Future projections of child oral-related hospital admission rates in Western Australia

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alla Alsharif ◽  
Estie Kruger ◽  
Marc Tennant
Keyword(s):  
Dental Caries ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Admission Rate ◽  
Projection Data ◽  
Impacted Teeth ◽  
Admission Rates ◽  
The Future ◽  
Hospital Morbidity ◽  
Western Australian

This study aimed to project the hospital admission rates of Western Australian children for oral conditions, with a particular focus on dental caries, embedded and impacted teeth, and pulp and periapical conditions through to the year 2026. Two methods were used to generate projection data through to the year 2026, using the Western Australian Hospital Morbidity Dataset for the period 1999–2000 to 2008–2009. The projected admission rate increase in those children aged 14 years and younger from 2000 to 2026 was 43%. The admission rates are expected to more than double over time (7317 cases in 2026 compared to only 3008 cases in 2000) for those children living in metropolitan areas. Dental caries, embedded and impacted teeth, and pulp and periapical conditions will remain the top (mostly) preventable causes of admission throughout this time. Anticipating the future burden of oral-related hospital admissions in children, in terms of expected numbers of cases, is vital for optimising the resource allocation for early diagnosis, prevention and treatment. A concerted effort will be required by policymakers and oral healthcare communities to effect substantial change for the future.

scholarly journals The bimodal rise and fall acute coronary syndromes curves paralleling COVID-19 outbreaks

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Trabattoni ◽  
G Teruzzi ◽  
P M Ravagnani ◽  
G Santagostino Baldi ◽  
P Montorsi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiogenic Shock ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndromes ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Admission Rate ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Swab ◽  
Admission Rates ◽  
Coronary Syndromes ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction Preliminary reports from the early phase of COVID-19 epidemic in Italy reported a dramatic reduction in hospital admission rates for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) coupled with longer times from symptoms onset to hospital presentation. Purpose To assess the impact of COVID-19 on hospital admission rates and ACS patterns, as well as time to presentation and clinical outcomes, following the acute pandemic phase in 2020 compared to previous year. Methods We conducted a single institution retrospective analysis conducted in a cardiovascular hub serving a large metropolitan area in Italy. Number and monthly distribution of hospital admissions for ACS from January 1 to December 31, 2020 were compared to the respective figures in 2019. Baseline clinical features, time from symptoms onset to hospital admission and main clinical outcomes were collected. Results A total of 599 ACS cases were recorded in 2020 vs. 386 cases in 2019, with a net 55% increase. ACS presentation rate in 2020 showed a bimodal pattern, paralleling the most contagious outbreak periods (Figure 1). SARS-CoB-2 nasopharyngeal swab or specific antibody tests were positive in 34 (5.7%) patients. Time from symptoms onset to hospital presentation tended to be longer in 2020 than in 2019, being two-fold longer during the peak epidemic phase (February 21-May 3, 2020; median time 2.0 vs. 5.0 hours, p=0.030). The proportion of late-presenting STEMI (>8 hrs from symptoms onset) was higher in 2020 compared to 2019 (30% vs. 18%, p=0.003),as well as higher was in-hospital mortality (15% in 2020 vs 6% in 2019, p=0.001), partly due to a three-fold increase in cardiogenic shock on ACS presentation. Conclusions ACS admission rate significantly increased during the 2020 COVID-19 epidemic outbreak for several reasons only partially explained by a SARS-CoV-2 infection trigger effect on ACS. Longer presentation times and higher rates of cardiogenic shock and mortality were observed, urging the need health-care systems to keep a high priority on cardiovascular emergencies response networks. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1

scholarly journals Changing patterns of hospital admission for asthma, 1981–97

Thorax ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 56 (9) ◽  
pp. 687-690
Author(s):  
D S Morrison ◽  
P McLoone
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Admission Rate ◽  
Hospital Admission Rate ◽  
Admission Rates ◽  
Lengths Of Stay ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Changing Patterns ◽  
Bed Days ◽  
Age And Sex

BACKGROUNDHospital admission rates for asthma have stopped rising in several countries. The aim of this study was to use linked hospital admission data to explore recent trends in asthma admissions in Scotland.METHODSLinked Scottish Morbidity Records (SMR1) for asthma (ICD-9 493 and ICD-10 J45–6) from 1981 to 1997 were used to describe rates of first admissions and readmissions by age and sex. As a measure of resource use, annual trends in bed days used were also explored by age and sex.RESULTSThere were 160 039 hospital admissions for asthma by 82 421 individuals in Scotland during the study period. The overall hospital admission rate increased by 122% (from 106.7 to 236.7 per 100 000 population) but this varied by sex, age, and admission type. First admissions rose by 70% from 73.2 per 100 000 in 1986 to 124.8 per 100 000 in 1997 while readmissions fell. Children (<15 years) experienced a decline in overall admissions after 1992 due to falls in both new admissions and readmissions. By 1997 the ratio of female to male admissions was 0.57 in children, but 1.50 above 14 years of age. Mean lengths of stay fell from 10.7 days to 3.7 days between 1981 and 1997 and bed days used showed little change except for a decline after 1992 in children.CONCLUSIONSAfter a period of increasing hospitalisation for asthma in Scotland, rates of admission among children have begun to fall but among adults admissions continue to rise.

scholarly journals 1683. Hospital Admission Patterns in Adult Patients with Complicated Urinary Tract Infections (cUTIs): Identification of Potentially Avoidable Hospital Admissions Across United States (US) Hospitals

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S825-S826
Author(s):  
Thomas Lodise ◽  
Teena Chopra ◽  
Brian Nathanson ◽  
Katherine Sulham
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Panel Member ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Independent Contractor ◽  
Healthcare Database ◽  
Admission Rates ◽  
Comorbidity Index ◽  
Multi Center Study ◽  
Tract Infections

Abstract Background There is an increase in hospital admissions for cUTI in the US despite apparent reductions in the severity of admissions. However, there are scant data on cUTI hospital admission rates from the emergency department (ED) stratified by age, infection severity, and presence of comorbidities. This study described US hospitalization patterns among adults who present to the ED with a cUTI. We sought to quantify the proportion of admissions that were potentially avoidable based on presence of sepsis and associated symtpoms as well as Charlston Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores. Methods A retrospective multi-center study using data from the Premier Healthcare Database (2013-18) was performed. Inclusion criteria: (1) age ≥ 18 years, (2) primary cUTI ED/inpatient discharge diagnosis, (3) positive blood or urine culture between index ED service days -5 to +2. Transfers from acute care facilities were excluded. Based on ICD-9/10 diagnosis codes present on admission, incidence of hospital admissions were stratified by age (≥ 65 years vs. &lt; 65 years), presence of sepsis (S), sepsis symptoms but no sepsis codes (SS) (e.g., fever, tachycardia, tachypnea, leukocytosis, etc.), and CCI. Results 187,789 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean (SD) age was 59.7 (21.9), 40.4% were male, 29.4% had sepsis, 16.7% had at least 1 SS symptom (but no S), and 53.9% had no evidence of S or SS. The median [IQR] CCI was 1 [0, 3]. 119,668 out of 187,789 (63.7%) were admitted to hospital. Among inpatients, median [IQR] length of stay (LOS) and total costs were 5 [3, 7] days and $7,956 [$4,834, $13,960] USD. Incidence of hospital admissions by age, presence of S/SS, and CCI score are shown in the Table. 18.9% of admissions (22,644/119,668) occurred in patients with no S/SS and a CCI ≤ 2. Their median [IQR] LOS and total costs were 3 [2, 5] days and $5,575 [$3,607, $9,133]. Incidence of Hospital Admission by Age, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), Presence of Sepsis (S), and Presence of Sepsis Symptoms (SS) Conclusion Nearly 1 in 5 cUTI hospital admissions may be avoidable. Given the resources associated with the management of inpatients with cUTIs, these findings highlight the critical need for healthcare systems to develop well-defined criteria for hospital admission based on presence of comorbid conditions and infection severity. Preventing avoidable hospital admissions has the potential to save the healthcare system substantial costs. Disclosures Thomas Lodise, PharmD, PhD, Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Consultant) Teena Chopra, MD, MPH, Spero Therapeutics (Consultant, Advisor or Review Panel member) Brian Nathanson, PhD, Spero Therapeutics (Independent Contractor) Katherine Sulham, MPH, Spero Therapeutics (Independent Contractor)

scholarly journals Challenges of using asthma admission rates as a measure of primary care quality in children: An international comparison

2021 ◽  
pp. 135581962110127
Author(s):  
Irina Lut ◽  
Kate Lewis ◽  
Linda Wijlaars ◽  
Ruth Gilbert ◽  
Tiffany Fitzpatrick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Underlying Disease ◽  
Primary Diagnosis ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Attendance Rates ◽  
Admission Rates ◽  
Primary Care Quality ◽  
Hospital Administrative

Objectives To demonstrate the challenges of interpreting cross-country comparisons of paediatric asthma hospital admission rates as an indicator of primary care quality. Methods We used hospital administrative data from >10 million children aged 6–15 years, resident in Austria, England, Finland, Iceland, Ontario (Canada), Sweden or Victoria (Australia) between 2008 and 2015. Asthma hospital admission and emergency department (ED) attendance rates were compared between countries using Poisson regression models, adjusted for age and sex. Results Hospital admission rates for asthma per 1000 child-years varied eight-fold across jurisdictions. Admission rates were 3.5 times higher when admissions with asthma recorded as any diagnosis were considered, compared with admissions with asthma as the primary diagnosis. Iceland had the lowest asthma admission rates; however, when ED attendance rates were considered, Sweden had the lowest rate of asthma hospital contacts. Conclusions The large variations in childhood hospital admission rates for asthma based on the whole child population reflect differing definitions, admission thresholds and underlying disease prevalence rather than primary care quality. Asthma hospital admissions among children diagnosed with asthma is a more meaningful indicator for inter-country comparisons of primary care quality.

scholarly journals Association between home insulation and hospital admission rates: retrospective cohort study using linked data from a national intervention programme

BMJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. m4571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Fyfe ◽  
Lucy Telfar ◽  
Barnard ◽  
Philippa Howden-Chapman ◽  
Jeroen Douwes
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Rate Ratio ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Relative Rate ◽  
Intervention Programme ◽  
Admission Rates

Abstract Objectives To investigate whether retrofitting insulation into homes can reduce cold associated hospital admission rates among residents and to identify whether the effect varies between different groups within the population and by type of insulation. Design A quasi-experimental retrospective cohort study using linked datasets to evaluate a national intervention programme. Participants 994 317 residents of 204 405 houses who received an insulation subsidy through the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority Warm-up New Zealand: Heat Smart retrofit programme between July 2009 and June 2014. Main outcome measure A difference-in-difference approach was used to compare the change in hospital admissions of the study population post-insulation with the change in hospital admissions of the control population that did not receive the intervention over the same two timeframes. Relative rate ratios were used to compare the two groups. Results 234 873 hospital admissions occurred during the study period. Hospital admission rates after the intervention increased in the intervention and control groups for all population categories and conditions with the exception of acute hospital admissions among Pacific Peoples (rate ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.90 to 0.98), asthma (0.92, 0.86 to 0.99), cardiovascular disease (0.90, 0.88 to 0.93), and ischaemic heart disease for adults older than 65 years (0.79, 0.74 to 0.84). Post-intervention increases were, however, significantly lower (11%) in the intervention group compared with the control group (relative rate ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.88 to 0.90), representing 9.26 (95% confidence interval 9.05 to 9.47) fewer hospital admissions per 1000 in the intervention population. Effects were more pronounced for respiratory disease (0.85, 0.81 to 0.90), asthma in all age groups (0.80, 0.70 to 0.90), and ischaemic heart disease in those older than 65 years (0.75, 0.66 to 0.83). Conclusion This study showed that a national home insulation intervention was associated with reduced hospital admissions, supporting previous research, which found an improvement in self-reported health.

scholarly journals Biphasic pattern in the effect of severe measles infection; the difference between additive and multiplicative scale

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nhat Thanh Hoang Le ◽  
Nhan Thi Ho ◽  
Bryan Grenfell ◽  
Stephen Baker ◽  
Ronald B. Geskus
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Measles Virus ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Admission Rate ◽  
Second Phase ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Two Phases ◽  
Additive Scale

Abstract Background Infection with measles virus (MeV) causes immunosuppression and increased susceptibility to other infectious diseases. Only few studies reported a duration of immunosuppression, with varying results. We investigated the effect of immunosuppression on the incidence of hospital admissions for infectious diseases in Vietnamese children. Methods We used retrospective data (2005 to 2015; N = 4419) from the two pediatric hospitals in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. We compared the age-specific incidence of hospital admission for infectious diseases before and after hospitalization for measles. We fitted a Poisson regression model that included gender, current age, and time since measles to obtain a multiplicative effect measure. Estimates were transformed to the additive scale. Results We observed two phases in the incidence of hospital admission after measles. The first phase started with a fourfold increased rate of admissions during the first month after measles, dropping to a level quite comparable to children of the same age before measles. In the second phase, lasting until at least 6 years after measles, the admission rate decreased further, with values up to 20 times lower than in children of the same age before measles. However, on the additive scale the effect size in the second phase was much smaller than in the first phase. Conclusion The first phase highlights the public health benefits of measles vaccination by preventing measles and immune amnesia. The beneficial second phase is interesting, but its strength strongly depends on the scale. It suggests a complicated interaction between MeV infection and the host immunity.

Unplanned hospital admission in patients receiving concurrent chemotherapy and radiation.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 258-258
Author(s):  
Nicholas Damico ◽  
Ellen Tiemeier ◽  
Laura Krukowski ◽  
Lucy Colo ◽  
Christine Marie Sydenstricker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Admission Rate ◽  
Concurrent Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Admission Diagnosis ◽  
Unplanned Admission ◽  
Admission Rates ◽  
Patients At Risk

258 Background: Concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy (CCRT) has become a curative treatment for many malignancies. Many patients are ultimately cured, but at the cost of significant acute toxicity. When severe, this can require unplanned hospitalization. More research is needed to better identify patients at risk for hospitalization and how to prevent it. Methods: As part of quality improvement at the Seidman Cancer Center, patients in the University Hospitals (UH) system who underwent CCRT were identified. A review was done to determine which patients experienced an unplanned admission in the UH system during their radiation course or within 30 days and the admission diagnosis. We recognized malnutrition and dehydration as causes for hospitalization that were preventable. Several interventions were then performed to reduce these admissions. The first was standardized nutrition screening that prompts earlier dietician referrals for patients at risk of malnutrition. We also instituted hydration assessments for patients beginning in the 3rd week of radiation. Patients found to be dehydrated were scheduled to receive intravenous (IV) fluids as an outpatient for the remainder of their treatment course. Admission rates for patients undergoing CCRT have been tracked as part of this initiative and are reported here. Results: From 7/2017 to 12/2018 we identified 303 patients who completed CCRT. 78 (26%) had an unplanned hospital admission during their treatment course or within 30 days of completing radiation. This included patients with primary head and neck, CNS, GI, lung, GYN, and GU malignancies for which admission rates were 36%, 32%, 23%, 29%, 19% and 8% respectively. 18 (23%) of these patients were admitted after completing the radiation course but within 30 days. The initial admission rate prior to intervention was 34%. This has since declined to 19% (table). Conclusions: Unplanned admission rates are high in patients who undergo CCRT across disease sites. Patients remain at risk following completion of radiation therapy for up to 30 days. Some admissions may be prevented by early dietician referrals and IV hydration. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals COVID-19 and delivery of difficult asthma services

2021 ◽  
pp. archdischild-2021-322335
Author(s):  
Anna-Louise Nichols ◽  
Mayank Sonnappa-Naik ◽  
Laura Gardner ◽  
Charlotte Richardson ◽  
Natalie Orr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Multidisciplinary Team ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Forced Expiratory Volume ◽  
Acute Hospital ◽  
Attendance Rates ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Admission Rates ◽  
Oral Corticosteroids ◽  
Difficult Asthma

The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated an urgent reconfiguration of our difficult asthma (DA) service. We rapidly switched to virtual clinics and rolled out home spirometry based on clinical need. From March to August 2020, 110 patients with DA (68% virtually) were seen in clinic, compared with March–August 2019 when 88 patients were seen face-to-face. There was DA clinic cancellation/non-attendance (16% vs 43%; p<0.0003). In patients with home spirometers, acute hospital admissions (6 vs 26; p<0.01) from March to August 2020 were significantly lower compared with the same period in 2019. There was no difference in the number of courses of oral corticosteroids or antibiotics prescribed (47 vs 53; p=0.81). From April to August 2020, 50 patients with DA performed 253 home spirometry measurements, of which 39 demonstrated >20% decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 s, resulting in new action plans in 87% of these episodes. In our DA cohort, we demonstrate better attendance rates at virtual multidisciplinary team consultations and reduced hospital admission rates when augmented with home spirometry monitoring.

scholarly journals The challenge of using routinely collected data to compare hospital admission rates by ethnic group: a demonstration project in Scotland

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 748-755 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Knox ◽  
R S Bhopal ◽  
C S Thomson ◽  
A Millard ◽  
A Fraser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Ethnic Group ◽  
Ethnic Groups ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Heart Diseases ◽  
Equity In Health ◽  
Admission Rates ◽  
Group A ◽  
Rate Ratios ◽  
Equity In Health Care

Abstract Background Recording patients’ ethnic group supports efforts to achieve equity in health care provision. Before the Equality Act (2010), recording ethnic group at hospital admission was poor in Scotland but has improved subsequently. We describe the first analysis of the utility of such data nationally for monitoring ethnic variation. Methods We analysed all in-patient or day case hospital admissions in 2013. We imputed missing data using the most recent ethnic group recorded for a patient from 2009 to 2015. For episodes lacking an ethnic code, we attributed known ethnic codes proportionately. Using the 2011 Census population, we calculated rates and rate ratios for all-cause admissions and ischaemic heart diseases (IHDs) directly standardized for age. Results Imputation reduced missing ethnic group codes from 24 to 15% and proportionate redistribution to zero. While some rates for both all-cause and IHD admissions appeared plausible, unexpectedly low or high rates were observed for several ethnic groups particularly amongst White groups and newly coded groups. Conclusions Completeness of ethnicity recoding on hospital admission records has improved markedly since 2010. However the validity of admission rates based on these data is variable across ethnic groups and further improvements are required to support monitoring of inequality.

Frequency of Emergency Department Visits for Sickle Cell Disease Vaso-Occlusive Crisis and Its Contribution to Hospital Admission Rates

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5569-5569
Author(s):  
Patrick Loeffler ◽  
Taylor Mueller ◽  
Abdullah Kutlar ◽  
Robert Gibson ◽  
LaShon Sturgis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Sickle Cell Disease ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Admission Rate ◽  
Cell Disease ◽  
Admission Rates ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Number Of Visits ◽  
The Difference ◽  
First Time

Abstract Background: Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) frequently seek care in the emergency department (ED). To improve and increase consistency of care patients with uncomplicated VOC, are treated in the Emergency Department Observation Unit (EDOU) where they are treated with an individualized protocol-based pathway. EDOUs have been shown to be effective in meeting treatment guidelines and reducing hospital admission. Objective: This study examines the admission rates of individuals with SCD stratified by frequency of presentation at the EDOU. Methods: A retrospective review of an ED database was completed to explore the relationship between EDOU utilization and admission rate for patients with uncomplicated VOC. All patient records meeting pathway inclusion criteria for uncomplicated VOC during the time period September 2013 through May 2015 were included in the study. Visits were first associated with individual patients. Then, based on the number of visits per time period, patients were categorized as high users, moderate users, or low users. Categorization was done using the number of visits during the first, 12-month period (9/11/13 - 9/10/14), or the second, nine-month period (9/10/14 - 5/31/15). Adaptations to the categorization scheme for the nine-month time period were as follows. Low users were patients that had no more than one visit in either the first or second time period; moderate users were patients with two or three visits in the first time period or two visits in the second; high users were patients with four or more visits in the first time period, or three or more visits in the second time period. Admission rates were calculated as percentages of visits to the EDOU. Rates of admission for high, middle, and low users were compared using an unpaired, one-tailed Student's t-test. This study was approved by expedited review by the institution's Institutional Review Board (IRB). Results: A total of 727 visits for 154 patients were included in the analysis. High users (n=44) had a total of 539 visits and an average patient admission rate of 22% (n=118). Moderate users (n=49) had a total of 108 visits and an admission rate of 31% (n=33). Low users (N=61) had a total of 80 visits and an admission rate of 36% (n=29). The difference between the number of high user admissions and low user admissions was significant (p<0.01) as was the difference between the number of moderate-user visits and the number of high-user visits (p=0.04). The difference between the number of moderate and low user admissions was not significant (p=0.14). Conclusion: This study found that the difference in the number of admissions between high and low users and between high and moderate users was significant. The findings provide support for the value of the EDOU in reducing unnecessary hospital admissions. These findings also raise important questions regarding the phenotypic expression of pain in SCD and the availability of care. Although the criteria for categorization of patients in this study was limited and the time periods unequal the results suggest different patterns of personal response to pain and treatment seeking. It is unknown how these groups may be different in regards to access to care, treatment preferences, self-care practices, or severity of disease. It can be hypothesized from these results that there may be two different patterns of care seeking with some patients only using the EDOU when crisis is severe (low users) and other patients (high users) using the EDOU as part of their regular pain treatment strategy. To address these questions it is necessary to further examine the differences between these groups to look for explanations that can address increased utilization of the EDOU among some patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document