Long-range spin-spin coupling in avenaciolide and related compounds

1965 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 373 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Brookes ◽  
S Sternhell ◽  
BK Tidd ◽  
WB Turner

The allylic system in avenaciolide (I) offers an example of exceptionally large allylic coupling constants with a reversed order of relative magnitude (Jcisoid 2.17 c/s; Jtransoid 2.56 c/s). Allylic coupling in related cyclic systems is discussed.

1966 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 617 ◽  
Author(s):  
RK Norris ◽  
S Sternhell

N.m.r, data for fifteen 1,4-benzoquinones, four 1,4-naphthoquinones, and six cyclohex-2-ene-1,4-diones are tabulated. From these, and previously available data, it is possible to obtain characteristic ranges for methyl-allylic coupling constants (c 1.3 c/s) and methyl-methyl homoallylic coupling constants (c. 1.3 c/s) for this for this series of compounds as well as values for other long-range and vicinal interactions, including a negative coupling across five bonds. On the basis of both chemical shifts and coupling constants it was concluded that 1,4-benzoquinones have little aromaticity from the N.M.R. point of view. The halogen atoms in 5,6-dihalogenocyclohex-2-ene-1,4-diones appear to be tram diaxial.


1969 ◽  
Vol 47 (9) ◽  
pp. 1507-1514 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Schaefer ◽  
S. S. Danyluk ◽  
C. L. Bell

The signs of all proton–proton and proton–fluorine spin–spin coupling constants in 2-fluoro-3-methylpyridine have been determined by double and triple resonance experiments. The signs of the longrange coupling constants, JH,CH3 and JF,CH3 are the same as in fluorotoluene derivatives. Their magnitudes are consistent with the assumption that the nitrogen atom primarily polarizes the σ bonds in the molecule, leaving the π contribution to the long-range coupling relatively unaffected.


1991 ◽  
Vol 69 (6) ◽  
pp. 927-933 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Schaefer ◽  
Rudy Sebastian ◽  
Christian Beaulieu

The inversion potentials, obtained from STO-3G, STO-3G(*), 3-21G, 3-21G(*), and 4-31G basis sets, are reported for thianthrene and thioxanthene, molecules in which both or only one of the methylene groups have been replaced by sulfur in 9,10-dihydroanthracene. Comparison with the available experimental data suggests that the split-valence bases lead to an overestimate, possibly by about 10 kJ/mol, of the inversion barrier in the crystal, whereas the STO-3G and STO-3G* basis sets underestimate this barrier. It appears that the inversion barrier for thianthrene is much lower in solution than in the crystal. The long-range coupling constants between the methylene and ring protons for thioxanthene in solution are consistent with an inversion barrier somewhat smaller than those obtained with the split-valence bases but rather larger than those predicted with the STO-3G basis set. The bond lengths and angles in the equilibrium structures of the two molecules, as computed with the 3-21G(*) basis, agree reasonably well with those in their crystals, except that the theoretical folding angles are smaller than measured. These discrepancies become less marked when expectation values are calculated from the theoretical inversion potentials at finite temperatures. Key words: MO calculations, inversion potentials of thianthrene and thioxanthene; 1H NMR, thioxanthene; spin–spin coupling constants, long range, in thioxanthene.


1976 ◽  
Vol 54 (20) ◽  
pp. 3216-3223 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J. E. Parr ◽  
Roderick E. Wasylishen ◽  
Ted Schaefer

The stereospecific spin–spin coupling constants over five bonds between the α-proton in the side chain and the protons in the heterocycle in 2-vinylfuran, in its β-nitro and β-aldehydic derivatives, and in 2-vinylthiophene are used to demonstrate the preponderance of the s-trans conformers in polar and nonpolar solutions. These conclusions are compared with predictions made by molecular orbital theory at the STO-3G, INDO, CNDO/2, and MINDO/3 levels. Long-range coupling constants between the protons in the side chain and protons in the heterocycle are calculated by CNDO/2 and INDO–MO–FPT and are compared with experiment. It is concluded that the five-bond couplings involving the α-proton are most sensitive to conformation and that they are transmitted mainly via a σ electron mechanism. The other long-range coupling constants are discussed in terms of σ and π electron mechanisms. The STO-3G calculations yield barriers to internal rotation of greater than 4.8 kcal/mol.


1977 ◽  
Vol 55 (15) ◽  
pp. 2835-2838 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Schaefer ◽  
William J. E. Parr

The observed and calculated, negative, long-range spin–spin coupling constants over five bonds between olefinic and methylene protons in ethyl vinyl ether and in 2,2,2-trifluoroethyl vinyl ether are consistent with predominant s-cis planar conformations. The five-bond couplings are sensitive to the proximity of the bonds containing the coupled nuclei and are unobservably small in 1-butene where the H,H distances are somewhat larger than in the ethers. The present results concur with the arguments based on other spectroscopic techniques.


1990 ◽  
Vol 68 (9) ◽  
pp. 1548-1552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Schaefer ◽  
Rudy Sebastian

STO-3G and 4-31G MO computations are reported for a range of values of the folding angle in xanthene, the dihedral angle between the benzene planes. Unlike 9,10-dihydroanthracene but like dibenzo-p-dioxin, its "parent" molecules, the inversion or puckering potential for xanthene is calculated to be rather flat. The molecular energies between a folding angle of 180° (planar molecule) and 120° are reproduced by analytical functions of [Formula: see text], θ being the folding angle. The long-range spin–spin coupling constants between the methylene protons and the aromatic protons at 300 K are reported for xanthene dissolved in a CS2/C6D12 solvent mixture and in acetone-d6 solution. These conformationally sensitive coupling constants are consistent with the theoretical puckering potentials and therefore with substantial "butterfly" motion at ambient temperatures. The computed geometries of xanthene are also given and briefly discussed. Keywords: xanthene, MO computations on inversion; xanthene, long-range spin–spin coupling constants; xanthene, internal motion; xanthene, inversion potentials.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document