Contemporary group alternatives for genetic evaluation of milk yield in small populations of dairy cattle

2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 1022 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Pereira ◽  
F. S. Schenkel ◽  
R. V. Ventura ◽  
D. R. Ayres ◽  
L. El Faro ◽  
...  

In the present study, different random regression models, focussed on the nature of the effect of the contemporary group, fixed or random, were compared for genetic evaluation of test-day milk yield in dairy Gir breed, whose herds are characterised by relatively reduced numbers of cows. Cows were assigned to the same contemporary group if they were tested in the same herd, year and month. In one of the evaluated models, the contemporary group was investigated as a fixed effect and a clustering procedure was adopted to group herd-year subclasses in order to, at the end of the process, all contemporary groups contained at least three cows. The models were compared by the quality of fit, the accuracy of the predicted breeding values and their estimates of genetic parameters. The clustering procedure did not significantly improve the accuracy of predicted breeding values. Moreover, the fit to the data for this model was negatively affected. Therefore, this strategy should not be further implemented. The model including the herd-calving period effect and contemporary group treated as random effect showed similar characteristics to its equivalent, where the contemporary group was modelled as a fixed effect. However, the fit to the data for this model was slightly worse. Thus, the results suggest a random regression model including the herd-calving period effect and the fixed effect of contemporary group for the genetic evaluations of production traits in dairy Gir cattle. These findings could be extended to small dairy cattle populations whose herds are small-sized.

Author(s):  
Rodrigo Junqueira Pereira ◽  
Denise Rocha Ayres ◽  
Mário Luiz Santana Junior ◽  
Lenira El Faro ◽  
Aníbal Eugênio Vercesi Filho ◽  
...  

Abstract: The objective of this work was to compare genetic evaluations of milk yield in the Gir breed, in terms of breeding values and their accuracy, using a random regression model applied to test-day records or the traditional model (TM) applied to estimates of 305-day milk yield, as well as to predict genetic trends for parameters of interest. A total of 10,576 first lactations, corresponding to 81,135 test-day (TD) records, were used. Rank correlations between the breeding values (EBVs) predicted with the two models were 0.96. The percentage of animals selected in common was 67 or 82%, respectively, when 1 or 5% of bulls were chosen, according to EBVs from random regression model (RRM) or TM genetic evaluations. Average gains in accuracy of 2.7, 3.0, and 2.6% were observed for all animals, cows with yield record, and bulls (sires of cows with yield record), respectively, when the RRM was used. The mean annual genetic gain for 305-day milk yield was 56 kg after 1993. However, lower increases in the average EBVs were observed for the second regression coefficient, related to persistency. The RRM applied to TD records is efficient for the genetic evaluation of milk yield in the Gir dairy breed.


2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Mosharraf ◽  
J. Shodja ◽  
M. Bohlouli ◽  
S. Alijani ◽  
S.A. Rafat

Genetic parameters of milk, fat, and protein yields were estimated in the first lactation of Holstein dairy cattle. The records were collected during the period 2006 to 2011 and analyzed fitting the random regression model. The data included 41178, 25397 and 18716 test-day records of milk, fat and protein yields, respectively that produced by 4746, 3437 and 2525 cows respectively. Fixed effects in model included herd-year-month of test day and age-season of calving. The fixed and random regressions were modeled with normalized Legendre polynomials and (co)variance components were estimated by Bayesian method and Gibbs sampling was used to obtain posterior distributions. Estimates of heritability for milk, fat and protein yields ranged from 0.18 to 0.26; 0.06 to 0.11 and 0.09 to 0.22, respectively. Heritabilities for 305-d milk, fat and protein yields were 0.36, 0.23 and 0.29, respectively. For milk and protein yields, heritabilities were lower at the early of lactation due to the trends of lower additive genetic variance, higher permanent environmental variance. Genetic correlations for milk, fat and protein yields ranged from 0.14 to 1.00; 0.39 to 1.00 and 0.27 to 1.00, respectively. Ranges of estimated breeding values for 305-d yield of milk, fat and protein yields were from -1194.48 to 1412.44; -210.57 to 271.22 and -194.08 to 203.25, respectively. According to the results of this study, random regression model seems to be a flexible and reliable procedure for the genetic evaluation of milk production traits and it can be useful in the breeding programs for Iranian dairy cattle.


2007 ◽  
Vol 2007 ◽  
pp. 64-64
Author(s):  
Stefano Biffani ◽  
Fabiola Canavesi ◽  
Maurizio Marusi

In January 2006, ANAFI (Italian Holstein Breeders Association) introduced a genetic evaluation for fertility based on a multiple-trait animal model (Biffani et al., 2005), which included the following traits: days from calving to first insemination (DTFS), calving interval (CI), first-service non return rate to 56 d (NR56), angularity (ANG) and mature equivalent milk yield at 305 d (ME305). Breeding values have been subsequently combined in an aggregate index (T), with the breeding goal to increase conception rate (CR). This paper will show how the breeding values have been combined into an aggregate index. At the same time the efficiency of selecting on alternative aggregate indexes versus the official aggregate index is presented.


2003 ◽  
Vol 2003 ◽  
pp. 139-139
Author(s):  
H. Farhangfar ◽  
P. Rowlinson ◽  
M. B. Willis

In practical dairy cattle breeding programmes, usually a small number of animals (selected from a large population) have a major influence on the genetic gain of the concerned population over a period of time (Hofer, 1998). Candidate animals are usually selected based on their breeding values that are predicted by using animal models. In order to predict breeding values, genetic parameters (calculated from variance and covariance components) of the traits under consideration should be estimated to be used in genetic evaluation systems either based on lactation or test day models. The use of test day models has increasingly become of interest in genetic evaluation of dairy cattle due to the fact that they can take more accurate account of the effects of environmental factors influencing test day milk yield over the course of lactation. The main objective of this study was to use a repeatability test day animal model to estimate genetic parameters of monthly test day milk production traits in first parity Iranian Holsteins.


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
pp. 1387-1399
Author(s):  
Sayan Buaban ◽  
Somsook Puangdee ◽  
Monchai Duangjinda ◽  
Wuttigrai Boonkum

Objective: The objective of this study was to estimate the genetic parameters and trends for milk, fat, and protein yields in the first three lactations of Thai dairy cattle using a 3-trait,- 3-lactation random regression test-day model.Methods: Data included 168,996, 63,388, and 27,145 test-day records from the first, second, and third lactations, respectively. Records were from 19,068 cows calving from 1993 to 2013 in 124 herds. (Co) variance components were estimated by Bayesian methods. Gibbs sampling was used to obtain posterior distributions. The model included herd-year-month of testing, breed group-season of calving-month in tested milk group, linear and quadratic age at calving as fixed effects, and random regression coefficients for additive genetic and permanent environmental effects, which were defined as modified constant, linear, quadratic, cubic and quartic Legendre coefficients.Results: Average daily heritabilities ranged from 0.36 to 0.48 for milk, 0.33 to 0.44 for fat and 0.37 to 0.48 for protein yields; they were higher in the third lactation for all traits. Heritabilities of test-day milk and protein yields for selected days in milk were higher in the middle than at the beginning or end of lactation, whereas those for test-day fat yields were high at the beginning and end of lactation. Genetics correlations (305-d yield) among production yields within lactations (0.44 to 0.69) were higher than those across lactations (0.36 to 0.68). The largest genetic correlation was observed between the first and second lactation. The genetic trends of 305-d milk, fat and protein yields were 230 to 250, 25 to 29, and 30 to 35 kg per year, respectively.Conclusion: A random regression model seems to be a flexible and reliable procedure for the genetic evaluation of production yields. It can be used to perform breeding value estimation for national genetic evaluation in the Thai dairy cattle population.


1992 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Wang ◽  
G. L. Roy ◽  
A. J. Lee ◽  
A. J. McAllister ◽  
T. R. Batra ◽  
...  

Early first lactation data from 2230 cows of five research herds of Agriculture Canada were used to study the interactions of genetic line by concentrate level, and sire by concentrate level and to estimate breeding values of sires. The genetic lines were defined as Holstein (H), Ayrshire (A), and H × A or A × H (C). The interactions of sire by concentrate level were studied separately using progeny of five different mating groups: G1, H sires mated to H cows; G2, H sires mated to H, A and C cows; G3, A sires mated to A cows; G4, A sires mated to H, A and C cows; and G5, C sires mated to C cows. The interactions of genetic line by concentrate were significant (P < 0.05) for 56- to 112-d milk yield (MY112), corrected 56-to 112-d milk yield (CMY112) and feed efficiency (EFMY112 = MY112/TDN consumption). H and C cows produced more milk and were more efficient than A cows when fed high levels of concentrate. The H cattle possess a greater capacity to convert the concentrate into milk, while A cattle reach maximum milk production earlier than H cattle. The interactions of sire by concentrate were statistically significant for MY112, EFMY112 and CMY112 in G1 (P < 0.01), and G2 (P < 0.01). The breeding values of sires for MY112 were estimated using BLUP for all of the H line (BLUP-T), for half of the population consuming low amounts of concentrate (BLUP-L) and for the other half consuming high amounts (BLUP-H). A significant reranking of sires was found among the three groups. Key words: Genotype × environment interaction, milk production, efficiency, breeding value, dairy cattle


2014 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 327-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alena Svitáková ◽  
Jitka Schmidová ◽  
Petr Pešek ◽  
Alexandra Novotná

The aim of this review was to summarize new genetic approaches and techniques in the breeding of cattle, pigs, sheep and horses. Often production and reproductive traits are treated separately in genetic evaluations, but advantages may accrue to their joint evaluation. A good example is the system in pig breeding. Simplified breeding objectives are generally no longer appropriate and consequently becoming increasingly complex. The goal of selection for improved animal performance is to increase the profit of the production system; therefore, economic selection indices are now used in most livestock breeding programmes. Recent developments in dairy cattle breeding have focused on the incorporation of molecular information into genetic evaluations and on increasing the importance of longevity and health in breeding objectives to maximize the change in profit. For a genetic evaluation of meat yield (beef, pig, sheep), several types of information can be used, including data from performance test stations, records from progeny tests and measurements taken at slaughter. The standard genetic evaluation method of evaluation of growth or milk production has been the multi-trait animal model, but a test-day model with random regression is becoming the new standard, in sheep as well. Reviews of molecular genetics and pedigree analyses for performance traits in horses are described. Genome – wide selection is becoming a world standard for dairy cattle, and for other farm animals it is under development.


2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (sup1) ◽  
pp. 153-155
Author(s):  
N. P. P. Macciotta ◽  
F. Miglior ◽  
A. Cappio-Borlino ◽  
L. R. Schaeffer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document