The responses of maize and grain sorghum hybrids to nitrogen fertiliser in south east Queensland

1990 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 825 ◽  
Author(s):  
DE Hibberd ◽  
BD Hall
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Grain Sorghum ◽  
The Other ◽  
N Application ◽  
Nitrogen Fertiliser ◽  
Maize Hybrids ◽  
Grain Yields ◽  
Maize Yields ◽  
Applied Nitrogen

We investigated, over 3 seasons, 1973-74 to 1975-76, the responses of 5 selected maize hybrids and 5 sorghum hybrids to applied nitrogen (N) under irrigation on N-deficient, black earth soils in South East Queensland. Five levels of N (0, 60, 120, 180 and 240 kg/ha) were applied as urea at sowing to 5 maize hybrids, XL81, Q739, PQ500, PX50, RX404, at 1 location. The same rates were applied to sorghum hybrids NK212, P846, E57, Goldfinger and Goldrush at another location. Higher grain yields were obtained from maize hybrids XL81 and RX404 than from 4739, PX50 and PQ500. A mean grain yield of 6660 kg/ha was produced from XL81 over the 3 seasons for the application of 180 kg N/ha. A hybrid x N interaction occurred only in the year with highest yields. Over all years, grain yield of each hybrid was linearly related to mean site yield and slopes were not significantly (P>0.05) different. Hybrids XL81 and RX404 showed significantly (P<0.05) higher grain yields than other hybrids over the range of grain N concentrations obtained. We conclude that 180 kg N/ha applied at or prior to sowing would optimise maize yields on N-depleted soils in South East Queensland. Highest grain yields of sorghum were obtained from all hybrids when N application was in the range 120-180 kg N/ha. The grain yields of all 5 hybrids converged in the 5000-7000 kg/ha yield range, indicating no superior yielding potential in any 1 hybrid. Goldrush, however, showed significantly (P<0.05) higher grain N concentrations than the other hybrids over the range of grain yields.

scholarly journals Influence of Cultivars, N levels and Time of N Application on Plant Characters, leaf Composition, and Yield of Corn Grown on an Oxisol.

1969 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 273-280
Author(s):  
J. Badillo-Feliciano ◽  
M. A. Lugo-López ◽  
T. W. Scott
Keyword(s):  
Puerto Rico ◽  
Grain Yield ◽  
Stem Diameter ◽  
The Other ◽  
N Application ◽  
Grain Yields ◽  
N Level ◽  
Local Cultivar ◽  
Leaf Composition ◽  
Different Levels

An experiment was conducted during the summer of 1975 (June 5 to September 24) on a clayey Oxisol in northwestern Puerto Rico to test the performance of 7 cultivars of corn at 2 different levels of N (67 and 134 kg/ha) at 3 different times of application (all at planting, 1/4 at planting + 3/4 one month after planting, and all one month after planting). There were no significant differences in yields between the 2 levels of N, but there was a significant 5% increase in yield with all N applied postplant in comparison with all preplant. There were also significant differences between grain yield of cultivars. The best grain yields were obtained with Pioneer X- 3068 with more than 8,000 kg/ha at both N levels and times of application. An almost neglected local cultivar, Diente de Caballo, had a high mean yield of 7,387 kg/ha, which was significantly higher than those of the other 5 cultivars. Funk's G-795W and Opaque-2 type Sp 622 were the lowest yielders with about 5,400 and 4,800 kg/ha, respectively. Standard local cultivars (Mayorbela, and two other Opaque-2-Tuxpeño x La Posta and Composite K, hard endosperm) were intermediate in yield with over 6,000 kg/ha. Pioneer X-3068, Diente de Caballo, Tuxpeño X la Posta and Composite K, hard endosperm, produced over 6,000 kg/ha of stover, while Sp 622 produced only about 3,900 kg/ha. Plants of Pioneer X-3068 and Diente de Caballo were the tallest, while those of Sp 622 were the lowest. Plants of Funk's G- 795W had the smallest mean stem diameter. Mean leaf Nat silking was higher for all cultivars in the high N level (134 kg/ha) than in the low N level (67 kg/ha), except in Mayorbela. There were no significant interactions between cultivars, N levels and time of N applications.

Effect of weeds and nitrogen fertiliser on yield and grain protein concentration of wheat

1996 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 443 ◽  
Author(s):  
MG Mason ◽  
RW Madin
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Weed Control ◽  
Dry Matter ◽  
Protein Concentration ◽  
The Other ◽  
Grain Protein ◽  
Dry Matter Yield ◽  
Wheat Grain ◽  
Grain Protein Concentration ◽  
Nitrogen Fertiliser

Field trials at Beverley (19911, Salmon Gums (1991; 2 sites) and Merredin (1992; 2 sites), each with 5 rates of nitrogen (N) and 3 levels of weed control, were used to investigate the effect of weeds and N on wheat grain yield and protein concentration during 1991 and 1992. Weeds in the study were grasses (G) and broadleaf (BL). Weeds reduced both vegetative dry matter yield and grain yield of wheat at all sites except for dry matter at Merredin (BL). Nitrogen fertiliser increased wheat dry matter yield at all sites. Nitrogen increased wheat grain yield at Beverley and Merredin (BL), but decreased yield at both Salmon Gums sites in 1991. Nitrogen fertiliser increased grain protein concentration at all 5 sites-at all rates for 3 sites [Salmon Gums (G) and (BL) and Merredin (G)] and at rates of 69 kg N/ha or more at the other 2 sites [Beverley and Merredin (BL)]. However, the effect of weeds on grain protein varied across sites. At Merredin (G) protein concentration was higher where there was no weed control, possibly due to competition for soil moisture by the greater weed burden. At Salmon Gums (G), grain protein concentration was greater when weeds were controlled than in the presence of weeds, probably due to competition for N between crop and weeds. In the other 3 trials, there was no effect of weeds on grain protein. The effect of weeds on grain protein appears complex and depends on competition between crop and weeds for N and for water at the end of the season, and the interaction between the two.

Effect of in-season application methods of fertilizer nitrogen on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency in maize

2004 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. L. Ma ◽  
M. Li ◽  
L. M. Dwyer ◽  
G. Stewart
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Nitrogen Use Efficiency ◽  
Dry Matter ◽  
Foliar Spray ◽  
Soil N ◽  
Nitrogen Use ◽  
N Application ◽  
Maize Hybrids ◽  
Use Efficiency ◽  
Application Methods

Little information is available comparing agronomic performance and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) for N application methods such as foliar spray, soil application, and ear injection in maize (Zea mays L.). The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of various N application methods on total stover dry matter, grain yield, and NUE of maize hybrids using a 15N-labeling approach. A field experiment was conducted on a Dalhousie clay loam in Ottawa and a Guelph loam in Guelph for 2 yr (1999 and 2000). Three N application methods were tested on two maize hybrids, Pioneer 3893 and Pioneer 38P06 Bt. At planting, 60 kg N ha-1 as ammonium nitrate was applied to all treatments. In addition, 6.5 kg N ha-1 and 13.5 kg N ha-1 as 15N-labeled urea were applied to either foliage (Treatment I) or soil (Treatment II) at V6 and V12 stages, respectively. In Treatment III, 20 kg N ha-1 as 15N-labeled urea was injected into space between ear and husks at silking. The results showed that compared with soil N application neither foliar spray nor injection through ear affected grain yield or stover dry matter. The NUE values ranged from 12 to 76% for N fertilizer applied at V6 a nd V12 stages, or at silking for all treatments. There was no interaction of hybrid × N application methods on any variables measured with the only exception that for soil N application, grain NUE in Pioneer 38P06 Bt was significant higher than in Pioneer 3893. The difference in total N and NUE of grain and stover between soil N application and foliar N spray was inconsistent. However, NUE was substantially higher for N injection through the ear than for foliar or soil application without differential responses between the two hybrids. Nitrogen injection through the ear at silking might have altered N redistribution within the plant and improved NUE. Hence, it can potentially enhance grain protein content. Foliar N spray is not advocated for maize production in Ontario. Key words: Maize, Zea mays, nitrogen application methods, nitrogen-15, yield, nitrogen use efficiency

Growth, yield and nitrogen requirements of winter sown cereals grown after cotton or summer fallow in the lower Namoi Valley, New South Wales

1984 ◽  
Vol 24 (125) ◽  
pp. 236
Author(s):  
GK McDonald ◽  
BG Sutton ◽  
FW Ellison
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Leaf Area ◽  
Dry Matter ◽  
New South ◽  
New South Wales ◽  
Grain Yields ◽  
South Wales ◽  
Matter Production ◽  
Summer Fallow ◽  
Applied Nitrogen

Three winter cereals (wheat varieties Songlen and WW 15, triticale variety Satu) were grown after cotton or summer fallow under three levels of applied nitrogen (0, 100 and 200 kg N/ha) at Narrabri, New South Wales. The cereals were sown on August 7, 1980 and growing season rainfall was supplemented by a single irrigation. Leaf area, total shoot dry matter production and ears per square metre were lower after cotton than after summer fallow, while grain yields of cereals sown immediately after cotton were 33% lower than those sown after fallow. Adding nitrogen increased leaf area, dry matter and grain yields of crops grown after cotton and fallow, but significant increases were not obtained with more than 100 kg/ha of applied nitrogen. Crops grown after cotton required an application of 100 kg N/ha for leaf and dry matter production at anthesis to equal that of crops grown after fallow with no additional nitrogen. The corresponding cost to grain yield of growing cotton was equivalent to 200 kg N/ha. The low grain yield responses measured in this experiment (1 8 and 10% increase to 100 kg N/ha after cotton and fallow, respectively) were attributed to the combined effects of late sowing, low levels of soil moisture and loss, by denitrification, of some of the applied nitrogen. The triticale, Satu, yielded significantly less than the two wheats (1 99 g/m2 for Satu c.f. 255 and 286 g/m2 for Songlen and WW 15, respectively), and did not appear to be a viable alternative to wheat in a cotton rotation.

Nitrogen efficiency of wheat cultivars in a Mediterranean environment

1999 ◽  
Vol 39 (8) ◽  
pp. 957 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. K. Anderson ◽  
F. C. Hoyle
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Soil Nitrogen ◽  
Nitrogen Uptake ◽  
Nitrogen Efficiency ◽  
Grain Protein ◽  
High Ability ◽  
Wheat Cultivars ◽  
Nitrogen Fertiliser ◽  
Yield Increase ◽  
Applied Nitrogen

Summary. Experiments were conducted at 3 sites in Western Australia in 1993 using 33 wheat cultivars and crossbreds. Two rates of applied nitrogen fertiliser (0 and 40 kg/ha of nitrogen) were used to screen the lines for efficiency of nitrogen uptake, grain yield and grain protein production per unit of nitrogen applied, and nitrogen translocation to the grain. This information can be useful in determining nitrogen fertiliser strategies for wheat cultivars in the field. Nitrogen uptake in the plant tops was measured during the season and in the grain and straw at maturity. Grain yield, grain protein and nitrogen efficiency parameters were not markedly different between grain quality grades which are largely based on grain hardness. Yield efficient lines (high net yield increase per unit of applied nitrogen) were characterised by greater net uptake and net utilisation efficiencies but had similar yields and grain protein percentages as yield inefficient lines. Protein efficient lines (high net grain protein increase per unit of applied nitrogen) also had greater uptake efficiencies but lower utilisation efficiencies than protein inefficient lines. No lines were both yield and protein efficient suggesting that lines either use fertiliser nitrogen preferentially in yield production or in production of protein. The results indicate that in nitrogen-responsive situations it will be more profitable to use yield-efficient lines. Further investigation is needed to examine the suggestion that where soil nitrogen levels are higher (and yield responses to nitrogen are less) a greater economic return may come from using protein efficient lines. Some wheat lines had a high ability to recover fertiliser nitrogen applied to the crop. Others had a high ability to take up soil nitrogen. It is postulated that these differences may be due to differences in root systems. Some mid- and long-season lines that had high concentrations of nitrogen in the tops at anthesis metabolised that nitrogen poorly into grain yield or protein. This suggests that nitrogen efficiency may be partly related to maturity relative to length of growing season.

Nutrition of irrigated crops on an alkaline brown clay soil at Trangie, New South Wales. 2. Wheat

1986 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 451 ◽  
Author(s):  
DK Muldoon
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Clay Soil ◽  
Yield Response ◽  
Nitrogen Fertiliser ◽  
Grain Yields ◽  
South Wales ◽  
Irrigated Crops ◽  
Grain Nitrogen ◽  
Irrigated Wheat ◽  
Brown Clay

In a field nutrient-omission experiment, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, sulfur and zinc were sequentially omitted from a 'complete' fertiliser applied to irrigated wheat on an alkaline brown clay soil. Wheat forage and grain yields were recorded for 3 years following this single application. The chemical composition of forage and grain was determined. A second experiment elucidated the response to nitrogen fertiliser after 2 years of wheat or fallow. Deficiencies of phosphorus and nitrogen were evident in the second and subsequent crops. Forage and grain yields were reduced in the absence of these elements as were the respective concentrations of phosphorus and nitrogen in the forage and grain. The omission of zinc fertiliser reduced the concentration of zinc in the grain but not the grain yield. Omitting sulfur led to lower grain yields in the second year. Both sulfur and nitrogen were required to achieve maximum grain nitrogen and sulfur contents. The response to nitrogen fertiliser peaked at 130 kg/ha N after a fallow. After continuous wheat, however, over 200 kg/ha N was required for maximum yields. A positive tillering response to nitrogen accounted for much of this grain yield response. Grain nitrogen contents remained low until 100kg/ha N was applied.

scholarly journals Effects of weed control through cowpea intercropping on mayze morphology and yield

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 433-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.K.O. Gomes ◽  
P.S.L. Silva ◽  
K.M.B. Silva ◽  
F.F. Rodrigues Filho ◽  
V.G. Santos
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Weed Control ◽  
Control Method ◽  
The Other ◽  
Weed Species ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Maize Cultivars ◽  
Poaceae Family ◽  
Maize Yields ◽  
Hand Weeding

Intercropping combined with competitive maize cultivars can reduce the use of herbicides to control weeds. The objective of this work was to evaluate the effects of intercropping cowpea and maize, as well as hand-weeding on maize morphology and yield. The experimental design was in randomized complete blocks, with treatments arranged in split-plots and five replications. The plots consisted of four maize cultivars (BA 8512, BA 9012, EX 4001, EX 6004) and the split-plots consisted of the following treatments: no-weeding; twice hand-weeding (20 and 40 days after sowing); and intercropping with cowpea ('Sempre Verde' cultivar), both maize and cowpea sown at the same time. The variables evaluated were: maize fresh green ears and grain yield; characteristics of internodes, leaves, tassels, ears, grains; plant height and ear insertion height; number of weed plants and species; fresh and dry biomass of weed species and cowpea. Ten weed species were outstanding during the experiment, many of them from the Poaceae family. No interactions were found between weed control method and maize cultivars for most variables evaluated; and plants from hand-weeded split-plots showed superior mean values compared to plants from non-weeded and intercropped split-plots, both not differing from each other. The cowpea was inefficient in controlling weed, reducing the maize yields and not producing any grain. The maize cultivars 'BA 8512' and 'BA 9012 showed the highest mean green ear yield, and the highest grain yield in hand-weeded, no-weeded and intercropped split-plots. On the other hand, the maize cultivar 'EX 6004' showed such high means only in no-weeded and intercropped split-plots. 'EX 4001 presented the worst means in these variables for hand-weeded, no-weeded ant intercropped split-plots.

scholarly journals Baby corn, green ear, and grain yield of corn cultivars

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 960-964 ◽  
Author(s):  
Itala Paula de C. Almeida ◽  
Paulo Sérgio L. e Silva ◽  
Maria Z. de Negreiros ◽  
Zenaide Barbosa
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Rio Grande ◽  
The Other ◽  
Corn Yield ◽  
Grain Production ◽  
Grain Yields ◽  
Maize Cultivars

Most maize cultivars have been developed for grain production. Because superior cultivars may differ in their exploiting purposes, interest has been demonstrated for the evaluation of corn cultivars with regard to their baby corn, green ear, and grain yields production ability. In the present work ten corn cultivars (AG 405, AG 1051, AG 2060, AG 6690, AG 7575, AG 8080, DKB 333 B, DKB 435, DKB 350 and DKB 747) were evaluated in the yield of baby corn, green ears and dry grains. Two experiments were carried out in the same season, in neighboring areas and managed in a similar way, in Mossoró, Rio Grande do Norte State, Brazil, in a randomized blocks design with five replicates. Baby corn yield (178,571 plants ha-1) was evaluated in one of the experiments. The other experiment (50,000 plants ha-1) was set to evaluate green ear and dry grain yield. Cultivars DKB 350 and AG 8080 were the most productive in number and weight of marketable unhusked, and husked baby corn ears. Cultivars DKB 435 and AG 8080 were the most productive in number and weight of marketable, unhusked, and husked ears. There were no differences between cultivars for grain yield.

Wild Cane and Forage Sorghum Competition in Grain Sorghum

Weed Science ◽  
1973 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. F. Vesecky ◽  
K. C. Feltner ◽  
R. L. Vanderlip
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Sorghum Bicolor ◽  
Leaf Area ◽  
Seed Weight ◽  
Grain Sorghum ◽  
Forage Sorghum ◽  
Grain Yields ◽  
Culm Length ◽  
Sorghum Grain

Grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor(L.) Moench ‘RS 671’) was grown during 1969 and 1970 in competition with two other members of the same species, wild cane and Kansas Orange forage sorghum, transplanted at various densities along grain sorghum rows. All densities of wild cane and Kansas Orange significantly reduced both grain and fodder yields of grain sorghum. Grain yield was highly and positively correlated with leaf area, culm length, culms per plant, panicles per culm, seeds per panicle, and amount of light received at the grain sorghum canopy; and grain yield was negatively correlated with plant factors that benefited wild cane and Kansas Orange. Grain yield did not correlate with either plants per hectare or seed weight. Panicle size was most important in determining grain yield. Kansas Orange reduced grain yields more than did wild cane in 1969. During 1970, with less favorable rainfall, grain sorghum responded similarly to both transplanted weed types.

scholarly journals Enhanced Efficiency Liquid Nitrogen Fertilizer Management for Corn Production

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Tyler W. Steusloff ◽  
Gurbir Singh ◽  
Kelly A. Nelson ◽  
Peter P. Motavalli
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Block Design ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Soil Conditions ◽  
Corn Yield ◽  
N Application ◽  
Grain Yields ◽  
Time Of Application ◽  
N Source ◽  
Quality Response

Claypan soils have a high potential for N loss, which can lower corn (Zea mays L.) yields. Field research was conducted from 2011 to 2013 in Northeast Missouri to determine corn yield, plant population, and grain quality response to N application timings (fall vs. spring) and five N sources/placements at two different N rates (84 and 168 kg·N·ha−1) on a poorly drained claypan soil. The five N source/placement systems were no-till (NT)/surface broadcast urea ammonium nitrate (UAN) (Surface UAN) or strip-till (ST)/deep banded UAN (deep UAN), NT/surface broadcast UAN plus Nitamin Nfusion (surface NF) or ST/deep banded UAN plus Nitamin Nfusion (deep NF), and ST/deep banded anhydrous ammonia (AA) (deep AA). The field trial was a split-plot randomized complete block design with four replications. Deep UAN with a fall N application produced the highest grain yield (8.12 to 9.12 Mg·ha−1) at 84 and 168 kg·N·ha−1, but it was less effective with a spring application in 2011. Fall deep AA produced the lowest grain yields (5.97 and 6.8 Mg·ha−1) in 2013 at 84 and 168 kg·N·ha−1 potentially due to wet soil conditions at the time of application. Warmer and wetter soil conditions during April-May of 2013 resulted in relatively higher grain yields compared to cooler and drier soil conditions in 2011 with all spring-applied N source/placement treatments. Extreme drought in the 2012 growing season resulted in poor corn growth. Farmers may need to consider fall N applications on claypan soils because spring N application might be riskier since corn grain yield was generally greater than or equal to spring-applied treatments.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document