scholarly journals Abstracts of the Australasian Association for Academic Primary Care (AAAPC) Annual Research Conference, 14–15 August 2020

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. iii
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Research Conference ◽  
Academic Primary Care

Perspectives of Caregivers Experiencing Persistent Food Insecurity at an Academic Primary Care Clinic

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid L. Tablazon ◽  
Deepak Palakshappa ◽  
Faith C OBrian ◽  
Brenda Ramirez ◽  
Joseph A. Skelton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Food Insecurity ◽  
Primary Care Clinic ◽  
Care Clinic ◽  
Academic Primary Care

Improving Patient-Provider Continuity in a Large Urban Academic Primary Care Network

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dane A. Snyder ◽  
Jonathon Schuller ◽  
Zeenath Ameen ◽  
Christina Toth ◽  
Alex R. Kemper
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Care Network ◽  
Academic Primary Care

Developing a Quality Measurement Strategy in an Academic Primary Care Setting

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. e90-e100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra F. Dalton ◽  
Corey Lyon ◽  
Bennett Parnes ◽  
Douglas Fernald ◽  
Carmen L. Lewis
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Primary Care Setting ◽  
Quality Measurement ◽  
Measurement Strategy ◽  
Academic Primary Care

scholarly journals What do academic primary care physicians want in an electronic journal?

2003 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dario M. Torre ◽  
Scott M. Wright ◽  
Renée F. Wilson ◽  
Marie Diener-West ◽  
Eric B. Bass
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Electronic Journal ◽  
Academic Primary Care

Assessing outcomes of educational videos in group visits for patients with chronic pain at an academic primary care clinic

2017 ◽  
Vol 129 (5) ◽  
pp. 524-530
Author(s):  
Carrie N. Vogler ◽  
Stacy Sattovia ◽  
Laura Y. Salazar ◽  
Tiffany I. Leung ◽  
Albert Botchway
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Primary Care Clinic ◽  
Care Clinic ◽  
Group Visits ◽  
Educational Videos ◽  
Academic Primary Care

scholarly journals Longitudinal, multidisciplinary, resident-driven intervention to increase immunisation rates for Medicaid, low-income and uninsured patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. e000986
Author(s):  
Cynthia Cantu ◽  
Kristopher Koch ◽  
Ramon S Cancino
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Primary Care Practice ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Waiting Room ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Vaccination Rates ◽  
Initial Intervention ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Academic Primary Care

IntroductionMore payers are closely linking reimbursement to high-value care outcomes such as immunisation rates. Despite this, there remain high rates of pneumonia and influenza-related hospitalisations generating hospital expenditures as high as $11 000 per hospitalisation. Vaccinating the public is an integral part of preventing poor health and utilisation outcomes and is particularly relevant to high-risk patients. As part of a multidisciplinary effort between family and internal medicine residency programmes, our goal was to improve vaccination rates to an average of 76% of eligible Medicaid, low-income and uninsured (MLIU) patients at an academic primary care practice.MethodsThe quality improvement project was completed over 3 months by three primary care resident groups. The setting was a suburban academic primary care practice and eligible patients were 18 years of age or older. Our aim was to increase immunisation rates of pneumococcal, influenza, varicella, herpes zoster virus and tetanus and diphtheria vaccination. There were 1690 patients eligible for the vaccination composite metric. Data were derived from the electronic health record and administrative data.InterventionsCohort 1 developed an initial intervention that consisted of a vaccine questionnaire for patients to complete while in the waiting room. Cohort 2 modified questionnaire after reviewing results from initial intervention. Cohort 3 recommended elimination of questionnaire and implementation of a bundled intervention approach.ResultsThere were minimal improvements in patient immunisation rates after using a patient-directed paper questionnaire. After implementation of multiple interventions via an improvement bundle, there were improvements in immunisation rates which were sustained and the result of special cause variation.ConclusionA key to improving immunisation rates for MLIU patients in this clinic was developing relationships with faculty and staff stakeholders. We received feedback from all the medical staff and then applied it to the interventions and made an impact in the average of vaccinations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document