Employee factors associated with interest in improving sun protection in an Australian mining workforce

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamara D. Street ◽  
Drew Leighton Thomas
2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danette Langbecker ◽  
Pip Youl ◽  
Michael Kimlin ◽  
Karen Remm ◽  
Monika Janda

2020 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. 386-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim D. Reynolds ◽  
David B. Buller ◽  
Julia Berteletti ◽  
Kim Massie ◽  
Jeff Ashley ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 151 (9) ◽  
pp. 991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara J. Walkosz ◽  
David B. Buller ◽  
Peter A. Andersen ◽  
Allan Wallis ◽  
Mary Klein Buller ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 170 (6) ◽  
pp. 1327-1335 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Sattler ◽  
S. Thellier ◽  
V. Sibaud ◽  
C. Taïeb ◽  
S. Mery ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 934-945 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elyse Shuk ◽  
Jack E. Burkhalter ◽  
Carlos F. Baguer ◽  
Susan M. Holland ◽  
Alisa Pinkhasik ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Hilton H. Mollenhauer

Many factors (e.g., resolution of microscope, type of tissue, and preparation of sample) affect electron microscopical images and alter the amount of information that can be retrieved from a specimen. Of interest in this report are those factors associated with the evaluation of epoxy embedded tissues. In this context, informational retrieval is dependant, in part, on the ability to “see” sample detail (e.g., contrast) and, in part, on tue quality of sample preservation. Two aspects of this problem will be discussed: 1) epoxy resins and their effect on image contrast, information retrieval, and sample preservation; and 2) the interaction between some stains commonly used for enhancing contrast and information retrieval.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document