scholarly journals Transient Electromagnetic Responses of High-Contrast Prisms in a Layered Earth

1988 ◽  
Vol 19 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 322-324
Author(s):  
Gregory A. Newman ◽  
Gerald W. Hohmann
Geophysics ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 545-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Macnae ◽  
Yves Lamontagne

An “imaged” conductivity section of a layered earth can be obtained by simple transformation of step‐response electromagnetic data measured in the quasi‐static zone. This method of data transformation is presented as an alternative to conventional apparent conductivity transformations. At each delay time, the variation of the step response as a function of geometry (transmitter and receiver location) is transformed to an equivalent reference depth h, which can be related to the depth of electromagnetic field diffusion. The behavior of h as a function of delay time is nearly independent of the source‐receiver geometry. The slowness dt/dh divided by the magnetic permeability is almost exactly proportional to the cumulative conductance measured from the surface down to a depth h. Thus we can estimate an apparent conductivity, which we call the “imaged conductivity,” at depth to be [Formula: see text]. The cost of this transformation is a fraction of the cost of conventional data inversion, and it does not require an a priori constraint on the number of parameters used in the inversion. The empirically developed technique was used successfully to process UTEM field data measured over a quasi‐layered earth.


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory M. Schultz ◽  
Jonathan S. Miller ◽  
Lin-Ping Song ◽  
Leonard Pasion

Geophysics ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 51 (6) ◽  
pp. 1291-1297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Sheng

Early‐time and late‐time apparent resistivity approximations have been widely used for interpretation of long‐offset transient electromagnetic (LOTEM) measurements because it is difficult to find a single apparent resistivity over the whole time range. From a physical point of view, Dr. C. H. Stoyer defined an apparent resistivity for the whole time range. However, there are two problems which hinder its use: one is that there is no explicit formula to calculate the apparent resistivity, and the other is that the apparent resistivity has no single solution. A careful study of the two problems shows that a numerical method can be used to calculate a single apparent resistivity. A formula for the maximum receiver voltage over a uniform earth, when compared with the receiver voltage for a layered earth, leads to the conclusion that, in some cases, a layered earth can produce a larger voltage than any uniform earth can produce. Therefore, our apparent resistivity definition cannot be applied to those cases. In some other cases, the two possible solutions from our definition do not merge, so that neither of them is meaningful for the whole time range.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document