scholarly journals The bridgehead proton spin coupling in endo-cis-5,6-Dibromonorbornene

1973 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 1831
Author(s):  
K Browne ◽  
RI Kagi
Keyword(s):  
Computer Program ◽  
Proton Spin ◽  
Analysis Procedure ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Coupling Constant ◽  
Zero Coupling

The signals due to the vinyl and bromomethine protons in the 60-MHz p.m.r. spectrum of endo-cis-5,6-dibromonorbornene have been analysed in detail by means of the computer program LAOCN3. All non-zero coupling constants in the system are obtained. The value for the bridgehead- bridgehead coupling constant J1.4 corrects a reported value obtained by an incorrect analysis procedure.

An estimate of the spin–spin coupling constant, 1J(1H,13C), in gaseous benzene

1996 ◽  
Vol 74 (8) ◽  
pp. 1524-1525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Schaefer ◽  
Guy M. Bernard ◽  
Frank E. Hruska
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Dielectric Constant ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Coupling Constant ◽  
Spin Coupling Constant ◽  
Spin Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling ◽  
Gaseous Benzene

An excellent linear correlation (r = 0.9999) exists between the spin–spin coupling constants 1J(1H,13C), in benzene dissolved in four solvents (R. Laatikainen et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 11006 (1995)) and Ando's solvation dielectric function, ε/(ε – 1). The solvents are cyclohexane, carbon disulfide, pyridine, and acetone. 1J(1H,13C)for gaseous benzene is predicted to be 156.99(2) Hz at 300 K. Key words: spin–spin coupling constants, 1J(1H,13C) for benzene in the vapor phase; spin–spin coupling constants, solvent dielectric constant dependence of 1J(1H,13C) in benzene; benzene, estimate of 1J(1H,13C) in the vapor; nuclear magnetic resonance, estimate of 1J(1H,13C) in gaseous benzene.

Internal motion in benzylidene diacetate and its 2,6-dibromo derivative by DNMR and the J method

1989 ◽  
Vol 67 (6) ◽  
pp. 1022-1026 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Schaefer ◽  
Craig S. Takeguchi
Keyword(s):  
Double Resonance ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Maximum Magnitude ◽  
Coupling Constant ◽  
Spectral Parameters ◽  
Proton Proton ◽  
Ether Solution ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling ◽  
Dibromo Derivative

The 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectral parameters are reported for benzylidene diacetate in CS2 and acetone-d6 solutions. The long-range spin–spin coupling constant over six formal bonds, 6J, is used to derive apparent twofold barriers to rotation about the exocyclic C(1)—C bond in the two solutions. The conformation of lowest energy has the α. C—H bond in the benzene plane. The barrier is higher in CS2 than in acetone-d6 solution, in contrast to a molecule like benzyl chloride. In the 2,6-dibromo derivative, the free energy of activation for reorientation about the bond in question is 36 kJ/mol at 165 K in dimethyl ether solution. Such a high barrier implies a very small six-bond proton–proton coupling constant for this derivative because 6J is proportional to the expectation value of sin2θ. The angle θ is zero when the α C—H bond lies in the benzene plane. 6J is −0.051 Hz in acetone-d6 solutions; its sign is determined by double resonance experiments. The question of an angle-independent component of 6J, that is, whether 6J is finite at θ = 0°, is addressed. A maximum magnitude of 0.02 Hz may be present at θ = 0° for the 2,6-dibromo derivative, although a zero magnitude is also compatible with the experimental data. In a compound with a higher internal barrier, α,α,2,6-tetrachlorotoluene, the experimental results are best in accord with a negligibly small 6J at θ = 0°. Keywords: 1H NMR of benzylidene diacetate, spin–spin coupling constants for benzylidene diacetate, DNMR, 2,6-dibromobenzylidene diacetate.

Proton spin–spin coupling constants and intramolecular hydrogen bonding in bromine derivatives of 1,3-dihydroxybenzene

1976 ◽  
Vol 54 (14) ◽  
pp. 2228-2230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Schaefer ◽  
J. Brian Rowbotham
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Bond ◽  
Hydrogen Bonding ◽  
Proton Spin ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Hydroxyl Groups ◽  
Oh Groups ◽  
Spin Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling ◽  
Derivatives Of

The conformational preferences in CCl4 solution at 32 °C of the hydroxyl groups in bromine derivatives of 1,3-dihydroxybenzene are deduced from the long-range spin–spin coupling constants between hydroxyl protons and ring protons over five bonds. Two hydroxyl groups hydrogen bond to the same bromine substituent in 2-bromo-1,3-dihydroxybenzene but prefer to hydrogen bond to different bromine substituents when available, as in 2,4-dibromo-1,3-dihydroxybenzene. When the OH groups can each choose between two ortho bromine atoms, as in 2,4,6-tribromoresorcinol, they apparently do so in a very nearly statistical manner except that they avoid hydrogen bonding to the common bromine atom.

Proton spin coupling constants in methylcyclopentadienes

1976 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 368-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. I. Mstislavsky ◽  
V. A. Korenevsky ◽  
N. M. Sergeyev ◽  
V. N. Solkan
Keyword(s):  
Proton Spin ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Spin Coupling Constants
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document