scholarly journals General practice registrars’ intentions for future practice: implications for rural medical workforce planning

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Harding ◽  
Alexa Seal ◽  
Joe McGirr ◽  
Tim Caton
Keyword(s):  
General Practice ◽  
Workforce Planning ◽  
Rural Practice ◽  
Fee For Service ◽  
Ability To Work ◽  
Medical Graduates ◽  
Practice Models ◽  
Part Time ◽  
Future Practice ◽  
General Practice Training

The models of practice that general practice registrars (GPRs) envisage undertaking will affect workforce supply. The aim of this research was to determine practice intentions of current GPRs in a regional general practice training program (Coast City Country General Practice Training). Questionnaires were circulated to 220 GPRs undertaking general practice placements to determine characteristics of ideal practice models and intentions for future practice. Responses were received for 99 participants (45%). Current GPRs intend to work an average of less than eight half-day sessions/week, with male participants intending to work more hours (t(91)=3.528, P=0.001). More than one-third of this regional cohort intends to practice in metropolitan centres. Proximity to family and friends was the most important factor influencing the choice of practice location. Men ranked remuneration for work as more important (t (88)=–4.280, P<0.001) and women ranked the ability to work part-time higher (t(94)=3.697, P<0.001). Fee-for-service payment alone, or in combination with capitation, was the preferred payment system. Only 22% of Australian medical graduates intend to own their own practice compared with 52% of international medical graduates (χ2(1)=8.498, P=0.004). Future general practitioners (GPs) intend to work fewer hours than current GPs. Assumptions about lifestyle factors, practice models and possible professional roles should be carefully evaluated when developing strategies to recruit GPs and GPRs into rural practice.

scholarly journals What influences trainee decisions to practise in rural and regional Australia?

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 520
Author(s):  
Alexa Seal ◽  
Catherine Harding ◽  
Joe McGirr
Keyword(s):  
Rural Areas ◽  
Rural Practice ◽  
Substantial Part ◽  
Medical Graduates ◽  
Practice Models ◽  
Binary Regression Analysis ◽  
Royal Australian College ◽  
Key Variables ◽  
Regional Australia ◽  
Remote Medicine

Although international medical graduates (IMGs) make up a substantial part of the Australian rural general practice workforce, most research on factors associated with rural practice has focused on Australian medical graduates (AMGs). This study aimed to determine whether there were differences between IMGs and AMGs in terms of these factors. Registrars in training and recent fellows (Fellowship of the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners/Fellowship of the Australian College of Rural and Remote Medicine) who participated in training in rural and regional Australia were surveyed about practice models and rural practice. Almost two-thirds of participants were practicing or intending to practice in rural areas, with no difference between AMGs and IMGs. None of the variables associated with rural practice for AMGs was found to be associated with rural practice in IMGs in univariate binary regression analysis. Two key variables that are strongly associated with rural medical practice in the current literature, namely rural background and rural exposure, were not significant predictors of rural practice among IMGs. Due to the significant number of IMGs in regional training programs, any future incentives designed to improve rural recruitment and retention need to address factors relevant to IMGs.

scholarly journals Factors influencing specialty choice and the effect of recall bias on findings from Irish medical graduates: a cross-sectional, longitudinal study

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances M. Cronin ◽  
Nicholas Clarke ◽  
Louise Hendrick ◽  
Ronan Conroy ◽  
Ruairi Brugha
Keyword(s):  
General Practice ◽  
Workforce Planning ◽  
Working Hours ◽  
Specialty Choice ◽  
Baseline Survey ◽  
First Year ◽  
Recall Bias ◽  
Medical Workforce ◽  
Medical Graduates

Abstract Background Despite being a vital part of medical workforce planning and development, how medical students and graduates choose their career specialty is still not well understood. This study aimed to identify the factors medical graduates consider important influences in their choice of specialty after their first year of practice, and to test the validity of relying on respondent recall to measure changes in specialty choice. Methods The baseline survey was administered online to all final year students in Ireland’s six medical schools. Those who consented to follow-up (n = 483) were surveyed 18 months later (June 2018), during the final month of first year of practice. Results The baseline survey had a 67% (n = 483) response rate. At the follow-up survey, (n = 232, 48% response rate) the top specialty choices were: Medicine, n = 54 (26%); Surgery, n = 34 (16%); General Practice, n = 28 (13%); Anaesthesia, n = 16 (8%) and Paediatrics, n = 14 (7%). Of the 49 respondents (28%) reporting a change of specialty since baseline, 13 (27%) selected the same specialty in both surveys; of the 121 (69%) reporting no change, 22 (18%) selected a different specialty at follow-up. Over 90% of respondents rated as ‘important or ‘very important’: ‘Own aptitude’, ‘Work-life balance’ and ‘What I really want to do’. Over 75% rated as ‘not at all’, or ‘not very important’ ‘Current financial debt’ and ‘Inclinations before medical school’. When adjusted for sex and age, compared with Medicine, General Practice rated as more important: continuity of patient care (RRR 3.20 CI(1.59–6.41), p = 0.001); working hours/conditions (RRR 4.61 CI(1.03–20.60), p = 0.045) and a career that fit their domestic circumstances (RRR 3.19 CI(1.27–8.02), p = 0.014). Those choosing Surgery rated as less important: patient contact (RRR 0.56 CI(0.33–0.95), p = 0.033) and working hours/conditions (RRR 0.55 CI(0.31–0.96), p = 0.035). Conclusions The different demographic and motivational profiles by specialty choice are consistent with other studies suggesting a distinct profile for doctors intending to enter General Practice. In addition, our results suggest longitudinal study designs guard against recall bias and so provide more robust medical workforce models to inform and direct recruitment drives and interventions in future medical workforce planning.

scholarly journals Exploring Doctors’ Emerging Commitment to Rural and General Practice Roles over Their Early Career

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (22) ◽  
pp. 11835
Author(s):  
Matthew McGrail ◽  
Belinda O’Sullivan ◽  
Tiana Gurney ◽  
Diann Eley ◽  
Srinivas Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan
Keyword(s):  
General Practice ◽  
Specialty Choice ◽  
Early Career ◽  
Rural Practice ◽  
Medical Graduates ◽  
Career Intent ◽  
Pass Through ◽  
The University ◽  
New Evidence ◽  
Registrar Training

Producing enough doctors working in general practice or rural locations, or both, remains a key global policy focus. However, there is a lack of evidence about doctors’ emerging commitment to these decisions. This study aimed to explore changes in the level of certainty about career interest in working in general practice and working rurally, as doctors pass through various early career stages. The participants were 775 eligible respondents to a 2019 survey of medical graduates of The University of Queensland from 2002–2018. Certainty levels of specialty choice were similar between GPs and specialists up until the beginning of registrar training. At that point, 65% of GPs compared with 80% of other specialists had strong certainty of their specialty field. Consistently (and significantly) less of those working rurally had strong certainty of the location where they wanted to practice medicine at each career time point. At the start of registrar training, a similar gap remained (strong certainty: 51% rural versus 63% metropolitan). This study provides new evidence that career intent certainty is more delayed for the cohort choosing general practice and rural practice than the other options. The low level of certainty in early career highlights the importance of regular positive experiences that help to promote the uptake of general practice and rural practice.

Career development subsequent to general practice training

1983 ◽  
Vol 47 (12) ◽  
pp. 767-770
Author(s):  
SL Handelman ◽  
PM Brunette ◽  
ES Solomon
Keyword(s):  
General Practice ◽  
Career Development ◽  
General Practice Training

Understanding the general practice nursing workforce in New Zealand: an overview of characteristics 2015–19

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Sarah L. Hewitt ◽  
Nicolette F. Sheridan ◽  
Karen Hoare ◽  
Jane E. Mills
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Survey Data ◽  
Nursing Workforce ◽  
Roles And Responsibilities ◽  
Primary Health ◽  
Part Time ◽  
Role Confusion

Limited knowledge about the nursing workforce in New Zealand general practice inhibits the optimal use of nurses in this increasingly complex setting. Using workforce survey data published biennially by the Nursing Council of New Zealand, this study describes the characteristics of nurses in general practice and contrasts them with the greater nursing workforce, including consideration of changes in the profiles between 2015 and 2019. The findings suggest the general practice nursing workforce is older, less diverse, more predominately New Zealand trained and very much more likely to work part-time than other nurses. There is evidence that nurses in general practice are increasingly primary health care focused, as they take on expanded roles and responsibilities. However, ambiguity about terminology and the inability to track individuals in the data are limitations of this study. Therefore, it was not possible to identify and describe cohorts of nurses in general practice by important characteristics, such as prescribing authority, regionality and rurality. A greater national focus on defining and tracking this pivotal workforce is called for to overcome role confusion and better facilitate the use of nursing scopes of practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document