scholarly journals Being well and wellbeing: better understanding of patient priorities in primary care

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Corin

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONAchieving desired health outcomes in primary care can be challenging because of dissonance between the theory and reality of medicine, inadequate understanding of patient perspectives and priorities regarding wellness, wellbeing and goals of treatment, and under-emphasis of the concept of whole-person care in the doctor–patient relationship. ASSESSMENT OF PROBLEMSAnticipated dissonance in the doctor–patient relationship was explored using a self-designed audit, which also functioned as an educational and engagement tool. Over a 12-month period, 282 adult patients (aged 24–94 years) provided responses to a question asking them to describe their best day in the context of their current health status. These responses were then entered into the Classifications field of the practice’s patient management system. RESULTS OF ASSESSMENTMost respondents appreciated the opportunity, with a small number commenting on the challenging nature of the question. STRATEGIES FOR QUALITY IMPROVEMENTEntering audit findings into the patient’s clinical record in a format accessible to all clinical staff enables increased opportunity for patients to be valued and engaged with. Goal setting and therapeutic choices can be made in the light of a better understanding of what matters most to the patient. LESSONS AND MESSAGESThis project provided valuable and, at times surprising, information to clinical consultations that had not previously been obtained from or offered by patients. Such information requires an intentional, engaged and collaborative interaction with the patient, and enhances patient-centric consultations with a focus on whole-person care and wellness in the journey to therapeutic goals and health outcomes.

2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 257-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
E J Nordal ◽  
D Moseng ◽  
B Kvammen ◽  
M-L Løchen

We compared the diagnoses made by one dermatologist via telemedicine with those of another dermatologist made in a face-to-face consultation. The patients first underwent a teledermatology consultation and then a face-to-face consultation. A general practitioner was present with the patient in the videoconference studio. Videoconferencing equipment connected at 384 kbit/s was used. The doctor-patient relationship and the satisfaction of the patients and dermatologists in the two settings were assessed, as well as technical conditions during the videoconferences. There were 121 patients, with a mean age of 40 years (range 17-82 years). There was a high degree of concordance between the two sets of diagnoses, with 72% complete agreement and 14% partial agreement between the two dermatologists. A total of 116 patients (96% of those included) completed a questionnaire. Both the patients and the dermatologists were in general satisfied with the videoconferences. Videoconferencing with a participating general practitioner may be useful in dermatology, but the technique should be used only for selected patients.


1972 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 287-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. D. Wittkower ◽  
W. J. Stauble

The psychiatric role of the general practitioner covers a wide field and depends crucially upon his efforts to understand himself, his patient, and the doctor-patient relationship. The patient must be approached in terms of how he is affected emotionally by physical illness, and how his state of physical health is affected by his emotions. His behavior during initial stages of physical illness, his reaction to the diagnosis, and his feelings and interactions during the full-blown stages of illness are important areas for the doctor to explore in order to deal more effectively with a patient's withdrawal, depression, narcissism, frustration, or anxiety. The doctor must also explore his own motivations for choosing the medical profession in order to implement his role in caring for patients. Each of the models of the doctor-patient relationship–activity-passivity, guidance-cooperation, mutual participation-requires different degrees of emotional involvement on the part of the doctor. An understanding of the psychodynamics of this relationship, involving the attitudes and conflicts of both members, can help the general practitioner to handle effectively and successfully his patients in everyday practice. Practical suggestions are made for teaching psychological concepts to general physicians: improved courses in psychiatry in medical schools, emphasizing the “whole person” approach; ongoing seminars for doctors in practice–“Balint Groups”–in which the aim is to understand the nature of the patient's emotional conflicts, the doctor-patient relationship, and the part the doctor plays in it; refresher courses; and consultations with psychiatrists.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-29
Author(s):  
Christopher Tollefsen ◽  
Farr A Curlin

Abstract In this article, we first give a normative account of the doctor–patient relationship as: oriented to the good of the patient’s health; motivated by a vocational commitment; and characterized by solidarity and trust. We then look at the difference that Christianity can, and we believe, should, make to that relationship, so understood. In doing so, we consolidate and expand upon some claims we have made in a forthcoming book, Ethics and the Healing Profession (Curlin and Tollefsen, 2021).1


2000 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 3-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith B. Prins ◽  
Gijs Bleijenberg ◽  
Eufride Klein Rouweler ◽  
Chris van Weel ◽  
Jos W. M. van der Meer

2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae-Ho Lee ◽  
Yong-Jun Choi ◽  
Seung Hwa Lee ◽  
Nak-Jin Sung ◽  
Soo-Young Kim ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 96 (4) ◽  
pp. 180-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Lings ◽  
P. Evans ◽  
D. Seamark ◽  
C. Seamark ◽  
K. Sweeney ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document