic cells, which can be used for the production of progeny through somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). This approach could enable restoration of valuable high-genetic-merit progeny-tested bulls, which may be dead but the cryopreserved semen is available. We have successfully produced a live buffalo calf by SCNT using somatic cells isolated from >10 year old frozen semen (Selokar et al. 2014 PLoS One 9, e90755). However, the calf survived only for 12 h, which indicates faulty reprogramming of these cells. The present study was, therefore, carried out to study the effect of treatment with trichostatin A (TSA), an epigenetic modifier, on reprogramming of these cells. Production of cloned embryos and determination of quality and level of epigenetic markers in blastocysts were performed according to the methods described previously (Selokar et al. 2014 PLoS One 9, e90755). To examine the effects of TSA (0, 50, and 75 nM), 10 separate experiments were performed on 125, 175, and 207 reconstructed embryos, respectively. The percentage data were analysed using SYSTAT 12.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) after arcsine transformation. Differences between means were analysed by one-way ANOVA followed by Fisher's least significant difference test for significance at P < 0.05. When the reconstructed buffalo embryos produced by hand-made clones were treated with 0, 50, or 75 nM TSA post-electrofusion for 10 h, the cleavage percentage (100.0 ± 0, 94.5 ± 2.3, and 96.1 ± 1.2, respectively) and blastocyst percentage (50.6 ± 2.3, 48.4 ± 2.7, and 48.1 ± 2.6, respectively), total cell number (274.9 ± 17.4, 289.1 ± 30.1, and 317.0 ± 24.2, respectively), and apoptotic index (3.4 ± 0.9, 4.5 ± 1.4, and 5.6 ± 0.7, respectively) in Day 8 blastocysts were not significantly different among different groups. The TSA treatment increased (P < 0.05) the global level of H4K5ac but not that of H3K18a in embryos treated with 50 or 75 nM TSA compared with that in controls. In contrast, the level of H3K27me3 was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in cloned embryos treated with 75 nM TSA than in embryos treated with 50 nM TSA or controls. The ultimate test of the reprogramming potential of any donor cell type is its ability to produce live offspring. To examine the in vivo developmental potential of the 0, 50, or 75 nM TSA treated embryos, we transferred Day 8 blastocysts, 2 each to 5, 6, and 5 recipients, respectively, which resulted in 2 pregnancies from 75 nM TSA treated embryos. However, one pregnancy was aborted in the first trimester and the other in the third trimester. In conclusion, TSA treatment of reconstructed embryos produced from semen-derived somatic cells alters their epigenetic status but does not improve the live birth rate. We are currently optimizing an effective strategy to improve the cloning efficiency of semen-derived somatic cells.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document