Community-based Shared Mental Health Care: A Model of Collaboration?

2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Keleher

Shared mental health care is being developed as a community-based model of service delivery that is described as a collaborative model with the intention to shift cultures of general practice from simple referral models to stronger models of collaboration. This article examines the degree to which community-based shared mental health care can be considered a collaborative model of care, and the implications for policy and practice and for consumers recovering from depression and related disorders. Victorian-based research informs the discussion, together with literature that discusses shared mental health care. Overall, the literature supports the view that there are positive outcomes of shared primary mental health care, including continuity of care for consumers and enhanced skills for general practitioners. However, features of collaborations such as inter-disciplinary trust, working together, shared planning or sharing of resources are weak in shared mental health care, suggesting that current practice models are working at a level of cooperation rather than true collaboration. The conceptualising of shared mental health care practices in terms of the theory of par partnerships and collaborations can only inform and strengthen the foundations of shared mental health care.

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 222
Author(s):  
Angela E. Elliott ◽  
Peter C. Elliott ◽  
Roger Cook

Australia’s federal, state, territory and local governments all have responsibilities, often overlapping, for policy and delivery of primary mental health care to postpartum women. Identification and treatment of postpartum distress is carried out by a broad range of professionals from diverse disciplines. Although there is evidence to show that anxiety and stress are important aspects of postpartum distress, substantially greater emphasis has been given to identification and treatment of depression. In addition, relatively little attention has been given to incorporating positive and negative social experiences in healthcare policy and practice. This study aimed to extend the postpartum literature by: (1) comparing the levels of depression, anxiety and stress (i.e. distress indicators) in a non-clinical sample of postpartum mothers to those in the general non-clinical population; (2) comparing the prevalence of anxiety and stress to that of depression in postpartum mothers; and (3) examining the consequences of negative social exchange, alongside perceived social support, on postpartum distress indicators. A self-report survey was completed by 242 postpartum women assessing levels of perceived social support, frequency of negative social exchange and distress indicators. Postpartum mothers were found to have significantly higher depression, anxiety and stress than the general population, and had anxiety and stress levels that were similar in severity to depression. In addition, both negative social exchanges and perceived social support were found to be important for postpartum depression, anxiety and stress. These findings suggest that Australia’s primary postpartum mental health care policy and practice guidelines, delivered through a broad range of professionals, may benefit from giving anxiety and stress equal weight to depression and by embracing the important effects, for good and for ill, of positive and negative social interactions.


2003 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Crowden

Objective: This article takes up the challenge to comment and extend on Jennifer Radden's claims for a ‘unique ethics for psychiatry’ articulated in ‘Notes towards a professional ethics for psychiatry’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 2002; 36:52–59. Method: The author is analytically trained in bioethics and employs the method of conceptual analysis. Results: Psychiatry is a unique mental health care practice which calls for unique ethical responses. However, it doesn't necessarily follow that a unique ethics for psychiatry is required. Conclusions: A more plausible explanation for how philosophical ethics informs the unique nature of psychiatric practice is better articulated within claims about the role-related nature of particular health care practices and the influence that the virtue of phronesis (practical wisdom) has on a clinician's decision-making and judgement.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
René Keet ◽  
Marjonneke de Vetten-Mc Mahon ◽  
Laura Shields-Zeeman ◽  
Torleif Ruud ◽  
Jaap van Weeghel ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Athié ◽  
Christopher Dowrick ◽  
Alice Lopes do Amaral Menezes ◽  
Luanda Cruz ◽  
Ana Cristina Lima ◽  
...  

Abstract Taking into consideration issues such as stigma and the mental health gap, this study explores narratives of anxious and depressed women treated in a community-based primary care service in a Rio de Janeiro favela about their suffering and care. We analysed 13 in-depth interviews using questions from Kadam's study. Framework analysis studied Access, Gateway, Trust, Psychosocial Issues, and Primary Mental Health Care, as key-concepts. Vulnerability and accessibility were the theoretical references. Thematic analysis found “suffering category”, highlighting family and community problems, and “help seeking category”, indicating how these women have coped with their emotional problems and addressed their needs through health services, community resources and self-help. Women's language patterns indicated links between implicit social rules and constraints to talk about suffering, especially if related to local violence. High medical turnover and overload are barriers for establishing a positive relationship with family physicians and continuity of care is a facilitator that promotes trust, security and adherence. Concluding, to plan community-based primary mental health care of this population, cultural and social factors must be comprehended as well as the work health teams conditions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document